KDE 3.5.4 Released 65
Carewolf writes "While KDE4 is pushing ahead the stable KDE 3.5 branch is also seeing quite some development and new features. Today KDE 3.5.4 was released, with improved removable device support, speed optimization and many bug fixes. Among the bug fixes is of course a fix to layout the new slashdot sidebar properly in Konqueror. The story is also carried on The Dot."
What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:3, Interesting)
That said, I'm still emerging it today.
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2)
It has its advantages and disadvantages, just like any distro.
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:3, Insightful)
> I love the UI and basic apps, and I like select apps from each package, but the vast
> majority of it is a waste of space for me.
With todays large harddisks this is hardly any problem, and not worth the package maintainers
time to split the packages into even more packages.
> That said, I'm still emerging it today.
If you are so concerned with waste of space, why do you build KDE
and dependant libraries by you
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2)
Not many people care about disk space. But do you really want to download and compile a whole collection of packages whenever a tiny bug is fixed anywhere in that collection?
I only use KWordQuiz from the KDE Education collection. That's ~500KB. I don't want to download and compile ~30MB of source whenever a bug is fixed in any of the applications in th
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2)
It's not me that's having the issue, I'm merely responding to somebody that was saying that having everything lumped into one big package is fine because everybody has lots of disk space.
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:1)
the packages have various options (like KDE using Samba or CUPS) to
help third party dependencies.
Another poster wrote that Gentoo have split up the official KDE packages into
individual applications, really, I would not maintain such packages, but hey,
it's not me to decide their time spending
But people that complain about KDE size and them does an "emerge" does not
get much sympathy from me....
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:1)
Why not use the precompiled packages made by your favourite *BSD or Linux
package maintainer when they are available?
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2)
> time to split the packages into even more packages.
They already are
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kde-split-ebuilds.xm
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:3, Informative)
Look at the kde-meta ebuilds, they split kde up into all of it's constituent apps, so you can emerge konqueror seperately etc...
If you emerge kde-meta, you get the entire of kde, but as seperate packages so you can remove unwanted ones later.
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:1)
Try to actually do something, and in my general experience, anything under 512MB of RAM is unacceptable[1].
And by "someth
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:2)
Re:What will make KDE the perfect desktop... (Score:1)
Argh... (Score:1, Offtopic)
Oh well
Re:Argh... (Score:5, Funny)
I wonder how long it will take before (Score:1)
Re:I wonder how long it will take before (Score:2)
I hate to disappoint you, but I just installed KDE 3.5.4-2 from the offical Debian "Sid" repositories last night. It would seem that your complaint against Debian's package management is unfounded, at least for the desktop-oriented releases. Perhaps you were trying to run a desktop system out of the "stable" (server-oriented) repository? "Testing" and "unstable" are
Re:I wonder how long it will take before (Score:2)
Re:I wonder how long it will take before (Score:2)
Perhaps that's true for some systems. I wouldn't know, since I've been running (more or less) my current installation without incident from Sid for four or five years now, w
Re:I wonder how long it will take before (Score:1)
Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:5, Insightful)
What do you mean? Konqueror has had good user stylesheet support for years. Settings | Configure Konqueror | Stylesheets. You can specify your own user stylesheet, or there's a dialog box to set up a new stylesheet in a user-friendly manner.
Speaking of CSS, this new version has improved support for various parts of CSS 3. In particular, as far as I know, no other browser has implemented the CSS 3 replaced content model yet, which is one thing that can singlehandedly wipe out massive amounts of unnecessary HTML and JavaScript for things like rounded corners, image replacement, etc.
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:2)
Opera have supported replaced content for a few years. Btw, supporting it leads to stupid bugs: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130689 [kde.org]
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:2, Insightful)
Of course. But that's mostly because you don't use konqueror for editing.
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:3, Insightful)
Why not. It's a file manager and god knows what else, they might as well add it.
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:2)
You're right, it used to be called -replace and -o-replace [blooberry.com]. Thanks for the pointer.
I have to disagree there. I don't know what the web designer was thinking, but he was adding generated content to an <i> element and expecting it not to be rendered because CSS 2 limits generated content to the :before and :after pseudo-elements. Of course, CSS 3 doesn't have this limitation, so the content is r
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:2)
Well that and border-radius, but I can wait for that.
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:2)
Agreed, that's useful. The disappointing thing is that this is something that web developers can fix, without waiting for browser support, simply by adding a CSS signature [incutio.com] to their sites. Usually web developers are stuck waiting for browser support, but in this case they are not and there's really no excuse not to include them.
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:2)
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:2)
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:5, Interesting)
Seriously. Once you get used to directly dropping files from an obex:/ Bluetooth folder to an sftp:/ folder, or from an audiocd:/ Compact Disc to a Samba share.. you'll never want to go back. Ever.
You forgot... (Score:3, Informative)
... fish:/
If you work with a bunch of Unixish boxes like I do (mostly Linux, but with some Solaris, Mac OS X, etc.) the fish:/ kioslave is the best thing since sliced bread.
For those who don't know about it, if you type fish://hostname in konqueror's location bar, it opens a file browser on your home directory on the referenced machine. The implementation uses SSH plus common Unix command line utilities like 'ls', so it works with any remote host running an SSH server with the basic utilities.
Even be
Re:You forgot... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:You forgot... (Score:2)
Get yourself a breadmaker. I can recommend Panasonic -- I've had mine four years and it's still going strong. A sachet of instant dried yeast, strong flour (2 parts white to 1 part wholemeal; too much wholemeal has trouble rising, even on the dedicated slow wholemeal programme, whereas too little lacks flavour), 3
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:3, Interesting)
Seriously. Once you get used to directly dropping files from an obex:/ Bluetooth folder to an sftp:/ folder, or from an audiocd:/ Compact Disc to a Samba share.. you'll never want to go back. Ever.
Yep. Also, the lack of KWallet support is highly irritating (to me, anyway). What good is a centralized secure password storage system if the application that most frequently need
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Wow, they're actually _doing_ something (Score:2)
kde mirrors (Score:2, Informative)
A GNOME user converts. (Score:4, Insightful)
Besides the fact that Kubuntu as a whole is far more stable than Fedora Core, it should also be noted that Kubuntu includes a highly-integrated distribution of KDE. I was somewhat skeptical at first about the change. After all, GNOME had been working for for me (or so I thought) for years. It allowed me to get my work done in a timely manner. But for the sake of exploration, I decided to make use of KDE. And what a grand decision that was!
It soon became apparent to me that KDE is of a higher quality design and implementation than GNOME. I'm not suggesting that the GNOME developers are incompetent or lousy programmers. It seems to be more a case of KDE using the right tools for the right job: they use C++ directly, rather than trying to craft their own unnatural OO subsystem and framework in pure C as is done by GNOME. Second, I found that Qt was a far faster, more responsive toolkit than GTK+. Windows would redraw faster, and in general the GUI felt far more responsive.
I also find the KDE applications to be superior to their GNOME equivalents. The Kate text editor offers more functionality than that of gedit, while also feeling far more responsive on the same hardware, and consuming far fewer resources. Konqueror is another major success story. It renders much quicker than Gecko, and thus is a much more enjoyable browser to use than Firefox, Galeon2, or Epiphany.
While I have no regrets over the years I spent with GNOME, I am glad I have switched to KDE. What was a very enjoyable experience with desktop Linux using GNOME has become a completely fantastic one now that I'm using KDE. My productivity has skyrocketed, too. What would take me an hour to do with GNOME tools, I can often get done in 45 minutes while using KDE. Overall, it's been a very remarkable experience switching to KDE. It's something I recommend for all Linux and UNIX users to do.
Re:A GNOME user converts. (Score:1)
Re:A GNOME user converts. (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:A GNOME user converts. (Score:3, Informative)
FYI - Fast user switching is in fact available in KDE. It just launches a new kdm session on a new X display and optionally locks the current one. Works just fine for me.
Most of the other stuff are just applications - I use evince all the time on KDE. I don't care what set of widgets an app uses so much as how the overall window-manager and integrated app
Re:A GNOME user converts. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:A GNOME user converts. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:A GNOME user converts. (Score:2)
Warning to Kubuntu Dapper users! (Score:5, Informative)
Use aptitude (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Warning to Kubuntu Dapper users! (Score:2)
Well, there is always TWM if KDE craps out