Comment From the crappy transcripts Teams does... (Score 1) 22
... I gather nobody is actually reading these. Sounds like mostly CYA.
... I gather nobody is actually reading these. Sounds like mostly CYA.
Yep, it is like an insane cult that, without the members caring, has an end-goal of mass-suicide.
Yep, the fireworks will be spectacular. Quite deadly as well unless you are at a safe distance. Which probably would be at > 13'000km for this gigantic mess.
I'll point to how the UK wanted to invest in electricity production in Morocco in order to have a portion of that electricity shipped to the UK by undersea cables. That would have meant bringing jobs, education, and wealth to help Morocco with droughts. Then the politics got to be too much for the UK so they backed out. That's unfortunate, in my opinion at least, as that could have helped Moroccans so much.
I do not know what your "news" source is, but the actual reason was that producing renewable electiricity in the UK was found to be cheaper. That may have included some risk-costs.
Yep. The human race is defective like that. Still tribal, still no idea what is going on.
freevee content on prime always had ads.
Only half true: A bunch of originally ad-free "included with Prime" content got moved to (or new seasons appeared on) FreeVee, with ads. Someone here has already mentioned Bosch - Legacy, Alex Rider was another one - pretty sure there was more.
...the Prime Video App requires an Amazon account - but not an Amazon Prime subscription (yes, you're probably meant to be confused).
If you don't monitor it the problem will surely go away,
If the voters are experiencing their own entry-level Dunning-Kruger Effect, then they are possibly voting because it simply sounds good, not that it's actually correct. They have been convinced, but whether that convincing is because the information is actually good is another matter.
If we could tell when people were actually worth listening to versus just being able to sound good, we wouldn't have the sorts of problem with how we choose leadership that we have either.
Poor are better off than ever throughout history.
That's actually why all these "we're all going to die in global boiling if we don't put poorest back into starvation by denying them cheap and reliable energy" mostly stopped at this point. Too much repetition, too many people that heard it all since at least 1980s, and oceans are still not only not boiling off, but humans are better off than ever in our history. And it's getting better.
So the language has been shifting ever since massive reckoning of "we were laughably, insanely wrong in our predictions" that happened around 2020 in IPCC. That's when they had to admit that hard predictions made in 2000 of what should happen by 2020 if any of their predictions are correct turned out so phenomenally wrong when 2020 arrived and we could observe not only none of the catastrophies predicted occurring, but that in many cases what was predicted from 2020 baseline... got better. I.e. desertification was massively pushed back for example. There's now such a massive surplus of Polar Bears, the animal that was supposed to die out due to "destruction of habitat because of AGW" that we had to roll back many of the protection measures as Polar Bears are so numerous and spread so widely that they're actively hunting humans in the Arctic towns and villages now.
So now the language shifted from "we're all going to die in 12 years due to global boiling if we don't do what we the great priests of AGW say" to "catasophe is still happening, it's just so slow that no one can see it. And no, we're making no predictions on when it'll actually happen, so you don't get another 2020 moment, when we predicted a lot of things that should happen by that year, and none of them happen, making us look like what we are: peddlers of lies for personal financial and status gain".
Case described is about parsing CV and application with an AI.
Which means input is both used as a part of an AI prompt, and as a part of actual written application.
I don't think that "lazy managers" are the ones who decide what backend outputs in the first place. That's software architects' job. Lazy manager gets what software architect decides is appropriate for her.
I know you don't. That's what the second paragraph is about.
Now we are _better_ than millions of years of humans were before! Oh, wait
Indeed. This is essentually the same when rats and other pests start to slowly crawl into a building.
"What man has done, man can aspire to do." -- Jerry Pournelle, about space flight