I was one of the haters on initial release, but Hello Games 100% redeemed themselves over time and are still actively maintaining the game with new content - free new content, not paid DLC - every few months. And today, I'd rate NMS as one of my favorite games of all time.

That said, from the two comparisons you made, I suspect you're thinking of NMS as the wrong kind of game here. It's not an "escape room" style survival game, and base building is mostly meant to be a simple place to keep / display your stuff, not Factorio-in-space. There is no real plot or long-term goals beyond what you set for yourself and a few "story" missions to encourage you to at least leave the starting planet and check out the neighborhood.

If you haven't seen it since 2016, it's a radically different, and better, game. And if you have - Hey, it's not for everyone and that's okay. Some people like open world exploration, some people like puzzle games, some people like FPSs.

There's effectively no difference between single and multiplayer in NMS. Multiplayer isn't so much a distinct mode of gameplay, as merely hanging out in the game with another player. Think "playing Legos with a friend". Same activity, just more than one person. There are a few features intended to focus on multiplayer, like the nominally co-op Nexus missions - But I'm not aware of any exclusively multiplayer content, and even the Nexus missions are IMO easier to solo than trying to coordinate with someone else. And even in purely single-player mode, you can still see/visit bases/etc from other players, you just won't see the other players themselves.

I suppose a proper answer to your question depends on what you really mean by single-vs-multiplayer, though. There's a core storyline that's honestly more like a long tutorial mode, and they put on events roughly every two months (which are again often about showing off new features); but there's not really anything you'd call a proper "campaign mode". It's fundamentally an open-world exploration / survival / building game, from start to there-is-no-finish.

And just in case anything I've said here sounds negative - NMS is a mind-blowingly good game. Strongly recommend, particularly in VR.

Sure, we'll just assign "master all things x509" to engineer #78 of 205... in our four-person shop.

Everyone in this conversation seems to be assuming every company has a massive IT department with folks just standing around picking their noses waiting for real work to show up and break the monotony. Outside Silicon Valley and Fortune-500s, that's an extreme rarity.

There's also an implicit assumption we're all running major-vendor enterprise-grade software written within the last twenty years; rather than an actively automation-hostile "best of a bad breed" industry-specific solution cobbled together by the nephew of a paranoid former CEO around the time I was graduating high-school, and it's sadly still the top tool of the trade.

Those who enjoy the luxury of never needing to leave Entra to do their jobs should stop throwing stones, take a step back, and realize their world isn't representative of the real world of IT.

You realize you don't have the power to "press charges", right? Whether or not Flock is happy with the situation, they have zero ability to compel the police to do a damned thing about it. Now... Sure, nobody can promise the feds won't investigate (though they wouldn't even have jurisdiction without abusing something like interstate commerce), but most colleges "are" their containing town, including the local PD. Remember why Cornell is currently in the spotlight for how poorly a particular investigation went down? Why would a purely external police matter reflect poorly on Cornell?

As for what I'd tell anyone who did investigate - Nothing at all, because 1) read the above, 2) absolutely nothing we ignore our fifth amendment rights to say will be used for our benefit, and 3) we'd need to be a complete moron to show our faces while cutting down a flock pole; and while I may be no genius, I'm also not a complete moron.

The poles are 20lbs of high-quality aluminum - Ironically, jokes about letting tweakers know about the gold in the e-waste Flock keeps leaving on the side of the road aside, the poles themselves are the single most valuable part of an installation (as scrap).

More importantly, a simple hacksaw will go through them like butter.

Maybe not, but this is a college campus. Simply make it known nobody's going to investigate their disappearance, and they'll be gone by morning.

I'm actually surprised this played out as long as it did - Had the same battle taken place at my alma mater, I can promise you I'd personally have cheerfully harvested them for parts the same day, and I'm by no stretch unusual in that regard.

Golly, wouldn't life be awesome if we could just take a few pills per day to get all our nutritional needs like some kind of 1960s sci-fi trope? Oh, wait - No, no it wouldn't. Food is enjoyable, to the point most people like eating so much we have an obesity epidemic in the Western world.

It's also worth mentioning that countless studies have failed to find any benefit of taking supplementary vitamins on either lifespan or quality of life in otherwise well-fed individuals. Conversely, ~600 kids per year (in the US alone) need medical treatment from OD'ing on them.

All great questions, and I realize you said this a bit tongue-in-cheek, but... No, a contractor didn't "fail" to install updates. Most cheesy mobile games refuse to run and automatically kick us over to the app store when a new version comes out. The goddamned FBI's MDM can't even manage the same basic level of enforced integrity?

Oh goody, scapegoat #1 has been arrested and scapegoat #2 fired. Now how about the spoils-system appointed idiots who chose a platform less secure than a random gooner gatcha?

>Please just put a sock in it.

No.

The OP complained about low quality programmers and "slop"; clearly a reference to AI generated code.

My retort was to challenge that - to point out that fronteir LLMs are now much better at writing software than most programmers. That is objectively true. It doesn't "feel true"; it _is_ true.

Then someone replied to me to try and snipe at ESR and DHH, as if they weren't both excellent programmers. Both of them are. That wasn't a person arguing against my point; that was the response of someone who COULDNT argue against my point, but was upset about it.

There are some bright and accomplished people here. That's part of what makes the place interesting and valuable.

There are also a lot of drive by haters.

Those are two examples.

You can also go read what Carmack says about it. (example: x.com post from 2026/9/11)

I hope you won't be so stupid so as to try dunking on Carmack.

I apologize for not knowing you or your accomplishments, but just playing the law of averages, both ESR and DHH have significantly larger bodies of successfully and daily-used code than you do, with bigger impacts on the field and the industry, than you do.

You probably don't have the right to shit on them, given your own lack of contributions.

(But to be fair, I'm just assuming, based on the law of averages. I apologize if I should know you and your great contributions, but do not)

I can say that both of them certainly eclipse _me_ so greatly that I can't be seen on any map that is zoomed out enough to show both of them. And while I am a relative nothing, I've had a handful of patches accepted in my life... and I've secured a few software patents in my day. That puts me in above-average territory. But there's more accomplishment gap between them and I, than there is between me and a person who cannot code at all.

There's no harm in admiring outstanding people. A particular fault of our age is that men do not know how to truly compliment and admire greatness when they find it.

ESR is a great man. DHH is a great man. My world and our industry is better for both of them. When they say that LLMs have completely changed the way they do the thing that they are better than almost all other human beings at... you should listen.

In advance, I promise I'm not promoting any conspiracy theories here, this is a sincere question...

There's an old, largely ridiculed idea of the "nuclear hand-grenade", with most references talking about using a particular isomer of Halfnium. The primary objection I've seen to the idea is we have no practical way to "excite" nucleons in any meaningful sense - at least not without gear the size of a particle accelerator. But... This clock appears to be making use of exactly such an effect, just at sub-fissile energy levels.

Is this effectively a disproof of the most common disproof of the "Halfnium grenade"?

I agree we need better programmers.

We have better programmers.

The frontier models _are_ better programmers than all but the very best.

Look at the AI related posts from ESR and DHH on twitter. They are _all in_ on AI.

(DHH has been showing benchmarks of web apps being machine-re-written in Rust. Unsurprisingly, the apps get much faster)

A rough estimate is that the best LLMs do software engineering about as well as IQ 150 software engineers do it. That makes them better at it than the vast majority of people who write code.

People see an AI do something they dont like and then conclude "the AI sucks". But lets use honest weights and measures: Human programmers make worse mistakes, and make them more often, and iterate 1000x more slowly.

The way to think about it is this: generally the AI will write better code than the person prompting it would write, and it will do it several OOM faster. That means more code getting written than would otherwise get written, AND, it means that code is higher quality than it would be otherwise.

"Perfect" isn't the bar. "Better and in less time than if the human doing the prompting had written it themselves" is the bar. And that bar has been cleared with by a mile of daylight.

Junior engineers don't normally get to tell IQ 150 engineers what to go do. LLMs change that.

Sure, the rest of the market is barely keeping pace (4%) with inflation (3.4%) YTD; but but but, NVidia is shiny and AI is going to save us all! Pay no attention to the billionaires promising us a post-scarcity world while building massive survival bunkers in the background.

In server-grade hardware, sure. And you paid $$$$$ for it.

The earliest "consumer" grade RAID cards, by contrast, were basically just softRAIDs with a built-in IDE controller - And that's still true to a large degree; the "RAID-mode" in your gaming PC's BIOS is still merely offloading the hard work to the CPU.

I'm not claiming Linux' softRAID implementation was or wasn't faster than cheap RAID hardware, but I have no problem believing it could at least be comparable.