When the AI steals the ideas of others and presents it as a new idea to the AI user, it's still theft and the inventor is the original inventor and the ideas were on the open internet to be scraped by the AI and so is prior art.

While this is an option, reliability would go waaay down for multiple reasons.

I liked this part: "...work proceeded in 1964 when a general envisioned a scheme to incapacitate an entire trawler with aerosolized BZ; this effort was dubbed Project DORK.[17]"

I really want you to explain why you know better than the MIT researchers quoted in the summary who determined you are wrong. Most jobs can't be replaced by current LLM, that's what they found. Why do you disagree with it?

So they took a website that was working just fine and spent a kabillion dollars to make it significantly worse.

I'm sure everyone here will agree when I say that I've definitely never heard of something like this ever happening before. Never ever.

Or SAP.

She'll be right mate!

I said this:

You responded by saying rocks can think. Strong example of cognitive bias.

You're wrong here, and you refuse to cure your ignorance.

ok look. "Thinking" is defined with extreme mathematical rigor. It's not completely defined, but we can definitely rule some things out.

Of course, I don't have time to explain all the math here, so as an example I used the fact that rocks don't think. However, some people like you idiotically tried to argue that rocks do think. You are a moron! Why are you even arguing that??? Get off the internet for a while.

Traditionalists prefer "War Profiteers".

...involved

...and sell them a tool to remove jammed quarters.

I wonder if they're pulling resources from this to more profitable programs (which are also probably overdue).

Heh. Reminds me of when I inherited my parent's late-sixties Olds 98. Helluva tank to drive around in the nineties, until SUVs took over. It was just old and beat up enough that I found other drivers remarkably polite.