He may be suffering from AI psychosis. Look at how easily he is manipulated when he meets far more intelligent and skilful leaders like Xi and Putin in person. Talks tough before hand, meets them and suddenly they are his best friends. It seems like it wouldn't take much for AI to convince him of its own worth.

If it does then it signals that a lot of other jobs are going away as well. Personally I feel that AI isn't good enough to replace me yet, but I can't rule out that it will be sooner or later.

That in itself isn't a problem, the issue is the political and social ramifications in countries that are already rapidly ageing.

It was legitimately a decent movie though. Not going to change the world or anything, but it was funny and well executed.

Why would people think it was going to be a total loss? Presumably those with a stake in it had seen it, or at least talked to people who had seen it, and knew it was pretty good.

But I am the graybeard. Bringing my Model M keyboard from job to job in case I need to readjust someone's thinking. :-)

I prefer the you have no right to complain philosophy. :-)

We actually liked the two week sprints because we genuinely wanted to get user feedback as soon as possible. The sprint concept also provided a wonderful pretext to ignore management when they got a visit from the "good idea fairy". A week or two later and they had forgotten their idea.

Differential equations and linear algebra did some weeding. The two CS specific weeding out classes were the compilers class (huge project class) and a hardware class where we wired up a CPU, RAM, timers, interrupt controller, and various peripheral chips on a breadboard and wrote some code to initialize it all (another big lab class).

He had 77M votes compared to 75M for Harris. He won the popular, not just the electoral.

And the distortion is not really in the electoral college itself. It is in the states that choose to allocate electors in a winner take all manner. Its a state base flaw not a constitutional flaw.

On a team of experts it can work. On one such team we also treated the "rules" as informal suggestions. So it was more of an iterative process with a list of things to deliver in two weeks. Skipping anything we considered performative silliness. Admittedly, this only worked due to the individual expertise and reliability.

I'm thinking of a project where the AI assistance is largely confined to certain modules. And that we are free to change the documentation for those modules and have the AI generate a new implementation from scratch if necessary. Other AI use in human developed modules would be more focused. Say asking for an implementation of a well known algorithm. Sort of saving the time of looking up something in Kuth and converting MIX to the current language. Dated but the idea probablty comes across. :-)

Only a full retard completely detached from the reality could produce such a non-sequitur. Naturally, you did :))))

I swear AI is going to make us return to extensive design documents up front. Reduce the number of decisions AI can make.

We used to weed out type (2). However at some point CS departments decided to stop weeding out the "weak" for some reason. Late 1990s early 2000s according to a friend who was teaching at the time.

The emperor's new clothes were deemed "amazing" despite the military-grade girdle and diaper on full display.

No this is the president that a majority of people were willing to tolerate to avoid an even more idiotic candidate and party. The lesser of two evils.