That's fine, but remove the “memory safe” label. The “unsafe” keyword is important because it signifies you can't actually be memory safe, performant, and a system language. If you owned a company that produced “nut-free” food, you can't also have products which contain nuts, and always carry on that you are absolutely hardcode nut-free. If your customer base was doing that on your behalf, you should be coming out and publicly making statements that you do not endorse or support that label, and its customer created.

Your other comment, he gets a lot of hate for simply suggesting Rust is not some super language that should take over the world. He makes objectively true statements, isn't biased about it, and holy crap, gets absolutely destroy because of it. I've never tried Rust, I'm not concerned with Rust, but from what I know of its public image, it's the ultra memory safe, system safe, solver of all, language, and time after time, isn't. That's my point.

Aside from the choice screens, you can already do all of this on Android. Why does anybody buy anything that doesn't give you these options to begin with? That's just asking to be enshitified at some point. Safari is already enshitified.

Though maybe I'm not the typical iphone demographic. I don't use stupid apps. Basically everything I do is in Firefox. With extensions to disenshitify websites. Maybe what separates me from iOS users is when Reddit says "time to sign in with a shitty app" I say "fuck you, reddit" and disable that crap with ublock if I really need it that bad. Whereas ArchieBunker says "oh yay! a new app! There's an app for that!" and then proceeds to hum the apple ad piano melody.

The value proposition in a console has never been in the graphics, it's always been in the games. You bought the N64 not because it was 3D, but because you couldn't play Mario 64 on your SNES. You talk about the jump from PS2 to PS3 ... well the PS2 outsold the PS3.

On PC where hardware capability is variable for the same released games it's a different story, where better hardware = better graphics for the same games. But on consoles the games dictate the console not the graphics quality.

That is a simplistic single variable (technically 3 variable) view of a very fucked multi-variable scenario.

Yes RAM prices are high, however that is just making and already shittacular year for sales worse than it already was. We have hardware prices raised thanks to tariffs (globally, thanks to Microsoft distributing the loss in profits and not just passing them off to Americans alone ... in a way Trump was right that other people are paying *throws up*), we have had a truly shit year when it comes to AAA releases, major anticipated releases delayed, less major releases were an incredible flop, and thanks to Nintendo for teasing the ability to sell expensive titles gaming in general got more expensive too.

Also there's always a new NVIDIA launch on the horizon. That has little impact, especially considering the cards have been flops in recent memories and there's no reason to think they won't be next year.

Also the Steam Machine was only just announced mid month, so it has had no impact on half of November or indeed any of the shit months prior.

Warmer climate means land will become farmable further north, higher CO2 will mean greater agricultural yields and less severe forest fires, glacial melt will free up more water for agriculture and consumption, and real estate will become attractive in northern latitudes.

Climate change solves the water, housing, food, and air quality problems.

It is being done properly. We're just doing more complex shapes *properly* now than the horrendously inaccurate abstractions from the days where this kind of shit may have been done in Fortran.

Welcome to the modern world. But I get it man, I look around and too wish I was back in the 90s.

His salary is irrelevant, he is billing that to you. The cost of business is passed on to the customer. I doubt the OP is sitting there running CFDs just for their own shits and giggles on the weekend.

Windows isn't the reason for an OS to feel sluggish. Linux would run like absolute dogshit on 4GB if you were to run Teams on it. Heck I disagree with your premise, Linux runs like dogshit on 4GB with a significant browser heavy workload as it is.

Applications chew through RAM. The OS is quite insignificant.

Simply raising money isn't a reason to go public. The reason to go public is fundamental capital flexibility, and allowing investors to flexibly cash in when they want.

The fact that OpenAI doesn't make money is only loosely related to why they would go public. Even if they did make loads of money there would still be good reason for investors (i.e. Microsoft) to request the company to go public. Specifically with a high evaluation now is a great time to cash in.

given all of the levels of checks needed to board a plane this guy wasn't responsible either, if he was let on this means the system worked as expected

I don't see any pointer semantics in that. Am I missing something?

How about you spend more time minding your own business, and less time assuming you know what other people are doing? I work my 50+ hours/week. I have "productive" hobbies. I keep a home. I contribute to society. I raised kids into functioning adults. If I want to sit on my ass in front of the tube once in a while who the heck are you to judge? If you were to look at my usage you'd probably assume I was another one of those adults wasting their lives away, but that's about as far from the truth as can be.

Why was this hacker arrested, shouldn't they arrest those who let him on instead?