But you can't deny that it represents the thinking of the booger-eating moron perfectly.

Username checks out.

Far from it, just not when they're coming from a datacenter.

The comparison is always a cost/benefit analysis. Steel mills actually deliver a useful product, so the costs of their existence is justified. An "AI" datacenter produces hallucinations, its existence is completely unjustifiable.

Yes, the vision problem known as "unlike you, I know what I'm talking about".

Yeah. But it is a typical oracle.

I can't see how this - wrapping an experiment in a layer of abstraction - is any different from a "pure" experiment that simply records data, except that it is more complex.

A similar screen sprung up in the recent (well, perhaps not that recent) Debian updates.

Before that I would paste shit into an empty vim buffer in the terminal, now for simple things I don't even have to.

Because they literally said so.

Vibe-coding?

Not a rick-roll!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

More numbers are necessary to qualify the risk. Dosimetry is an exact science, so enlighten us how dangerous this shit is. You can refer to my posts on the subject in my posting history for additional insights.

You'll be so sorry in 30 years' time when they colonize Mars and strike you from their orbital clandestine platforms.

From the legal doc, it appears that Dolby is suing snap for not signing a licensing agreement for other codecs it is using, and not primarily AV1.

IANAL and I only flipped through the case, but the claims are about specific patents that dolby thinks are used in codecs that snapchat is using on their site alongside AV1, which are covered by some large license pool Dolby is a member of, which snapchat refused to sign, despite being "invited" several times over. Perhaps there is a side to the case where methods covered by the referenced patents are claimed to be used in AV1 as well, but I didn't get to it, it is 91 pages long.

Hopefully, if there are such claims, the consortium behind AV1 will step in and defend it against that part of the claims. For the rest it is very likely the job of snapchat to show it doesn't need a license.

I was being mildly sacrastic, but apparently it doesn't work well.