Are Rebates Scandalous? 685
theodp asks: "Motley Fool offers a dead-on take on the computer mail-in rebate fulfillment process--Once I receive your 'claim,' I will begin to 'process' it. Assuming that you filled out all the information correctly, and assuming nothing is missing, and assuming your claim doesn't get lost somehow, and if you call or write a few times to check on your claim's status, then I will mail your check within 10 to 12 weeks. Maybe. Or maybe it'll be four to six months. Or never." What are your thoughts on rebates, and have any of you noticed who, at least in the computing industry, is more trustworthy with rebates than others?
Update by J :
Here's the
short version
of the article.
rebates are a total waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
I must say that my buying life has been much, much less stressful and guilt-free since I adopted the position that rebates simply don't exist. Whatever the non-rebate price is, that's my price and my choice to buy it or not will based on that, not the mythical rebate/smail spam sign up that won't ever actually happen.
Rebates suck.
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:5, Interesting)
PNY -- Denied both rebates. Reason? They paid a rebate for ram for me before. Even though it was a completely different rebate offer on a different kind of ram and it was ages ago. I expected them to pay at least one of them. A year ago (or more) they paid a rebate in about 7 weeks. Not a lot of money.
CyneDyne -- Sent in Dec 11, heard nothing, call
Jensen (speakers) -- Sent in in November. They claim they recieved nothing. I sent them the origional reciept as per their rq, and didn't make a photocopy of it because I didn't figure I would need it. Not much I can do about it. Ripped off for $40.
Going to have to send this stuff registered mail if I ever bother with it again. I prefer just to buy online with no rebates. Less hassle, more honest. I wish I had instead of visiting Best Buy, Office Depot..etc
I'm 0 for 4 with xmas/yule rebates. That's not good, and it wasn't this bad a couple years ago.
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:3, Insightful)
Sent in both rebates with 1 receipt in 1 envelope.
Got 2 checks in 2 envelopes about 6 months later. Little late, but no hassle. I haven't even recieved any snail-spam from them either. Definately a plus for them when I look to buy more hard drives in the future [assuming it's not to replace the ones I bought that've been running well for 3 years now]
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:3, Funny)
2. Cut out rebate form and UPC.
3. Send everything in.
4. Wait.
5. Wait.
6. Wait.
7. Complain.
8. Wait.
9. Complain.
10. ??????
11. Profit!
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:3, Interesting)
1- Buy a bunch of crap.
2- Cut out rebate form and UPC
3- Make copies
4- Fill out little "return receipt required" form at the PO and pay a buck or so more
5- Send in.
6- Wait 2 weeks to a month
7- Recieve check.
8- Let check sit on my desk until it is almost bad, then make a mad rush to the bank to cash it.
If you send them in with proof that they were sent in, the person doing the signing doesn't want to get in trouble, and ensures that it is processed.
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:2)
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:3, Informative)
You might be wondering "why are the fufilment centers located in minneosta?" they could find cheap, reasonably reliable labor up here, when they decided to build a rebate fufilment center. Or maybe they got a tax break from the state to locate her
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:5, Interesting)
Actually, I'm pretty sure most people would pay a few dollars more to avoid dealing with rebates (depends on the total price of course, $2 more on a $5 item is significant; $2 more on $100 isn't). Do the math including the stamp, emvelope, your time, the time value of money (I use 6% these days, sigh for the good ol 20% days), and make an informed decision rather than boycotting anything (which, to me, smacks of blind rejection, which seems about as smart as blind acceptance). Anyway, that's really not a way to combat anything -- it's common sense (admittedly less common than the name would imply though, so I could be wrong). It's not really a boycott either.
I use rebates (and price matches, BVG from amex, and cashback systems from places like ebates) extensively. I get a lot of heavily discounted (occasionally free) goods (and yes, goods that I wanted anyway) by using the awesome info available on the web at places like hot-deals.org and fatwallet.com.
A quick quicken check tells me that I sent in more than $1700 in rebates last year, and I've received all but $90. The ones I didn't get were from companies that I've never heard of (and possibly no longer, or never did, exist).
Rather than assume all rebates have a value = $0, I calculate a modifed rebate price by multiplying the rebate value by a factor less than 1.0 that I assign to that company. Intel/AMD/Dell companies with something in their name they might want to lose get close to a 1.0. Imation/Buslink/UltraWiz companies I've never (or barely) heard of get close to a 0.0. Others usually get something in between.
BTW, that $90 will be recouped somewhat by claiming it as a 'bad debt' on my tax return (which I still haven't completed, unfortunately) -- if you have a business, you can do that too. Though of course IANAL, consult your tax professional, close cover before striking . . .
I guess my point in this long post is: assuming all rebates are worthless is as unwise as assuming all are worth face value.
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:4, Insightful)
In both cases you get $2, why is this scale factor involved? There's really no obvious logical reason to prefer one vs the other.
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:rebates are NOT a total waste of time (Score:5, Insightful)
Also, how to prevent information from being sold ? You can't, but how do you deal with potential SPAM ? Each company gets their own rebate address. Also the only company that really seems to sell information is Staples.
I've gone out now 3 years now, and spent over 1500 and gotten 1200 of it back. (and I DO track my rebates).
What people are probably doing (not doing ?) is following the instructions EXACTLY so of course they get screwed.
The only products I won't buy now are Mad Dog (they keep screwing my rebates claiming a problem).
Re:rebates are NOT a total waste of time (Score:3, Interesting)
So what you're telling us is that over the past 3 years you have *loaned* several companies $1200, interest free.. and don't have a problem with that?
Re:rebates are NOT a total waste of time (Score:4, Insightful)
No. I think he was trying to say, in return for loaning those companies $1200, he has received discounts on goods and services.
Just suppose that he spent all of his money in year 1, and he could get a rate of 4.00% a month on this money, had he kept it:
Nominal Rate of Return: 4.00%
Investment Duration (Years): 3 years
Compounding Frequency: Monthly
Compounded Rate of Return: 12.73%
$1200 * 12.73% = $152.76 opportunity cost.
He obviously thought that $152.76 + $1500-$1200 = $452.76, was worth $1500 worth of goods and services.
Re:rebates are NOT a total waste of time (Score:3, Insightful)
Either it's "In order to purchase something here, you need to give us a $200 loan for 3 months" (the exact opposite of interest-free-credit, which is what most shops use)
Or, it's "Here's a computer for $1200, and by the way, we're lying about that price" which should certainly have the retailer shut-down by trading standards. The evidence in this article certainly indicates that they have little int
Re:rebates are NOT a total waste of time (Score:3, Funny)
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:2)
How is that the fault of the company? I'm a bit of a rebate junkie myself. I don't know why people complain about it being such a "hassle". How is writing your name and address on a piece of paper, sticking it in an envelope along with a copy of the receipt, and mailing it out a hassle? It takes what? 3 minutes tops? I can't remember the last time I paid more than tax + the cost of a stamp for a stack of blank CDRs. Some rebates are slower than others but I always
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:3, Insightful)
While there certainly is administrative record-keeping required to process rebates, it can't be much more than admini-trivia required to sell items in the first place. For a wholesaler, retail rebates of course mean a greater volume, but the process can largely be automated.
But your company manages to do the work required to sell the item in the first place, and it doesn't take you weeks to proce
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:2)
Also, a legend has it, that this rebate practice is slightly subsidized by the post-office as each rebate requires a stamp to be purchased.
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:5, Interesting)
Rebates are bad for consumers due to a number of reasons:
As you can see, it's a "no win" situation for us consumers. Unfortunately, this practice seems more and more common these days...
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:4, Insightful)
3. Rebate promotions always require you to cut out the UPC barcode from the original box. Many people throw the box away. Also, when you remove the barcode, it's a guarantee to the store that the merchandise WILL NOT BE RETURNED. I wonder if it lowers their insurance rates.
I'm not sure what stores you shop in, but usually the ones I shop in will take it back and refund all my money minus what I would be getting on the rebate. So once you receive your rebate, you've recouped your losses...Of course except if you don't depend on rebates, but then if you don't, you wouldn't go off tearing off UPC barcodes.
5. Who guarantees that rebates will ever be honored? A company can use rebates according to their cash flow. Lean times? Just delay (or throw-away) some rebate coupons. A quick way to make cash. If consumers complain, blame it on the postal office or some other force of nature.
Yeah, that's something to think about, but the *great* majority of the time, I get my rebates.
6. Did you notice that your rebate checks look just like ordinary printed propaganda? This is done on purpose, to increase the probability of the check being thrown away together with all the other bulk mail people receive. Moreover, those checks have a fairly short expiration date (Sometimes, one or two weeks after the date you receive the check).
...like ordinary printed propaganda...What in the world are you talking about? Rebate checks usually come in smaller than 4 1/8" x 9 1/2" (No. 10) envelopes, thick paper (and not see-through because of the "security sheet" that has a dark patterns), and perforated in 3 of the sides. As for the expiration date, 2 weeks? WTF? Yes I know the rebates take a long time to arrive, but when they do arrive, they are dated a few (4-5 days) prior and are usually valid for up to 90 days.
7. Loss. Yes, you can lose the checks after you get them. I've lost two (total = $70, ouch!).
How are rebates bad for consumers due to loss? I would say that's the customer's fault...stupid ones at that. If you loose your keys, is it too the dealership's fault?
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't return things very often, but I've never heard of such policies (not to say they don't exist). I used to work retail, and at our store our policy was that we would n
Re:rebates are a total waste of time (Score:4, Informative)
3. Then why have I seen 'open items' at 'best buy' with no UPC? Either A. an employee did it on mistake, or b. did it to pocket the mail-in rebate for themselves.
5. The government.
Remember that E-rebate company? the one that claimed to get you stuff for free after rebates and crap? Government shut those fuckers down, siezed thier assets, and did thier best to give the money they could back to victimized consumers.
Basically, if you're running a scam you've got about 6 months-1 year to try to get the money and run. All things considered rebate scams aren't the best scam option available. If you're crafty enough to design and run a rebate scam there are a plethora of more lucrative scams where you can rip off each victim for thousands instead of tens of dollars.
6.
It is against the law for them to refuse to honor the check within the first 90 days, and in some states that law is 6 months or even a full year.
It is against the law to 'pre-date' checks.
If they're 'holding' checks up from being mailed intentionally then they are again breaking the law.
Basically they're required to disclose how long thier check processing process takes, and if they're routinely holding checks longer than that, or have an obsurdly long process that causes checks to bet mailed way below the 90 day requirement then they're gonna get in trouble with someone -- if a disgruntled employee decides to rat them out.
7.
I've lost one $5 'rebate coupon' (store credit only, stupid menards) and one $10 check.
The former I knew about but I didn't have a need to go to menards, and the one time I did before it expired I didn't think about it until I got home and saw it sitting there. The latter got mixed up in junk mail, and when I finally found it was 6 months expired.
Rebates (Score:2)
Re:Rebates (Score:2)
Re:Rebates (Score:2)
Bad- I bought a Samsung 17" in aug,2002. Sent in the rebate form in nov(dec was the deadline). Called them up in jan to ask why the delay.
They had'nt received the form! I faxed the forms this time but since I was new to this rebate system I sent in the UPS shipping label instead of the UPC label. Called them up that day and they said they were going to process the forms and I should wait for a month. They did'nt tell me I sent the wrong label. Called up in April and they
manage them yourself... (Score:2)
right now for example i have $125 in pending rebates that are still within the 4-8 weeks 'processing' time... it's good to know.
Forget the Money and the Wait! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Forget the Money and the Wait! (Score:5, Funny)
1. Rip open all your junkmail and throw it on the floor.
2. Search through the mess for Business Reply Mail envelopes. Get them all.
3. Grab handfulls of the jumk mail and stuff it into the Business Reply Mail randomly. Apply tape as needed to maintain envelope integrity.
4. Mail the bulging Business Reply Mail envelopes (free and legal!)
5. Laugh your ass off.
Re:Forget the Money and the Wait! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Forget the Money and the Wait! (Score:4, Funny)
Ouch! That's nasty... I mean, the guys have lost their faces and/or names, and this guy's sending them stuff to read. That's cruel! How are they supposed to read anything without a face? I mean, usually eyes are located in upper part of the face and stuff.
Good and Bad... (Score:2, Informative)
Wonder how much collective interest companies earn by holding that money for 8-12 weeks...
I am the King of Rebates (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I am the King of Rebates (Score:2)
Here and now! Not later! (Score:5, Interesting)
So for that reason I don't like rebates. I like my savings at the register, not in my personal cash-flow analysis at the end of the quarter.
levine
Not worth my time (Score:2)
I don't think they are scandalous, by and large, but they are there to serve the manufacturer's marketing interests.
Re:Here and now! Not later! (Score:3, Funny)
Rebates are another scam (Score:5, Insightful)
Regarding computer-related rebates, they are even worse. I bought some CDR media that was "$2 after $10 rebate". I had a weak moment and figured it was worth the $10. The Best Buy receipt offered a way to file your rebate request online. I thought, great! Mailing rebate requests is sure lame!
So I go to punch in the rebate information and am presented with a page that I can print and USPS mail in.
Completely worthless, except now some additinoal "rebate processor" company also has my information.
Re:Rebates are another scam (Score:5, Insightful)
Personally, I'm pretty religious about sending in my rebates and have only ever had good results. Of course, if everyone did that they'd stop offering them, so for all you folks that don't send in your rebates, thanks!
Re:Rebates are another scam (Score:2, Redundant)
A lot of people forget or are too lazy to mail in rebates, which means more money for the company.
Re:Rebates are another scam (Score:2)
So? I mean, so long as we're clear that's what they're doing and are ok with it, what's the problem?
There's no other reason for them not to do rebates at the POS/cash register.
Actually, another legitimate use of rebates is as a method of a company to borrow very short term money. Again, the rebate form says right on it how long its going to take, so what's the problem?
Completel
People are lazy! (Score:2)
They're buying your personal information so they can either use it to fill your mailbox with their junk or everyone's junk. There's no other reason for them not to do rebates at the POS/cash register.
Are you crazy? There's a big reason: most people are so damn lazy and/or disorganized that they never send in their rebate. If companies gave the rebate right there at the cash register without the customer doing anything, they would HAVE TO pay out the bucks. I'd be interested in seeing statistics on ho
Re:Rebates are another scam (Score:2)
Get over it. (Score:3, Insightful)
They send you a check in return for the marketing information that you provide them. If they don't send a check, complain until they do. How is this a scandal, again?
Bah (Score:2)
And about the rebates -- I was once promised a 10% refund by Sears for getting a $700-ish washer/dryer combo. I got $30 back, because only ONE of the appliances was $400. Incredible. If they're going to give a rebate, I think it should be done right away. Or just have the price lower in the first plac
Yes, these are pure fraud!! (Score:2, Interesting)
Ever notice when they send the check back to you it never says what the original item you bought was? This is so you cannot be pissed at the store or manufacturer because it took forever!!
Boycott teh mail in rebatez!!!!!!!!!!1
The followup article (Score:5, Informative)
Part II [fool.com]
Some links (Score:5, Informative)
I would recommend Dell, Amazon.com and Viking Components for rebate deals - never had problems with either one of those, and just got another $50 Dell Axim rebate in the mail today. The rules are always clear, the fulfillment is on time.
The whole rebate thing does strike me as odd - if they can pay you back the money, why not lower the price right there in the store? You still have to pay state sales tax on the before-rebate price.
Re:Some links (Score:2)
Would definitely be nice if other companies handled their rebate promotions in the same manner
Re:Some links (Score:3, Interesting)
I can afford that 20" monitor because of the lazy/forgetful or those who can't be bothered. I salute you!
Re:Some links (Score:5, Insightful)
It called Marketing. As the resident evil capitalist, please allow me to explain...
1. They can be used to 'not' lower the price for price matching policies. "Yea, you bought it last week but the price is still $100, we just have a rebate. We can't give you the rebate if you bought then."
2. They can be used to make people think that the factory is giving us this money, its not that we are overcharging you the rest of the time. "Its $100, before a $50 rebate, but we would lose money if we sold it for $50" Really, Im not making it up. I get paid for this stuff.
3. Sense of urgency. Its for a limited time only. This is true for all sales, but with rebates, the message, and response is stronger. "act now or miss out".
4. Convenience. Rebates are dubious at best, but with an 'instant rebate' you know you can't get ripped off. So its a better value, because there is no risk. Even though it IS the same as reducing the price, it is called "transfering the risk" to the seller, instead of to you. It works.
5. Its a different kind of sale. All sales are good. Very often, an instant rebate is used on NEW items at their introductory price. IE: This item is $150 with a $50 instant rebate. After the rebate is gone, we put it on sale for $100.
Its all marketing, thats all. The above may not make sense to some of you. Good. Thats the idea. Many of you will smugly say that the above is stupid. Thats good, too. The more 'stupid' you think these sales tricks are, the more likely you are to fall for them. I'm not making it up either, it REALLY does work that way. But that is why they (we) do instant rebates: Because it works very very well, especially for quazi impulse purchases.
Remember boys and girls, you do NOT have to be evil to be in Marketing, but it helps.
States might be slow to respond on the issue... (Score:2)
Rebates are a calculated bet to fool consumers (Score:5, Interesting)
However, they *know* that most people: (1) forget to send them, (2) lose them, (3) fill them incorrectly (even a misspell of a city name is "wrong" for them, (4) or simply cannot fill them because the box where the product came in (and that had the barcode scan number on it) has been long gone in the trash.
In other words, it's a way for them to screw you. I have to admit I only received *one* check in my entire life out of a rebate, and it arrived so long after the purchase that I had already forgotten about it.
My thought is that any self-respected company who *trully* cares about customers, should simply drop rebates and lower the price of the products (even if not by as much as the value of the actual rebates).
Microsoft (Score:2)
I also submitted a rebate to Amazon a little while back... haven't been home to check the mail (I'm at a university on the other side of the country), so I don't know if I got the check from them or not.
For a company, rebates are wonderful. (Score:5, Insightful)
Curiously enough, these are much the same set of reasons that a rebate is bad for the consumer.
There is one other bad thing about rebates from a consumer's point of view: you pay sales tax on the non-discounted price of the item.
Rebates are a profit mechanism (Score:2)
Then there are the deals that are "too good to be true" like the $20 product - $2
Best advice from article ... (Score:3, Informative)
Another reason why.... (Score:2, Informative)
Store rebates encourage me to buy via mail order (Score:5, Informative)
I can't help wondering whether these rebate processing companies aren't a variant of the coupon fraud crooks, where criminals gather those grocery store coupons and submit them for credit without anyone actually buying any items. al-Qaeda is/was involved in those. "When big corporations use rebates, they're funding terrorism!" (cue scary music...)
I'll give Best Buy credit for having the best rebate system out there. They print out separate "rebate receipts" and rebate forms at the cash register. I emailed them a complaint about the racks of rebate forms they used to have at their stores so I'd like to think I had something to do with that, even though they didn't quite get the hint that rebates in general are fscking repulsive. I think I've received every rebate since they started their new system though, averaging 2 months turnaround time.
Dell Canada is Very Bad (Score:2)
Mostly Good Luck (Score:2)
One was for a M$ sidewinder game pad... check came. Never got any form of spam.
One was for Covad to refund my installation ($100!!). Of course, the agent said it was still valid when the rebate clearly said it expired months ago. However, wrote a false date on the form, sent it
I Know I'm Lazy... (Score:2)
Usually this means buying the $40 spindle of CDR instead of the $50 with a $20 rebate.
There are occasional offers worth it. Once bought a PowerBook that got me a free PCMCIA modem if I sent in the magic post card. Though, I would have bought that anyway.
Don't respond to Rebate. Ever. (Score:2)
I have sent in ~10 rebates in my life.
I have received: Zero.
And once you've sent your rebate, guess what? You can't even prove that you ever actually bought it, let alone that you sent off for a rebate.
It doesnt matter if there's some honest rebates out there- the system is set up like fraud, no way to check, no way to prove, and no system in place making sure t
Worst Buy Ad Fraud (Score:2, Informative)
Rebates are a scam (Score:2)
Be Careful (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Be Careful (Score:3, Interesting)
You could also try to have the store charged with fradulent advertising. If they publish a rebate that you cannot possibly collect on, then the FTC or other local consumer rights groups should get involved.
Maybe it's just luck... (Score:2)
Yeah, they take forever. But isn't it a nice suprise to get a check you have totally forgotten about?
Assuming you don't toss it in the trash, they're usually not well marked.
Never noticed a substantial increase in junk mail or phone solicitations.
Rebates (Score:2)
I don't know specifically which companies have screwed others over (if they even have; I'm sure a lot of it is sheer exaggeration) but I can vouch for D-Link. I got a rebate on my cable modem from them, and damn promptly.
Large rebates? (Score:3, Interesting)
Thats a $70 rebate. Uh, I don't think so. I made the guy go verify the price, and he told me, with a straight face, that it was a $70 rebate.
So, I buy something else with a $14 rebate (I forget now what it was its been so long). And this check finally shows up, made out to 'UNKNOWN'. How am I supposed to cash a check made out to 'UNKNOWN"?
Rebates are a scam.
Tricks (Score:5, Informative)
There should be a law (Score:3, Interesting)
The form for my rebate... (Score:3, Funny)
Lexmark (Score:3, Informative)
big rebates were ok with HP (Score:3, Informative)
Frys has been the worst for me (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Frys has been the worst for me (Score:3, Funny)
I had the same problem with Motorola twice! Here's the real kicker, both times I received the notice after the rebate period was over. Furthermore, the "missing" part was the barcode from the box. Each time, they returned the contents of the envelope I sent the rebate in. And here's the real kicker, both times the damn barcode was included in the stuff they returned!!!
Other reason: price differentiation (Score:5, Insightful)
That reason is price differentiation. If the company charges a high price, they sell few units at a high margin; a low price means more units a lower margin. By introducing these coupon schemes, they can charge different prices for the same product. Price-sensitive customers go through the trouble of filling in the coupons, insensitive ones don't. It is the best of both worlds!
Another example of price differentiation is university tuition. There it is called "financial aid" - a scheme clearly designed to make everyone pay exactly what they can afford (note: I am not saying that there is something wrong with financial aid; I am just pointing out that it is very much in the financial interest of the universities).
Tor
There should be a special place in hell... (Score:4, Interesting)
Basically it's an interest-free loan to the vendor. You get to pay sales tax on the pre-rebate price, and then have to jump through hoops to maybe get the rebate months later.
The store ought to be required to hand you the rebate at the time of purchase, or submit the information electronically at the time of purchase...but then they'd actually have to give you the money, wouldn't they? Stores can take rebates and use them for reaction mass, as far as I'm concerned.
How to get a rebate on time EVERY time (Score:5, Interesting)
"Thank you for processing my rebate. I have marked my calendar to receive my rebate no later than (2 months to the day I mailed it.)" = Fill in () appropriately.
Just below this type your information from the receipt including SKU numbers, your mailing address and store of purchase plus how much you are expecting. Printing an actual two month calendar and highlighting the day of rebate is a nice touch.
I will gaurantee you will not have another "missing" rebate. They think, "looks like this guy would sue over a $5 rebate, we better get it right"
A buddy of mine goes a step further and puts:
"Consumer protection laws in my state require that rebates be processed in 8 weeks"
Re:How to get a rebate on time EVERY time (Score:3, Funny)
they think "Hey this is a nice guy, lets send him the rebate promptly"
From the Inside (Score:5, Informative)
Most of the stories I've heard are largely due to the incompetence of the home workers (many of whom do not speak english as a first language) that basically open the envelopes and enter all the relevant data. Their pay? US$0.08 an entry. Not the highest pay around--working dilligently and competently this comes out to about $10/hour.
The reason it takes 10 - 12 weeks is that CPG will usually invoice the company they're contracted with at the end of the month and there's considerable turnaround time. Costco, on the other hand, directly wires the rebate money to CPG--I got my $2 Dove soap rebate a couple of weeks after I mailed it in. Another reason to shop at Costco.
My friend works the phones at CPG and basically the problems that he handles with regards to Dell are data entry errors. From this I derive that it's best to type your application
Also, he sees a lot of situations in which the rebate didn't apply to the customer for whatever reason because a pushy uninformed Dell phonemonkey just wanted to get off the line and close the sale. Make sure that the product you're getting actually has an applicable rebate. Just another reason to not listen to salespeople and by your stuff online.
I didn't tell you this, but most rebates can be reissued for $20 and under cashed or not because it's too much trouble for CPG and their clients to work the specifics out of actually sending out a STOP payment. Get double the rebate simply by calling them and inventing some story.
The average rebate takes ten or so weeks to process, so mark that window on your calendar and a halfway point to remind yourself in a month to call up and check on the status of the rebate by calling up the 800 number.
Most of what the article bitches about is largely just symptomatic of lazy people forgetting receipts and the rebate itself. If the money is important to you, don't forget stuff. Don't throw anything away until you have confirmation that the rebate is on its way or you actually have the check in hand. It's not that difficult to stow a box in the garage.
Keep on top of things and you should have no problem... I got dicked by Ericsson for a hundred bucks because of some missing paper and by the time I called the window expired--this is what you get when you expect the rebate to come without problems! They of course said they sent a letter in response, I never got it. Buyer beware.
most recent rebates (Score:3, Interesting)
Rebates are fraudulent. (Score:5, Informative)
I bought TurboTax for the past few years and sent in the $40 (approximately) rebate with ALL of the information filled out correctly. I swear I spent at least 30 minutes putting together each rebate package, copying the contents in their entirety and mailing them on time from the post office. Out of $140 (approximately) that they owe me in rebates for YEARS now, I received only about ten bucks for a state rebate. I assure you that everything was done correctly.
Then, my mother bought a Sony laptop. There was a $100 rebate. I spent over an hour putting together the entire rebate package, going over the rebate checklist several times, and I *know* for a *fact* that I did it correctly. I also sent it in ahead of the deadline by nearly a month. A couple of months later, my dad (who checked my email) said that I got an email from Sony stating that there was some error in my preparation of the rebate papers. I got so pissed off at that point that I decided no longer to buy products that offer a rebate of any kind.
Yes, this story is absolutely true. Rebates are fraudulent and these companies get away with it because they know that most people consider it too much trouble to go after them for a rebate and the rest will call in a few times, so when lawsuit threats come, the company can shut them up by mailing the check then. Sony can go to hell. Intuit can as well.
COMPANIES, WHAT YOU SHOULD DO: Make the stores handle the rebate process. The store should charge me the price AFTER rebate and then deal with the distributor for the money, the same way as coupons are handled at the grocery store.
The etymology of the word Rebate (Score:3, Funny)
http://www.wordorigins.org/wordorr.htm#Rebate [wordorigins.org]
Connecticut's Rebate Law - Check It! (Score:5, Informative)
Here is the law:
Sec. 42-110b-19. Advertising "free," "reduced," "discount," "below cost," or a rebate
It shall be an unfair or deceptive act or practice to:
(a) Advertise any merchandise or service as free by the use of the word "free" or any other terms of similar import when the merchandise or service is not, in fact, free (see (d) below). Failure to disclose any and all terms, conditions and obligations required of the consumer shall be a violation of these regulations.
(b) Advertise the price of merchandise or service as a reduced or sale price, or compare the price to a previous price unless the advertised price is lower than the actual, bona fide price for which the merchandise or service was offered to the public on a regular basis by the advertiser, for a reasonably substantial period of time prior to the advertisement or as a discount price, unless the advertised price is lower than the price being charged for the same merchandise or service by other sellers in the area; provided, however, in the case of a new product, if the advertised price is less than the price which the advertiser, in good faith, expects to charge after termination of the introductory sale, there is no violation of this subsection. The actual price after the sale shall be evidence of the advertiser's good faith expectations.
(c) Advertise the price of any merchandise as below cost, unless the price is, in fact, below the cost for which the merchandise was purchased and prepared for sale by the advertiser.
(d) Advertise merchandise or service as free or the price of merchandise or a service as a discount, reduced, or sale price if receipt of such merchandise or service is contingent upon the purchase of other merchandise or service at a price which is higher than the actual, bona fide price at which the merchandise or service was offered to the public on a regular basis by the advertiser for a reasonably substantial period of time prior to the advertisement, or at a price which is substantially higher than the price being charged for the same merchandise or service by other sellers in the area; provided, however, in the case of a new product, if the advertised price is less than the price which the advertiser, in good faith, expects to charge after termination of the introductory sale, there is no violation of this subsection. The actual price after the sale shall be evidence of the advertiser's good faith expectations.
(e) Advertise the availability of a manufacturer's rebate by displaying the net price of the advertised item in the advertisement, unless the amount of the manufacturer's rebate is provided to the consumer by the retailer at the time of purchase of the advertised item. A retailer will not be required to provide the purchaser of an advertised item with the amount of the manufacturer's rebate if the rebate advertises that a manufacturer's rebate is available without stating the net price of the item. For the purpose of this subsection, "net price" means the ultimate price paid by a consumer after he redeems the manufacturer's rebate offered for the advertised item.
Micro$oft (Score:3, Funny)
Top of the box
Front page of the manual
Paper insert from the CD. (didn't specify front or back so I used both.
You had to have a receipt (real tough to make..)
The original rebate coupon (slick paper copied great at kinkos)
So at the big company I worked for they actually bought boxed versions, no license agreement and we kept them in the storage room, TONS of them.
Toughest part was the limit of two per address. Ended sending them to every friend and relative I had. Also tried (and succeeded) by slighty changing my name and street name for multiple receipts at the ole home address. Worked, and redemption time was pretty quick. We called them presents from "Uncle Bill" Odd thing though, about eighteen months later I did start getting random junk mail to those bogus address...
??? Profit.
Tax (Score:4, Insightful)
When you buy an item for $1,000 (which includes a $100 rebate), you're actually paying the tax on the $1,000, not on $900.
So, make sure you factor in the tax factor before committing to a rebate sale. Actually better yet, everyone should just boycott any and ALL items with rebates. It's all just a scam. If they wanted to give you the money they would've discounted it at the counter.
it's off the books! (Score:3, Interesting)
So that $5000 projector yields not just $1200 in rebates, but a tax free $1200! That makes it equivalent to something like a taxed $1600 worth of income or so.
rebate companies (Score:4, Interesting)
More requirements are making it harder. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Beware of Microsoft Money/Taxcut rebates (Score:2, Insightful)
Enron was a tasty snack, and chewing up some companies to win some popular votes appeals to a great many politicians.
Re:Beware of Microsoft Money/Taxcut rebates (Score:2)
Re:suck (Score:2)
If you aren't happy about being a "rebate slave", then stop buying things with rebates on them. Its not like they're putting a gun to your head and saying "Take this money or else".
Re:Rebates (Score:5, Funny)
Dang fool, mabee if u' be all up in there face like "gimmie muh money beotch!" then they'd make good.