Slashdot Log In
Online Video Popularity Still Climbing
Posted by
CowboyNeal
on Thu Sep 13, 2007 09:54 PM
from the better-and-better dept.
from the better-and-better dept.
Ant writes "Macworld reports that people in the U.S. have steadily increased the amount of time they spend watching videos online, as Google's YouTube remains by far their preferred video site, according to a study.
In July, almost 75 percent of U.S. Internet users watched videos online, up from 71.4 percent in March, according to comScore Networks. The monthly time spent watching videos went up to an average of 181 minutes per viewer in July from 145 minutes per viewer in March, according to comScore. In July, the average user watched 68 clips, up from 55 clips in March. Overall, almost 134 million U.S. Internet users watched a little over 9 billion video clips in July, up from 126.6 million people and a little over 7 billion clips in March."
Related Stories
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Online Video Popularity Still Climbing
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 59 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Who doesn't (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Who doesn't (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.digg.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday May 26 2005, @05:50PM)
Re:Who doesn't (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Saturday August 18, @01:56PM)
Not really true. MTV killed videos itself about 10 years ago when it decided to stop airing them,... replacing real music content with Beavis and Butt-Head, and crap pop culture reality shows,... The good news is, at least YouTube seems to have somewhat resurrected music videos! ;-)
Re:Who doesn't (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/)
Demand will be met (Score:5, Interesting)
How much simpler could it be?
I want to watch what I want to watch, when I want to watch it, and I'll pay up to a couple bucks a day to get it. I don't want to wait, and I don't want alot of hassle. What we're seeing is the end of an era - the era of broadcast television. Broadcast television will wane, and the quality of online video developed under alternative business models will improve. (We hope - most of the YouTube content is either pirate or just awful to watch)
But the ability is there, and the public networks aren't (so far) willing to adapt. So they'll die.
How much simpler could it be?
Re:Demand will be met (Score:5, Insightful)
Now, now. Don't be so quick. I agree we're in the early stages of transition, and in the next years we'll see lots of channels broadcast on the internet, but don't kill classic TV just yet.
You know they killed radio and cinema when TV was introduced, and killed cinema yet again with VHS. Then with DVD again (but ok.. VHS died
There are currently a billion or more folks world wide at 30+ who prefer the passive experience of cable/air TV (I'm not saying it's a bad thing either), and the market will continue to deliver to this market, if even for the sheer amount of investment in broadcast equipment they already have.
For the longest time I see content being broadcast on both classical TV and on demand. While in the next 5 years I expect the Internet on-demand/live streaming business will boom, I expect it won't be before 20-30 years that we see classic broadcast TV become a niche and disappear, if ever.
Online video site business model. (Score:5, Insightful)
2. Declare the site beta.
3. Allow people to upload videos as high as 18 megabits per second. [divx.com]
4. Wonder where all the venture capital went.
You gotta see Tourette's Guy! (Score:2)
"I hope this is the Puff Daddy version and not that Sting piece of SHIT!!!..." pause.. "AWWW FUCK!!!"
Broadband (Score:4, Interesting)
Upload vs. Download stats (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.diffen.com/)
I'd like to see some statistics on how many people upload videos vs. how many download/watch them.
Like the study that showed men like hot women... (Score:2, Funny)
(Last Journal: Wednesday August 22, @11:29PM)
This was news, several years ago... (Score:3, Insightful)
Looking at websites? Check.
Downloading music? Check.
Social networks online? Check.
Watching videos? Check.
Can we just presume that more people are doing whatever next comes along, and not keep reporting on it?
Greatest fun is ahead of us (Score:4, Interesting)
Only weeks ago was Flash with MPEG4+AAC beta announced. And only days ago was Silverlight 1.0 with WMV support announced.
I expect in the next 5 years we'll see a huge surge in online video as video content producers scramble to take a foot in this brand new market.
And I actually expect online video will outdo bittorrent traffic, since a large part of bittorent traffic now is actually various TV series and movies, things that will be legally available for streaming in the near future.
The big question mark is: what do ISP-s do about it. They can filter and slow down bittorrent traffic since the popular opinion is it consists mostly of illegal content (and it's mostly, though not entirely correct). They'll have a quite unique problem doing so with streaming media (and you can wrap streaming in HTTP traffic on port 80 too) when official distributors start streaming DVD or HD quality content as the rule, rather than the exception.
Yes, but.... (Score:2)
(http://www.clutterme.com/)
http://www.clutterme.com/internetpeople [clutterme.com]
(not really a shameless plug since that page has nothing to do with my site)
75 (Score:1)
(http://www.comicalcomics.com/)
Re:What the... (Score:2, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/~Himring/journal/179579 | Last Journal: Saturday August 18, @11:20AM)