Heroic IT Dept Less Likely to Steal... Lunches? 491
An anonymous reader writes "According to an article in the Houston Chronicle concerning lunch theft, people from IT are least likely to steal lunches because they are a "hero department." The most likely? Accounting and Customer-Support... "
Re:muffins (Score:2, Insightful)
Top execs know they aren't going to get fired for something stupid like that.
Re:Unfortunately.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:muffins (Score:4, Insightful)
Size matters (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:muffins (Score:5, Insightful)
Let's say you give two people $2,000 in equipment (laptop, phone, accessories, whatever). Someone making $20,000 could never afford all that stuff on their own, so they're likely to view it as valuable. Someone making $200,000 could afford it and is probably less likely to consider its intrinsic value. Someone making $2,000,000 probably scoffs at anyone ever being able to use such low-end tools.
Price is fixed; value is not. As such, the appearance of scruples might vary. To account for this, it would be required to compare items of equal relative value to each person. Are the odds of someone making high six-figures not returning a laptop equal to the odds of interns making low-five figures not returning office supplies?
How lets somebody steal his lunch? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:muffins (Score:3, Insightful)
All the envious "higher ups get there because they steal ha ha ha" comments aside, I think there's a simpler explanation. The more money you make, the smaller the theft seems. A buck to someone making a million a year is not the same as someone who has to watch every dollar and appreciates it.
Or to put it another way, a more interesting experiment would be to put a penny candy jar out. A penny is nothing to everyone, so I would expect the rates of theft to much closer to the same.
Re:muffins (Score:5, Insightful)
Another part of the problem is that the laws and systems that provide corporate governance were put in place a long time ago. The country and its people had a very different view of ethics and morality in those times. I mean, where do CEO's and the like come from? Who are the people that invest money in their companies? Well, they come from us, and our own moral fiber (or lack of it) is being reflected in the nature and behavior of the corporations we invest in.
It's like the old joke about corporations being like septic tanks
That doesn't work with the muffin example. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Unfortunately.... (Score:2, Insightful)
A friend of mine used to have a quite big video store and allowed anyone to use the bathrooms, even if they werent buying anything, only to see the same thing happen (piss on the floor, shit on the walls), of course, it all stopped once he closed the bathrooms doors, and only gave the keys to customers.
Re:That doesn't work with the muffin example. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:muffins (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:muffins (Score:1, Insightful)
Until you rip off the company for billions of dollars in an accounting scam...
It isn't about scruples; it's about understanding why they are there and dealing with the feelings arising from them. A lot of scruples are not based in logic or fact, and at some level, you need to be able to require forgiveness to act in the proper manner. Generals, when sending men into combat, have to be unscrupulous; they know men will die, and they choose the path of least death in doing so. As a CFO, I can see the numbers aren't adding up and report my findings to the CEO, who may order job cuts. I have to find a way, therefor, to work past that feeling of guilt. Where does that guilt arise from? Not being able to pay a lot of good men.
Sure, I could steal a hungy babies food, and not feel bad about it whatsoever, but why would I want to? The issue with corporate america is that they have defined morality is that conscious feeling which hinders them from doing which it is they need to do. And instead of trying to understand morality, they bludgeon it with a sledgehammer until it no longer annoys them and then do as they please or are told. They cling to a rigid corporate structure to help offset that psychopathic tendancy, but really, they will never be able to do so until they understand the reason for morality.
There you go (Score:2, Insightful)
These are the jobs I'm told PhDs are overqualified for, and people with degrees and experience just aren't enough of a "team player" for. I guess asking "what the fuck are people doing wasting time talking about who stole what lunch?" is being a non-team-player.
The modern workplace is an unwiped ass.
watch out when the food is free (Score:3, Insightful)
We love the free food.
Re:Steal? (Score:3, Insightful)
And I do think that Walmart would be more likely to be looted because it's a corporation, not an individual.
Re:Speaking as one who regularly steals food.... (Score:3, Insightful)
what do you do if there is no food? die?
Re:muffins (Score:5, Insightful)
That feeling of guilt arises from the knowledge that the company's profit margin will remain intact, while some people's ability to even feed their families will be shot to hell.
I don't even really fault the people who make these decisions (people like you.. you're doing your job and YOU will be fired if you don't - you have as little choice as the people you might end up firing).. I fault an economy that favors profit at all costs and a stock market that is punishingly unforgiving when a company's profit margin falls a mere 0.000000000034%.
I fault a country that has long since forgotten what making a living is all about, and what building a community, and a nation, is all about.
I'm all about profit. Profit can be a good thing.. but profit is not always a good thing, and that is what so many have long since forgotten.
Re:muffins (Score:4, Insightful)
Obviously there's a sense of "entitlement" there as well, but I think people are jumping on the 'all executives are sociopaths' bandwagon a little quickly. It reeks of sour grapes.
If I was trying to keep people from taking bagels/muffins/coffee in a situation like that, rather than putting out a "coin jar" where people have to put in a piddling amount every time they take an item, which requires that they keep small change hanging around (or cash money in general, which many people don't have), it might be easier to let people pay in advance. E.g., in many government offices the water coolers are paid for by members of the "water club;" if you want to drink water, you pay $10 at the beginning of the quarter and get your name put on a list that's taped to the front of the water cooler (or simply made known to everyone else).
Re:muffins (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Steal? (Score:4, Insightful)
One of the big stores in Chicago was impressed and sent an executive down to see if they could learn something they could use in Chicago. So he flew into Amarillo, met the district sales representative for that brand, and they got in the sales reps car and drove to the store a couple of hours away.
When they walked into the store about 11 am, they didn't see anyone at all. They figured that maybe the employees were drinking coffee or something and so they waited.
Then they noticed a sign that said "If you see a tv you like, take it home and try it out". Another sign instructed people bringing in a tv for repair to write down what was wrong with it and put the paper on the tv. Another sign said "If you brought your tv in for repair and you see it here, it is fixed. The repair cost is on the tag. Leave the money in the cigar box on the counter or sign the tag and leave it in the cigar box and we'll bill you for it."
About an hour after they arrived, one of the town's more idle citizens walked into the store and they asked him where the owners were. He replied, "Oh, they're out harvesting wheat. They should be back by 8 or 9 tonight to close the store for the night."
The visitors figured that nothing that we did here would work at all in their Chicago stores.
Re:muffins (Score:5, Insightful)
You're a seller, and apparently an honest one. You only see half the business interactions: cheap buyers with honest sellers, and generous buyers with honest sellers. You don't see the interactions with dishonest sellers. Any company which says "just do it right and install what you think it needs" to every vendor will be out of business in a year. There are dishonest vendors out there who will rape you if you give them a blank check like that.
The key is to be thrifty with your money when seeking out vendors, then when you find one that you know is honest and does good work, be generous with it. Of course there are always tightwads who will never be anything but tightwads. But if you're seeing a disproportionate share of them, you should probably raise your prices and work harder to convince clients that you're honest and do good work for their money.
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Man traps are illegal (Score:3, Insightful)
Now, if you string a trip wire with some tin cans on it to warn you if you have an intruder and they fall, hit their head and die, in most places you are off the hook. You had no intent to harm, and you tried to use a non-lethal approach.
That is the difference between thinking like a 3 year old and an adult. An adult understands when the response is in alignment with the offense. Placing ex-lax in a lunch to catch some one stealing your lunch is about right. Using broken glass is way over the line.
"no value". (Score:3, Insightful)
A bagel has no real value to a CxO because the CxO earns so much.
A $20 bill has no real value to a CxO because the CxO earns so much.
So the CxO picks up a bagel (no value) and drops in a $20 bill (no value). But that does not happen.
Re:Heard stories at work (Score:5, Insightful)
I suspect the waitress has a good story to tell about what your sister and your family ate after the rehearsal dinner.
Re:Ick. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:That doesn't work with the muffin example. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:muffins (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:muffins (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:muffins (Score:4, Insightful)
I was working for one of the many "we're going to enhance the users internet experience" companies. The VP of development was a woman who had become independently wealthy from the IPO of a previous company and was only working here because being retired was too boring.
One day six of us, including said VP, go out to this new greek restaurant. The food is delicious, the service was warm, we were all happy. We all got the same thing which cost $8 after tax, and we all agreed that $2 each was an appropriate tip. Well the VP was too good to carry cash so she put it on her credit card. She received $50 in cash for a $48 bill.
SHE FILLED OUT THE CREDIT SLIP FOR $51!
I could not believe what I had just seen. Talk about your sense of entitlement. In my opinion she had just robbed the wait staff. Pitching in 1 of her several million dollars for an $8 meal was beyond belief. I'm not sure which pissed me off more: that she had done it, or that there wasn't a damned thing I could do about it.
Re:muffins (Score:3, Insightful)
Pinching every monetary penny is an awful idea. Pinching every value is the way to go, and sometimes that involves spending more money than otherwise.
Re:"no value". (Score:3, Insightful)
If your company started asking for $.10 for a drink from the water cooler, would you bother putting in that dime? Would you put in $1? (assuming they had no way of knowing who did and did not pay for water)
-matthew
Re:muffins (Score:3, Insightful)
The job itself is poorly defined (on purpose) as a structural way of giving a manager power.
Only their boss knows what they've told them to accomplish and only their boss can evaluate them.
Re:Might be a gov't thing. (Score:3, Insightful)
Rich
Re:muffins (Score:3, Insightful)