name checks out

I'm waiting for your apologies

/s

also, use NoScript:

https://noscript.net/

https://noscript.net/getit/

this must be Joe or Hunter Biden's fault...

they should be cut back but:

https://www.statnews.com/2026/...

no, you don't seem able to understand the simple concept of 'adding more information to a previous argument'. I first said "and I can prove it by quoting you". then, in my next post I added to it by saying "and if you could you would have quoted me. but you can't". no circular logic. it's unfortunate that you can't understand it.

I say you didn't provide any argument. you say you did. then quote it.

both the /. post and my reply discussed the diversity of the crew. nothing wrong with either post.

you did that by dropping the term 'diversity hire'. you threw a molotov bomb to a pretty innocent discussion .

only in your ignorant mind.

you used the word "nazi".

I never claimed otherwise. I only claimed you used the word "nazi". four letters: n a z i.

I didn't use the word historical. due to your extreme ignorance you're hallucinating.

let's make it simple so you can follow along.

did I talk about diversity? yes

did I use the term 'diversity hire'? no

did you use the term 'diversity hire'? yes

did I talk about the qualifications of one group but omit the qualifications of another? no

did you omit the qualifications of the white men while mentioning those of all other groups? yes

look in this mirror to find the ignorant party in this discussion.

username checks out.

do you even know what the term 'circular logic' means?

here: Circular logic, also known as circular reasoning, is a logical fallacy where the conclusion of an argument is assumed in the premises, meaning the argument goes in a circle without providing independent evidence. For example, saying "This medicine works because it is effective" is circular reasoning, as it restates the claim without offering proof.

I added more information to my previous post. thus the word 'and' in the beginning. but doing this is unfamiliar to you. so you find it funny. that's unfortunate. I'm telling you, your local library can help you.

Of course I did. And you weren't able to provide any argument against it.

I responded to the original /. post which mentioned the diversity of the crew. Nothing wrong with talking about the diversity of the crew. Then you come along and drop the term 'diversity hires'. and now you're trying to accuse me of a politicized post. think about it:.

those "erroneous implications" are figments of your ignorant imagination.

no matter how much you try to wiggle out of it, the fact that you were the first to use the term 'nazi' won't change. drop the thresholds to 0, load all comments, do a CTRL-F for nazi, and see where it first appears. your words aren't going anywhere.

the dodge is yours and only yours. once again, you're trying to wiggle out of omitting the qualifications of the white men using projection. nice try but everything you said, or didn't, isn't going away.

that's why I used the word 'and'. I just added more information to my previous post. learn to read.

going to your public library and speaking to a librarian about your problem can be a big help

unlike you I proved my claim. otoh, not only you didn't, you had the gall to behave as you did. your sense of entitlement is off the charts.

you were the first to use the word nazi. you can see it in the quoted text .

defending? quite the opposite. you omitted the qualifications of the white men. they are automatically qualified in your mind just by being while men.

you should be ashamed.

after you come back from the library, look in the mirror to see the absurd person in this conversation.

and if you could you would have quoted me. but you can't

there's no need to confess anything. our posts are public and they not going anywhere.

everyone can see your ignorance. there is nothing you can do about it.

pure projection. and I proved it.

there is one nazi in this conversation and it is you.

by whom? the only one that used the term 'diversity hires' was you. and I can prove it by quoting you:

yes, and I explained to you why:

you didn't provide any explanation thus admitting your guilt and ignorance.

Thank you for admitting that, finally.

LOL! there's no need for any of us to admit anything. this isn't an oral argument. our words are in our posts.

no matter how much you deny it, you were the only one to use the term 'diversity hires'. your words are not going away.

ROTFLOL! you can't find anything wrong with my post so now you resort to projections.

I don't need them, you do.

he/she mentioned the qualifications of the person of color and the woman but omitted those of the white men. not me. he/she used the moronic term 'diversity hire'. not me.

I only replied to the exact words of the post. I didn't make up anything. furthermore, the post said "These are not diversity hires" implying I made a 'diversity hires' claim. I didn't.

you chose to copy and paste the text that you did. you chose to omit the qualifications of the white men, not nasa. nasa didn't write your post. you have agency. don't hide behind nasa. nasa wasn't selective when it provided the qualifications of the astronauts, you were.

the politicized was yours. again, you're the one that mentioned the qualifications of the person of color and the woman but omitted those of the white men. not me. you're the one that used the idiotic term 'diversity hire'. not me.

I used the term diverse. no problem there. again, you're the one that used the idiotic term 'diversity hire'. don't blame me for something that you did. look on the mirror.

you would like to think that you did but you didn't. you only showed your ignorance.

I have some incredible moneymaking opportunities for you!

so, just because it's a person of color, or a woman, we have to list their degrees and qualifications when they get a job? so, just because it's a person of color, or a woman, we have to be afraid they are unqualified? so, just because it's a person of color, or a woman that means they're stupid and the only way they got the job is because of the color of their skin or the absence of a Y chromosome in their genes?

it's the other way around: just because it's a person of color, or a woman that means they had to work much harder to get their job. I see you didn't list the degrees and qualifications of the white men. I guess just by being a white man that means you're automatically qualified. I must have missed legacy admissions being outlawed

I never made such a stupid statement.