Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Internet Giving Homeless a Home

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Mon Jun 26, 2006 06:35 AM
from the long-reach-on-that-outreach dept.
Wired is reporting that many individuals currently without permanent housing still manage to stay connected via a cellphone, laptop, or some other gadget. Many homeless have email addresses and find that it offers them a way to get their foot back in the door of 'normal' society. From the article: "Hellerich slept on benches but she frequented a women's shelter with a cluster of internet-connected computers used mostly by the children who arrived at the safe house with their mothers. She started blogging and conducting a business. As an independent internet marketer, she was able to maintain bank accounts, nurse existing client connections and forge new business relationships. The business brought in only about $100 a month, but that was enough to help get her life back on track."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Advertising opportunities (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LiquidCoooled (634315) on Monday June 26 2006, @06:36AM (#15604461)
    Wake up scuttle, you can't run a story like this without linking to thinkgeek!

    There's no place like 127.0.0.1 [thinkgeek.com]

    In all seriousness, there are many homeless folks in this world not all of them have the opportunity to get back on their feet.

    Most homeless people aren't there by choice and there are lots of folks who are just 1 pay check away from joining them, spare a thought when your walking around town and if you have some change give generously.
    • Re:Advertising opportunities (Score:5, Interesting)

      by quokkapox (847798) <quokkapox@gmail.com> on Monday June 26 2006, @06:54AM (#15604515)

      Most homeless people aren't there by choice and there are lots of folks who are just 1 pay check away from joining them, spare a thought when your walking around town and if you have some change give generously.

      Better yet, vote AGAINST the incumbent fools running this temporarily godforsaken country. They just implemented the biggest cut yet on federal housing grants (HUD) here in my county in Pennsylvania. In the short term, this means that elderly folks in public housing who used to have a nurse/social worker visit them and help them once or twice a week, are SOL. Do you know how much it helps an elderly person trying to stay independent, to have a nurse or a social worker come in once a week?! It helps a lot. I know this from personal experience.

      Well, we gotta cut the "death tax". Onward and upward.

      Goodbye and good riddance, Senator Santorum and your filthy ilk. I can't wait until this fall when we kick your asses out.

      [ Parent ]
      • by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 26 2006, @07:08AM (#15604577)
        As we all know, poor people [shelleytherepublican.com] are a huge problem in our great nation, therefore, they must be eliminated.

        Maybe you're even worse than a Democ-rat - you might even be a Euro-hippy. Stop polluting our minds with your socialist nonsense like science [shelleytherepublican.com] or worse, "Linux" [shelleytherepublican.com] - we all know the true history [shelleytherepublican.com].

        Fortunately, I have an idea to solve these problems. I call it A Modest Proposal:

        What do we have an excess of in the USA? That's right - LIBERALS. These tend to be exactly the poor homeless people who can't afford to buy Operating Systems like Microsoft Genuine Advantage Windows, and must make do with the inferior communist alternatives. Remember, these are the people who actually OPPOSE the war on terror in Iraq, even after September 11 showed how evil Saddam Hussein was!

        Also, we import much of our oil from disgusting foreigners (like Venezualans, who we must liberate soon BTW). Why don't we grind up the liberal hobos who lower valuable property prices in our neighborhoods, and use the oil from their bodies to power up our SUVs?

        This way everyone wins.

        What do you think, slashdot.org?
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Advertising opportunities by Lord Kano (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @07:25AM
      • being independent by falconwolf (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @07:47PM
      • Where is it the Fed's responsibility? by SonicSpike (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @10:00PM
      • Re:Advertising opportunities by internic (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @10:27AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Advertising opportunities (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PixelPirate (984935) on Monday June 26 2006, @07:11AM (#15604586)
      While I agree with your sentiment, I must respectively disagree. I worked in one of the largest homeless shelters in the city in which I live and I'll give you a couple of snapshots.

      Many of the clients (as they were referred to as) often faced addictions and/or mental issues. Often times, living on the street was a matter of their choice -- they didn't trust anyone enough to follow them into a building. Likewise, when people say "give a bit of spare change", this is often the worst advice that can be given as much of that money will go directly into feeding their addiction. It is far better to offer to buy them a coffee, or recommend them to a shelter. Of course, I live in Canada, so it may very well be different in the United States of America...


      -PixelPirate
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Advertising opportunities (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Ohreally_factor (593551) on Monday June 26 2006, @07:17AM (#15604606)
      (Last Journal: Sunday November 27 2005, @02:29PM)
      Yeah, this article is pretty misleading, containing a handful of anecdotes while there are millions of homeless people worldwide, and hundreds of thousands in the US (one count [usatoday.com] is at over 700,000. I find it hard to believe that the majority of those people have email addresses that they use on a regular basis to improve their lives to any significant degree. I find it hard to believe that the majority of them have laptops or use their cell phones to browse the web. The article repeatedly uses the word "many", but doesn't tell us what numbers they mean by "many".
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Advertising opportunities by firl (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @07:19AM
    • screw localhost by El_Muerte_TDS (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @07:20AM
    • Re:Advertising opportunities by Call Me Black Cloud (Score:3) Monday June 26 2006, @07:41AM
    • Re:Advertising opportunities by m874t232 (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @08:01AM
    • Re:Advertising opportunities by Funkcikle (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @08:07AM
    • Homeless by choice and illness by Hoi Polloi (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @09:20AM
    • Re:Advertising opportunities by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @10:31AM
    • Re:Advertising opportunities by professionalfurryele (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @11:18AM
    • Re:Advertising opportunities by aggiefalcon01 (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @11:40AM
    • Re:Advertising opportunities by worker9 (Score:1) Wednesday June 28 2006, @03:05AM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • hmm (Score:5, Interesting)

    by SlamMan (221834) <squigit.gmail@com> on Monday June 26 2006, @06:37AM (#15604466)
    independent internet marketer? Spammer?
  • wait (Score:2, Interesting)

    by PunkOfLinux (870955) <mewshi@mewshi.com> on Monday June 26 2006, @06:37AM (#15604468)
    (http://www.mewshi.com/)
    Instead of cell phones and laptops... couldn't that money be put towards better things, like... I dunno... food
    • Re:wait (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Looke (260398) on Monday June 26 2006, @06:46AM (#15604487)
      What's the saying ... "Give a man a fish, and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and you have fed him for a lifetime." We're talking about getting a life back on track here.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:wait by notaspunkymonkey (Score:3) Monday June 26 2006, @06:47AM
      • Something like that in Boston by technoextreme (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @06:57AM
      • Re:wait by CRCulver (Score:3) Monday June 26 2006, @07:03AM
        • Re:wait by anaesthetica (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @08:41AM
        • Re:wait by mcvos (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @10:09AM
      • Re:wait by zaphod_es (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @07:21AM
      • Re:wait by Jeff DeMaagd (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @07:27AM
        • Re:wait by Golias (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @07:57AM
          • Re:wait by niteice (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @12:45PM
            • Re:wait by Golias (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @02:48PM
      • Re:wait by jrumney (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @08:04AM
      • Re:wait by CodeArtisan (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @10:30AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:wait by Monkeys!!! (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @07:01AM
    • Re:wait by TheRealBurKaZoiD (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @08:05AM
    • Re:wait by Nuitana (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @11:00PM
    • Re:wait by falconwolf (Score:2) Tuesday June 27 2006, @12:59AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • really? (Score:4, Informative)

    by ElephanTS (624421) on Monday June 26 2006, @06:51AM (#15604504)
    The woman in the TFA wasn't exactly homeless homeless. She was staying in a shelter and so able to keep clean and not smell of pee, have clean clothes and so on. I don't imagine anyone going off to 'forge new business relationships' if they hadn't brushed their teeth for a week so I'd say the general 'technology is so great it evens rescues the homeless' message is hype. Even charging up your cell isn't going to be easy when you're sleeping under a bridge.
  • by fuyu-no-neko (839858) on Monday June 26 2006, @06:52AM (#15604509)
    Graham Walker (website [domainomania.com]) is a well known Big Issue seller around my area of the UK, and to my knowledge he's been online for a while now.
  • by Qbertino (265505) on Monday June 26 2006, @07:07AM (#15604570)
    People living in coffin 'hotels', doing micro-scale low-revenue high-thoughput business and paying half of what they earn to stay connected to whatever net is hip at the moment. If they're 'richer' they have a container storage somewhere where they keep their stuff. Most of the money won't be payed to own stuff but to have access to things. Homeless will get a new kind of definition. We're seeing societies like this building allready - in Japan for instance, where the cost of living is so high you're a dropout almost as soon as you lose a job. Without the last straw called 'Hartz 4' we'd have the very same situation in germany aswell. In the future it will be very much like in the Novels Neuromancer and Snow Crash in some places.
    • Quite possibly, yes. (Score:4, Insightful)

      by TheNoxx (412624) on Monday June 26 2006, @07:22AM (#15604631)
      (http://thenoxx.deviantart.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 30 2005, @04:14PM)
      Well, that's the thing. Extreme capitalism is just another form of extreme opression: work like a dog and do what you're told, or be homeless. That's the biggest problem with not having a liveable minimum wage... everyone lives in fear of losing their paycheck.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Quite possibly, yes. by JesseMcDonald (Score:3) Monday June 26 2006, @08:25AM
        • Re:Quite possibly, yes. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @08:41AM
        • Re:Quite possibly, yes. (Score:5, Insightful)

          by kthejoker (931838) on Monday June 26 2006, @08:45AM (#15605122)
          Great in theory, hilarious in reality.

          I love that idea that if minimum wage was raised, Wal-Mart would be forced to cut workers, rather than reduce their huge profit line to meet the new line.

          If I have one worker, and I pay him $15,000 a year, and I make a profit of $60,000 a year, and the government raises his minimum wage to $20,000 a year, I can still make a big profit and afford him.

          That is the dichotomy which is nonexistent in that silly libertarian approach to the minimum wage. If minimum wage is raised, Wal-Mart doesn't have to cut marginalized jobs. They can also raise the costs of their products, or *gasp* not profit *as much* as they were. Profit is still profit. If you can pay a certain wage and make a profit, then that wage is not detrimental to the job market. Despite the Kool-Aid you're selling.

          Of course the goal is to maximize profit, but it's maximizing it *under certain conditions*, which include providing your workers with a livable wage. If the only reason Wal-Mart executives take home huge paychecks (executive : laborer pay ratios are at an all-time high) and I have cheap goods at Wal-Mart is because they aren't paying their workers a livable wage, that's not a sufficient reason to continue paying their workers that same wage.

          The truth (ie reality, not econ 101 theory) is that we have been on a major trend of reverse distribution of wealth - the rich get richer, the poor get poorer - for nearly 15 years in America. To suggest that somehow companies *won't have the money* to pay any additional wages forced upon them by Congress - and will have to cut jobs rather than pay their workers more - is so disingenuous as to be outrageous.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:Quite possibly, yes. by stinerman (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @12:47PM
    • Re:The 'Cyberpunks' will be the futures middle-cla by jrumney (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @07:45AM
    • I read snow crash recently by scwizard (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @08:34AM
  • Beowulf (Score:4, Funny)

    ... a women's shelter with a cluster of internet-connected computers

    Oh NO, even the homeless have Beowulf clusters! Am I the ONLY ONE left on the planet who doesn't run a cluster??

    • Re:Beowulf by FrostyCoolSlug (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @11:17AM
  • Homeless (Score:5, Insightful)

    by timbennett (702155) on Monday June 26 2006, @07:29AM (#15604663)
    The group we lump together as homeless are really at least 2 distinct groups. Group 1 are individuals and families who lack a support network such as family or friends, or may just be too proud to impose upon them. These people can be given a helping hand and can re-integrate into society. Group 2 are the chronic homeless. They are the alcoholics, the drug addicts, the mentally insane. Their only goal in life is their next drink. You can institutionalize them or let them be on the street, but you can't help them. And for every yuppie do-gooder out there who wants to help them, please don't ever give a homeless person money. There are extensive networks run by churches and non-profit groups to distribute food to the hungry. There are no programs to distribute cheap vodka. That requires do-gooders to give them money to purchase the liquor. Give the homeless guy in a park a sandwhich, he's liable to throw it back at you. He'll never say no to the quarter though. Funny huh?
    • Re:Homeless (Score:4, Funny)

      by ElephanTS (624421) on Monday June 26 2006, @07:54AM (#15604809)
      the mentally insane


      As opposed to the physically insane?

      BTW, I disagree with you. I often give homeless people money - some won't want handouts from a church.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Homeless by Nimey (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @09:51AM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Homeless (Score:4, Informative)

      by 246o1 (914193) on Monday June 26 2006, @08:01AM (#15604852)
      "They are the alcoholics, the drug addicts, the mentally insane. Their only goal in life is their next drink. You can institutionalize them or let them be on the street, but you can't help them."

      I have no idea how a comment this odious got modded as insightful. There are services available that can and DO help members of all three of those groups recover and lead better, functional lives. While some mental illnesses may as yet be untreatable, many of the homeless in America could no doubt be helped were the medical system remotely responsive to the needs of the poor. Likewise, drug addicts and alcoholics recover all the time, it's such a normal part of society that I'm amazed that you would even say something like this. Perhaps it's different for you, but I know people who have recovered from such situations and gone on to have productive lives. Some people call them 'family,' and I think it's disgusting that you can dismiss them like that. Have you ever given a guy a sandwich and had it thrown back at you? Just because some people out there are going to use money to feed there addictions doesn't mean that all compassion for the homeless is wasted. Have a fucking heart.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Homeless by timbennett (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @08:20AM
        • Re:Homeless by 246o1 (Score:1) Monday June 26 2006, @10:44AM
      • Re:Homeless (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Jellybob (597204) on Monday June 26 2006, @08:31AM (#15605035)
        (Last Journal: Thursday January 29 2004, @08:43AM)
        I'm with 246o1 on this one, as one of my best friends spent several years sleeping on benches in London, and had a major drink and drug problem, and her kids were taken into care - she finished college a couple of years ago, and is now working for a security firm while she goes through University, and has her own flat.

        Anyone can be helped, they just need to want that help. I'm not saying it's easy, but it is most definately possible, and an inspiration for anybody who actually talks to people who havn't had the easy life so many of us are used to.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Homeless by King_TJ (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @11:32AM
      • Re:Homeless by Dlugar (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @11:54PM
    • Re:Homeless by elrous0 (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @08:11AM
    • How Paternalistic by MartinB (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @08:12AM
    • Re:Homeless (Score:4, Informative)

      by ignacionyc (985037) on Monday June 26 2006, @08:41AM (#15605096)
      Yeah, I give food to homeless all the time. druggies and alchies, they eat it. There are programs in nyc to distribute food to the homeless, by going out into the streets and subways... I've never seen anyone turn down food. Its not quite right to say that you can't help group 2. I've known some group 2'ers who have gotten themselves together, i know group 1ers who became group 2ers... alchoholism, drugs, depression... all easy to get fucked up by when you're out on the streets. The idea that only group 1 can reintegrate and 2 can't isn't entirely accurate, Mitchel Duniere has shown in his ethnographic study of street vendors on 6th avenue between 8th and west 4th in manhattan how what you call group one'ers can help and mentor group 2'ers and help them get clean and help them start becoming self-sufficient by giving them jobs (manning book tables, scavenging, saving table spaces overnight. Many number 2s were once number 1s. Of course you can't help everyone, and of course some people relapse.. but people with homes relapse as well. The homeless of any kind don't always rely on the housed for help, a lot of them help each other or themselves. This isn't always the case I agree, but many times it is.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Homeless (Score:4, Interesting)

        by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (813746) on Monday June 26 2006, @09:20AM (#15605357)

        Yeah, I give food to homeless all the time. druggies and alchies, they eat it. There are programs in nyc to distribute food to the homeless, by going out into the streets and subways... I've never seen anyone turn down food.

        While I agree with most of your sentiments, I think it is important that people understand this particular assertion does not hold true everywhere. I've seen attempts to hand out sandwiches to the poor that were greeted much, much more poorly. Only about 1 in 5 were interested in the food. Half would take it, then ask for money for some other reason and discard the food when none was provided. A number reacted violently, either threatening physical attacks or verbally attacking those giving out food. I personally witnessed this once and was told of the same response during several other attempts in the area.

        When there are good shelters and food sources around, most of those begging for money for food are simply trying to run a scam and a significant number are not even homeless (according to homeless people at one of the local shelters). Many of those who are homeless, prefer it that way and do just fine squatting in an abandoned house and raiding dumpsters. They will beg, but usually it is for booze or drug money.

        I guess what I'm saying is, you probably are doing a lot more good donating to a shelter than you are giving away food or money and if you try the former, make sure you are either in large enough numbers or have the ability to defend yourself.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Homeless by soft_guy (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @02:43PM
          • Re:Homeless by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @03:46PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Homeless by anaesthetica (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @08:43AM
      • Re:Homeless by anaesthetica (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @11:04AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Homeless by jefu (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @08:54AM
    • Re:Homeless by poot_rootbeer (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @10:01AM
      • Re:Homeless by petermgreen (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @06:12PM
    • Re:Homeless by aussersterne (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @10:37AM
      • Re:Homeless by pete6677 (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @11:20PM
    • Re:Homeless by Neoprofin (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @10:37AM
      • Re:Homeless by soft_guy (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @02:47PM
    • Re:Homeless by soft_guy (Score:2) Monday June 26 2006, @02:40PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • I used to volunteer at a local homeless shelter -- nobody was contemplating getting hooked up to the internet or starting a career. Most of the people in these places are mentally unstable folks who were kicked out of institutions starting in the 80's when funding was slashed or drug/alcohol addicts who simply cannot function in society.

    These folks need medical help, not email.

    Maybe its different in California... but I doubt it.
  • Bunkum (Score:2, Insightful)

    by EMacAonghusa (929754) on Monday June 26 2006, @07:44AM (#15604739)
    (http://www.ssi-developer.net/)
    What does "many" mean? Is it even a dozen? Out of the hundreds of thousands (millions?) of people living on the streets across the US & Europe? Many of these people have barely 2 cents to rub together for food, they ain't blogging, they ain't emailing and they ain't staying connected via cellphone ... Some of them have alcohol problems, some of them drug problems, some suffer from depression or other such problems, and their first concern is living to tomorrow.
    As someone mentioned it's a hype story, stuff like this shouldn't be published. Fair dues to anybody who can get off the streets, but any story focussing on homeless should be looking at the majourity (99.9%) who are STILL on the streets and need help.
    Rant over.
  • by Chabil Ha' (875116) on Monday June 26 2006, @08:05AM (#15604873)
    ...that the Internet is shrinking everybody's social life [slashdot.org].
  • first hand experience (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ignacionyc (985037) on Monday June 26 2006, @08:09AM (#15604895)

    Maybe I can give a little first hand background. I was in a relationship with a homeless man for a year 1999 - 2000. We had met and I liked him very much, went on a few dates, was surprised to find out he was homeless because he had a phone number and we emailed each other all the time. He had lost his house a few years prior, and had lived on the streets, shelters on occasion (not so easy for men to get access to shelters actually) and on occasion in churches that were sympathetic. His cellphone and internet access were very important for a few reasons, first of all they allowed him to keep in touch with a support network that could help when necessary. If he absolutely had to get off the streets because the weather was too bad for street sleeping and no shelter room, he could often find a place to crash because he could easily contact friends who could put him up for the night, people he knew before he became homeless and also other homeless people who had gotten into SROs (single room occupancy) and would let him crash on their floor. The cell phone and email also was a great aid in navigating the world of social services... organizations to help him find housing, his caseworkers, his doctor and find work here and there. It is very hard to get a job without a phone number you can be reached at, and without a home you don't have a landline... cellphone might be your only chance at getting the job that will help put you back on your feet.

    If someone he knew and knew of his situation had an odd job that needed doing he could be contacted by cellphone so that he could make some money. He made good money this way, fixing people's computers. All it takes is a cellphone, a little knowledge of computers, and some flyers reading "need help with your computer, affordable computer help, call peter at 555-5555" is all it takes to make a few bucks. Later on he became unable to walk more than a few steps and was confined to a wheelchair, cellphone and email helped him get the info he needed to get a wheelchair which was paid for by his ssi or adap or something, i forget. It also helped out the day his brand new wheelchair wheel fell off while he was going down a hill... he wasn't too badly hurt, but with the cellphone he could reach a friend in the area who could help him get back to his place. I mean this is putting technology to good use, I think... a little different from texting your friends mindless banter and what not.

    Something that a lot of people don't realize is that there are a lot of programs out there for people with these sorts of problems and guess what, most case workers, people at shelters have no idea what is out there in terms of services. Its not their fault, its a lot of stuff to be on top of. Using the internet many people are able to be their own caseworkers, learn about the system, how to find what they need and get the services they need to get back on their feet. They can be more proactive and not just hope that their caseworkers know what they're doing... many do not. you know what else you can find on the internet, housesitting opportunities...

    Peter finally managed to navigate the system and managed to get himself a room at a pretty nice sro, shared kitchen... but private rooms and baths. He wouldn't have been able to get it if there was no way for his caseworker to get in touch with him. nobody is going to go find you on the street if your benefits have been approved... people need to get in touch with you.

    When peter moved into the place, I met a lot of other people and learned about how they ended up in their situation, and how they were dealing. One of the things that I found striking was that a lot of families are broken up by this, women are granted housing along with daughters but men aren't... the idea is that you give to the people who most need the services... but it builds into the system absentee father'ism... eliminates one of the means of support, the family unit. Many places will not allow men in at all. Fathers and sons left to fend for themselves. Fath

  • Yeah go homeless (Score:1)

    by grued (983682) on Monday June 26 2006, @08:46AM (#15605128)
    Sweet now with couple grand she spent on a laptop with the money she pays for the cell phone she can the 100 bucks a month to buy wireless internet for her computer! Finally she broadcast her miseries on YouTube, yes!
  • To quote Franklin D. Roosevelt:

            "Our greatest primary task is to put people to work. This is no unsolvable problem if we face it wisely and courageously."

    With the enormous power we have with the Internet, we could help bring together those people looking for work and those who need their services. It seems to me that the sticking point is usually that neither of them has any money. But, if they could trade some sort of on-line IOUs, and try to honor them, perhaps there is some solution.

    I'm baffled as to how to go about it, but so many people simply looking for work is wrong. If a man is willing to offer his labor, there are needs out there to be filled. To leave him idle wastes his talents and damages his pride.
  • Homeless Guy Blog (Score:2, Informative)

    by mixonic (186166) on Monday June 26 2006, @09:19AM (#15605343)
    (http://madhatted.com/)
    I haven't RTFA, but I've been a fan of the Homeless Guy blog for a while now (he mentions being included in the Wired article). His site is at http://thehomelessguy.blogspot.com/ [blogspot.com], he's living in Nashville, TN right now. He has many enlightening comments on who makes up the homeless population, how politics and "aid" affect them, and the impact of stereotypes. A good read.

    -mix
  • The latest spam (Score:2)

    by Hoi Polloi (522990) on Monday June 26 2006, @09:27AM (#15605395)
    I was wondering why I was suddenly getting this spam:

    "Can you spare 50 cents? A buck, come'n buddy, a buck! Hey...hey...pretty lady, yah you! Com'n give me some change! I'm a veteran with a wife and kids, I swear! Don't you care about vets and kids?..."
  • Internet for the Rest of Us (Score:3, Insightful)

    "an independent internet marketer
    [...]
    But she lives in fear that at any point, circumstances could throw her back into the urban wilderness.
    "

    Like if she gets busted for spamming?

    Homeless spammers. Blade Runner arrives ahead of schedule.
  • This deserves its own thread as I've seen a few comments about people making a lot of money begging. The Straight Dope recently addressed this issue...
  • What if the US Government gave everyone an official email address for life? They wouldn't have to run an actuall email service but let everyone set up that address to point to their current address. I used to have a Bigfoot email addy like that.
  • Support Our Troops (Score:4, Interesting)

    How about if the US government spent some of the $1 TRILLION we're going to spend on the Iraq War on giving war veterans a home [canada.com]?
  • It's been long known that italans are cell phone addicts, but last time I was in Rome I was really surprised to see two bums, one an old guy in a wheelchair and a nose half as big and just as red as the red wine bottle on his lap, the other a young girl with a baby, both talking on a cell phone. Two things I don't understand: they certainly don't buy it themselves, so who gives it to them ? And I'd think that those people are excluded/marginalized, so who do they talk to ?
  • by v3xt0r (799856) on Monday June 26 2006, @12:20PM (#15606730)
    I dropped out of high school in 11th grade, and began learning computer graphics and digital audio engineering in a vocational community college program, which I also never completed.

    The reason I could not complete these classes, was due to the fact that I couldn't afford to goto school AND support myself AMD my mother. I literally had to support myself and my mother from the time I was 17, until I was 25. It was horrible! Luckily, I was able to use my PEL grant from community college to get myself a decent computer (celeron 300a) back then, and was able to acquire a great amount of skills and experience, thanks to some really smart and talented friends on IRC.

    I call it: Better learning through IRC.

    When I wanted to learn a new programming language, I could easily find someone on IRC to help get me pointed in the right direction, until I eventually learned enough to walk on my own. I have to thank those IRC characters for helping push me into a job, where as everyone else around me was pushing me into the gutter.

    There is a lot to be said about Open Source Learning, and internet-based home/self education, and I owe it (and them) a lot of thanks.
  • by telso (924323) on Monday June 26 2006, @12:43PM (#15606921)
    An interesting blog [blogspot.com] by a homeless man in Abbotsford. There was an report about this guy and the plight of the homeless in general on April 5 on CBC [blogspot.com], but the report doesn't seem to be available online.
  • by mrmeval (662166) <mrmeval@nOspAM.gmail.com> on Monday June 26 2006, @05:44PM (#15609288)
    I found it better to know where the nearest truck stop with a shower happened to be. Where I could get free food. Where I could find a place to sleep.

    I can always get internet at a library.

    But that's just me.
  • Im Homeless.... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ckeo (220727) on Monday June 26 2006, @11:10PM (#15610647)
    (http://www.newfoundnews.com/)
    I live in Calgary Alberta... I carry a Toshiba portege 3440CT in my backpack and troll parking garages for wireless signals... because my battery dosnt work so the power outlets are also a necessity... I have no addictions like drinking or drugs.. but I also have no friends or family...
    A bad month for `me means living on the streets. tho this is not the first time. I dont go to homeless shelters, nor do I ask people for money. People often stop and offer me money tho... and most tTimes I decline... but as for your money feeding the addictions of the homeless... well... i have to disagree... the majority of panhandlers drink not drugs... druggies have no patience to panhandle.

    For myself, I collect pop/beer cans for a living... and do quite well... $50 - $100 dollars a day...
    plus stuff like cell phones and stuff that people throw out that are easily resellable.

    I dont think many on here know what its like to be homeless and I dont think you should be judging people until you ven been there.. people judge me and assume im homeless so i must be a thief alcoholic or crackhead... im neither.. im just a guy trying to survive... and finish developing my website.

  • Huh? (Score:1)

    by Brandybuck (704397) on Tuesday June 27 2006, @12:31AM (#15610893)
    (http://www.usermode.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday April 17 2007, @09:13PM)
    They can find a place to access the internet and stay connected, but they can't find anywhere other than my garden to take a dump?
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Yeah, a new home. (Score:2, Funny)

    by Maelwryth (982896) on Monday June 26 2006, @06:51AM (#15604501)
    "And it's appearently the library."

    Apparently it has dictionaries.
    [ Parent ]
  • 7 replies beneath your current threshold.