Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Do you complain about casinos stopping muggers? (Score 1) 10

Maybe do something about all the scam advertisements on your (Google/Alphabet) platforms. No? Thought so.

Why first? That's pretty stupid. Yeah, Google allows some shady shit, but NOTHING compared to what organized crime syndicates have done. Also, the scam ads are a small fraction of their revenue. I think it's safe to say they're an oversight...they're making billions of dollars advertising for MAJOR pharmaceuticals, for example...the thousands of dollars they're receiving for fake boner pill ads don't really compare to the money they're making on Cialis and its competitors. The casino may be robbing me, but I am not eager to get mugged at gunpoint by even more desperate criminals.

Comment I know a quarter of Tesla sales used the credits (Score 1) 56

And I think it's safe to say they're going to lose sales. I don't think they'll lose all of them but I would expect to lose about half that quarter or about 12%. Worst case it could be as high as 15.

A normal company losing 15% of its sales would be dead meat. Wall Street would cut it up for parts.

But people bought into Tesla when it was so ridiculously overvalued that everybody is afraid of being the one who pulls the trigger. Nobody wants to get caught holding the bag when it eventually collapses.

Meanwhile Elon musk's last two pay packages are worth about $100 billion dollars. If you're wondering how he's going to get that money since those were stock deals he's going to dump the stock into pensions and 401ks. To put that into perspective it's more money than Tesla can make in 50 years with the subsidies...

It's not a question of when company is going to collapse it's just which of the big four are going to buy up the remains and who gets caught holding the bag. I am pretty certain it won't be Elon

Comment We never learn (Score 1) 16

After world war II Russia was a burnt-out husk and it never fully recovered. Putting a criminal in charge of the country was the final straw. Russia was never a threat and there was zero reason to have a cold war with them except to keep the military industrial complex going and to line the pockets of well connected defense contractors at the expense of the public at Large.

At this point with Russia not even able to subdue a nation of 20 million it's stupidly obvious they are no threat so we can't use them to go booga booga at voters.

So China is the next step. And China for their part is happy to use America as an external threat to keep their populace in line. Because we've always been at war with Eurasia.

We never fucking learn.

Comment It's too early to tell, really (Score 2) 56

If by next year EV sales in the US haven't tanked, I'll be somewhat surprised - since Trump and his puppet-masters are actively trying to kill EVs for some reason.

Regardless, as I've mentioned before - my next car will be an EV, likely a Hyundai Ioniq 5 or 6. It's just a question of when I make the purchase. It's possible I'll change my mind on the make, although I can say for sure it will not be a Tesla.

Comment Re:Not a bad game, no... (Score 2) 14

It's just crazy how much money was spend making that mediocre game. Something like 400 million.

You would think the CEO responsible for that disaster would be drummed out of the industry and never work again but I don't even think they bothered to fire him from Sony. I think it's pretty obvious that the fucker was trying to throw money to create a big franchise so that he could move up in the company. It must be nice to waste hundreds of millions of dollars through mismanagement to advance your career and then take absolutely no hit whatsoever.

Submission + - Apple reportedly preparing to oust Tim Cook after Vision Pro flop and AI humilia (nerds.xyz)

BrianFagioli writes: Apple is reportedly preparing to oust Tim Cook after the Vision Pro flop, the Siri stagnation, and the weak reception to the iPhone Air. Multiple reports claim the company is accelerating succession planning for as early as 2026, and the tone suggests this may be more than routine leadership rotation. While Apple has thrived financially under Cook, critics argue that core products have slipped. Siri has fallen years behind competitors, AirPods remain uncomfortable, Apple Watch still struggles with a screen too small to be useful, and Vision Pro has become a poster child for overpricing. Even Appleâ(TM)s AI-focused iPhone Air has been labeled a flop, raising questions about whether the board is losing confidence in Cookâ(TM)s direction.

John Ternus, Appleâ(TM)s hardware engineering chief, is reportedly the leading candidate to take over, signaling a potential shift back to stronger hardware-first leadership. With competitors racing ahead in AI and new form factors, Apple is facing pressure to prove it still has a clear product vision. The timing of these leaks suggests the board wants the public to know that change is coming, and fast. For a company that once defined entire categories, the next CEO may determine whether Apple regains its footing or keeps drifting toward overpriced experiments and fading relevance.

Slashdot Top Deals

Mathematicians stand on each other's shoulders. -- Gauss

Working...