Comment Re:LLMs do not (Score 1) 59
If you are really smart, yes. You will understand that. Most of my students limit LLM use, also because they have to pass an exam without. But less smart ones? They will just become dependent and learn nothing.
If you are really smart, yes. You will understand that. Most of my students limit LLM use, also because they have to pass an exam without. But less smart ones? They will just become dependent and learn nothing.
Plato was wrong on this one. He was not wrong to generally be skeptical of tools. A tool needs to prove its adequacy and usefulness before it sees general deployment. LLMs have not done that in the education space.
There is evidence right in the story. I guess you have terminal AI brain-rot.
This is exactly what any smart educator expected and the smarter students do too. A lot of mine are not using AI or using it only very carefully.
What we will increasingly see is a large divide between good and bad students. Not a surprise at all.
I got a feeling this will quickly become the new "everything causes cancer and we have to tell you about it" California nonsense.
Everything will have this disclaimer, since algorithms now set prices even in retail, and no one wants to take a risk of being on the wrong side of damages on this one.
Well, the house of cards they have build is crumbling. Absolutely no surprise.
It is just called being professional and wanting a long-term future for your business. Boeing is all shot-term greed and incompetence.
From my understanding, yes. Crime support is the only thing that made crapto viable.
Not debunked and not bullshit. It is just idiots like you that cannot accept reality. Yes, all got hit. No, it was not the same. They all were warned years before by a Microprocessor-Forum presentation. Intel got fully hit with practical exploits early on because the did not care one bit. AMD was careful and only had theoretical exploits for the longest time and it is not clear to me whether there ever were any practical ones for them.
It is no surprise to me you are unable to see the difference between the two things.
Gender identity does exist. Denying that is delusional and disconnected. Now, it is not a single but but a lot more complex.
Spoken like a fuckup that cannot accept reality. YOU are a really bad person by trying to force your deeply flawed views on everybody.
I am well aware of what Money did. He did not think gender identity was a spectrum. He though gender identity can be manipulated and externally imposed, essentially by force. And that is wrong and not consistent with what Science says today. But gender identity is a spectrum and comes from the person in question. Denying that makes the person denying it a liar or clueless.
For most of my early life, Intel was about process engineering, not CPU engineering. They were usually a year ahead of other manufacturers so even if their CPU design was lacklustre they could win on the manufacturing process.
Then they lost the lead there and now their problems with CPU designs have caught up with them.
Intel sacking white men and replacing them with DIE hires was widely discussed over the last decade, along with predictions of the inevitable end result. Which is now clear to everyone.
No-one I know on the right want to spy on everyone's phones.
It's a government thing, not a left/right thing. Governments want to spy on everything all the time because they're authoritarian scumbags, regardless of whether they claim to be left-wing or right-wing.
I mean, it's not a right-wing government pushing Digital ID in the UK. It's a left-wing Labour government who claim to be the socialist party of the working man and have been trying to force ID cards on the British people for the best part of thirty years now. Nor is a right-wing EU government pushing software to spy on every private message.
I think I'd rather be nuked than starved.
You will have a head crash on your private pack.