True. But then these semantics were often applied to people's role in their society. Such as Hatshepsut. The labels may not translate exactly into modern languages.

The football game is on now.

Yeah.

I just POP them all to my local system. And then read/delete or juust delete them as I see fit. I don't want the remote server to know which ones I just delete, when I read messages or how I manage them.

Too much spam coming from GMail. If they figure out who's mail I read, they'll just tack that From: address onto everything.

... millions of Nigerian princes cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.

My phone doesn't have a little red light. I can put it in my shirt pocket and start it with a voice command or a BlueTooth remote.

Please, please call it MAGAputer.

They lost the war, it's our country. Fuck 'em, we'll beat 'em again.

That is in no way unlike IMAP. Nothing about IMAP prevents local caching/copies. Thunderbird will do it.

It's like there are at least two layers of funny money accounting going on here.

First, you have the strange way that people equate market cap with value. There's no guarantee that holding shares with a current market value of $X will eventually return $X or more in dividend payments plus maybe some eventual disposal of assets, and these are usually the only tangible values involved. A market cap based on ludicrously high P/E ratio will be high, but trading those shares is like trading Bitcoin: it starts to look more like a Ponzi scheme than a genuine value-based investment.

Second, even the market cap is mostly theoretical here, because any shares held can't be freely traded on an open market. The asset is almost completely illiquid other than occasional anomalies like the secondary sale we're talking about. The first IPO of an AI unicorn could be the pin that bursts the bubble.

It's the difference between being one of the AI unicorns that doesn't actually make any real profit yet and is largely funded based on hype and hope, and being a supplier like Nvidia that is actually being paid real money (funded by all the AI investment) and has a P/E ratio that is high but not off-the-charts stupid.

Thank goodness it's not a creepy fuck walking around with a phone camera.

Red Electrica has a public-private ownership structure. So, who to blame? Shareholders? Corporate interests? The government that the people elected (i.e. blame themselves)?

My concern with connected cars is malicious actors performing a mass zero day attack that could either disable cars or turn them into homocidal weapons.

Learn to Code wasn't really about learning to code. If you talk about the efforts related to young students, it was too much about pushing coding careers that weren't reasonable matches for everyone; if you're referring to the general advice to future workers going to school, it created a lot of low-skill coders who also weren't actually suited for the occupation.

Learn to AI is bullshit for a whole ton of reasons, but primary among them are 1) you're training what they want to replace you with and 2) if you don't actually know the subject, you can't figure out when AI is bullshitting you. Both of them make leaning on the computer inferior to learning on the computer. If you don't learn to code, you can't learn to AI code.

The drones were obviously not equipped with the latest system: Maneuvering Augmentation for Going Over Objects (MAGOO).