Define discriminate. I can have sex with people that I am attracted to. But that's because someone like Lisa Ann floats my boat. Someone for whom an under aged person turns them on? Sorry. We will discriminate. It's possible that chemical castration, with periodic checkups to ensure ongoing efficacy could allow them to live normal lives in all other aspects. But as far as the sex part is concerned, Nope. Not gonna happen.

Go ahead and call that discrimination. I don't care.

Those monsters! Last time I went to the hospital parking was free!

I tried to post this quoted text and it says I cant post to this page... its true. AC is dead.

"you can still post anon, here look at this..."

First off your "distinction" even if true matters why?

Secondly I reviewed the transcript and you're a partisan cock gobbling lying piece of shit.
Go ahead, show me where they're talking about groupies: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/1...

Away with your bullshit.

Having a single IP address in your server logs is enough to require GDPR compliance.

If he IP address isn't sufficient to identify a person then no you don't have to. And if you're worried, then don't log it forever. There is no requirement under the GDPR to instantly respond to any deletion requests, so delete your logs and you're fine.

just so later some SJW

Have you finished your 2 minutes hate yet? We know how this goes: you screech about SJW, then on the assumption that all SJW are evil, anything done by an SJW must be bad and since you've unilaterally decided that GDPR actions are the domain of SJW if follows from your misapplication of logic that GDPR actions are therefore evil.

Actually I think YOU are the real SJW here. I mean it fits.

actions and delete it, which you can't because of EU terrorism and copyright regulation.

Cite chapter and verse of the relevant EU regulation or you're making it up.

If they can't move anymore, they also can't cause trouble.

Criminal prosecution has nothing to do with the civil suit. The most the restitution would be is the amount they paid, and they probably got that back on the first ticket.

You probably didn't have the abusive-negligant parents to match the abuse in school.

In other words, no one can pardon him now.

At least now we can flag spammers and they are subject to the same post limits as all new accounts.

They would never turn off comments, since comments are the only original content that slashdot produces, and the main reason why people still keep visiting it. Most of the time, enough of them are better than the articles themselves.

Well, looks like the DNC managed to take Epstein out before he could be brought to justice and continue bringing them down with him.

;-)

While not out of the question, they would need to be very different from us. Homo Sapiens is currently struggling to make it past 200'000 years.

In other words, every Tory politician that was caught in the men's room with his pants down and bent over for a rather unusual prostate exam is a crook? Not just to his voters but in general?

New account created because anonymous accounts banned - check.

Two posts, both linked to link bait sites - check.

Both flagged as spam - check.

It might not end shitposting, but the 8chan mess is forcing people to take action. The search engines already downgrade sites that contain hate speech because of laws in various countries - and as time goes on, it's just going to get better (or worse if posting hate speech is your thing).

Now it will be a competition between spammers creating new accounts and users flagging their spam. But at least they will have to jump through more hoops, be subject to rate limiting for new accounts, and possibly medium-term IP blocks if a particular IP is only associated with bogus accounts.

Whenever there's progress, some people are inevitably left out. But don't worry, later on we just call them stupid Luddites and say it was their fault and they totally deserved it.

That does it. I officially vote to rename it Urectum.