Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Fee funded (Score 2) 48

For Traffic Coordination System for Space (TraCSS) to be sustainable long term and not vulnerable to political whims, the funding should be analogous to how aviation works ( like landing fees, gate slot rental, etc. ) which are aligned and proportional to the benefit received. Spread over the entire orbital industry, that amount of money is trivial to players like SpaceX, Amazon, etc. Really no different than tech companies contribution to Open Source software projects for building and maintaining common infrastructure.

Comment To get value out of coding assistance.. (Score 2) 47

You have to get a feel for when it's utterly useless and when it's got a good chance of success. You also have to have a different vigilance as the LLM will make mistakes unlike what humans will do. My experience is it can be a modest time save but only because I've learned to ignore it for most of my work. Occasionally neat completion, very very rarely generating useful snippets from prompts, and ability to generate doc strings that no one will probably read anyway. Utterly asinine at trying to write comments, documenting the self evident tediously and skipping commenting anything that actually could use it. One example is if I write a little command line utility using variables that make sense to me it's decent at seeing the uninitialized variables and generating a chunk of argument parsing code including decent staff help text based on the observed variables

When all is said and done, if AI convinces management I don't need the diploma mill outsourced code slinger from the lowest bidder, I come out ahead even if I never even use the AI at all.

Comment Re: Winning? (Score 1) 155

That doesn't make him wrong.

He's using a version of made-up numbers.

How about real numbers? E.g. how many average yearly salaries do you need in 2025 (vs. 2005, for instance) to buy an average house?

Or how many big macs can you buy from.an average salary?

Because US economy is leaving behind major parts of its population at a rapid pace. Higher GDP doesn't translate to better standard of living, it translates to fewer people hoarding even more wealth.

Submission + - Preliminary report says fuel switches were cut off before Air India 787 crash

hcs_$reboot writes: A pair of switches that control the fuel supply to the engines were set to "cutoff" moments before the crash of Air India Flight 171, according to a preliminary report from India's Air Accident Investigation Bureau released early Saturday in India.

According to the report, data from the flight recorders show that the two fuel control switches were switched from the "run" position to "cutoff" shortly after takeoff. In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots can be heard asking the other "why did he cutoff," the report says, while "the other pilot responded that he did not do so."

Moments later, the report says, the fuel switches were returned to the "run" position. But by then, the plane had begun to lose thrust and altitude. Both the engines appeared to relight, according to investigators, but only one of them was able to begin generating thrust.

Comment Re:Science a Global Endeavour (Score 1) 58

Hardly. The US was definitely gaining rapidly before WW2 but Europe, and particularly the British Empire, was still very much the world's superpower.

Militarily yes, because the US was not interested in having a global military presence.
As I said, as soon as it withdrew from its isolationist curtain, there was no longer any contest.
The US surpassed the British Empire economically in the late 1800s.
Militarily? The second it decided it wanted to.

Submission + - AI Slows Down Some Experienced Software Developers, Study Finds (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader writes: Contrary to popular belief, using cutting-edge artificial intelligence tools slowed down experienced software developers when they were working in codebases familiar to them, rather than supercharging their work, a new study found. AI research nonprofit METR conducted the in-depth study on a group of seasoned developers earlier this year while they used Cursor, a popular AI coding assistant, to help them complete tasks in open-source projects they were familiar with.

Before the study, the open-source developers believed using AI would speed them up, estimating it would decrease task completion time by 24%. Even after completing the tasks with AI, the developers believed that they had decreased task times by 20%. But the study found that using AI did the opposite: it increased task completion time by 19%. The study’s lead authors, Joel Becker and Nate Rush, said they were shocked by the results: prior to the study, Rush had written down that he expected “a 2x speed up, somewhat obviously.” [...]

The slowdown stemmed from developers needing to spend time going over and correcting what the AI models suggested. “When we watched the videos, we found that the AIs made some suggestions about their work, and the suggestions were often directionally correct, but not exactly what's needed,” Becker said. The authors cautioned that they do not expect the slowdown to apply in other scenarios, such as for junior engineers or engineers working in codebases they aren’t familiar with. Still, the majority of the study’s participants, as well as the study’s authors, continue to use Cursor today. The authors believe it is because AI makes the development experience easier, and in turn, more pleasant, akin to editing an essay instead of staring at a blank page. “Developers have goals other than completing the task as soon as possible,” Becker said. “So they’re going with this less effortful route.”

Slashdot Top Deals

We declare the names of all variables and functions. Yet the Tao has no type specifier.

Working...