He did go away. He's at his own company now developing non-core products that you're free to ignore. Seriously man, show us on the doll where he touched you.

Have you gone back and applied it to all your old code bases? I mean I'm sure you as a coder probably are way ahead in the LLM game compared to script kiddies, but are you using it everywhere? Do you even have the time to do so? I suspect you probably have better things to do than to convert your life to an endless bugfixer.

The reality is it doesn't matter how good our tools are if we don't apply them.

AI is technically accurate. ML is literally the core component of the 1955 conjecture that defined AI. LLMs are a display of intelligence as a result of ML, also directly part of the original conjecture.

You thinking it is something different is your problem, not a problem with the term AI.

False. AI is as much a description of a system as a baby displays intelligence. The fact it lacks creativity and independent thought doesn't make it any less AI. What the group called a few years ago AI was already AI then and it's only gotten better.

The fact that some people equated AI to an all powerful genius indistinguishable from a human is their own misunderstanding. The 1995 definition discussed a machine simulating intelligence through learning which is explicitly what AI algorithms have done for many decades now.

I'm sorry you had false hopes based on incorrect assumptions.

AI isn't slop. Slop is AI. AI is just a tool. Whether the output is slop or not depends on the stupidity of the person using it.

Maybe he thinks he can bend spacetime after his "lunch break."

Typical humanities types.

Inconceivable!

Not actual intelligence by any meaningful measure. So the S in SI must only stand for sub-intelligence.

So pony up, racist!

Mind you folks, there are whole established communities of people who believe the use of technology is counter to the objective of living a moral life.

Hint: they tend to not work white collar jobs like university administrator.

Super Intelligence II Turbo Pro Max (Apple Edition)

I agree with you. Unfortunately, the same can be said for the current government of my own United States.

For example: everyone is always in favor of saving Hitler's Brain. But put it in a Great White Shark? Oh, SUDDENLY you have gone TOO FAR...

- Professor Farnsworth

Hey, you can still use the term "SI"... just have it represent "Slop Intelligence".

You had your own socks? Boy, you were lucky. I had to share a single pair of socks with my nine brothers and sisters.

Joe: For the last time, I'm pretty sure what's killing the crops is this Brawndo stuff.
Secretary of State: But Brawndo's got what plants crave. It's got electrolytes.
Attorney General: So wait a minute. What you're saying is that you want us to put water on the crops.
Joe: Yes.
Attorney General: Water. Like out the toilet?
Joe: Well, I mean, it doesn't have to be out of the toilet, but, yeah, that's the idea.
Secretary of State: But Brawndo's got what plants crave.
Attorney General: It's got electrolytes.