Slashback: Membership, Quarkiness, Audioggogy 181
A tornado's worth of spin control. telstar writes "The Code Report is reporting that last week's story from the New York Times concerning the death of Hailstorm was not entirely accurate. A Microsoft spokesperson has stated that Microsoft is shifting from a model in which MSN was the sole operator to a model where the operation of these services is available to multiple operators."
Onan Meets Midas. daoine writes: "Reversing the outcome of an earlier argument, boston.com is reporting that MGM and New Line Cinema have reached an agreement that permits New Line to continue with the Goldmember name. It also stipulates that further satirical names must be approved by MGM."
Does dishes, saves gas, freshens your breath, cleans your pets ... Apparently, Gentoo Linux is contagious. JigSaw writes: "OSNews features an interesting review of Gentoo Linux 1.0 and they call it 'the fastest loading, fastest-operating Linux distribution to date.' Gentoo may be the fastest Linux for a workstation today, but according to the review, it still has some problems, most notably, annoying bugs. However, it still manages to score a glowing 8.2 out of 10 overall."
Reader sckevyn also points to the Gentoo PowerPC page for those equipped different.
First steps always seem small. camusflage writes "Yahoo has a story from ZDNet about TheKompany's recent release of tkcPlayer for the Zaurus, which is being billed as the first portable Ogg Vorbis player. A player for a format not many people are using on a platform even fewer people are using. Admirable, but not likely to be a commercial success."
Honey, your quark is showing. ngrier writes "As a quick follow-up to the story posted here a few days ago regarding the potential quark star, the NASA APOD today is a picture of the aforementioned star."
Oops... (Score:3, Funny)
Oh shit...
Re:Oops... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Oops... (Score:1)
Take the maximum you can posibly owe write a check and file an extention.
Refile later and get some money back.
In the mean time Uncle Sam hold on to your money.
He's good for it don't worry.
Re:Oops... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Oops... (Score:2)
Info on irs.gov [irs.gov]
It's not tax day where I live (Score:2)
(The relevant part of the page is under "News & Updates" on the left.)
Re:Oops... (Score:3, Informative)
It lets you fill out your taxes via an interactive online form that asks all the right questions and then 'E-files' a finished form for a small fee without having to leave your computer or find an all-night post office.
I have nothing to do with Quicken, i just used the service and it's great.
get crackin, geeks!
Re:Oops... (Score:1)
AC
Re:Oops... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Oops... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Oops... (Score:1)
Re:Oops... (Score:1)
You lazy sack of shit. I feel your lazy weight on my back. Prolly some lazy socialist who wants high taxes -- for other people -- to drive society along while they sit back on welfare with a free PC and free Internet surfing for pr0n. Hey, you're not that guy who tried to get on social security disability for agoraphobia who wanted to play EverQuest all day long, eh? Eh, comrade?
Re:Oops... (Score:1)
Re:Oops... (Score:1)
Re:Oops... (Score:1)
Feeling sorry for those who forgot it's tax day... (Score:1)
Re:Feeling sorry for those who forgot it's tax day (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Feeling sorry for those who forgot it's tax day (Score:1)
Re:Feeling sorry for those who forgot it's tax day (Score:1)
Re:Feeling sorry for those who forgot it's tax day (Score:1)
And a lot of people don't know that the april 15th deadline is only important if YOU'RE paying THEM. If you're getting a nice sum back on your return, It works even up to a year late, and if you don't file, oh well, they keep your money.
Re:Feeling sorry for those who forgot it's tax day (Score:1)
I actually just did this... quite painless. Note, however, that if you end up owing taxes, you will at least have to pay interest on them, if you don't pay them now. Kinda weird: "I don't know how much I'll finally need to pay, but here is what I owe." At any rate, for those who need to do so, go here [irs.gov] and grab form 4868.
APOD [Quark Star] URL (Score:3, Informative)
It's only tax day.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:It's only tax day.. (Score:1)
Re:It's only tax day.. (Score:2, Insightful)
Wow, two of my biggest pet peeves in one post. First of all, Slashdot is an American site. Deal with it, or start a slashdot.(your country code here). And damn, can't you people use the subject line for a subject and not for the first half of your first sentence? At the very least, repeat your pseudo subject in the message body. Moderate me down for being off topic or flamebait or whatever, I don't care.
Re: globalization and websites (Score:1)
If that were the case, using your own argument, the site would be named slashdot.org.us, wouldnt it?
* Disclaimer, not all US-citizens are gringos, only the stupid, prejudiced, egotistical jerks that seem to plague the world.
Re: globalization and websites (Score:1)
(1) With your "disclaimer", you prove to be just as stupid, prejudiced, and egotistical.
Cheers!
Re: globalization and websites (Score:1)
Re: globalization and websites (Score:1)
Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric. Do you have any plans to be more international in your scope?
Slashdot is U.S.-centric. We readily admit this, and really don't see it as a problem. Slashdot is run by Americans, after all, and the vast majority of our readership is in the U.S. We're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories, but we don't have any formal plans for making that happen. All we can really tell you is that if you're outside the U.S. and you have news, submit it, and if it looks interesting, we'll post it.
Answered by: CmdrTaco
Last Modified: 10/28/00
Re: globalization and websites (Score:1)
Re: globalization and websites (Score:1)
> enjoy its benefits.
All roads lead to Rome. All huge fucking lines to get into a country lead into the US.
It's better to be a citizen of Rome than to be the Queen of Toronto.
Re: globalization and websites (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:It's only tax day.. (Score:1)
right URL for quark star is... (Score:1, Troll)
APOD Quark Star picture (Score:1, Flamebait)
Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:5, Insightful)
Since when do they need permission to use a parodized name? I thought that parody law not only allowed one to use a similar name ('Goldmember' is not THAT similar...), but also their original artwork could be closely mimicked.
Anybody remember reading about that guy who put up an 'aolsucks.com' site? AOL attempted to sue him because he used their artwork to parodize him. His lawyer said he was well within his rights because it was a pardoy/criticism of the company.
Question: Wouldn't the same logic be applied as it was for this guy, or is there a variable I'm not considering?
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:1)
WERM
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:5, Informative)
They could sue each other if they wanted, but they've settled in this way.
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:1)
Kierthos
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:3, Insightful)
MGM convinced the club to rule against New Line. However, MGM also said that wouldn't have a problem with New Line if New Line would do MGM some favors.
At any point, New Line could've said "Screw you, these are our rights. You're not the boss of me." and refused to abide by the MPAAs initial ruling. At that point, MGM could have sued New Line (And probably lost), wasting valuable $$, raising anamosity within the industry, and possibly establishing a(nother) precedent that could come back and bite New Line on the ass when someone else tried to use a New Line-like title for their film. Instead, New Line (probably) agreed to show some MGM trailers before the film, and MGM agreed to let them use the title.
On one hand we have an industry group making the Wrong Decision (TM) initially in supporting MGM's petition against New Line. That's bad.
But on the other hand, we have an industry group policing itself -- not relying on the legal system to resolve disputes. That's not that bad.
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:1)
Kierthos
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:1)
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:2)
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:1)
Yeah what he said
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:2)
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:1)
That, by the way, is why the "It's a parody!" claims you always see here, when an open-source project blatantly infringes on the name of the commercial product it clones, are nonsense.
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:1, Interesting)
Yes, two:
The suit had no real merit in law but it would have cost New Line money both for the lawyers and for the delay in release of the movie. The latter was probably the larger incentive for MGM to file suit and for New Line to give in. As reading articles on Slashdot for the past few years can teach you, lawsuits (from patent, copyright, et al) are a powerful weapon regardless of their merit. Also, entertainment corporations generally like to maintain some semblance of good relations with each other in case of future collaboration.
Re:Errr, what happened to the law? (Score:1)
.NET (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:.NET (Score:1)
Yep. Security and reliability. Passport isn't so great either.
Re:.NET (Score:1)
How so?
Passport isn't so great either
Same question, though I'll stipulate that I didnt get far when I tried to set up a passport site
Re:.NET (Score:2)
It's a principal thing with me. When I go out and solicit some service on the web, I get to make a decision whether I want to step through a company's hoops in order to do business with them. In many cases I've found other vendors because I didn't like the hoops offered. In the MSDN case, I have the choice of finding another job, or jumping through the hoops. It's even worse, when I consider the hoops are likely to get a lot worse in the near term.
No solid interface:
It's not the individual pieces that are a problem. It is general trends. In this case, we see Microsoft creating a virtual machine (not unlike Java) and basing as much future development on it as possible. However, different than Java, Microsoft will be using their win32 libraries behind the scenes to get much of the work done.
From what I've seen of Microsoft efforts in the past, I'd have to guess they aren't going to do a very good job of creating a good isolated "sandbox" to run untrusted or semitrusted code in. How can they if the "sandbox" is running win32 calls under the hood? So, the goal is to have code that can run anywhere and on any machine, or across several machines, but security (and reliability to some degree) is essentially left up to application developers. This leaves the field wide open for malicious (or just plain foolish) applications to cause all sorts of grief.
I'm not all that familiar with the C# and
I'm not saying it can't be done, or that Microsoft can't do it. But if Microsoft comes up with a secure reliable development environment with more features and integration than ever before, you'll be able to bowl me over with a toothpick.
Re:.NET (Score:3, Insightful)
"Don't confuse an expansion of the operator strategy with any kind of de-commitment from the idea of user-centric web services that help create a more personalized, more consistent experience across the different technologies in an individual's life."
Let me paraphrase the MicroSpeak:
"We are still committed to the idea of controlling all aspects of people's lives beyond the PC. Once we get widespread adoption of
Since users have already committed too much time and effort (much like word
If I am wrong, I will eat my shoes.
Re:.NET (Score:2)
Surprise, Surprise (Score:4, Informative)
Yawn, I hope they put all of that in the agreement this time, so we don't have to hear about it in future installments.
NY Times was wrong on hailstorm, move on (Score:4, Insightful)
They're moving to a federated model, meaning MS will not be the only one providing the services.
Nothing to add - the original article was just wrong.
Re:NY Times was wrong on hailstorm, move on (Score:3, Insightful)
...which means the same stellar history of secure code, but with more people to blame for individual incidents!
More or less the same business model present in the current IT Industry.
Gentooizing Debian? (Score:2)
'apt-build install kde3' or something, mmmm
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:2)
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:1, Interesting)
Personally I can't say I noticed any speed improvements over my Debian 2.2r5/3.0 unstable system. And yes I compiled everything including the bootstrap and yes I optimized it for my CPU. I like the "emerge" system. It seems to be more advanced than apt-get. That's just my opinion though.
As the last guy pointed out, the packages are very up to date. Whether or not that is important is a matter of opinion.
Over all I think it is a good distro that does NOT fall into the "Yet another borring distribution" category. My only gripe is that it protects "su" by default and I can't figure out how to allow my "normal" user account to su over to root.
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:1)
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:1)
root:ALL EXCEPT GROUP root:DENY
This will deny anyone except people in group "root" from su-ing to root. This file is alot more robust, you should probably read the manpage for (man 5 suauth) it.
As for the "wheel" group, that's a BSDism, and is simply the way things are done in the *BSD distros, I have no idea where the name comes from.
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:1)
If that doesn't work, hit bugs.gentoo.org, there is an
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:1)
Calculating dependencies !!! Couldn't find match for vmware; aborting.
apparently it's not in the rsync yet, thanks for the info I'll check it out now.
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:2, Informative)
apt-get --build source <some-package>?
It will act just like 'apt-get install <some-package>' except that now it downloads the source and builds it.
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:2)
Re:Gentooizing Debian? (Score:1)
Re: Slashback (Score:5, Funny)
LISA: You have to do your taxes every year, dad.
Homer: Ahh! Marge! How many kids do we have? Oh, no time to count, I'll just estimate! Uh...nine!
Marge: Homer, you know we don't h--
Homer: Shut up, shut up! If I don't hear you it's not illegal! OK, I need some deductions, deductions... ah!! Business gifts!
[Homer grabs the boat painting from above the couch and hands it to Marge.]
Here you go, keep using nuclear power!
Marge: Homer! I painted that for you!
Homer: OK, Marge, if anyone asks, you require twenty four hour nursing care, Lisa's a clergyman, Maggie is seven people, and Bart was wounded in Vietnam!
Bart: Cool!
Membership? (Score:1, Offtopic)
Yes, that's right, a Slashback featuring the title of "membership" says nothing about using a non-paypal method of subscribing to Slashdot.
Love it or leave it, subscribership seems to me to be a way of supporting the site to which so many of us devote our time.
Yet, they're not rushing to pacify their most zealous "PayPal Hating Credit Card Wielding" fans. Maybe it's difficult to set up a relationship with the local bank that allows a computer to accept a credit card number, spew out a hard copy receipt and then /dev/null the number. Or have one of the editors take some of his "Grammar Is Irrelevant" time and sit down with his e-mail reader of choice and one of those merchant credit card readers.
I don't expect Slashdot will ever favor the most vocal Slashdot minority, the "Tin Foil Wearing Small Unmarked Bills" wielding folk.
Re:Membership? (Score:2, Informative)
Portable(ish) flac (Score:3, Interesting)
Gentoo Linux (Score:1)
I'm using Gentoo Linux right now, and it certainly is fast. I'm on a dual-P3 system, so running KDE3 (which is da bomb), reading Slashdot, checking my mail, and compiling KDevelop in the background isn't too bad. Things have gotten a bit easier with the addition of stage 2/3 tarballs, meaning that the build gcc/glibc rebuild binutils/gcc/glibc cycle is eliminated, cutting down the installation time a lot.
Gentoo is a lean distro, to be sure. Everything uses MMX/SSE, which is nice, though the performance gain of that is probably marginal. What really gives it a good kick is that the base install contains only a handful of apps (the *bare* minimum) and everything else is installed as necessary. That's certainly not unique to Gentoo, but it's a plus. (Why have eject if you don't have a CD-ROM?)
The only downside, though, is the lengthy compiles; a dual-P3 box is decent, but a full recompile of XFree86 still takes time. But hey, in my opinion, it's worth it.
Re:Gentoo Linux (Score:1)
What I'm not sure of now is whether portage has an equivalent to RPM dependency hell. My suspicion is that it should be less of a problem, just because source compatibility seems more common than binary compatibility, and because so far portage has been really good at figuring out dependencies on it's own. But ask me again in six months.
Re:Gentoo Linux (Score:1)
Perhaps the coolest thing about gentoo is that while it is easy to use and to maintain, it somehow teaches you all the fundamentals of running a linux machine at the same time. Portage, the packaging system is totally rad and
Re:Gentoo Linux (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Gentoo Linux (Score:1)
Yeah I realize you're a troll, but I need to counter your point.
re: Gentoo I've said it before... (Score:1)
Hailstorm (Score:1)
Bleep! That is to say rumours of Hailstorm's death have been greatly exagerated? Curses!
Interstellar ping (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course, the chances of this working are a million to one, and the arrival date might be off by a few hundred years, but if it did work I think it would be an great archeological find for the 4th millenium or so.
btw, anyone else read Interstellar Pig back in the day? William Sleator is a GOD.
Re:Interstellar ping (Score:1)
Re:Interstellar ping (Score:2, Funny)
neat movies (Score:2)
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/htmltest/rjn_bht.html [nasa.gov]
good stuff
watch out for the time dialation.
Tiny visible star, huge X-ray star (Score:3, Informative)
I actually saw the video press release go out on NASA TV last week (woohoo, I get to watch NASA TV at work). They did a fade FROM that picture to another one done in the X-ray spectrum (Chandra) where that virtually invisible star turned into a shining beacon of quark.
and mike myers? (Score:1)
was it bristley? pokey? does he have grounds to sue for brutality?
Re:and mike myers? (Score:1)
Oh, goody! I'm an indecent movie-going person!
Stefan.
Sharp Zaurus (Score:2, Insightful)
Ok, everyone who keeps saying that they refuse to buy a player that doesn't support Ogg Vorbis needs to step up to the plate. Heck, you get the added bonus of it running on Linux. If *you* don't, who will? Then when it fails, everyone will say it's because the people *want* closed source, proprietary products...
Re:Sharp Zaurus (Score:1)
Die, Hailstorm! You and your little dog pTiVo! (Score:1)
Man, I need advice here: Do I crack jokes about how much safer I feel now that Microsoft is planning to share it's hoard of all my info? Or do I ask how is this an improvement on everyone sharing my info now?
Between this and the WinXE-Tivo story (a few hundred bucks worth of buggy software and a $1000 computer to replace a $300 appliance in a still-tepid market), I can't decide which is more of a product without a need. Ah, well, lets all sit back and enjoy the warm glow as Microsoft burns another billion of that massive war chest. Microsoft cell phones, XBox blues, a legal case based on "Security By Obscurity"... and now these techno-misfires.
IEEE Reconsiders DMCA Restriction (Score:5, Informative)
"The plan is to remove the reference to the DCMA," says Bill Hagen, intellectual property rights manager for the IEEE. "It's controversial to say the least. We've been getting a lot of correspondence, comment and opinion and have been forced to reconsider it."
This is even better than preserving the status quo, because in this case the hooplah got the problems of the DMCA out in front of the IEEE membership, which is very large and includes some extremely influential people. Score one for the good guys.
Re:IEEE Reconsiders DMCA Restriction (Score:1)
New Hailstorm nothing but damage control. (Score:3, Interesting)
Nope, Hailstorm is dead dead dead. A key feature of Hailstorm was that Microsoft wants to be the "gatekeeper" of the internet. In order collect a toll requires a monopoly. People are NOT going to pay at a toll booth when there's a free street to the same place.
The "new and improved" version of hailstorm is nothing but a glorified version of a standard username/password database. I doubt many companies are going to buy the software, and even if they do the proffits of selling the software are nothing compared to OWNING the identity of everyone on the net and selling the service.
The "new and improved" hailstorm is a desperate attempt to keep a colossal failure from sinking
-
My delusion that lawyers are rational human beings (Score:5, Interesting)
That really sums up the value of MGM's case against Goldmember. If they genuinely felt that the name tarnished their James Bond property then why the hell would they want to use it to advertize a Bond film?!
It also stipulates that further satirical names must be approved by MGM.
Ok, maybe I'm having delusions that lawyers are actually rational human beings, but you *could* read that to mean MGM realized it was a frivolous lawsuit and to avoid a countersuit they stipulated they would approve any and all satirical names in the future.
-
Re:My delusion that lawyers are rational human bei (Score:2)
I'll wager what happened is something like this:
MGM said, "we want you to advertise a bond file"
NLC says "mmmmNo"
MGM brings its 'CASE' to the MPAA.
MPAA says "You can't do that"
NLC says "we're protected under the parody law"
MPAA says "This is about the agreement you have with us, and we're arbitrating and we say NO. If you take it to court, we'll toss you out of the MPAA and sue you for breech of contract"
NLC "you bastards!"
MPAA "yes?"
MGM "you know, we don't want to be an ass, so we'll let you keep the name, if you advertise are next JB film. Oh yeah, here is an approved list of parody names, feel free to use those. If you use something else, we'll go through this again."
NLC "stupid MPAA"
Clearly, because MGM acted first and put NLC into a defence position, they won.
What is it with you people? (Score:1)
Ever since the zaurus has come out, it seems everyone has been against. When it came out everyone complained the website could not be accessed from mozilla, you complained there were not enough applications and now you doing it again.
It runs linux, a development model was produced to encourage, not beat the open source community. The first fruits of that is already coming through. What do you people want!!!!
I've had a development model since March. It is wonderfully usable, has everyting I could want and I am now writing apps for it. I had a windows CE machine for years before that and never did much more than read the address book.
Seesh, no wonder microsoft are winning, they don't have to listen to you lot winging.
Re:Attention Timothy poster of article (Score:2)
Re:samuel jackson hat on (Score:1)
You mean the ones from 2001?
Re:check this out.... (Score:1, Offtopic)
uggc://jjj.cynarg-fbhepr-pbqr.pbz/io/fpevcgf/Fu
Vg'f gura nf fvzcyr nf cnfgvat vagb n jro-cntr. Gb zr n jro cntr fhccbegvat phg naq cnfgr frrzf zhpu rnfvre guna hfvat n pbzznaq yvar crey fpevcg be fbzr fhpu...
Re:Gentoo is cool, if it works.. (Score:3, Informative)
sm