It literally says in the 3rd paragraph above:

"It delivers 175 watt-hours per kilogram of energy density, which is lower than nickel-rich chemistries but roughly on par with lithium ion phosphate batteries... "

Google "Google home".
It's not Google Launcher.

90% of the 89 urine samples that showed infection, from 273 urine samples collected from out patients at one particular hospital.

I think more data is needed to assert 90% across the entire population.

Still, 90% is high in just one study.

The mutations are random, and the ones that help them survive continue. As do others, though, that happened alongside.

There's no guarantee that the mutations are NOT harmful to humans.

Poisonous mushrooms didn't necessarily evolve to be harmful to us. There's no pressure on them to be harmful to us. It just sucks for us that whatever random mutations happened in their evolutionary history that helped them survive happens to kill us.

Whilst the likelihood is low that the mutations are harmful, you cannot assume that they are not.

"A return trip to the ISS" is correct. It went to the ISS and returned. Similar to "a return flight to Australia".

But "getting things done" doesn't mean "deleting half of the code base because they don't understand it".

It's possible to replace those plastics. Compostable plastics made from things like potato starch exist. I use them in my bins. They cost more than plastic, and money is the main driver to pretty much everything.

'nough said.

It writes code using libraries that don't exist.

Consultants are often brought out with a mandate to tell the company that the answer is X.

"Do the work, but the answer needs to be X"

I'm pretty sure they brought in some retired experts that were calling them out, brought them through the investigation, the findings, their analysis, and their thoughts for Artimis Ii, and they agreed that, yes, the decision made was sound.

Many others saying there's a problem haven't seen all the data, I wager.

The engineers said that the O-Rings were never tested down to those low temperatures, and didn't want the launch to do ahead.

They were overruled (effectively "by management").

After that disaster things changed drastically, basically putting everyone in a position to abort a flight.

I'm not sure it's fair to judge the designer on the ability of the builders to implement the design...

But, yes.

Why does everything seems to be "historic" these days...? Especially so the stuff that's already been done before.

It's a great mission and I'm looking forward to it and I really hope it all goes well. I'm delighted that man is finally going back to the Moon.

But it's hardly a "historic" thing again. It's been done already. Several times.

Inserts hand into ass.
Pulls out prediction.