Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

AIM Bots: Useful or Spam?

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Nov 16, 2005 11:24 AM
from the future-of-advertising dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Imagine my surprise this morning when AOL AIM popped up a window and introduced me to two bots that it automatically added to my buddy list. " Two seperate issues- one is simply auto adding robots to your friends list, which is very uncool. The second is a corporation using bots in an official capacity. This is an interesting trend, although technically speaking, not that far from the eggdrop of old.
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Meh. (Score:4, Informative)

    by Fraize (44301) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:26AM (#14044386) Homepage Journal
    Right-click, Delete Group. Done.
    • Re:Meh. (Score:3, Insightful)

      Right-click, Delete Group. Done.

      Well, until they get added quicker than you can delete them (would 50 per second do?). Reminds me of some other well-known message-based protocol system.

    • Re:Meh. (Score:4, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:57AM (#14044773)
      $sys$robot?
    • Re:Meh. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by nkh (750837) <nkh@i[ ]rlol.net ['nte' in gap]> on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:59AM (#14044797) Homepage Journal
      The true question is: why did my IM client forgot to ask me about those new contacts? I would have denied those bots in the click of my mouse...
    • Re:Meh. (Score:5, Informative)

      by Khopesh (112447) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @12:18PM (#14045018) Homepage Journal
      Not done.
      Delete the group and close your IM client.
      Now open it again and log back in. AOL messages you wondering why you deleted its bots, though they are not put back.
      Now you're done. Damnit.
      • Re:Meh. (Score:5, Insightful)

        by LurkerXXX (667952) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @01:26PM (#14045644)
        AOL is letting me use their servers to connect to others to chat with. I'm using their resource for free, so yeah, I think they get a little more leeway than a spammer. Spammers tend to only use others resources. Spammers don't usually host email servers for the public for free. Totally different situation.
  • by Yahweh Doesn't Exist (906833) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:26AM (#14044391)
    try swearing at them or asking for sex; a recent New Scientist article found that this would provoke some bots into fighting back :)
    • by ralphart (70342) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @01:05PM (#14045457)
      Has anyone tried "Warning" the bots?

      Perhaps a well-orchestrated campaign would send a message to those responsible for this bit of obnoxiousness.
      • by jallen02 (124384) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:56AM (#14044766) Homepage Journal
        Actually when I sent the shopping budy "fuck you" it said, "Good grief, I can't respond to talk like that".

        Jeremy
        • by Shakrai (717556) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @12:45PM (#14045278) Journal
          I had a rather more interesting conversation with it just now....

          [12:43] Shakrai: fuck you
          [12:43] ShoppingBuddy: Welcome. Now you can search for products with AOLShopping. Type main to get started. To read our privacy policy, type privacy anytime.

          [12:43] Shakrai: fuck you
          [12:43] ShoppingBuddy: Hey -- clean up the language and get serious. I'm happy to help but can't deal with that mouth.

          [12:43] Shakrai: go fuck yourself
          [12:43] ShoppingBuddy: Hmm, that's not gonna get you anywhere with me.

          [12:44] Shakrai: i fucked your mom
          [12:44] ShoppingBuddy: OK, I'm searching for matches 4 U. Gimme a sec...

          [12:44] ShoppingBuddy:
          - Search results for fucked mom

            - Get Fucked [$6.21 - $9.99]
            - Grown Up Fucked Up [$8.99 - $13.98]
            - Fucked Up Mess [$8.30 - $13.98]
            - Fucked From Birth * [$12.99]
            - Not Fucked Enough * [$9.72 - $13.98]
            - The Essential Fucked Up Blues! [$10.02 - $13.98]
            - For All The Fucked-Up Children Of [$13.29 - $14.90]
            - For All The Fucked-Up Children Of [$33.99]
            - New [$9.18 - $12.99]

            Here are some related categories: 1. Hardcore & Punk Music, 2. Rock & Pop Music, 3. Miscellaneous Music, 4. Miscellaneous Books, 5. Miscellaneous Non-Fiction Books, etc. Type in the number to use the related category.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:26AM (#14044394)
    I could really use a friend.
  • I noticed this too (Score:5, Insightful)

    by zoloto (586738) * on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:27AM (#14044410)
    And the first thing I did was delete them. I don't need some "shopping buddy" to automatically add themselves and promote buying over their network. Someone missed the ethics boat on this one.
  • Very uncool? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by overshoot (39700) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:28AM (#14044423)
    Their servers, their rules. I can't complain about the cost of the service, after all, and this sure beats getting hammered by popups every few minutes while connected to their system.
  • by Lord_Slepnir (585350) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:28AM (#14044425) Journal
    I'm just surprised that AOL has taken this long to begin sending you advertisements via AIM. They have a near-monopoly on IM communications (near monopoly, I know that there are others out there, but everyone I know has an AIM name), and I'm hardly surprised that they have started to send people advertisements via IMs, since they put all of the resources and effort into maintaining the servers that people connnect to.
    • by Wieland (830777) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:35AM (#14044508) Homepage
      They have a near-monopoly on IM communications

      In the US, that is. Here in Europe, IM seems to be almost exclusively MSN. Hardly anyone uses AIM this side of the Atlantic.
    • by Phatboy (805714) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:35AM (#14044513) Homepage
      Don't be so sure about that monopoly, it all depends on where you live. I'm in the UK and don't know anyone who uses AIM - everyone uses MSN Messenger instead. Not that AOL isn't in a strong position in the places where they do have a monopoly, but doing things like this don't help them in the markets they don't yet control. Maybe they've just decided that it's not past the average user's annoyance threshold and not going to harm them.
    • by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (813746) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:39AM (#14044565)

      I'm just surprised that AOL has taken this long to begin sending you advertisements via AIM. They have a near-monopoly on IM communications...

      AOL has 56% last time I looked. 56% a monopoly does not make.

      As an aside, can we please move out of the dark ages of text chatting? Multiple, incompatible formats on different networks, without publicly available bridging is pathetic. Please everyone, switch to Jabber and set up a bridge until it gains most of the market. It's as if MSN users could not e-mail AOL users who could not e-mail Yahoo users. Remember when the internet used to be about standards and used for communication, instead of lock-ins and sending you ads?

      • Back in the day (Score:4, Insightful)

        by overshoot (39700) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @12:03PM (#14044837)
        It's as if MSN users could not e-mail AOL users who could not e-mail Yahoo users.

        It seems that today is my day to be the token geezer.

        The situation you describe was not all that long ago. Anyone who can drive legally was already breathing at the time.

  • by ThatGeek (874983) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:30AM (#14044440) Homepage
    I see this as the future of advertising. Everyone is now using GAIM or some other alternate client, so people miss all of AOL's annoying (yet profit-generating) ads.

    AOL had to think of something new -- some way of profiting off of their protocol. Sticking interactive ads, that people think of as their "buddies"! What could be better?

    These bots sneak in to your list, pretend to be your friends, and if you send them a message, BAM! Custom ads delivered right to you.
  • Eliza (Score:5, Funny)

    by Racher (34432) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:30AM (#14044441)
    How does it make you feel that a corporation using bots in an official capacity?
  • AOL Intruder (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Ranger (1783) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:31AM (#14044455) Homepage
    I can't say I'm glad I'm the only one. At least now I know it wasn't because I installed AOL Triton. I posted this rant against AOL in the last "AOL Sucks Ass" story.

    I hate using AIM but I have friends who I chat with and they won't use anything else. I use Trillian so I can use ICQ and Yahoo! Messenger as well. I signed in this morning and I get this message from AOL that said "We've installed two new bots ShoppingBuddy and MovieFone. I thought "What the fuck is this shit?" It may have been because I installed AIM Triton preview to see if I could get the video chat to work. This is even more egregious than all the ads and tickers and additional software they want to install on your computer. Anyway I blocked them.

    In the past, I've had to go in and edit some of the AOL files to get rid of all sorts of crap. AOL is about as welcome as an anal probe. They want to block other peoples intrusive software so they can foist their crap on you. AOL's idea of "consumer friendliness" is to come into your home uninvited, bend you over, put an anal probe up your keister, and tell you just how wonderful and lucky you are to have it. Your very own mini-Federal-pound-me-in-the-ass prison in the comfort and safety of your own home. Only 9.95 per month!
  • So? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by afra242 (465406) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:31AM (#14044464)
    I use Adium on OSX and also received this message this morning. The two bots were automatically added.

    I can predict many users here will bitch endlessly about it. The fact is that the service is free. If it means that I have to right click on each of the names of the bots and choose "Delete....", to use this service for free, so be it.

    What's the big deal?
  • by NardofDoom (821951) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:32AM (#14044482)
    My friend was in a chat room, late one night. He was the only real person in the room, but there were 50 screennames on the list. They were all bots, all trying to get the other bots to click their links.

    Now imagine if you programmed even a rudimentary adaptable AI into an AIM bot, and had it talk to other AIM bots with a similar AI. You'd have them talking to each other, learning from each other. Then imagine if they had web crawlers attached to them, learning about the Internet, communicating their findings back to each other.

    The only way we'd know if the Internet became sentient is if it stepped up and said 'hi.'

  • At IBM we use Lotus SameTime internally as our IM infrastructure. Several enterprising folks have written various sametime bots that allow us to look up acronyms (WhatIs Bot), look up employee info from our directory (BluePages Bot), and others I can't think off off the top of my head.
    • Here we are... found a list out on the intranet... I didn't know a few of these existed. I'm sure other corporations have some as well.

      Who Is - do BluePages name and phone info searches
      Helpline - Helpdesk FAQs searches
      What Is - Definitions of acronyms
      StockQuote - IBM and all other stock quotes
      Dictionary - English language dictionary
      SkillTap - contact others that may be able to help you
      W3Alert - send broadcasts out to selected groups
  • by Billosaur (927319) * <wgrotherNO@SPAMoptonline.net> on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:38AM (#14044551) Journal

    Apparently once you've installed someone's software or used someone's product on your computer, they have the right to tinker with your machine and settings at will.

    I was more than a little distressed to find these things appearing on my Buddy List. Like any "feature", don't I get the right to refuse it? Of course the cute little system message tells me I can right-click and delete them, but that's not the point. If you're going to add capailities to something, fine, but give the opportunity to say yea or nay first.

    While not as bad as Sony's rootkit fiasco, it does point out the growing hubris of we, the software users of the world, when we believe that we still have control of how our systems work and how they are configured. It's not just worms and viruses now, but wholesale invasion by any company that feels you're not using their product most effectively. Pretty soon I expect Adobe Reader to ask me "Should you be reading that?" or IE to say "Sorry, no Slashdot for you today!"

  • I see no problem. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Oz0ne (13272) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:44AM (#14044618) Homepage
    1) You can delete them.
    2) These are provided by AOL, not random companies.
    3) This is a free service, and it's theirs. You have absolutely NO right to complain about their business practices. If it bothers you, don't use AIM or their servers.

    This dose of "stop your whining, you spoiled unrealistic brats," has been brought to you by the grumpy old techy (tm).
    • "You have absolutely NO right to complain about their business practices"

      I disagree, people complain all the time, its part of human nature. If you don't like something and don't complain, how is AOL going to know? It is software, not a piece of art work. It is in AOL's best interest to listen to what people like and don't like in order to create a more perfect method of spamming you (kidding.)
  • Not on GAIM, yet (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Jtheletter (686279) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:48AM (#14044664)
    Using GAIM here at work and as of now these haven't shown up on my friends list.

    What I wonder is what happens security-wise when some AIM virus (always new ones popping up) manages to infect these bots? When it's just a question of one person's buddy list being used by a virus to propagate, the infection is limited somewhat by the low number of contacts. What happens when the same contact appears in say 75% of people's lists? Granted, the bot is administrated by AOL directly and no doubt has better security in place than your average user or user's bot, but I wonder if perhaps such a wide-reaching target will prove irresistible for virus writers. Just musing, I'm sure some people more familiar with the inner workings of AIM can refute or corroborate this idea.

    • Re:Not on GAIM, yet (Score:5, Informative)

      by LordJezo (596587) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @12:07PM (#14044877)
      I use GAIM here and when I signed on this morning I saw them, I had no idea what was going on, I thought it was some kind of new GAIM feature since I just upgraded a day ago to the new version (I am slow on those things)

      Maybe its being pushed in phases?
  • by Chapium (550445) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:48AM (#14044669)
    What is actually so unethical about adding 2 entries to your buddy list on a service they provide? I had no problem with it other than being mildly confused 2 seconds before I painfully deleted 2 WHOLE buddies from my list. Seems like such a mild issue to get so steamed up about.
  • by 93 Escort Wagon (326346) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:57AM (#14044775)
    December 2, 2005 (AP Newswire)

    Microsoft has announced a new addition to it's popular MSN Chat service - ClippyBotTM. According to Chief Software Architect Bill Gates, ClippyBot will "be a welcome addition to your buddy list. ClippyBot will watch for common behaviors, and will provide you with gentle, helpful assistance in completing those tasks." When asked about those users who might not want ClippyBot to be added to their buddy list, Gates replied "We are always responsive to the needs of our users. Removing ClippyBot from your buddy list is as easy as editing 13 registry keys!"
  • "My buddy list" (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Acy James Stapp (1005) on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:58AM (#14044782)
    That's where you failed it. It's *their* buddy list, and they're just letting you use it under the terms of the EULA.
  • by jasonhamilton (673330) <jason@ty r a n n ical.org> on Wednesday November 16 2005, @11:59AM (#14044793) Homepage
    I thought they were useless at first, but if you have a cell phone like the sidekick2 where web browsing is super slow, but AIM works flawlessly, the bot will let you do movie lookups much quicker.