"The real problem with modern nuclear is its just expensive and extremely complicated to get running compared with the cheaper energy from solar, wind, etc. But. the Environmental dangers? We solved that issue decades ago."
Who is "we" here? Certainly not a failing country that will absolutely cut every corner.
They transferred a different fab. Your citation also doesn't show they actually built the fab in question. Got one that does?
"AI can deliver turnaround times that humans can't.
That military operation that hit the headlines this morning?"
The one that blew up a bunch of little girls? Maybe turnaround time isn't the most important goal.
Yes, that's exactly what I wanted to allude to. I have sympathy for them due to that. I feel bad I'm not doing more, but I also don't want to be trafficked or go before a firing squad
"They had a chance to be the open weights model company"
Exactly what does that get you?
Facts are trolling on Nazi slashdot
Yes. Chatrie v. United States (No. 25-112), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6â"3 that law enforcement's use of a Google geofence warrant to acquire a person's historical cellphone location data constitutes a "search" under the Fourth Amendment.
That was a ruling on a search which required a warrant, and the ruling states that the district court itself found that the warrant was invalid as it violated the suspect's fourth amendment rights. It would seem to apply except that these are warrantless requests. It also specifically references Carpenter v. United States' determination that such a request as in Chatrie is able to look into the past, which makes possible surveillance which was formerly impossible and was therefore unexpected when the relevant laws were written, but the flock requests we're discussing are for recent information. It remains to be seen whether this court would apply the same logic to these similar but different specific uses.
Defrost? They're not frost free? What year is it? It's not like they're deep freezes.
When Russia started this they were not expecting a war. They were confident that the Ukrainians would welcome them.
That's certainly what Putin said, but it's not clear why you would believe it when they went into Ukraine with military vehicles, not with a brass band and a parade, unless... have you suffered some major head injury recently?
Personally, I don't believe that Trump is an active Russian asset, controlled through blackmail or some other means.
So did you miss the part where after Deutsche bank dropped Trump, his kids told us they were doing all their banking with Russia? Trump was broke, all of his properties were fully leveraged, then Putin rode in on a white horse (and no shirt) and saved his bacon.
That was 80+ years ago and they still haven't changed. They learned nothing over the decades
Every time someone who knows something disagrees with Putin, they're defenestrated. This results in a lot of window-based loss of intelligence, and the rest learning not to offer any. This is not really a new mode of operation, it being cheaper to open a window than to pay for poison, but seems to have ticked up in recent decades.
Maybe Russia is as good at picking its disinformation targets as the US is at picking its bomb targets... outdated.
If they'd have opened nuclear power plants with the funds put towards the war, they'd have made more
...Chernobyls
It is difficult to feel sorry about Russia's problems.
I am sorry the citizens have to live under Putin, does that count?
How can you possibly advocate against $POLICY and then say "If $COMPANY had done what I advocate against, things would be better for all of us"
Who said that? You need to work on your reading comprehension skills, bub.
"Anyone attempting to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin." -- John Von Neumann
