Yes.

I too, for a long fucking time, held the belief that they must be just feeding us that shit. No- I'll grant them this: They eat their own shit.

Relocating your headquarters does not unincorporate your incorporated entities within the jurisdiction in question, and that's the trouble they're in now. They have many onshore (Chinese) holdings.

An Irish corporation doing business in the US via a US-incorporated entity is subject to US law. The people within that parent corporation are very subject to US law if they step foot on US soil, and mostly subject to US law if they step foot on the soil of any country with an extradition treaty with the US.

One proton vs Antiproton explosion releases 1,877 MeV (mega-electronvolts). All the antimatter they transfered would not give off 200,000 MeV

1 foot pound of energy contains more than 8 trillion MeV

So basically, it could be happening inside your body and you would never notice it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Tracks at 8 km away, hits at 2 km away. Process takes seconds.

You are thinking 'not reliable' means they hit the target less than 5% of the time.

We are thinking 'not reliable' means they blow up the ship that tries to launch them.

This is a fallacy.

What happens is this. Someone makes a product with a 0.1% reliability. They sell it but warn it is not that high quality. Then someone says "If they are at least 10% reliable, it is worth it and buys the product.

Their is no evidence these are 10% reliable. Everything about it screams these are a new cheap, almost worthless missile. Particularly the use of the word 'hypersonic' to describe a missile that the US would never call hypersonic (we reserve that word for advanced, hard to hit hypersonic cruise missiles, not hypersonic ballistic missiles that are easy to destroy)

Exactly what I was thinking. Soon you won't be able to scrape anything even if it's not abusive.

The analogy doesn't really work for two reasons. Firstly copyright infringement is a civil matter, not criminal. Secondly they were informed about the copyright infringement, but declined to cut off the customer. It was a request to stop providing service that was allegedly being abused, going against their own Terms of Service.

This is still the right decision. Aside from it being bad if companies can be forced to enforce their own ToS, there has never been a trial to determine if the copyright infringement actually took place, and if the right person was identified. These claims are notoriously unreliable.

Television wasn't nearly do addictive as social media. For a start, it's a one way medium. Social media lets you respond. The closest TV gets is stuff like phone poll voting, which was heavily regulated in a lot of countries.

Lockheed focuses on reliability of weapons, rather than quantity. As we have seen in Ukraine and now in Iran, quantity is often more important. Ukraine uses a lot of civilian grade material in drones, for example, as does Russia. Shear numbers and low cost are more important than military grade component reliability.

Around me people seem used to prices going up and down. We all knew the world would be upside down with the buffoon in charge.

Americans should count themselves lucky that most of Trump's initiatives have been neutral and ineffective at best. You are lucky if skyrocketing inflation is all you have to deal with.

Which one is Melania?

That's why there are governments that collect taxes. They are there to solve such problems that won't be solved by capitalism.

But running things with batteries is not new technology. People tried it before gas, it didn't work. All of this is technology that has been around for 100 years.