Ring Tones Will Save the Music Industry 271
tabdelgawad writes "Well, not quite, but according to Jay A. Samit, senior vice president for new media at music label EMI Group PLC, quoted in this Washington Post article, "This is huge. This is the largest growth area for music companies and our artists". The article goes on to prove two facts we already know: that the music industry is greedy (already asking for a bigger slice of this pie!) and that the porn industry is a prime innovator in marketing and technology :-)"
but will you have to pay royalties (Score:5, Funny)
Going off in a theatre is bad enough, but just imagine if it rang in a taxi-cab!
Re:but will you have to pay royalties (Score:3, Funny)
Well .. in the UK (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:but will you have to pay royalties (Score:2)
Or do you ride around in those clown cabs frequently?
Re:but will you have to pay royalties (Score:2, Informative)
That cabs thing was a reference to a recent article where the music industry was harassing taxi companies for playing music in the taxi without paying royalties.
Re:but will you have to pay royalties (Score:2, Insightful)
That would be a good thing. I'd love to see the idiots in movie theaters who don't put ther phones on silent/vibra mode pay big $$$ for spoiling my movie
Humiliating (Score:5, Funny)
What worse way to become musically recognized:
"I take good songs, and translate them into annoying beeps. I'm proud of that and would like to publicly take credit for it."
Then again, with the general level of quality that the music industry expects of it new up-and-coming groups, he just may be able to get that fat record deal he's always been hoping for.
Re:Humiliating (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Humiliating (Score:3, Funny)
Hhmm... You must mean the "Puff Daddy" Remix.
until (Score:3, Funny)
It's already possible! (Score:3, Informative)
Here is the link to ONE of the MIDI phones [nokia.com].
It's been possible for a LONG time (Score:3, Insightful)
The first GSM mobile phone I ever owned (back in 1999), a Nokia 3210, had a ring tone composer which I could use to send ring tones I composed to my friends who had compatible phones. Newer 3xxx (e.g. 3310/3350, etc.) models even have the ability to resend tones that have been received. Heck, if this isn't (an admittedly primitive) P2P network built on top of GSM, I don't know what one is. With SMS chat services, getting the tones you want is not too difficult.
But then again, it seems that the United States is somewhat backwards when it comes to cellular telephony for some reason. We've been doing this in the Philippines for at least five years almost.
Odd thing for a third world country like us to have market penetration rates for cellular phones approaching that of the wealthiest European nations. Heck, I see street vendors here who have GSM mobiles!
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:What's the difference? (Score:2, Insightful)
Then:
Now:
I dunno, but maybe... (Score:5, Interesting)
But it seems tho that since we're so behind here that that won't materialize like it has overseas - and not just Japan, but in a lot of other wireless countries. I dunno, our attitude and recording industry cartel just seems different here; hard to say what will happen..
Re:I dunno, but maybe... (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't know about you, but when I find new cool techno music I throw a party.
Re:I dunno, but maybe... (Score:2)
after my brother showed me the video they shot, i thought Yamaha throwing a party like that was pretty cool. looked just like any other club goin off. sux to be us with the annoying nokia standard ringer i guess..
Re:I dunno, but maybe... (Score:2)
Drawbacks: grayscale screen instead of color. Although it's done in Java, the SDK is not open -- blame Deutchse Telekom, though, not the US industry, for that one.
I think the device fares quite well compared to Japan's Java-enabled color phones, because it has a real keyboard and real applications that are useful. If I want to play Tetris in color, I'd get a game boy.
And yes, it has Beatnik 12-voice polyphonic ringtones that sound great.
Re:I dunno, but maybe... (Score:2)
Re:I dunno, but maybe... (Score:3, Funny)
Or you could be using a tiny joystick to paint tiny little pictures on your tiny little phone to send to some tiny little friend. Isn't that USEFUL?!
Re:I dunno, but maybe... (Score:4, Interesting)
And because our corporations find it much more lucrative to stifle new technology for 'just good enough' stuff. If you don't think this is true, you should read some of the articles available on how the FCC screws the public over by pandering to the every wish of the media and phone companies, which have no desire to create better networks for their subscribers. We're behind, and that's a fact! We get very little for our spectrum that the FCC just gives away..
Re:I dunno, but maybe... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I don't think so: (Score:3, Insightful)
If I am at your house and use your phone for 500 minutes, how much does it cost you? Nothing (beyond the money you already spent to have active service).
You see, in many other countries, there is a per minute fee, on top of the monthly fees, to use your land line phone. Given the insane prices of local phone service, it is no surprise that mobile phone rates (especially the early days of digital networks) looked very reasonable to them, and completely outragous to us.
As for the notion that we like big out of gluttony, I think you are overgeneralizing. Small cars are popular in Europe because of their narrow, treacherous streets, many of which were laid down before cars existed. Most midwestern US cities became heavilly populated after cars existed, and grew up around big roads. I own a massive Crown Victoria, but if I lived in Europe or Japan, I would want a little Mini or something, if I owned a car at all.
Likewise, we have big yards because real estate is so much more cheap and abundant than elsewhere. I would need to be a multi-millionare to own a house as big as mine in Japan.
How we dress? Have you been following Japanese fashion at all? The most excessive "fashion slave" in the US would become exhausted trying to keep up with changing J-pop trends.
"A smaller phone is not very likely to be perceived as being better, here in the US. Put some beazzler jewels on them, and a "Polo" label on them and then they'll move."
A stroll through Best Buy proves you wrong almost immediately. Small fold up phones are almost always double the price of a big blocky one with the same features. We put a very high value on small phones, and the only time people buy color bezels is when groups of them get identical phones from work, and want to be able to tell everybody's phones apart at a glance.
Ring tone piracy (Score:2, Funny)
And then... (Score:4, Interesting)
Of course, you can expect the RIAA to try to have it outlawed...
Re:And then... (Score:2, Informative)
Public performance (Score:3, Informative)
what is the difference between me playing a tune on my piano at home (presuming that I've legally bought the music sheet) or me playing it on my phone?
Subject to the fair use doctrine and some other exceptions, the owner of copyright in a musical work has the exclusive right to perform the work publicly (17 USC 106 [cornell.edu]). Playing a ringtone is potentially a public performance; playing a song on a musical instrument when nobody outside your family unit is present is not (17 USC 101 [cornell.edu] definition of "publicly").
Re:Public performance (Score:3, Funny)
It's chock full of usefull definitions! Check this one out:
A person's ''children'' are that person's immediate offspring, whether legitimate or not, and any children legally adopted by that person. (Score: +5 informative)
-
Re:And then... (Score:2, Interesting)
For example, this site [ringtonesearch.com] offers downloadable ringtones as well as screen savers and a bunch of other stuff. And this site [freeservers.com] provides "Free ringtones for Alcatel, Ericsson, Nokia, Motorola, Panasonic, Philips, Samsung, Sanyo, Siemens and Sony mobile phones".
Problem is closed user interfaces (Score:2)
* oh, come on, you remember Demolition Man. All restaurant jingles are for Taco Bell...
Re:Problem is closed user interfaces (Score:2)
Its sad (Score:3, Interesting)
With Processing power on Mobile Phones getting better, it would make sense to be able to play REAL Sound files. A 20-30 second sound mp3 file could easily fit on a phone, and it could be worth the price of around £2 per mini song, but not a couple of silly beeps
Landline phones are starting to get more spiced up, the singing lizard phone for example. But they are FREAKING PHONES after all, and they are supposed to go RING RING, not beep beep beep beep beep beep beep, leave that to Ellen Fiess!
Re:Its sad (Score:2)
Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:5, Insightful)
Approximately 50 percent of Europeans under the age of 30 have downloaded ring tones, according to Stonefield, who believes the U.S. market is ripe for similar growth. "There is no way that kind of distribution is going to be held back; it is a real social trend," he said.
Yes, it is a social trend, but not a U.S. one.
Most of the fads we see tend to have some obvious -- if obnoxious -- logic to it. Macarena? Catchy and annoying as all get-out. Pokemon? Competition, community, kids running around saying dumb things (which is precisely what kids are supposed to do). Micro RC cars? Cute and disturbingly entertaining to everyone but our employers and cats. I could go on for quite some time but because I wish to annoy you, the gracious reader, as little as possible, I'll get right to the point.
What do frickin' ringtones offer?
"Oh, hey! Cool, Rock Me Amadaeus as a ringtone! Sweet!
This is not a U.S. phenomenon and it won't ever be a U.S. phenominon. I'm not trying to imply that the United States is somehow more sophisticated, I'm suggesting that Americans tend to view cellphones ringing about as enjoyable as listening to a car alarm going off. And not because they're boring, monotone and tedious, either. We dislike the phone because it represents an interruption, rendered jarringly, like an audial ICQ popup (though I'm told they don't do that anymore).
Again, from the article:
"This is huge," said Jay A. Samit, senior vice president for new media at music label EMI Group PLC. "This is the largest growth area for music companies and our artists."
This is a sign that companies are literally scraping the bottom of the barrel, not the bleeding edge of the Next Great Thing.
Re:Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:2)
Re:Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:3, Insightful)
I want two things from my phone: 1) For it to work. 2) For it to be as little inconvenience as possible to carry around.
If I were the sort of person to carry a PDA around all the time anyway, attaching a phone to my PDA would make sense. Ditto for forest workers who always have a GPS on hand. Since I carry neither, for me the perfect phone would be the size of a typical earring, and worn as one. Or perhaps a sub-dermal device in my jaw.
I don't want to carry around a big honkin' video screen all day, just so I can see a choppy picture of the person I'm talking to (if the happen to own a phone on the same service network).
Re:Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:2)
I like to wrap my fist around the phone when I talk on it.
Also I would second a law that made all noise makers silenced to vibrate only. I am NOT impressed but only annoyed by the duration these idiots let their stupid phones ring. My pager is on default 'original' beep mode. NOthing more, nothing less.
Re:Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:2)
As for "man sized" phones... that's all well and good, except that any phone too big to carry in your jeans pocket requires that you tote around a very un-manly fanny pack, or leave it in your girlfriend's purse all evening.
Personally, I hate carrying a lot of shit around. During the summer, it's the driver's license, a loose roll of bills (money clips are redundant), one Visa card, a small ring of two keys (car and house), and my phone. Even the smallest currently affordable phone is still probably going to be the biggest thing I carry when the weather is warm.
Re:Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:2)
Re:Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:2, Insightful)
What do frickin' ringtones offer?
They have been very popular in europe and are now on their way out
This is not a U.S. phenomenon and it won't ever be a U.S. phenominon. I'm not trying to imply that the United States is somehow more sophisticated, I'm suggesting that Americans tend to view cellphones ringing about as enjoyable as listening to a car alarm going off. And not because they're boring, monotone and tedious, either. We dislike the phone because it represents an interruption, rendered jarringly, like an audial ICQ popup (though I'm told they don't do that anymore).
And you don't think anyone finds it anoying over here? And therefore people won't like it? Mmmmkay.
As a lot of other new mobile phone trends they started with teenagers using it, and then grew onto the general public (like SMS). The only thing stopping this thing from anoying you too within the next 6-12 months might be that most US phones propably don't support custom ringing signals, since most of them are ancient crap (or so i hear
Re:Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:2)
They must really enjoy it then. I sure hear an awful lot of car alarms going off all of the time. So many in fact, that no one even pays attention to them anymore.
Re:Don't Hold Your Breath (Score:2)
When my phone is lying around somewhere in the house or in my pocket while I am driving and it rings, ringtones (used with caller groups) allow me to know if it is some friend calling and I can find the phone and check out who later when I am free or some urgent call from work so I know I should interrupt whatever I am doing/pull over and answer or call back asap.
However this means I use the same meaningful easy to remember ringtones for the last few years.
Ah Yes... (Score:3, Insightful)
After all, did you ever hear an original ringtone...?
I wonder how long this will last (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh, great... (Score:2)
"Quick! Answer it on the first ring or it's another dollar to the RIAA!"
~Philly
Ringtones that play a melody are horrible... (Score:2, Insightful)
Personalized Ringtones Can Be Useful (Score:3, Insightful)
Assuming you're not in a space where noise would be a problem, having a personalized ringtone helps users distinguish their ringing phones from others'.
Whenever I'm in a public space and I hear the "Nokia" ring, I often see 4 or 5 people going for their phones. If those had people personalized their ringtones, they might have been able to save themselves a bit of mad scrambling.
(FWIW, when I'm in public, my cellphone is set to vibrate. No confusion for me.)
Re:Personalized Ringtones Can Be Useful (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Personalized Ringtones Can Be Useful (Score:2)
I've owned a cell phone for years, and always had the basic model that they give away for free, which everyone gets. I've never programmed any alternate ringtones in (for all I know, I can't on my current model), so it's always been the generic ring that comes with it.
Maybe I'm different, but I can generally tell the difference between something ringing in my pocket and something 6 feet away.
How do people hold coversations in a busy room if they're not capable of locating the source of sound?
This time... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:But then... (Score:2)
Re:This time... (Score:2)
> available), why not make it omnipresent as
> well?
Because 99% of what you and your friends consider great "tunes" I consider obnoxious, intrusive crap. And vice-versa, no doubt.
> What about a signature song that uniquely
> identifies you?
I don't think that the sort of people who are interested in these things want to be unique.
>
> every time you called someone else?
Clever. Audible caller id. I'd find obnoxious, except that I will never own a phone that plays tunes anyway. I might someday be willing to use one that says things like "You have a call from Zekk", though.
copyright hell (Score:2)
Therefore, someone could create a comprehensive database of all possible ringtone combinations, copyright it, and publish it.
Then sue the RIAA for infringement.
ho ho ho
Copyrighted phone numbers (Score:2)
Another great example of reducio ad absurdum - taking something to its absurd extreme. Or they could be simply making fun of the international copyright system.
Re:Copyrighted phone numbers (Score:2)
No banana for you. (Score:2)
It occurs to me that there are a finite set of possible ring tone combinations
Yes. However, even if you limit it to 16 notes of 12 pitches (do through sol in the next octave, or do chromatically through ti in the same octave) and short, medium, or long duration, you get 36^16 possible notes, on the order of 10^25 or 2^83. That's possibly several zillion times more information than exists in all the libraries of all the congresses of all the countries of all the planets in our galaxy.
However, copyright law does consider some partial melody matches to constitute infringing misappropriation. Look at an essay [everything2.com] I wrote about the "Yes! We have no bananas!" case and musical combinatorics that argues that there exist fewer than fifty thousand melodies that a judge (who is not a musician) would consider distinct.
Therefore, someone could create a comprehensive database of all possible ringtone combinations
That's been tried with telephone numbers [slashdot.org].
generational differences ... too funny (Score:4, Funny)
so then I travel back in mind-time and remember when... uhhh... oh crap... lavalamps, blacklight posters, duncan yo-yo's, nehru jackets, "head" boots.. OMG!
NEVER MIND LADS, CARRY ON!
My ringtone... (Score:3, Funny)
That should be great in movie theatres...
Cell phones and airports (Score:2, Funny)
Penn Jillette once described a screen saver he wanted for his laptop that started out by counting 10..9...8...7... in big letters, just for the airport people.
one non-annoying word (ok, setting, really) (Score:5, Insightful)
vibrate
Re:one non-annoying word (ok, setting, really) (Score:2)
Of course, this would negate the chief effect of having the thing set to vibrate, i.e. that it makes no noise....
Re:one non-annoying word (ok, setting, really) (Score:2)
Re:one non-annoying word (ok, setting, really) (Score:2)
I believe it's helicopter, train, ufo, motorcycle, jackhammer, traci lords, and continuous.
-
Re:one non-annoying word (ok, setting, really) (Score:2)
Mega Bass cellphones (Score:3, Insightful)
So we need subwoofers for cell phones. Or at least speakers that can go down to 100Hz or so, to get rid of that tinny sound. Of course, you need some high notes so people can find the cellphone; with nothing but bass, the wavelength is too long for localization.
Re:Mega Bass cellphones (Score:2, Funny)
Copyrighted how ? (Score:4, Interesting)
AFAIK this is a classic example of a (remotely) derived work, and lets face it a phone going dee-da-da-dee-da is not in really remotely related to or produced from the actual music that they phone melody makers are trying to reproduce.
The ring tones don't use any samples from the music and the music composition is totally different, both through different timing of the notes and through playing only one (or a couple) of notes at a time. Therefore the person who makes the phone ring tone is making a completely new piece of work and shouldn't need to give any cash for the permission to distribute it.
The only thing that you could even try and argue is under copyright is the songs name, which would/should get laughed out of any court.
So although it looks like a nice revenue stream for the music industry, why should they get any cash ?
Could you be more wrong? (Score:3, Informative)
Re-read that paragraph.
If a ringtone's "musical composition is totally different" from an existing musical work then, by definition, it doesn't sound the same. However, what we're talking about is works that do sound the same.
Note, there is a distinct difference between "identical" and "the same".
When I was a kid, I could play John William's Star Wars theme tune on my tinny Casio keyboard. Sure, it wasn't "identical" - nobody was ever going to mistake my performance on a kid's toy with that of a full, professional orchestra - but it was "the same" as far as any listener was concerned. My friends and family were impressed I could play Star Wars and, to a 6 year-old kid, that was all that mattered.
However, if I had tried to sell recordings of my rendition of the tune as an original work then the corporate lawyers representing John Williams (or his record label) would have stomped all over me, and rightly so. I would have been infringing on the copyright of an established artist, pure and simple.
The same is true today, and not just in the arts world - just because I could create a close (but not identical) copy of the classic Coca-Cola bottle that doesn't give me the right to use it commercially packaging my own brand of cola or other beverage.
Bottom line: there is a world of difference between composing an original work (even one that is inspired by or draws on previous works) and a simple reproduction of it, no matter how basic. (I won't even bother expanding on the argument that the next generation of phones that support polyphonic ringtones can produce tunes that are as good as 128kb/s MP3s.)
If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck and acts like a duck, then it's pretty likely to be a duck. Similarly, if a ringtone sounds like Run DMC's Walk This Way, The Prodigy's Firestarter, or whatever, then the same rule applies.
Finally, your assertion that "the only thing that you could even try and argue is under copyright is the songs name, which would/should get laughed out of any court", is laughable. You claim to be familiar with the arguments surrounding copyright ownership but yet you don't know that you can't copyright facts?
If what you said is true then the record labels would have shut down CDDB and FreeDB years ago. And artists (or their labels) would be suing each other left, right and centre over song titles. Last time I checked, Huey Lewis And The News weren't suing Frankie Goes To Hollywood over the name The Power Of Love, or vice versa.
Re:Could you be more wrong? (Score:2)
I'm all for not allowing folks to sell copies, but you sure as hell should be able to make them for yourself. It burns me that my provider (Telus) or phone maker (Sony/Ericsson) removed the 'compose' feature (its right there in the manual), so I'll never buy a stupid ring tone in my life.
I _can_ play Star Wars well enough to do it myself on a silly little beeping thing, thanks. Now the whole John Williams orchestra thing
Parody (Score:2)
I personally think ringtones fall nicley into the "Parody" category, as almost always it's just kind of humorous to hear some butchered rendition of a song you know as a ring.
Re:Parody (Score:2)
Uh, actually, yes they do. Weird Al has gotten permission from plenty of artists. He can't charge for the parody without getting permission (some of his earlier parodies are only found on Dr. Demento CDs because of this). He even claimed in an interview once that it was really hard to get permission until Michael Jackson let him do one of his songs. Now, all he has to say is "Michael Jackson let me do his" (that's what he said at the time) and they let him do it almost instantly.
By the same token, the guy who wrote "Star Wars Cantina" (to the tune of Copa Cabana) has never and can never charge for the song because Barry Manilow won't give him permission.
It really just depends on how big an artist you are. The bigger you are, the easier it will probably be to get permission to charge for a parody. Otherwise, you'll be limited to releasing your parody on some p2p network.
The IP and monetary issues being raised... (Score:2, Interesting)
Envisional [envisional.com], a UK-based Internet monitoring company, even goes so far as to claim that "Illegal downloads of mobile ringtones costs music industry $1million per day [envisional.com]". However, in all fairness, that article does mention that the estimates they talk about are rough, since "Reliable figures on the total ringtone market are very hard to come by...but there is no doubt as to the scale of the problem. This is another Napster in the making."
Fuck the industry, whos going to save music? (Score:3, Insightful)
'Nuff said.
Fair Use? (Score:4, Insightful)
In such cases of course, the excerpted piece of otherwise copyrighted material must only be a small percentage of the original work.
This allows one newspaper report to quote a few lines from a competing publication without fear of breaching their copyright.
So what's wrong with the claim that turning 10 seconds or so of a top-40 song into a ring-tone isn't also covered by this "fair use" exclusion because it's only a tiny percentage of the original work and it's *reporting* that someone has called your cellphone?
It would certainly be an interesting sharkfight if someone decided to test it out in the courts
MOD THIS UP (Score:2)
So tell those stupid greedy bastards to read their copyright law again before they start reaching for our wallets on this one...
Re:Fair Use? (Score:2)
Re:Fair Use? (Score:2)
IANAL, of course, but as i recall, that's how commercials get away with using tunes ... they either use a clip that's less than 10 seconds, or they change *just* enough of the tune that it isn't considered to be identical to the original.
Now, the only reason I'd guess that cell companies, et al, don't just ignore the RIAA on this one is that this is enough of a cost-free cash cow that it's a whole lot cheaper to pay than fight...
When can I get custom alarmtones for my car alarm? (Score:5, Funny)
My phone's ring is The Liberty Bell March, also known as the theme to Monty Python's Flying Circus. It came built in to my phone. I don't confuse my phone ringing with anybody elses, and I get a secret little geek thrill every time my phone rings.
euphemism (Score:2)
Man that's hard not to interpret as a euphemism for "orgasm!"
Well, so long as your phone plays the Python theme and doesn't vibr...er...it doen't vibrate, does it?
: )
Re:When can I get custom alarmtones for my car ala (Score:2)
I have only two words... (Score:2)
So knowing Q Basic Can pay. (Score:2)
Am I the only one... (Score:3, Insightful)
The math behind it: (Score:3, Funny)
Now: Some people would.
Percent incrase: ((Now/Then) * 100) - 100
WARNING: DIVIDE BY ZERO!
INFINITE GROWTH!!!!!!
The music industry can't get a cent from me... (Score:2, Interesting)
I always put one obviously wrong note (or two) in them, just for kicks. Kinda like how Bugs Bunny would play them.
Someone's phone is ringing.....
Oh, that's DEFINITELY mine.
Tchaikovsky's Piano Concerto #1 for me (Score:2)
It IS big. (Score:2)
So new pay sites came along, then then even ad's on tv for those sites. The kids love those ring tones, and those guys in the sales dept.
Are you a simpleton? (Score:2)
Re:Are you a simpleton? (Score:2)
And "we, the people" have nothing at all to do with deciding where ownership ends and greed begins. Ownership of something is a real, legal, fact. Greed is a human emotion.
Where does
Re:Are you a simpleton? (Score:2)
Until loan-sharking is made illegal.
The difference is in scale only. They do exactly the same thing that banks do (save for the heavies that come round when you don't pay up...).
The earlier poster's entire point was the arbitrary definition of "illegally exorbitant". This is an imposed definition. That was his point. You have missed it entirely.
Re:Are you a simpleton? (Score:2)
"Exorbitant" means "greedy" in this context, and that's why we declared it to be illegal.
And "we, the people" have nothing at all to do with deciding where ownership ends and greed begins.
We, the people, decide where ownership ends. With real property, it's a constitutional issue. With intellectual property, for the most part, it's not even that. We can change both through the democratic process.
Ownership of something is a real, legal, fact. Greed is a human emotion.
That's what I was saying. That's why music companies can both own tunes legally and still be greedy. Get it now?
reallocate is retarded (Score:2)
You are fucking daft. Ownership is a legal fact. You admit to it, but you say we the people have nothing to do with deciding where it ends and begins, which is wrong! If you erase all of the laws, I own nothing. Not a thing. Now, I may possess some things, but I have no indefenite control on them. They are only mine until someone big enough to take them away does. Under U.S. law, however, if someone big walks up and takes my keyboard away it is still mine. I still own it no matter what happens to it from there.
Re:Are you all idiots??? (Score:5, Insightful)
Legally, maybe; morally, definitely not piracy.
New Zealand copyright law to allow format shifting (Score:2)
Interestingly enough, copyright law in New Zealand is about to undergo a bit of a shake-up that would have an effect on this.
At present it's illegal to make *any* copy of any disk you own -- that's right, there's no fair use provision here.
However, the government (in an uncharacteristic exhibition of wisdom) appears to have decided that it makes sense to allow people to copy for the purpose of "format shifting" -- ie: from CD to MP3 or from CD to tape, etc.
This would create a very interesting situation where someone already had a specific CD but chose to download the MP3 version of its contents from a P2P network rather than rip it themselves. Under the proposed new law, this could be considered a completely legal act.
To make the matter even more ridiculous -- the proposed changes appear to have some DMCA-like provisions that prohibit the cracking of copy-protection schemes. So, if you've just bought a new CD which is copy protected -- it would be legal to download an MP3 version from the Net but illegal to rip it yourself.
Don't ya just love politicians and the laws they make?
Oh yeah, and this is a very likely scenario, given that EMI Australia has announced that it will be copy-protecting *all* its disks as of next year.
Ringtones are original compositions (Score:2)
Sure, these ring tones are inspired by original tunes, but the process of producing them is not an electronic algorithm. An artist (perhaps of dubious talents) has to "compose" these ringtones so that they sound right.
Ringtones technically are not degraded versions of original sound files; they are compositions "inspired" by other sound files.
Your CD licenses don't cover these ringtone compositions, however derivative they may be.
Can't clean-room around a music copyright (Score:3, Informative)
The record companies have the rights to the sheet music I would guess
That's true if the record company and the music publisher are owned by the same conglomerate, such as Warner Bros. Records [wbr.com] and Warner Chappell Music [warnerchappell.com] (owner of "happy birthday to you" [cni.org]) both owned by Warner Communications, a unit of AOL Time Warner Inc.
but they must not have any ownership if I listen to the radio and transcribe it myself.
No matter how you hear a copyrighted musical work, it's still copyrighted. Unlike with computer program copyright, there's no way to "clean-room reverse engineer" around music copyright. Even if you only unconsciously plagiarize a copyrighted musical work, you're still liable [vwh.net] under USA copyright law.
Nokia Ringtone Composer (Score:3, Interesting)
Cover Songs (Score:2)
Yes.
licensing fees (Score:2)
Ordinarily the pub would already be paying fees to BMI and several similar organizations to cover that. Basically BMI and friends go around to any place that has/might perform/play music publically in some fashion and demands money (this includes having a TV in the room with working sound).
Doesn't matter if you only play non-BMI-represented artists (as far as they're concerned, it's impossible to play music without playing something by someone they represent _sometime_).
But yes, so pubs and such are nominally covered. The aforementioned MP3 cover collection wouldn't be.
Same way you would for a song otherwise. For copyright purposes, the lowest threshold for uniqueness is four notes[1], but you might want to copyright something just a bit longer for a saftey margin (since you probably don't have high-powered industry lawyers to back it up).
---
[1] Yes, I realize at this rate we'll run out of non-copyrighted melodies in a decade or two... but I guess we'll cross that bridge when we come to it. In reality it's not quite so bad because that standard isn't consistently enforced.