Finding Friends Via Search Query Analysis 190
prostoalex writes "How many times have you met an interesting person, who happened to check out the same book in the library, or listen to the same music as you do? Researchers from University of Chicago suggest that it would be kinda cool if you could find like-minded people by analyzing the queries submitted to a Web search engine. Their PDF paper explains the research in more detail."
Bob? (Score:5, Funny)
Sounds like stalking to me ;) (Score:5, Funny)
What, no I'm not a stalker...
What do you mean.... Hello?... Hello?
Re:Sounds like stalking to me ;) (Score:2, Insightful)
It's all a matter of perspective.
Re:Sounds like stalking to me ;) (Score:4, Interesting)
I don't know if it's for real, but if it is, it disturbs me.
Re:Sounds like stalking to me ;) (Score:2)
Re:Sounds like stalking to me ;) (Score:2)
"You can't stalk her.
But we can."
Re:Sounds like stalking to me ;) (Score:2)
Happened to me with Natalie! (Score:3, Funny)
Hi Natalie Portman,
I realized by monitoring your searching habits that we have sooo much in common...i too am an only child. i too have been a vegetarian since the age of 8. i too became a vegetarian because i saw a demonstration of laser surgey on a chicken at a medical conference with my father. i too can speak fleuent Hebrew, French, and Japanese. i too have hobbies such as : Dancing, Reading, Writing, Acting, Ice-skating Can we please one day get together and watch Friends and Ellen together??
pur
Re:Happened to me with Natalie! (Score:1)
info here : Slashdot trolling phenomena [wikipedia.org]
Um... ya (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps I'm missing something.
Re:Um... ya (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Um... ya (Score:2, Funny)
Good point, but it doesn't exactly matter. (Score:5, Funny)
Spot on (Score:4, Funny)
Right.
If we do it to get a date, it's good.
Right again.
Perhaps I'm missing something.
Nope, you've got it just fine!
Of course. (Score:4, Funny)
If the government wants to screw you, its bad.
If an attractive member of the opposite sex wants to screw you, its good.
If an attractive member of the same sex wants to screw you, um... I leave that for you to decide.
END COMMUNICATION
Re:Um... ya (Score:3, Insightful)
What about referers? (Score:5, Interesting)
Talk about coincidence... I met someone <wink wink> less than 50 miles from me, who linked to an obscure page on my web site.
Re:What about referers? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What about referers? (Score:4, Funny)
Old news (Score:5, Funny)
coming soon.. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:coming soon.. (Score:2)
better way of doing it (Score:2)
Re:coming soon.. (Score:2)
same yet different (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:same yet different (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't think I could be friends with someone just like me.
Amen, brother! (Score:5, Interesting)
I work in a pretty small IT shop and I'm the only one that does what I do, the rest have other specialties. When I'm in situations where I'm immersed in other IT people like myself I always remark on how much I *dislike* those people, even though we share a lot of the same interests.
I find the same thing to be true in a lot of areas -- a lot of the people that I find that like X I don't like, even though we both like X.
The people I do like and spend time with have more subtle and abstract similarities from a personality perspective, and in ordinary ways are quite different from me, which is usually a good thing.
I find what interests me in people is uniqueness of perspective and depth of feeling. People with John Q. Public opinions and no feeling about them don't turn me on. People that feel passionately about something unusual I find fascinating, even if I find their opinions unappealing.
I'm familiar with someone who embraces a lot of pretty scary far-right attitudes on politics, race, and so on, but he's capable of explaining them in an intelligent and thoughtful way. At the end of the day I disagree with him, but I still think he's very interesting.
Re:Amen, brother! (Score:2)
Well, geez. What's not to like? Network transparency? Established standards? Everybody likes X. Except these guys [slashdot.org].
Re:same yet different (Score:2)
Pardon my ignorance, but what the fuck does that mean, when translated into English?
I genuinely don't get the argot.
Nooo (Score:4, Interesting)
Also privacy, spam, etc. Don't want one guy who looked for porn one time to get sucked into 10 porn mailing lists or anything like that.
Re:Nooo (Score:1)
This will result in every porno watching person from perverts to pedophiles to unite into one large and dangerous organization.
Here, let me fix your post:
This will result in every porno watching person from perverts to pedophiles to unite into one large and easily identifiable organization.
I think that arresting the perverts and pedos can only be a Good Thing [tm]; don't you?
Re:Nooo (Score:3, Interesting)
Since when was being a pervert necessarily an illegal thing?
For that matter, neither is being a pedophile - since the definition according to dictionary.com is someone who is _attracted_ to a child or children. It's not illegal to be, just illegal to not resist the urges.
Re:Nooo (Score:1)
Re:Nooo (Score:1)
And I cannot believe you'd be in favour of forcing your medieval ideas on other sovereign states
medieval would be if we went in and took them over by force.
All that I am saying is that we should be more selective about who we do business with.
Would you consider it 'medieval' for me to want to choose who I want to pay a salary to, or to whom I want living in the apartments or houses that I personally own?
I don't think most slashdotters would, so why is the idea of being selective about which countries
Re:Nooo (Score:2, Insightful)
Guess what: the vast, vast majority of relationships of this nature are not abusive at all. No one is denying that forced sex (including that which involves sodomy) is a crime. That has nothing to do with what I'm talking about here. Your assertion that sodomy is morally wrong is what I'm denying, NOT the assertion that abusive sexual relationshi
Re:Nooo (Score:2, Insightful)
For many years, for reasons of my own, I've given money to a women's rape crisis shelter. Obviously, there's no way I would ever condone sexual abuse of any kind; I've made a substantial, material committment against it. So don't think
Re:Nooo (Score:2)
Could you please rephrase.
Re:Nooo (Score:2)
OT:I believe that our children would prefer THAT (Score:3, Insightful)
It may have been originally settled by Puritans, but they weren't the only ones here when the constitution was created. In fact, the constitution expressly forbids discrimination over religion.
If this were simply a christian nation, there would be only one legal religion here.
Of course, this is WAY off topic.
I don't think so (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I don't think so (Score:2, Interesting)
Um... wait.. that's even more gross. Or is it?
You decide.
social engineering (Score:5, Funny)
Of course, this is only a suggestion and nothing that I'd actually do myself; I'm more the stalker type.
Re:social engineering (Score:2)
Re:social engineering (Score:2)
AudioScrobbler (Score:5, Informative)
(see my audioscrobbler [audioscrobbler.com]>
Expand your tastes? (Score:2)
*insert current group that's popular with the urban kids today.
Re:Expand your tastes? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:AudioScrobbler (Score:2)
Triv
Yeah, but... (Score:3, Funny)
Lots of sites use the old Firefly technology or something similar to project what you might like by comparing you to other people who currently have similar tastes. Amazon.com actually allows you to rate products that they recommend if you already own them. This gives them even more information to try to guess stuff they could sell you.
Looking for love. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Looking for love. (Score:1, Funny)
What a relief (Score:4, Funny)
Computerized dating service (Score:2, Funny)
if computers could make babies, id just want a computer dating server. beautiful full tower looking for same cpu mate. contact mw at 10.2.2.2
-foxxz
sounds like it could be cool (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:sounds like it could be cool (Score:2)
wonderful (Score:1)
Finding Friends Via Search Query Analysis (Score:2, Insightful)
Friends Forever or Partners in Crime? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Friends Forever or Partners in Crime? (Score:2)
Re:Friends Forever or Partners in Crime? (Score:2)
How to meet that special someone (Score:1, Funny)
No, No - not really a good idea. (Score:5, Funny)
-josh
Re:No, No - not really a good idea. (Score:2)
It's interesting that, like, six sponsored site links popped up for that, though. I think that's the largest number I've ever seen..
Re:No, No - not really a good idea. (Score:3, Funny)
Just a distraction... (Score:2)
Sample search (Score:2)
Results : 120323000 unique results
Identical members mapping: 23,00300 [slashdot.org]
How is this better? (Score:2, Insightful)
porn? (Score:4, Funny)
Re:porn? (Score:1)
Zero times. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Zero times. (Score:2)
Then again, I don't meet very many people. Maybe I just need to get out more and find folks that do have similar interests. Although, I wonder if they'd be as terribly boring as I am.
Re:Zero times. (Score:2)
Zero times so far. But every day I set my stool in front of that book and watch it to see if someone will check it out. The librarian made me turn off my music, so nobody else listens to the same music as I do.
Mediachest Let's You See What Your Friends Own (Score:4, Informative)
The relevancy here is that because your collection is in the site's database, you have the ability to find other people with similiar interests and those can be narrowed down to people local to you (close to a certain postal code). It even lets you find like minded people based on what school you go to.
This would be weird. (Score:2)
Re:This would be weird. (Score:2, Funny)
Will I be the first to say (Score:1)
Getting to know you... (Score:1)
Naked Fishing Lady (Score:3, Interesting)
Then, there would be the guy who would search for "Windows sucks Linux roolz" and you'd wish you could start chatting with him.
But finally I made my own website, and now I can search the referrer logs (hint: grep for "?query=" b/c it seems a pretty common referrer string) for funny searches. My favourite was someone searching for pictures of naked women fishing. Is there some popular naked women fishing fetish out there or something? I'd never heard of it. But the searches kept bringing up my pages, and people kept clicking through.
Re:Naked Fishing Lady (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Naked Fishing Lady (Score:2)
Exclude Altavista, though, or you'll be getting a lot of false positives from Webcollage.
Re:Naked Fishing Lady (Score:2)
Good idea for Asian countries (Score:1)
I would like to see a web sight that is much the same, but with a "Hot-or-Not" option to help find girls that I like.
somewhere (Score:2, Redundant)
attractive women everywhere weep
as if this is a good thing
anonymity is much beter than anything this tech can do
Google Labs dating service... (Score:3, Funny)
Of course, I really don't want to meet the woman who's doing the same kind of searches I do... ewww.
Or, check your web server log (Score:2)
And for those without a website, or a shitty one, there's Meetup.com [meetup.com].
Funny how scientist think it would be cool do something we've all be doing for years already.
Similar feature in LiveJournal (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Similar feature in LiveJournal (Score:2)
The intelligent thing (Score:4, Funny)
If you're looking for a date you should search for opposite subject matter.
Imagine typing:
"Hot 20yo blond chick"
and getting matched up with others looking for the same thing?
You'd want to type "geeky nerd with a slightly smelly pile in the back of his room". Bound to find a soulmate if someone matches up with that...
That's why it works so well for college roomates (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:That's why it works so well for college roomate (Score:2)
Let's say that you match 100% with student A, and less than 80% with everybody else. Somebody else also matches 100% with student A and 80% or less with everybody else. Who gets to room with student A? Or, another way to look at it: you have 3 perfect matches, but only two can fit in a room. Somebody has to be left out in the cold. I also suspect that whatever the college used to match room-mates was something less than optimal. No doubt, those forms were scrupulously analyzed by the same highly dedi
nice (Score:2)
friendster (Score:1)
It's a kind of interesting site to meet people and it shows how you are connected to others on the site through your friends.
Friendster [friendster.com] tells you what city someone lives in and lists some favorite books, movies tv shows etc.
So far there are only 3 Canadians on friendster, but there are lots from Tulsa OK.
Already in practice...mostly (Score:2)
Newsgroups, mailing lists, book clubs, amazon.com...
All of them are opt-in sort of communities and are just fine for meeting like minded people and trolls. The only advantage another system has is if it's involuntary, which sucks.
Time to set up those off shore anonymous remailers and dust off my foil hat. I'm first in line for cmdrtaco@leavemethehellalone.cx.
Government (Score:1)
Find peer (or mentor or coach) matchmaking service (Score:3, Interesting)
wiki page on such a service but at 10 hits from google in 4 months maybe it is not worth more investigation without more marketing!
Most newsgroups and slashdot items seldom lead to interesting one on one discussion except perhaps for aggressive self opinionated 'experts' (allegedly).
FYI I may have time for some one on one discussion but not necessarily to join an open source programming project, and the local linux group does not seem approachable enough for this purpose. Also the peer development may not necessarily be in the computing field.
Signed a meek want-to-be peer developed with 10 years developer experience.
Miss Fitzhenry? (Score:2)
But seriously, the only people I'll be stuck meeting are ones who can't spell
Too many common interests not good though (Score:2)
I'm fortunate to work and live with a group of people with whom I have just enough interests in common. And, despite the obsolete sexism and general lack of PC, I rather liked Ogden Nash's observation that it didn't hurt for husband and wife to be a little incompatible, provided he had income and she was pattable. How do we analyse for
BlogMatcher (Score:2)
Is this a dupe? (Score:2)
sillyest idea yet... (Score:2)
Eh, to be precise: NEVER!
I meet people in a number of ways, but not by my shopping habits (unless you count beer). Can anyone seriously say that they have met a friend by choosing the same item in a shop (or library, etc...)
Researchers from University of Chicago suggest that it would be kinda cool if you could find like-minded people by analyzing the queries