Comment Re:This will accelerate... (Score 1) 43
Amazon will replace workers with robots the second it is feasible. This won't do anything to change that.
Amazon will replace workers with robots the second it is feasible. This won't do anything to change that.
Is there any risk of being caught in the lie? Here it's possible that your employer will get at least a sense of your previous salary because they need to handle income taxes for that year.
I do it anyway and it's never backfired, but I suppose in theory...
SS Officer #2: Er, Hans?
SS Officer #1: Have courage, my friend.
SS Officer #2: Yeah. Er, Hans, I've just noticed something...
SS Officer #1: [Looking through binoculars] These communists are all cowards.
SS Officer #2: Have you looked at our caps recently?
SS Officer #1: Our caps?
SS Officer #2: The badges on our caps, have you looked at them?
SS Officer #1: What? No. A bit.
SS Officer #2: They've got skulls on them. Have you noticed that our caps have actually got little pictures of skulls on them?
SS Officer #1: Uh, I don't...
SS Officer #2: Hans... are we the baddies?
Not really. Care results fairly closely match Sweden’s once adjusting for confounding factors like weight, addiction, crime, genetics, and various statistical quirks (for example, Sweden doesn’t nearly as aggressively count premature birth deaths as infant mortality).
I agree with the last part in parethenses. Do you have citations for the rest?
Core vaccine schedule recommendations remain unchanged, and there’s zero proof of significant impact or negative impact.
Not for lack of trying. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/judge-blocks-rfk-jr-from-scaling-back-childhood-vaccine-recommendations.
Canceling federal funding for one particular research program at arguably the richest university in the world - with literally billions in endowments that it’s free to use - isn’t “cancelling all the mRNA research ”.
Bwah? The article I linked to is on Harvard's news site. It is not just about Harvard. As that article notes there's been about 500 million dollars of contracts canceled. Note that even if that were all Harvard (which it isn't) that would be a sizable chunk even in their endowment. And this has on top of that had a major chilling effect causing corporations to stop doing mRNA treatment research in general.
Bombing people doesn't really help them.
I see Israel has started its usual tactics of destroying all the civilian infrastructure in Lebanon, in preparation for annexing part of it.
Pardon? Have you not seen the barge landings?
There are many aspects of a flight profile. Some are based on where you put the payload when it is in orbit. Others are the weight of the payload. As an example, 9's Payload for a GTO orbit is 5.5t when recovered on barge, and 8.3t for an expended mission. LEO orbit, 17.5 t if recovered, 22.8t expendable.
Just because some flight profiles can land at a pad or on a barge, does not mean that this happens in all cases.
References from paper
A Survey of Launch Vehicle Recovery Techniques
Shraddha C.
Pankaj Priyadarshia
and Devendra Prakash Ghate
Institutes:
Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Thiruvananthapuram, 695022, Kerala, India
Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, 695547, Kerala, India
A pretty good read if you have the academic credentials to access it. Clear, at a reasonably high level so not too deep in the weeds, with all manner of different flight profiles for many rockets - including StarShip. And a lot more. Otherwise, I think it is a little premature to claim the success of Starship. The Falcon's are good reliable Rockets. Starship might end up a tad problematic.
Months? They have been converting some motorway here for *years*. I think we are about 4 years in now, I lost track. It's taken so long that they started out making it a "smart motorway", realized that those things are deathtraps, and now I'm not sure what it's going to end up as.
We have had average speed cameras in kilometre after kilometre of 50 MPH stretches for many years too. Some of them seem to have been forgotten about because there hasn't been any work or cones there for years, and most people speed through at 70.
Your assignment: Find out why reusable rockets are only useable for very specific launch envelopes. If you use them out of that launch envelope, there are just as disposable as the rockets you think are some sort of complete waste.
Interesting. I've never seen this claim made before; do you have a reference?
https://www.teslarati.com/spac... Forgive the link, it is a real rah-rah piece.
CEO Elon Musk says SpaceX has successfully expanded the envelope of orbital-class rocket recovery with its 50th booster landing, meaning that all Falcon boosters will have a better chance of safely returning to Earth from now on.
https://space-offshore.com/boo... "Falcon 9 missions may need to land on a droneship instead of RTLS due to the weight of the payload or the overall mission profile." I think you have academic access. Here is a good technical report on a lot of rockets that land after use. https://www.sciencedirect.com/.... You'll need academic credentials to download it. But it has a lot more info - and as part of the launch envelopes, there is constraint based on payload as well as direction. If you are going to land, there is a significant reduction in payload.
All of this is why I find it a little amusing that many among us find the most important aspect of launching these candles is the recovery.
tl,dr - where the rocket is going, what it is carrying has a big effect on recoverability. You can force things, reducing payload, or only sending the profiles to places where the first stage can make it back to the launch site, otherwise small extensions to allow it to make it back to a barge.
How many Bavarian Illuminati does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Three: one to screw it in, and one to confuse the issue.