Comment Re:training on your data (Score -1) 236
Anthropic asks if it can do that. It's an Opt-in.
Comment Re:What can possibly go wrong (Score -1) 40
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, asshat. PGP has NEVER been used in Linux. GNUPG has.. But that is, effectively, a PGP CLONE.
Rewriting it in something that is memory-safer is hardly a bad call. Further, you retarded, inbred, fuck:
Key Exposure and Leakage: Encryption relies on secret keys stored in memory. A memory-unsafe bug—such as a buffer overflow or out-of-bounds read—can allow an attacker to read arbitrary memory blocks, exposing private keys, initialization vectors, or plaintexts directly to unauthorized users.
Control Flow Hijacking: Bugs like use-after-free or stack/heap overflows allow attackers to overwrite function pointers or execution logic. Even if an encryption algorithm (like AES-256) is mathematically unbreakable, an attacker can hijack the program to dump data before it is encrypted or after it is decrypted.
Bypassing Authentication: Many cryptographic protocols (such as TLS or SSH) bundle encryption with integrity checks and handshakes. Memory corruption flaws can let an attacker skip verification steps, forge authentication tokens, or accept invalid certificates.
The Heartbleed Precedent: A classic real-world example is the Heartbleed bug in OpenSSL (a buffer over-read vulnerability). It did not break the underlying math of SSL/TLS, but it let attackers read server memory directly, exposing private keys and session cookies.
Comment Re:Radical humanism (Score -1) 189
The "fuck you, kids are your problem and I'm not paying for them" attitude has a lot to do with the declining birth rate in some countries.
You're a fucking idiot.
Comment Re:If you're not convinced the US is facist (Score -1) 19
Comment Re:If you catfish (Score -1) 189
Comment Re:Pay people better (Score -1) 189
And cut their work hours. If you want babies that's what you need to do.
You think people worked more or less in the past, idiot?
Comment Re:Crime (Score -1) 113
not people hiding in the dark to steal your purse at knife point (does that even still happen ?)
Are you really that spoiled, you fucking clown?
Comment Re:Great! (Score -1) 85
Comment Re:what kind of bugs (Score -1) 85
Comment Re:Standing? (Score -1) 113
Comment Re:Standing? (Score -1) 113
I'm not sure United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez aapplies like you think it does. If that were teh case, any foreign corporation without a physical/substantial presence do not have to comply with US law even if tehy offer services in the US, or foreign banks comply with US reporting laws on US citizens.
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez was about a search and seizure of a non-US citizen in a foreign country. Teh question is does offering services in the US via teh web and charging for tehm establish enough of a presence to be afforded Constitutional protection?
Corporations with no physical presence here to NOT have to comply with US law, moron. Of course, the US government has a bit more reach than most, so not complying could mean facing lockouts from the global financial systems. You think I give a rat's ass that my website isn't compliant with EU privacy laws even though an EU citizen can reach it?
Comment Re: Hollywood Accounting needs to be banned,prosec (Score -1) 142
On average, movie studios take about 55% to 60% of domestic ticket revenue, while theaters keep the remaining 40% to 45%. The bigger the movie is anticipated to be, or for the big franchise-films, the studio can demand up to 80% of the ticket sale. For Indie-style films, they may have to settle for 30%.
So, I guess my question is answered.. No, you idiots do not know what the split is. You'd all prefer to be conspiracy-theory assholes.
Comment Re:Hollywood Accounting needs to be banned,prosecu (Score -1) 142
Comment Re:Standing? (Score -1) 113
That is absolute and utter bullshit. It MIGHT be the case if DeepSeek had offices and/or facilities in the US. It does NOT. Merely offering services in the US doesn't get you anything. You clearly haven't got a clue what the fuck you are talking about.
United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez establishes that foreign citizens and corporations outside the sovereign territory of the United States do not possess rights under major provisions of the U.S. Constitution. Constitutional rights typically require a physical/substantial presence within the United States or its sovereign sphere.
Why can't you spell "the"? You fucked it up every single time.