It doesn't have to be. Depends hpw we do it.
Your argument seems to be resting on "let's *not* get everybody to where they need to go and drop them somewhere else instead, then we'll have less traffic". It doesn't sound very compelling to me, who happened to have had 45 min public transport from home to job, vs. 7 min car route.
Oh.
I guess the *woosh* is on me then...
Dude are you trolling?
India didn't develop nuclear weapons until half a FUCKING CENTTURY after Gandhi's death.
As Gandhi showed, one could confront and defeat an empire without violence
First, tou'd have to be Gandhi to achieve what Gandhi did. If you, yoursellf, did today everything that Gandhi did back in the early 1900s, all youd'd achieve would be starving in prison.
Second, it wasn't strictly non-violence that brought Gandhi success. The Brits didn't let India go because they thought "gee, what a noble character, this guy deserves success". They did becsuse they feared - rightfully so - massive upheaval, violence, and civil war.
What Gandhi did wasn't just to ask nicely; it was to mount a massive, credible threat of great violence. Kudos to him for knowing how to, and being in the position to, do that without personally throwing a single stone himself.
But the key ingredient of Ganfhi-esque success isn't not throwing stones, it's successfully projecting the threat of violent revolution.
*not EVs
But EVs, but maybe self-driving could. You have to admit, individual door to door public transport would be pretty cool.
So which is now, spontaneous electrocution or spontaneous fire?
Because most modern Li batteries, in particular LiFePO3 batteries, are largely incombustible. You really need to try hard to ignite them, and even then you're likely to fail if you don't know whatbl you're doing.
Gas on thenother hand...
You know that gasoline can easily ignite, right?
My grandfather was, and my mother is like this. No bites whatsoever.
Those private clouds are still going to be running at least some US software.
Which one?
On the other hand, most of us were behind the curve when it came to relational skills
Probably in the US, where intelligent people get bullied and ostracized in school, as a cultural peculiarity.
It's not everywhere like that.
On the other hand, most of us were behind the curve when it came to relational skills
Probably in the US, where intelligent people tend to get bullied and ostracized in school, as a cultural peculiarity.
It's not everywhere like that.
The number of limbs on people are not a random statistical distribution, either.
By completely ignoring any nuance involved [...]
"Completely ignoring any nuance" was already the name of the game in your original question.
Err... yes, when people are doing dangerous shit that's illegal anywhere else in the world, then criminalizing it in your country should be the go-to answer.
Why you asking?
If this is a service economy, why is the service so bad?
