Incorrect. You can repeat it until you're blue in the face, lol.
The Board took action via the committee that it was empowered to form to act in its name.
You're basically trying to argue that every official name in the history of the US was illegal.
All prior to 1947, which were done on executive action alone, and all since that were done through a subcommittee of the board.
Like it or not, the board does have the power to delegate to committees.

Back in your hole, dipshit.

Kind of. The landscape is rife with exclusivity agreements, which is highly anticompetitive. This is on machines that are virtually identical on the inside.
Sony has faced antitrust scrutiny in the EU for this.
Microsoft settled an antitrust lawsuit in the US.

Microsoft is actually alone in this, now.
PS5 and Nintendo are selling profitable units.

The arguments never really mattered. That is something people lose sight of a lot in antitrust discussions.
They think {n}opoly is a factor.
Anticompetitive behavior is, and the cost for you to escape that anticompetitive behavior.

Ya, the recent QC arm laptops were precisely what I was thinking.
That's like Microsoft coming in out of nowhere and saying, "We're going to take on Apple and Google in phones!"

Wait... shit.

Aye. Wonder if the physical games in the twilight era of physical games will ever be worth anything.
If so, I bought many before I surrendered to the online story mafia!

Congress empowered the Board to setup its own committees.
That committee has existed since 1947.
The executive+congress policy in question has existed at least since 2016.

Seriously, shut the fuck up and crawl back in your hole. You are terminally fucking stupid.

First of all, I'd like to congratulate you on your complete lack of understanding of antitrust law.
Neither Google or Apple have a monopoly either.

Would you like to recompute and try again?

So you figure they were waving ostrich feathers at him threatening to tickle?

Do you think the only actual guns in the school at the time didn't loom large in the kid's vision?

How do you suppose they picked out the "right" student to hassle without a picture?

In the before time when I was in high school, searching for weapons was a job for the unarmed principal or the football coach. Either they had the picture on them or they held the kid WAY longer than necessary after the pat down revealed nothing.

The parents should sue the crap out of the cops, the school, and probably the manufacturer of the scanner.

Agreed, the actual publication is considerably more ambiguous. In my case, 2K really would be about the max, but I can easily see other people would have a good case for 4K.

Though notably they're talking about ability to discern the difference in an A/B test. A somewhat lesser display may still make no difference in the 'experience' of normal watching, but that would require a follow-up study.

The AI would be better at feigning human decency.

Your passport number is all that really matters. Everything else is just for the plebes, when you interact with the TSA or other government agencies, the number gets checked against the government records which gives back a photo along with the other information. The issuing country tracks everything by that number, but that's not the end of it.

When you go abroad, they take a photo of you and your passport and put it in a database, using your country plus passport # as the real id. Now that new country starts to track you too.

Spies really hate this because it means that once they go to a country they really can't go back to it using a different name. The computer would match up your new false identity with the photo they took of you with the old identification.

Clean and simple. You're a man of reason.

Probably both.

Can't speak to all companies, but AP handles there here. It's their job to validate every invoice before it is paid out with people on our side of the transaction.
They also track changes to recurring invoices, and verify those changes.

These happen. We've had 2 this year.

Modern models can handle words perfectly- even in difficult situations like a word going through a fold that transforms the other half of its bounding box, for example.

They can find it.

We see a lot of LLM targeted phishing coming through, now.
It's pretty fucking scary, actually.
We've had to add filters on outbound email to quarantine any communications to unrecognized destinations for review.

I suppose if we want to drown in irony, we could have an LLM do the review...

We care because the IRS cares.
The IRS can care anytime from now until I die.
Unless there are plans for Cyborg Trump, we will generally continue to assume that we'll be audited at some point.