Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Comment: Sense Of Entitlement (Score 1) 618

by Mike610544 (#49713507) Attached to: Editor-in-Chief of the Next Web: Adblockers Are Immoral
If you don't like the ads on a site, don't visit that site. If enough people do that, site operators will figure out the types of ads people tolerate and those they don't. Ad blocking isn't 'stealing', but it is mildly sociopathic: "I want what I want and screw the people providing it."

I find ads as annoying as the next person, but that's how a lot of stuff I want to see is funded, so it only seems fair to accept them. Pretty much every 3+ comment here is pro adblocking.

Comment: Re:Fuck those guys (Score 5, Insightful) 569

Before breaking down the door, they should at least have a seasoned, senior officer knock to see if anything seems odd first.

They probably could respond more reasonably, but walking up to the door and knocking might be a bit reckless. What if it's not a false alarm and there's am unstable, armed murderer on the other side?

Comment: Re: Morale of the Story (Score 1) 217

The people who fund in kickstarter take all the risk, while having no possible upside beyond the products that they buy.

There are a few other things:

  • The satisfaction of creating jobs for people doing something you particularly approve of.
  • The impact a successful campaign has on the perceived feasability of similar future efforts (crowd funded or otherwise).

Comment: Re:What a nightmare (Score 1) 332

they managed to combine both action, a compelling story, and respect for the Star Trek mythos into commercially successful films....

Wait! ... amongst the things they managed to combine were such elements as action, a compelling story and ... i'll come in again.

Comment: Re:Logic! (Score 1) 776

Neither article (OP or this response) seem to support the assertions made in the posts.

Also, is "amount of radiation" a good metric for harm done? Seems like that leaves out a lot of factors that would affect the real world impact.

One thing that seems clear is that (even ignoring climate change) fossil fuels cause a lot more deaths than nuclear.

Comment: Re:You can't afford it, by your own admission. (Score 2) 120

If you can't afford the expert then you can't afford to collect such data. Move away from this project to something you have the ability to do.

I'm surprised it took this long for someone to say that. The people who will exploit your system and extract something valuable from it can afford those experts.

Comment: Re:Computer Teacher? (Score 1) 317

by Mike610544 (#41050397) Attached to: Your Favorite Technology That Didn't Come To Pass

They're talking about the sci-fi version, which is basically a specialized AI that has access to all that information. If you've read The Diamond Age, the Primer is a good example

Even in that vision of the distant future, human intervention was required to make it work completely.

The type of real GOFAI implied by "Computer Teacher" is probably the most valuable tech on the list, but it seems like it's a lot harder to do than the rest. The fact that our best "human simulations" are basically Eliza with a few hard-coded gags is kind of depressing.

Comment: Re:I know the answer! (Score 1) 448

by Mike610544 (#40305863) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Best Headphones, Earbuds, Earphones?
It's hard to accept, but digital now means "on a hard drive" or something. CDs and DVDs aren't considered digital. I bought a blu-ray a while ago and it actually said on the box "Includes bonus digital copy!"

It's maddening, but sometimes I find it best to just accept these things. It's not as bad as the whole hacker == criminal thing.

Tomorrow's computers some time next month. -- DEC