Here they start at $300. However, I don't know if I want them. They're still not completely there. One out of 200 have so many problems they have them removed. Leaves me wondering how many have problems but don't want to face another round of surgery
I've always been near-sighted, so it wouldn't be any big deal to get fixed-focus lenses that are optimal for near vision. Glasses would handle regular vision, same as they always have. Or I could get fixed-sight lenses for normal vision, and reading glasses for reading and stuff. Either way, avoid the halos around lights, etc. that come with variable-focus lenses.
I really don't know what the best solution is. I'll discuss it with my doctors and see what they think is best for my situation.
Mandrake 6 and 7 were ahead of the pack. Too bad they couldn't keep it up
1. Moonlight can be bright enough to read a book by. But it's not brightness that's the problem, or just closing your eyes would eliminate the "problem." It doesn't, because the problem is between the ears, not an actual real effect.
2. Turn on the room lights and the relative brightness of the monitor becomes a non-problem, People working in dark rooms are retarded.
3. Also, buy a better monitor and you'll be able to dim it. However, that's not the problem, as per 2. Again, turn on the room lights to a decent brightness.
House LED lighting is irrelevant to the issue of blue lights and computers in rooms with adequate daylight. More relevant to a good night's sleep would be getting away from the keyboard and taking the dog for a walk before going to bed, instead of taking your phone or tablet or laptop into bed. Nowadays bosses expect us to be "on" 24/7, and almost as bad, we see it as a badge of honor to be always on top of things. Stupid, self-defeating, self-destructive behaviour, but that's how low high tech has sunk.
The real issue is work/life balance. Get that right and "blue light" won't interfere with your life.
Humans don't need complete dark to sleep. We evolved on the African plains, and there's this big thing called the Moon that regularly lights up the night sky - and that light is pretty rich in blue when the moon is high in the sky. Don't take my word for it - go out some night and look.
Or take a nice lazy nap in the middle of the day with the sun shining bright. You can get a nice sunburn doing that at poolside. The bright light didn't keep you from falling asleep or you would have noticed you've cooked yourself.
We evolved for this sort of situation. If blue light were a problem, we'd have an inner eyelid to filter it out, like Vulcans, or have an adaptation where it's not a problem (which, all SciFi aside, is what really happened). But people will believe all sorts of crap rather than see what's literally in front of their eyes, because people WANT to experience the frisson that comes from "knowing something new that someone else doesn't" - same as gossip and fake news.
Thanks for the encouragement. One of my sisters is in the purchasing department for a neighboring government (population +13 million) and they're using two different Microsoft ERP products that handle rounding in different ways, so none of the reports balances. She's ordered them to fix it (yeah, she's that high up - good for her) but she's also pissed off that we keep re-inventing the wheel and breaking the same things over and over again (Microsoft has had rounding problems for decades, using several different methods that are just f*'ed up). And the "fixes" break previous calculations, so loading the same historical data suddenly gives a different result.
Same with everything else - newer devs haven't had to have it out with bosses over making applications that break privacy laws ("everyone's doing it so it must be okay" and "we can do this so we WILL do this") and showing them how to achieve their goals without being snoops.
Eventually we'll get to the point of "Peak Frameworks" where every single piece of software inspired the development of a new framework, and every iteration needs YAF (Yet Another Framework), often in YAL (Yet Another Language), just 'cuz. (or because whoever wrote the previous framework was smart enough to go somewhere else before the crap hit the fan).
Yes, Virtualbox. I don't bother with the clipboard, though I have the drive shared.
I'm "stuck" on Windows right now because if/when my eyes go again, I'm going to need a decent screen reader, and I tried NVDA - it works (free, but Windows-only).
The ophthalmologist who's been doing the laser photocoagulation that's stopped the bleeders on my retina did the last possible spaces a week ago. The idea behind pan-retinal laser photocoagulation is to reduce the permeability of the retina to oxygen, resulting in a lower level of oxygen in the eyeball, reducing the rate of growth of neovascularization (new fragile blood vessels) on the surface of the retina, where blood vessels don't belong. It will slow down, but not stop, future growth, bleeders, etc. Plus there's now blood vessels growing in the angle between the lens and the iris
Even after cataract surgery, the left retina will still be distorted (both are at this point). So, gotta be ready for the whole "legally blind" thing again down the road. Not that I'm that much worried - been there, done that, just never got the t-shirt.
The last few years, I've been able to read again, but NOT program. Sitting in front of the computer trying to write code, I would just draw a blank. This was the second time - the first being after the whole flesh-eating disease thing a couple of decades ago.
That's one of the dilemmas. You can be convicted of disobeying an unlawful order, and the fact that the order was unlawful might be considered as a mitigating factor in your punishment, but not in determining your guilt - you'll (most likely) be found guilty. Just as following an unlawful order doesn't free you from the consequences - the Nuremberg defense failed for that very reason.
The best you can do is do what is right, and accept that you will be punished. Same as people who protest, are arrested, and charged. You do what is right, accepting beforehand that you're probably going to pay for it. Then again, if it were easy, anyone and everyone would be doing it, and that would dilute the impact.
The story says " allowed an attacker to steal 370,000 Zerocoin, which is about $592,000 at today's price". I seriously doubt 370,000 Zerocoins is worth anywhere near $592k now that the news is out and trading has been suspended. If you can't spend it, it's worth is zero, which kind of makes sense for something named Zerocoin. The name should have been warning enough.
"Don't worry about people stealing your ideas. If your ideas are any good, you'll have to ram them down people's throats." -- Howard Aiken