Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Eh... (Score 4, Insightful) 29

My take on that is that, while lithium has its potential dangers, it seems like any other really power dense technology has the same fundamental problem. Whether it be chemical, electrical, electro-chemical or kinetic, storing a large amount of energy in a small package is going to be dangerous when (not if) power storage devices, or the devices which contain them, fail in certain ways.

For the sake of illustration, suppose we develop a better plastic that allows classic, well understood flooded lead-acid batteries to use a stronger solution of sulphuric acid and combine that with a way of making a reticulated lead foam. What you get is a lead-acid cell that can be up to half the size of the existing product, perhaps with a slightly better initial voltage or better cold cranking amps.

Only now: a) the risk of hydrogen build up explosions is higher b) the damage done by a leaking battery/acid spill is greater. c. Because a smaller form factor means closer terminal spacing, it is even easier for a mechanic to get a wrench or screwdriver caused short, shocking him and potentially welding the tool in place. d) Any hypothetical plastic that is resistant to very strong concentrations of sulphuric acid across a wide range of temperatures and internal pressures is likely going to be next to impossible to recycle.

Similarly, a kinetic system like a flywheel holds the potential to fail in entertaining (from a distance) ways if the bearings fail or if the base materials fail under load.

Comment Re:PLEASE...make a sports car again!! (Score 1) 247

And McLarens are far, FAR less likely to be parked on the street in front of the owners house or in the Local Wal-Mart parking lot.

If you're a thief and want to steal a McLaren or other million dollar car, how do you find one that isn't alarmed, indoors, under CCTV monitoring and possibly guarded as well? Whereas, if you're in the market for a hot Camry, Accord or what have you, any public parking lot is sure to have a few to choose from.

Also, if *I* owned a million dollar car, I'd definitely invest in Lo-Jack or similar GPS recovery system so that even if some hoodlum drags me out of the car at gunpoint while at a traffic light, he'd only have a few hours to find and disable the Lo-Jack before promptly re-locating the car to where it will actually be stripped or shipped out.

Comment The irony is just sickening... (Score 1) 114

Here we have a bigoted person advocating genocide, arguably one of the most violent acts any species, let alone any ethnic grouping of humans, could ever achieve. For the sake of argument, let us suppose that one ethnic group did manage to kill off all members of a chosen group/set of groups. We'll ignore for the moment the pragmatic reality that, thanks to many centuries of interaction (good AND bad) most peoples are genetic mongrels, with ancestry from 3 or more backgrounds. We'll even ignore the fact that, in many cases, the groups that hate each other most tend to be very closely related, (Semitic peoples as already mentioned, Chinese/Japanese/Korean, French and UK, the list goes on) again, because of centuries of interaction, both good and bad. That makes it practically impossible for anyone to actually accurately target ANY hated group.

sociopathic, genocidal murderers and their heirs will be all that is left

Even IF such a thing were technically feasible or to become so. There are still two really big problems that the hate groups never seem to even realize, let alone admit to anyone.

1) Who decides who is desirable vs undesirable? White supremacists would chose blacks, browns and yellows, pretty much in that order. There are elements in militant ethnic or religious groups who would happily eliminate whites from the world in turn. What you end up with is a MAD situation, with everyone (hopefully!!) being too sane to be the first to pull the trigger and making side deals with others in the room to gang up on the first one who does so.

2) There are many post apocalyptic stories and movies out there which can give us at least a passing notion of what a truly depopulated world would look like. None of the bigoted nutjobs seem to really think that through. At best, some seem to think this means law and order collapse and they get to take what they please at the point of the gun they've been hugging and whispering to. More likely, it means the utter collapse and likely extinction of the human race. ONE PLAGUE wiped out as much as 50% of the human race. We survived because a) People tended not to travel as much or as far/fast as they do today. The disease spread slower than it would today. b) Something like 80% of the population was involved in food production and nobody utterly relied on preserved and/or widely transported foodstuffs. c) The disease struck mainly the poorest and the ones living in the most crowded conditions the hardest. Most monasteries, for example, were almost or completely unscathed. Which also meant that the accumulated knowledge of the human race also survived. (and even if the librarian monk dies, the books are still on the shelves. If our electrical grid goes down permanently, everything stored electronically will be essentially GONE.) Because our civilization is so interconnected and interdependent, what *I* think the result would be:

A) Death tolls easily matching the First, Second and Third pandemics put together. It will happen within weeks, perhaps even days, compared to the months and years of the earlier plagues. That would eliminate 80+% of the human race.

B)There will be warfare as nations blame each other. Warfare that is quite likely to include nuclear weapons. That right there accounts of ~80-90 % of the human race. FOLLOWED BY

C) Wide spread and immediate Great Famine which accounts for 50-60% of who ever is left. FOLLOWED BY

D) Rampant dysentery and other diseases, caused by being surrounded by seemingly endless dead bodies and no access to clean drinking water. (many people in the west don't even know where their water comes from, let alone have the means to get there and extract it without power during a pandemic. FOLLOWED BY

E) A loss of human knowledge and know-how akin to the Viking sacks of the Irish monasteries, but occurring WORLD-WIDE. FOLLOWED BY

F) A drastic crash in world wide climate, perhaps even another Little Ice Age as we had in the medieval period. This may well account for the 5-10% of humanity that is left, huddling and starving in the dark. If the Little Ice Age had any help from Nuclear winter, it could easily be the tipping point to another Snowball Earth which would wipe out 95+% of ALL LIFE on the planet.

no, any sane individual, regardless of race, colour, creed or condition should be utterly terrified of the possibility of ANY wide spread bioweapon.

Comment I don't think they are "new installs" (Score 2) 333

TFA links to NetMarketShare, but doesn't detail how NetMarketShare determines whether a given machine is an existing or new installation. Windows 7 only went up by 0.11%, while Windows 10 went down by a mere 0.06%. Trying to make any solid conclusions with such skimpy changes in the numbers strikes me as futile.

One possibility occurs to me to explain the increase of Windows 7 installs. For a year, users of 7 and 8.x were allowed a free upgrade. (and let us not forget the shenanigans Microsoft pulled in "persuading" users to upgrade.) Thing is; none of those upgraded users received a physical copy of the Win10 installation media or a license key. So if a hard drive dies or the install gets corrupted badly enough, the user is going to have to reinstall whichever version they had been using previously. (I won't get into the stupidity of having ones physical copy of the OS actually be provided by a hidden restore partition on the root drive)

As far as I know NetMarketShare is just counting installations based on what peoples user agent strings are reporting during normal web surfing. I don't know of any way to determine an OS date of install from a user agent string.

Comment Speaking as a Canadian and privacy advocate... (Score 4, Insightful) 121

I've read a number of posts thus far and it seems the anti-police contingent is out in force tonight. Many of the paranoid or anti-police comments thus far have been posted by AC, so I don't know what prompts their attitudes.

In my opinion; Canadian police forces are far less deserving of anti-cop, paranoid rhetoric than US or Latin American forces. In this case, the police obtained a court ordered warrant before asking the telecoms for the tower dump info. This is exactly how the law is supposed to work The police are seeking information that they cannot obtain through the usual personal observation or talking to people one on one and one at a time. Traditional foot work just isn't going to produce the leads they need. They came up with a way to essentially canvas a virtual neighbourhood. Obtaining phone numbers and sending an sms message to everyone who was within a certain area and during a certain time seems to me to be the digital equivalent of knocking doors, asking residents if they've seen anything suspicious.

The only aspect that I can see where someone might make a legitimate objection is if the police then also use the list of numbers and names as a way to populate their list of suspects. Being a suspect, even if only a routine "talk to you so they can strike your name off the list" would trouble many people. Thing is, that is entirely within the bounds of normal police work. Using data that was legitimately obtained for further uses within the same case is an accepted and necessary part of police work.

As for myself, I have only two points of concern in this case:

1) I would want to be assured that the police didn't share this list with anyone else. Other investigations must go and obtain their own warrants. That way if a case might be helped by this data, but itself doesn't merit having a judge issue a warrant, it doesn't get that data. It also makes sure that the police or other authorities don't get handed an easy way to build a database of citizens and the numbers associated with them.

2) That the police do not retain this data. That way, if a user found in the current data changes his or her phone number down the road, they don't have the police looking at them for a crime committed by someone else who later got that number.

Comment Is it actually confirmed to be the GPS network? (Score 1) 176

The summary and the article it links to both say GPS, but there is no other information on which system and devices are showing the errors. Thing is, there are a handful of satellite navigation systems in use these days. The EU, India and China all have their own systems. But the Russians have their own system as well. GPS is a common term for satellite navigation, especially in Western media. Thus; I think there is room to ask if it is actually the American GPS doing this, or if it is the Russians own system. Also, I don't know the current state of export controls on satellite navigation systems. I just know that, at one time, GPS devices were not legal to import into a number of countries, mostly (ex) soviet bloc nations and known sponsors of terrorism. As a result, I would expect that most Russian citizens, especially high level officials, would be using devices that use the Russian (GLONASS)

Come to think of it, it's possible that many consumers devices actually track based on multiple satellite networks to increase availability and precision and the intermittent nature of the error is because the error depends on which satellite/satellite system is in view at the time.

Comment I have doubts....many doubts (Score 1) 275

This strikes me as a well-intentioned, but utterly impractical concept. I suspect the originators haven't paid much attention to actual world politics. There are *numerous* places on Earth, with actual resident populations that struggle to gain acceptance and recognition in the community of nations. This isn't even as plausible an attempt at nation building as Northern Cyprus, Transnistria or Somaliland. This is more akin to the Principality of Sealand. Namely, a place intended from its very inception to base its existence on a loophole of international law. And; as with Sealand, if this orbital micronation in any way steps on the toes of a real nation, it will quickly cease to exist.

On of the biggest challenges to public acceptance isn't having a large enough population of people who claim citizenship. Rather; it is the universal assumption that a nation must have a set physical location not already claimed by a bigger/more powerful pre-existing nation and have people already living on it who wish to be sovereign. I don't know of any cases where a ship or aircraft was declared to be sovereign, which would be the closest example. (There is the case of Princess Margriet of the Netherlands who was born in an Ottawa hospital, but in that case, it was Canada, an existing recognized sovereign nation, temporarily declaring a small portion of its territory to be extra-territorial. And was only done because she was a) effectively a temporary refugee of WWII and b) In the line of succession of another sovereign and allied state)

All in all, this seems similar to a RPG player who has found what he or she thinks is a loophole in a rarely referred to rulebook or rule supplement and thinks that this obscure reference should trump how the game is normally played or how the current quest is playing out. With a good GM, such rules-lawyers get hammered pretty quick. Hell, in a good group, quite often the other players will cooperate in squelching the rules-lawyer. In real world politics, I can't see gaming the system to be a viable strategy...

Comment Re:Genesis 6:3 NIV (Score 1) 290

For what it's worth, I seem to remember recent accounts of analysis of the Dead Sea scrolls and older analysis of the Bible that indicate that, if anything, the sacred texts changed remarkably little over the centuries. Live Science has a short article on the "virtual unwrapping" of the En-Gedi scroll which includes a big chunk of what the Jewish Tanakh and Christian Bible call Leviticus.

My take on this is that, being considered sacred texts by Jews and Christians, great care was taken in accurately copying the actual words over the years. The changes come from two sources: First is when the existing text is translated to another language. (e.g. Aramaic, Greek and Hebrew into Latin and then Latin into English.) It's my understanding that the Jewish texts have undergone much fewer translations over the centuries than the Christian ones. The second cause of misunderstandings or changes in the ext isn't in the words themselves, but in the changing use of words in living languages over that time. (e.g "Suffer not the witch to live" was actually an injunction against poisoners. I forget if it was in the original Aramaic in in the early Latin, but one of those languages used the equivalent term to describe anyone who used potions and herbs in harmful ways. European pagan practitioners of what is today called Wicca was NOT what they original writers were talking about)

Comment Re:Hard enough? (Score 3, Informative) 111

Keys aren't commonly made of steel and haven't been made of iron since the abandonment of skeleton keys for general use. Most keys are brass or aluminium with both being ~ a 3 on the Mohs scale. ( I use Mohs here because we're talking about contact with alleged sapphire and gemstones are usually rated on the Mohs scale, not Brinnell, Rockwell or Vickers) Thus a key should just skate across a smoothly polished screen surface if it indeed sapphire. In fact, if there are existing scratches on the screen glass, those scratches should mark the key!

There are two caveats though:

1) This only accounts for the keys themselves, not the spring steel keyring that is almost universally used to organize keys nor any keychains, fobs or charms.

2) There are several aspects lumped together under the term "hardness", scratch resistance, rebound hardness and resistance to deformation under a static load. A materials rating under the Mohs scale doesn't cover all of that, so only gives you one part of the picture. And as far as I know, no general purpose hardness test covers glancing/gouging impacts where the velocity of impact is as an equally important component of the tests. A straw can embed itself in wood if it's going fast enough after all. (velocity of the impacting object IS quite important in armour testing, so those tests are careful to take speed and angle of impact into consideration.

Comment Re:OH fucking whaaaaa (Score 3, Informative) 226

Once again I am seeing a prejudicial and negative opinion in a member of the public based on incomplete and/or outdated information. It is true that Asperger Syndrome as a separate diagnosis was removed from the DSM-V in 2013. However, what happened wasn't removing the condition completely as being invalid. Rather; it got lumped in with the autistic spectrum. Current thinking is that Asperger's is a form of high functioning autism distinguished from other forms by the child having normal or above average language skills. At one time, the condition wasn't even heard of. It was only after many years of study by mental health professionals around the world that Dr Hans Asperger's observations and classification was accepted and added to the DSM. Merging it with autism just represents the current level of refinement in classification and understanding of the disorder. Since we know nothing of the root causes of autistic spectrum symptoms, it is quite possible that the category will get split up into new labels as we learn more. (maybe, as an example, one type of autism is found to be caused by a neurochemical imbalance while another is caused by functional changes in the neuron structures in the cognitive centres and yet another caused by changes in structure of the hindbrain.)

Your post also reflects a common misunderstanding of the importance and proper use of the DSM. The DSM is first a method of classifying mental disorders. In this it resembles taxonomy. And as with taxonomy, having a species move from one genus or family to another doesn't mean that species doesn't exist, having a described animal move from being a distinct species to being considered a sub-species of another, better understood species doesn't invalidate the observations of the people who first described that sub-species. From there; it then acts kind of like a field guide for mental disorders for the mental health professional working in the field. The DSM is not meant to be exhaustive and it can only be as definitive as current understanding allows. This common misunderstanding tends to create a lot of hardship for people dealing with mental disorders or learning disabilities because it is often assumed by teachers, insurance companies, friends and family that if it isn't in the DSM, it isn't real.

Finally; for what it's worth, the DSM isn't the only guide for professionals in defining a patients mental health issues. There is also the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. (the ICD) And Asperger Syndrome is still listed separately there.

Comment Re:Spectrum... (Score 3, Informative) 226

There is a wealth of information out there to be had. It doesn't take much in the way of Google-fu to come up with the Autism Society of America or the National Autism Association Both of those are good places to start.

For your specific situation; I have a few things to consider, bits of advice:

1) It's called a spectrum for a reason. A child with autism may be only mildly affected or severely affected. Also; it's quite common for a child to have some traits or measured levels that qualify as autistic, while they may be normal or even above normal in other ways. Each kid is different. Thus, they may be considered severely affected on one axis, moderately so on another and totally fine on one or more others. This may explain why your sons teachers think he is fine. The attributes they see are within the normal range, whereas you see the bigger picture.

2) Proper testing and diagnosis starts with your family physician or pediatrician. You need to set up a 1/2 hr appt with him or her and explain why you think your child has an issue. Your doctor will then hopefully refer you and your child to a specialist in developmental disorders

2) Ultimately, autism is a diagnosis of exclusion. An average child goes through a year or two of testing before a diagnosis of autism is reached, because there are a large number of other learning disabilities or developmental disorders that share similar symptoms with autism. You need to prepare yourself to be patient during this phase.

3) There is no medication, no regime of diet or therapy is that is a "cure" for autism. (indeed, a large segment of the autistic community argues there is no *need* for a cure, they are fine the way they are...) What exists are teaching and coaching programs to help the child consciously master the soft skills the neurotypical majority take for granted. There are medications which can help buffer the secondary symptoms (anxiety, depression, co-morbid sleep disorders etc) but for the most part it is the patient teaching that creates the change, not the meds.

4) The teaching and coaching isn't just for the kids. Where I live, there is an excellent program (under the auspices of local community mental health groups) to teach the parents, and in some cases, the siblings how to understand and interact with the affected child. If such a program exists in your area, I highly recommend looking into it for your whole family.

5) You will constantly encounter people who have formed opinions about autistic kids based on incomplete or outdated information. The withdrawn rocking child is the archetypical face of autism, but one that only describes the most severely affected. (and, as described elsewhere in this thread, a symptom of an autistic kid who is overwhelmed, hasn't been given the mental tools to cope with excessive stimuli.) It is possible that your child's teacher has the assumption that all autistic kids are that withdrawn and unsocial archetype. And let us not forget what the other gentleman (ourlovecanlastforeve 795111) above blasted. There are many many people who think the misbehaviours, weird obsessions and compulsions are the product of bad parenting and they are quick to judge you accordingly.

Comment Re:Spectrum... (Score 5, Informative) 226

You have no idea what you're talking about. Worse yet, you aren't even aware of just how poor your knowledge of the subject really is.

Let me establish my credentials before I attempt to educate you.*

I am on the autistic spectrum myself (Asperger's), I worked for several years as a Big Brother, Personal support Worker and in-class Educational Assistant specializing in autistic and behavioural modification programs. I have two sons both on the spectrum and one foster son with a learning disability that isn't autistic, but shares many symptoms of spectrum disorders. As a result, I have literally decades of experience working with autism, as well as the medical and educational systems doing what can be done for children and youths on the spectrum.

1) ALL kids pick their nose at some point and virtually all adults do as well. All we really teach kids is to a) do it privately if possible and b) not to eat what they extract. Parents of autistic kids face the challenge that the child won't stop doing it whenever they feel the need unless you can give them a sensible reason why. Telling them it's rude, disgusting or whatever won't work. Nor will "because I said so" But explanations about how mucus contains a lot of bacteria and that nose picking spreads germs, risking making other people sick does work. (with one exception: If nose picking happens to be one of their "stimming" behaviours then you can't teach them to stop doing it. Instead you have to focus on managing the stress, boredom or external sensory input that is causing them to stim in reaction.)

2) Autistic kids often love video games even more than the neurotypical kids because it allows them to focus on one thing. The rules are very clear and consistent. It also provides a constantly varying but still predictable level of stimulation. Forcing them to just go outside and seek out playmates the same way the other kids do is like tossing a non-swimmer into a pool and telling them to swim the way everyone else is doing. Autistic children just don't have the skill-set to do that. Most people have an inherent or latent ability to socialize. Autistic people don't. They have to learn social skills on a conscious level. Many autistic kids can learn to play with the other children, but it takes an adult to properly frame and explain the rules to the child and much practice before they are comfortable with it. There is usually a lengthy period of adult supervision and coaching required. In the same way, attending school or holding a job presents enormous challenges to the autistic. School can be a source of huge stress to an autistic child. The structure of set class times and seeing the same teacher(s) every day at the same times is good for the autistic. But being proactive at answering questions, working on joint projects, even simply navigating the more chaotic environment of the hallways and playground can be difficult, even overwhelming. Let's not forget that children are very very good at picking up on who is different in some way and can be very insensitive, even cruel when it comes to dealing with kids outside the norm. Autistic kids get picked on a LOT because they are different. Forcing them to go play unsupervised in the playground is setting them up to be the victim. And since autistic kids are not good at expressing themselves, they often bottle up their frustrations and anger at being bullied until they explode and go postal on a kid. And all too often, teachers don't see the bullying, but they DO see the inappropriate explosion of violence, so autistic kids get into trouble more often and tend to get more severe punishments if the staff are not properly trained on the challenges of teaching autistic kids. 3) You are correct that if one can play minecraft, one can work a cash register. But that is a very simplistic statement. It totally ignores all of the other soft skills a person needs in order to be a cashier. Soft skills which go far beyond making eye contact and saying "have a nice day" I might add. If one is autistic, how do you even land that job in the first place? Autistic people suck at eye contact, explaining themselves, putting the best spin on their skill-set and fielding the sort of "there is no 'right' answer" tricky questions interviewers like to throw out there. Unless properly coached during their school years, they won't understand the need to dress well for the interview either. If they get the job, they would require that the store manager spend more one on one time teaching them how to operate the machine, with more one on one time every time the process gets changed. A good cashier develops a sense for when to cut a customer a break and when to get a manager to make that decision instead. (expired coupons, 10 cents short of the total, price matching a competitor etc) This sort of subtle judgement is a major challenge for many autistic people, particularly the more severely affected.

Comment but pretty cold from what I've read (Score 1) 218

I've read elsewhere that Proxima b that it has been calculated that the average temperature there is -40C. (which wikipedia seems to confirm) And yet the same article I'd read said that liquid water was possible, and hence, life was possible as well. By comparison; I think the average surface temperature of Earth is 16C. So, if there is liquid water on Proxima b, then it must be in a pretty slender equatorial zone.

Comment On a more serious note... (Score 1) 162

All gay jokes aside, I kind of think there might be an opportunity there for some high quality hackivism. I'm thinking that a skilled individual or group, who has access to some good North Korean translation could use this as an opportunity to post videos that give at least a few North Koreans a glimpse of what the rest of the world is like. The ideal video(s) would be subtle, things like going a wee bit over the top with praise for Brilliant Comrade Kim Jong Un or referring to the higher standard of living enjoyed by South Korea only to denounce its perceived "decadence" and claim that the suffering caused by Juche only makes the North Korean people stronger and morally "pure".

Given some of the insanity we've seen out of official North Korean media, a sophisticated satire could easily pass for an official press release. The better the hoax video is crafted, the longer it will take the authorities to figure out that it isn't an official release by some other department in the government and take it down.

I figure, as long as the culture in North Korea seems bent on slow self destruction, we might as well see if we can give it a bit of help. The sooner the North Korean regime collapses, the better it will be for the North and South Korean people.

One question remains though: It's well known that North Korea maintains its own national Intranet and only approved people are allowed to use it. Does anyone know just how well connected that Intranet is to the world at large?

Slashdot Top Deals

"Paul Lynde to block..." -- a contestant on "Hollywood Squares"