Comment Re: the real answer is openAI hires incompetent pe (Score 1) 62
You are not trying to understand the situation, you are trying to show that what OpenAI did is correct. But there's no way to do that: they broke the law.
I'd agree, but if someone else's compiler will give me 5% better performance they are toast.
Maybe YOU would, but most people can't even be bothered to set their optimization flags correctly.
All it involved was taking the popular opinion and going all in.
Insightful distillation.
the definition of AI is that it can tell you things not in the training data
That is not the definition of AI. Maybe next time don't post while high.
Just assume, for a moment, that OpenAI guys not only not worse IT pros than you but actually very much better.
My assumption is you are an AI fanboy.
Your comment appears to be motivated reasoning.
It's impossible to keep up these spending levels in the long term, and I am yet to see AI profits outpacing the spending.
The expensive part is the training, once the NNs are trained, they are significantly cheaper to run (and there are a lot of optimizations you can do to make them a LOT more efficient).
. It's a pretty neat way of allowing third-party app stores while still guaranteeing their cut.
It should be illegal.
I'm not sure they do work, though.
There are two ways sanctions work:
1: They are a negative economic factor. Over the long term, growth will be slower, meaning their army will grow relatively weaker and weaker. Biden tried to use this method of sanctions. The obvious example is North Korea.
2: An outright blockade. This can severely damage the economy, which is what happened in Gaza and Trump is trying to do in Iran (with apparent success, although it's hard to untangle the various factors there).
All they seem to do is cement an unfriendly regime's power and make us out to be enemies in the eyes of their people.
When the dictator controls the press, there is no way to avoid that.
You have to offend more than one person to get (and stay) modded down in
That's not quite true. You only need to offend one person to get modded down. However, if you also provide value, then you will probably not stay modded down. My karma has only been anywhere other than right up against the kap a couple of times in the last... uh, long time.
Agree. Sometimes my notifications are a war zone, with up and down mods. back and forth.
I mean have you seen the shit they didn't ban people for?
I mean have you seen the thing where Zuckerfuck called people who trusted him enough to give him their personal info for facebook "dumb fucks"? You should expect Facebook to intentionally not ban the worst people, if you are familiar with what a piece of shit Mark Fuckerberg is.
Yes, I've seen downright seditious and threatening ov violent harm in a few groups, and the person suffers no consequence. Someone might have reported you for just having a different opinion. When spring outside of an echo chamber, people in the echo chamber go Reeee!
Especially if you answer certain groups who appear to enjoy "punishing" those who disagree with them. Some even enjoy the experience.
C++ is the best example of second-system effect since OS/360.