"the future of film making", not the current reality. Big difference there. Given how far we've come so quickly I think it's well within reason that within my life time the results of AI film making will be both indistinguishable from our current methods and cheaper than even $400k to make a movie (although that's less than the cost of a house in half the country so isn't that crazy of a cost to make cinema).

I'm not talking about how Hollywood does or will use AI, I'm talking about when the technology matures more and the potentials for small film makers that AI will bring and they are absolutely huge. The sky will be the limit for creatives as they will no longer be limited by money. Cinema will become as accessible to artists as painting is and I can't wait for that to happen.

I think the future of film making is a small handful of creatives using AI software to make a movie and overall I think this will be good for cinema. While I do think it will be a shame to lose all of the acting and craft person jobs (amongst others) making movie making cheap enough for the common person to enter into the field without major financial backers means opening the way for a lot more creatives to make good cinema.

And before I hear it, yes this will mean a ton more crap movies out there as well. If we can find the good stuff to watch on YouTube though then we'll be able to find the good stuff for cinema under the conditions I describe as well.

Basically, an era where big Hollywood will no longer be able to act as gatekeepers to what we watch? Count me in.

That's fine, I'll just play them a few years from now on an emulator and Sony won't make any money off it.

I couldn't agree more with you here. I'm lucky enough to work for a good employer right now but have worked for awful ones in the past. The improvement in my general wellbeing moving from bad to good was significant enough to where it's become a significant part of my calculations in regard to whether I should change jobs/employer or not.

If that was a viable solution to employer abuse or poor practices we wouldn't have needed to pass all the labor laws we have that have dramatic improve things like work place safety.

Your citation is some one said so? I'm asking for data backing what you are saying. In other words, a proper citation. An authoritative person saying something doesn't make something reality. For instance, Trump says things all the time that don't match up to reality.

Probably because we were busy learning what constitutes a proper citation rather than off walking around being condescending to people. What should I expect though from someone who believes a state with property values like California's can also be a hell-scape at the same time. Hint: People don't pay California money to live in a shitty place.

And Brin makes up half of all billionaire wealth in California?

It was a question with a point.

Good lord you're tiresome.

Cite a source.

I've been hearing for decades this thing or that would doom California for ever and yet here we are in 2026 and California is still the largest economy in the union by a long shot. At this point, wolf has been cried so many times I'll need some real tangible evidence before I'll believe anything conservatives are trying to tell me about California.

Making people wait an extra day because of crappy delivery methods is bad for business. Then there's the issue of waste as many of us don't like seeing stuff go through all of the efforts and energy expenditures of being manufactured only to be destroyed without even being used once.

There is a very rational argument in that bunch of insults and expletives. Do better.

From what I'm looking at https://pcpartpicker.com/trend... they're close enough.

What's not to like about Data centers using as much power as 100,000 homes moving in to neighborhoods and jacking up the power bills for all the locals all so that these companies can replace American workers with AI!?