Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Brits Still Working on Stinky Email

Posted by michael on Fri Feb 20, 2004 12:43 PM
from the obligatory-french-joke-here dept.
prostoalex writes "British Internet provider Telewest Broadband is testing a system, which allows people to attach specific smells to their e-mail. It works with air freshener cartridge that one plugs into PC. The technology is developed by a US-based company Trisenx, which features the products and pricing on its Web site. A 20-channel serial port device costs $269, the same price for optional software package allowing the user to author specific smells. The replacement cartridges are $48 each." They're hardly the first attempt at adding smell to the computer experience. Digiscent didn't work out so well.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Brits Still Working on Stinky Email | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 356 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2
  • I am horrified to.. (Score:5, Funny)

    by bob670 (645306) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:44PM (#8340770)
    think what the porn industry could do with this?
  • Spam (Score:5, Funny)

    by TheSpoom (715771) * on Friday February 20 2004, @12:44PM (#8340774)
    (http://www.uberm00.net/ | Last Journal: Monday January 19 2004, @09:27PM)
    Personally, I don't want to know what sort of smell would be associated with penis enlargement spam...
    • Re:Spam by martin (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:45PM
    • Re:Spam by devnullkac (Score:3) Friday February 20 2004, @12:47PM
    • Re:Spam by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:57PM
      • Re:Spam by Highlander (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:41PM
        • Re:Spam by dwhitman (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @03:17PM
          • Re:Spam by operagost (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @03:57PM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Spam by AndroidCat (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:03PM
    • Re:Spam (Score:5, Funny)

      by NanoGator (522640) on Friday February 20 2004, @01:04PM (#8341061)
      (http://www.ferion.net/ | Last Journal: Monday May 06 2002, @02:16AM)
      "Personally, I don't want to know what sort of smell would be associated with penis enlargement spam..."

      Must... resist... yo mama.... joke....
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Spam by AstrumPreliator (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:43PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • And... by maztuhblastah (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:44PM
    • Re:And... by notque (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:47PM
  • Money... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by DRUNK_BEAR (645868) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:44PM (#8340779)
    For smelling, the price stinks too! ;)
  • send a fart to microsoft (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday February 20 2004, @12:44PM (#8340781)
    Great. Anybody who wants to can send a fart to Microsoft. I can imagine Redmond would very soon start to stink to high heaven.

    What smell would you send to Darl?

  • Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by E-Rock (84950) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:45PM (#8340783)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    Am I just missing it, or is there no possible use for such a device? What would it do that anyone would pay $300 for one?
    • Re:Why? (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Boing (111813) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:53PM (#8340916)
      What would it do that anyone would pay $300 for one?

      Well, I vaguely remember scientific studies indicating that human memory of scent is much stronger than any other sense, and with better retention. Theoretically, given enough resolution (enough "different" smells), you could odorize threads of messages to be the same, so that when reading new messages on the same topic, the previous content comes to mind more rapidly and accurately.

      Chance of this actually being a practical feature? Slim-to-nonesville, population: None.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by jfengel (409917) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:53PM (#8340925)
      (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Monday November 03 2003, @03:59PM)
      Well, it would be kind of interesting to add a smell factor to first-person-shooters. "Look out, I smell bad guys", or "I think there's some food over that way."

      Artistically, an accompanying scent would serve the same purpose as a soundtrack: to set a mood. The smell of smoke and ozone would be a cool accompaniment to an FPS. Or putting a bit of perfume on a love letter: a distinctive aroma can be highly evocative.

      Admittedly, I'm not paying $300 for either of those things.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by jpmkm (160526) on Friday February 20 2004, @01:11PM (#8341133)
        (http://jpmkm.com/)
        If something in a game triggered a smell then this device would release some aroma. You move to a different part of the game, but your room still smells like the previous part of the game because you move through the game much faster than the aroma disapates. When you go to a different part of the game another smell comes out. Soon your room is filled with a combination of smells which tell you nothing. This device is stupid and pointless. I have absolutely no desire for my computer to produce smells. That's just dumb. If these devices are ever actually released, I can see every one of them showing up in a thrift shop in about ten years.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Why? by RetroGeek (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:20PM
          • Re:Why? by jpmkm (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:25PM
            • Re:Why? by Beer_Smurf (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:42PM
            • Re:Why? by RetroGeek (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:17PM
              • Re:Why? by TwistedGreen (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @02:31PM
              • Re:Why? by jpmkm (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @02:31PM
              • Re:Why? by toddestan (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @06:10PM
              • Re:Why? by Tackhead (Score:3) Friday February 20 2004, @02:41PM
              • Re:Why? by jonfelder (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:52PM
              • Re:Why? by RetroGeek (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:58PM
              • Re:Why? by jpmkm (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @03:05PM
              • Re:Why? by RetroGeek (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @03:51PM
              • Re:Why? by DunbarTheInept (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @03:52PM
              • Re:Why? by RetroGeek (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @04:10PM
              • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:Why? by nebaz (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:47PM
            • Re:Why? by cayenne8 (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:52PM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Why? by drinkypoo (Score:3) Friday February 20 2004, @01:56PM
          • Re:Why? by Moraelin (Score:2) Saturday February 21 2004, @03:18AM
            • Re:Why? by drinkypoo (Score:2) Sunday February 22 2004, @12:57AM
        • Re:Why? by jdavidb (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:21PM
      • Re:Why? by NanoGator (Score:3) Friday February 20 2004, @01:12PM
        • Re:Why? by Anonvmous Coward (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @04:47PM
      • Re:Why? by Metal_Demon (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:13PM
        • Re:Why? by jfengel (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:43PM
      • Re:Why? by travdaddy (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @02:04PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Why? by DunbarTheInept (Score:3) Friday February 20 2004, @03:49PM
    • Re:Why? by amigabill (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:10PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by American AC in Paris (230456) * on Friday February 20 2004, @12:45PM (#8340787)
    (http://www.snowplow.org/tom/)
    Eh, this is really outside their area of expertise. They should pass this problem off to the French and instead work on making email flavorless and rubbery.

    Je blague, mes amis...

  • Great by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:45PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Email as air freshener? by Enteebee (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:45PM
  • Block List by GoofyBoy (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:45PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • please no spam by ejaw5 (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:45PM
  • Horrible Idea by DRue (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:45PM
  • I cant wait by WormholeFiend (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:45PM
    • Re:I cant wait by WormholeFiend (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:47PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • No way. (Score:5, Funny)

    by nate1138 (325593) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:46PM (#8340812)
    Part of the beauty of email is that I don't _have_ to smell someone to communicate with them. Being as I work in software development, this is a big plus.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by bad enema (745446) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:46PM (#8340813)
    The sense of smell is perhaps the most diverse when it comes to preferences. Just think of all the colognes/perfumes out there that end up delivering the opposite effect. Unless you know exactly what the user likes, giving them a scented email may look creative but runs the risk at the same time of offending the receiver.
  • I supply my own smells, thank you by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:46PM
  • Well. by hookedup (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:46PM
  • I smell success by Ernest P Worrell (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:46PM
  • Makes filtering spam easier. (Score:5, Funny)

    by xC0000005 (715810) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:46PM (#8340820)
    (http://www.voiceofthehive.com/)
    Porn Spam would have a very specific smell to it. If you could do the same thing with web pages, a lot of people would get in trouble when the wife went sniffing around the computer.

    If we could do this with packet level traffic it would give a whole new meaning to a network sniff (Yes sir, I suspected the router because it smelled like the homeless man outside your building.)
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Video Games (Score:3, Interesting)

    by danknight (570145) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:46PM (#8340825)
    While this is a Whacky technology, it could ad alot VR games like quake or Half-Life or even D&D style games.
  • Does this mean... by mypalmike (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:46PM
  • Why somebody think of the perfume makers? by samcentral2000 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:47PM
  • Is it just me... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:47PM
  • Sending Smells Is Easy... by 36526542DD (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:47PM
  • How do they do it? by mwheeler01 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:47PM
  • Thats great... by brainnolo (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:48PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Why by nurb432 (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:48PM
  • Fun with your friends (Score:5, Funny)

    by syntap (242090) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:48PM (#8340856)
    Hmm... send that fresh bakery smell to your Atkins buddies.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Something smells fishy here... by ImaNumber (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:48PM
  • French Emails by millahtime (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:48PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • It could be fun by erick99 (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:49PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • One question..... by noelp (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:49PM
  • for advertisements only? by gid (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:49PM
  • imagine the future by JWG (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:50PM
  • I bet everything ends up smelling... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:50PM
  • picture in the article (Score:5, Interesting)

    by morcheeba (260908) * on Friday February 20 2004, @12:50PM (#8340885)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday August 03 2005, @10:21AM)
    I love the picture of the "typical user" in the article. She's got a nice portable laptop, plus this huge aroma thing that looks like it's too bulky to fit in any laptop bag. Did she bring the laptop and connect the device in case she got a smelly email? Or did she have to go and get the device when she realized she had gotten a smelly email?

    Plus, she's eating - her taste/smell senses are already being used. So, now she's eating musk-perfume-flavored stawberries, and we're expected to believe that this is enjoyable? Pretty picture, yes. But poor marketing.

    Also: "Telewest says its "scent dome" could cost around 250 and would only work with a high-speed, broadband connection." -- WTF? The device produces only 60 smells - so is 6 bits now too big to send over a slow modem?
  • Gupta? by tigress (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:51PM
    • OT: Re:Gupta? by D4MO (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:55PM
  • Requires broadband?! by Saberwind (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:52PM
  • I can't smell, you insensitive clod! by samcentral2000 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:52PM
  • Bad email (Score:5, Funny)

    by JediTrainer (314273) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:54PM (#8340926)
    Great, as if your idiot uncle wasn't bad enough at family get-togethers, you can now look forward to emails that read:

    Pull my finger
  • new slogan (Score:3, Funny)

    by nuckin futs (574289) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:54PM (#8340928)
    sex smells!
  • I can't even stand... by Denyer (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:54PM
  • smellewest by Tony B Liar (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:55PM
  • spam by Lehk228 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:55PM
  • Old news! by Snebjorn (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:55PM
  • Practical Jokers Dream! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:55PM
  • Sounds like spam... by Snaller (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:56PM
  • "seafood"! by MoFoQ (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:56PM
    • Re:"seafood"! by MoFoQ (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:23PM
      • Re:"seafood"! by MoFoQ (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:34PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • "your armpits" technology by mm0mm (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:57PM
  • Interesting... by inertia@yahoo.com (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:57PM
  • Digital smells (Score:3, Informative)

    by LostCluster (625375) * on Friday February 20 2004, @12:57PM (#8340980)
    We've had jokes about smell-o-vision for about as long as we've had television. I guess the modern update is applying smells to e-mail. The consumer applications are a bit questionable, but there is an interesting scientific level below this...

    In order to transfer a smell from place A to place B, we need a notation scheme that can combine various levels of a small number of "elemental" smells, just like RGB are the elemental colors of light and CMYK are the elemental colors of pigment.

    Once there are devices that can take a smell, store it in the digital notation, and then reproduce it, the bottom is going to fall out purfume industry quick...
  • A Possible Use: by R.Caley (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:57PM
  • wtf? serial port only? by killbill! (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @12:58PM
  • Drug Dome? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Gothmolly (148874) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:59PM (#8340996)
    How about sending your loved ones a quick hit of LSD, or a tab of e, or maybe the scent of pot for a nice 'contact high' ? The new Drug Dome comes with 20 lab-quality chemical compounds which can be combined to form 60 separate drugs. Co-worker feeling a little anxious about a presentation? Email him a quaalude. Girlfriend not putting out? Send her a couple of tabs of e.

    For the record, rumors that the Drug Dome has been hacked to dispense a single blast of all 20 drugs at once are false.

    We are currently beta-testing a refillable Drug Dome, using a modified Linux kernel (Methix), the chemicals, their mixtures, and dosages can be completely customized by the end user.
    • Re:Drug Dome? by JonKatzIsAnIdiot (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:17PM
    • Re:Drug Dome? by AndroidCat (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:18PM
    • Re:Drug Dome? by Boing (Score:3) Friday February 20 2004, @01:21PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Drug Dome? by commodoresloat (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @02:26PM
    • MIDI Bong by SimHacker (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @03:40PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Flashback (Score:5, Interesting)

    Am I dreaming? This is like something from the dotcom boomtimes when an idea got more money for seeming wacky and apparently useless.

    Human don't use smell very much, anymore. For the most part, it's just figuring out whether the milk is OK to drink, or if the person next to you needs a bath. There are subconscious pheromonal responses, but hopefully they aren't loading this thing up with those. "Yes sir, we discovered the 'buy stuff' pheromone."

    Three hundred bucks to have a machine spray a grocery-aisle's worth of air fresheners.

    Maybe if we were as smell-focused as dogs, we'd be able to use this as a form of output. HEY! You could assign words different mixes of smells, and train your dog to delete spam!

  • Web Browsing taken (down) to a whole new level by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @12:59PM
  • RealAroma (Score:3, Informative)

    by jfengel (409917) on Friday February 20 2004, @12:59PM (#8341005)
    (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Monday November 03 2003, @03:59PM)
    Sadly, the realaroma.com [realaroma.com] site is down, but the wayback machine still has it [archive.org].

    The picture of the SmellU-SmellMe software is priceless.

    Good lord, does this really date to 1996? "I grow old, I grow old, I shall wear the bottoms of my trousers rolled." -- T.S. Eliot.
  • Stinky Spam by bgeer (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:00PM
  • Oh, great... by fforw (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:01PM
  • Obligatory Simpsons Quote by FarmerDave (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:02PM
  • Dumbest Idea Ever by Servo5678 (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:02PM
  • The Dot Bomb Mentality... by DynaSoar (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:05PM
  • I think it will catch on... by jbrader (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:06PM
  • I don't get it... by Frennzy (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:06PM
  • Too... many... jokes... by 26199 (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:06PM
  • The serious side of perfumes by jdkane (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:07PM
  • I think you're missing the point by howlinmonkey (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:11PM
  • And in a related story by H8X55 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:11PM
  • smells like... by NotAnotherReboot (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:12PM
  • Great game by Lizard_King (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:14PM
  • It just goes to show... by finelinebob (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:17PM
  • Futurama by red floyd (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:18PM
  • I already do... by fedork (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:19PM
  • Allergies SPAM by superpulpsicle (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:19PM
  • No thanks by hords (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:20PM
  • GREAT idea! by Cynikal (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:20PM
  • Need new email filters! by El (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:21PM
  • A stupid idea by nothingtodo (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:22PM
  • People prefer to pick what they're smelling by WayneConrad (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:23PM
  • New meaning to Spam email? by pluckyduck (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:25PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Finally! by tds67 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:25PM
  • Prank Scents by big_knuckles (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:29PM
  • This would be awesome... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Bluesman (104513) on Friday February 20 2004, @01:31PM (#8341326)
    (http://drblast.blogspot.com/)
    ...and I'll bet that somebody's already working on an Emacs syntax highlighting mode that produces different smells based on C types.

    Mmmmmmm, unsigned ints....

    Maybe using string functions without bounds checking could smell really bad. Then you could really sniff out the bugs. Neat!

  • A serious application for a smell generator by jamiefaye (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:31PM
  • colds by DuckWing (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:32PM
  • Makes me shiver by netglen (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:33PM
  • dial up.. ew by wo1verin3 (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:34PM
  • Hey! by Mr. Darl McBride (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:37PM
  • OH NO! by JayJay.br (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:37PM
  • HasToHasToHasTo be a joke by pileated (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:37PM
  • Notorious Software Engineers by FreshFunk510 (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:42PM
  • marketing by shaunyb (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:44PM
  • Why? by torpor (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:47PM
  • Ah, this gives an email *much* more 'content' by Lobo_Louie (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:51PM
  • Triumph says... by RGautier (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:53PM
  • Spam by jjsjeff (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:53PM
  • BO by UnixRawks (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:57PM
  • It's crazy that... by lxt (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:00PM
  • This idea stinks by Stephen Samuel (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @02:03PM
  • Bah, it'll never work! by ShortedOut (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:05PM
  • You may as well... (Score:3, Funny)

    by MrNemesis (587188) on Friday February 20 2004, @02:06PM (#8341749)
    (http://www.demolicious.org/)
    ...just glue a slice of spam to your nose and be done with it.
  • I hate to say it... by Stupid White Man (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:10PM
  • First tried in TV circa 1960 by gypsybones (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:11PM
  • Disney "Bug life" ride uses scents by peter303 (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @02:18PM
  • How is this different from the french one? by EqualSlash (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:21PM
  • Just goes to show... by jav1231 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:27PM
  • STUPID STUPID STUPID, by pablo_max (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:37PM
  • I think I've seen this in action by read-only (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:45PM
  • What are they going to do about shifting smells? by amembleton (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:46PM
  • Did we forget RealAroma? by thellamaman (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:49PM
  • by SimHacker (180785) on Friday February 20 2004, @02:53PM (#8342432)
    (http://www.donhopkins.com/ | Last Journal: Monday February 23 2004, @09:48AM)
    Coincidentally, I'm wearing my dirty old "iSmell" swag t-shirt, as I type this. Be glad you can't smell it...

    About 5 years ago, DigiScents [archive.org] developed a product called the iSmell, which was covered by Wired Magazine [wired.com]. It was even on the memoriable cover [wired.com]. They hired Marc Canter [canter.com] to be their visionary spokesguru:

    In Bellenson's apartment, Marc Canter has been lying on a postmodern faux-leopard-skin couch with his eyes half closed, listening as Bellenson and Smith outline their grand vision. He rouses himself now, like a lugubrious guru, a veteran of more than half a dozen projects pushing the state of the art. He wishes to make a statement about trends that lie ahead.

    "There is a new paradigm for tools," he says. "In the old days, they were shrink-wrapped pieces of software; you sat down and read the manual and used the tool. Nowadays, the tools are free. And what we need are scalable content tools. Look at Hollywood: They take a movie and amortize the cost among multiple forms, from cable TV to toys. On the Web, we haven't been able to do that, because it's just a delivery medium. But if all the content can be decoupled" - in other words, if it can exist separately from any particular format - "I can output a low-end Web site, a medium-res CD-ROM, and a high-end broadband version, all from the same ideas. In the smell world, this means 16-pack cartridges that do only a few smells, or big systems that do thousands."

    "We expect to have low-end and high-end iSmell hardware," Smith agrees. "The low end may retail for under $200. The smell cartridges - even at the high end - will probably cost under $50." With moderate use, he guesses, they should last a few months.

    "The key, as always, is the installed base," Canter says. "But there's so many different target markets. It'll be easy to get overwhelmed. You'll need a staff of 15 people just to answer the phones. We'll do the usual things - developers' kits, conferences, seminars, T-shirts, hats, all that stuff." The prospect seems to overcome him with ennui, yet he appears convinced it will work.

    [...] "I think aesthetic disclaimers will be more important," adds Canter. "You know, when PageMaker was first released, it created a lot of really ugly pages. I'll be surprised if 10 percent of the first smell output is bearable."

    This is, after all, a totally new art form.

    "We know when the first visual art was done, in cave paintings," Canter continues. "And the first musical art consisted of tribal people beating drums. Think of all the books written about musical and visual arts since then. Now show me the library on smells."

    They even had an SDK for programming the device. I talked with them at the game developers conference about a game I was working on that might benefit from smell. They thought it would be more fun, if you could smell when The Sims needed to take a shower, pissed their pants, or set the house on fire.

    For some reason, DigiScent's iSmell Digital Scent Technology never took off.

    -Don

  • what I don't get it by dedalus2000 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @02:55PM
  • Been There, Done That... by Blic (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @03:07PM
  • wtf? by smcavoy (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @03:45PM
  • Why? (nm) by cmay (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @03:51PM
  • Who would have thought... by WotPeed (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @03:58PM
  • Press release on behalf of Britain by t_allardyce (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @04:27PM
  • Obligatory... by pulse2600 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @04:29PM
  • Smell-O-Vision by Darth23 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @04:32PM
  • Logic has left the building by Tsu-na-mi (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @04:42PM
  • Smell blaster by Skadet (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @04:52PM
  • The LAST thing we need by localhost00 (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @05:20PM
  • Smelly Cinema by j.leidner (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @05:42PM
  • Just wait for the SPAM email ... by Dark$ide (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @05:48PM
  • Wasted effort by jjsjeff (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @05:54PM
  • File formats by jjgm (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @06:34PM
  • How to eliminate spam mail. by rice_burners_suck (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @07:51PM
  • Still no cure for cancer by serutan (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @08:36PM
  • The potential is there.... by covenant_uk (Score:1) Saturday February 21 2004, @05:14AM
  • But do we *need* Marmite-scented e-mail? by FrenchyinCT (Score:1) Saturday February 21 2004, @10:56PM
  • I wouldn't call it the worst idea ever, but it does stink of bad business plan. How are you supposed to make money selling these things? Who's going to pay two hundred seventy dollars for the "convenience" of letting someone across the internet burn through the fragrance in a fifty dollar scent cartridge?

    What's the target market for this thing?
    [ Parent ]
  • Webster's Dictionary says otherwise by fejikso (Score:1) Friday February 20 2004, @01:26PM
  • Re:Yup.. bring it on... by BLAMM! (Score:2) Friday February 20 2004, @01:27PM
  • 41 replies beneath your current threshold.
(1) | 2