Slashdot Log In
Conductive Concrete Offers Building Security
Posted by
timothy
on Thu Mar 21, 2002 02:28 PM
from the lacks-transparency dept.
from the lacks-transparency dept.
zdburke writes: "In a slightly different spin on the electromagnet-protected server room in Stephenson's Cryptonomicon, the folks at the National Research Council have developed concrete that conducts electricity, or 'percolates,' allowing it to serve as an electromagnetic shield. Current uses lean toward heated loading docks, non-freezing bridges, and grounding large-scale electrical equipment, but the counter-espionage idea is cool. The NYTimes has a brief story, and the folks at UN Omaha have some great pictures. It's not exactly new (it won a Popular Science prize in 1997) but it's still cool stuff."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Conductive Concrete Offers Building Security
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 162 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Wow... (Score:3, Funny)
HERF hacks ;-) (Score:2)
Blocks Cell Phones? (Score:3, Insightful)
Cool stuff? (Score:2)
Wouldn't "hot stuff" be more appropriate?
Cost and Uses (Score:2, Insightful)
A great big Faraday cage (Score:5, Interesting)
I shudder to think of the day when we will work in protective buildings like these, keeping company secdrets safe from Van Eck phreakers and war drivers, but also keeping out the mellow, smooth sounds of Office Light Jazz 94.7.
Lightning (Score:1)
Floating concrete structures?!? (Score:4, Funny)
Wow! (Score:3, Funny)
Now (Score:1)
music studio (Score:3, Interesting)
Concrete circuitry? (Score:4, Funny)
How about drywall transistors and logic-gate carpets?
I wont be happy till my split-level serves pr0n.
Heated loading docks (Score:2)
Brought to you by science.
Nevermind the espionage angle.. (Score:1)
No more salt (Score:1)
It kills slugs too. Who knows what good slugs do for our environment? Haha
Non-freezing bridges? (Score:2, Insightful)
Please study a little science before you post stories from similarly unclued "visionaries".
heating (Score:3, Interesting)
But wouldn't it be cheaper and simpler to embed, say, a PVC 2-inch pipe in the concrete, and run warm water through that? Note that you can use this method with just about anything (dirt, asphalt, etc) and keep it from freezing.
If you want a method to directly heat it using electricity, run stainless steel pipe instead, and use it as a load.
I've frequently wondered why civil engineers haven't implemented either of the above techniques before. Chalked it up to "roads don't freeze enough".
Thoughts?
Finally! (Score:1)
just don't use Russian contractors... (Score:1)
Question for a Civ Eng: (Score:2)
Intuition is telling me "yes to both", but I'm not a Civ...
Check this out... (Score:1)
Warning: professors at work (Score:1)
Same as ionized concrete? (Score:1)
It sempt like a good idea but I haven't heard anything else about it for quite awhile. Perhaps someday this tech will be common in homes, as people are becoming more conscious of home and workplace health in our increasingly estrogenic society.
What about... (Score:1)
A New Option for the Tinfoil Hat Wearing Crowd (Score:1)
Of course, remember, just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...
Power consumption? (Score:1)
Conductive Roads... (Score:1)
:-)
Interesting ideas (Score:1)
Static Control (Score:3, Informative)
And the suggested use of electrically heated payment leaves me wondering where they plan to get free electricity.
But there is one good application for this. Electronics manufacturers need to control static throughout their facilities. Fixed objects are grounded by hooking up wires, but people walk around, circuit boards and parts are carried around on carts, etc., and the only way to ground these while in motion is through the floor. So we paid plenty for conductive tile, and some sort of conductive underlay. If we could have put a conductive layer in the concrete slab itself, it would have saved a bunch (even at 3x the price of regular concrete), and it would be more reliable and lower maintenance.
thank god for EM shielding concrete... (Score:1)
NYT Random Login Generator (Score:1)
It's a simple HTML/javascripty thing to automatically generate a random NYTimes login every time you want to view a story. Just cut and paste the nytimes.com url you want to view, and hit the button.
If you could, please try to save the page locally and use it from your server or desktop, to keep the traffic to my server reasonable. Distribute at will.
Cell Phone Proof? (Score:1)
Wireless Guitars (Score:2)
"These go to eleven."
Heated Runways (Score:2)
I thought a big use for these were going to be for heated runways - so you don't have to worry about de-icing them anymore. (I just hope they don't heat them too much and then you have a bunch of lizards just hanging out on the runway warming themselves.)
Don't throw your wood stoves out yet (Score:2, Informative)
But for heating? Forget it! Two replies to this article mentioned something about how much energy it would require to melt ice. Now add the energy required to heat up the concrete. And know, that while electricity works quickly, it is just about the most expensive way to heat your home/whatever.
You might consider also, that while an abode of conductive material might be a great way to absorb stray radio signals coming your way, what are is your dwelling going to be emitting if you are hooking up AC voltage to it? If a micro-watt cell phone freaks you out, consider thousands of watts pumping through your house
Radiant heating systems are the way to imbed a heat source in concrete. The technology is gaining in popularity all the time, as it deserves.
Read more about it for yourself at: http://www.radiantcompany.com/ They are for profit, but the prices seem reasonable. They advocate do-it-yourself and lots of good info on the website.
It would be great to hear from an HVAC engineer on this, but I don't think they will tell you much different.
Bollux (a BSME)
i haven't gotten to that part yet! you bastard! (Score:1)
RF Nightmare - buildings as antennas (Score:2)
Today, large buildings reflect radio signals, creating interference for many signals in the shorter wavelength (6m to 30cm) bands. Imagine how much worse this would be if the buildings them selves had strong electromagnetic fields, or worse yet, emitted AC fields?
Also, these structures will convert radio signals and other EMF into electric current. Theoretically, it is possible that such current could be in the tens of milliamps or even higher, making for passive RF radiators.
I know we already use a lot of steel in buildings, but this is usually grounded and steel is a really poor conductor compared to something like copper or silver. I'm assuming this conductive concrete has much better electric conductivity than steel.
Vortran out
voltage (Score:3)
Power _cost_ will be irrelevant.... (Score:1)
So why melt the ice when we can use the temperature difference between an ice-forming-bridge and the temperature stable ground (or even the body of water the bridge crosses) to generate power for pr0n serving apartment complexes?
And we can drive our new electric vehicles slot car style, by drawing power from the road itself.
but What when the whole enchilada cracks? (Score:1)
cool! (Score:2)
Cryptonomicon again?! (Score:1)
Again, I am proved right. Where can I get my copy of Finux?
Limited use for corporate buildings (Score:1)
Obviously the usage will be limited to high security buildings, but hey, if you want to do that, you can just put metal panels in or on the walls.
Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write (Score:1)
Kindly grab both of your ears tightly, one in each hand, and pull firmly until your head is extricated from your ass.
Re:Slashdot writers have to learn how to write (Score:1)
plz point me to a certain 'rule' which requires people posting articles to use 'professional' terms