Did you know that really.__anything__() can be written as anything(really) ?

> I also wish you could turn off specific permissions (so app developers would have to check that they have the permission before they used it, erroring - and asking for the permission - if that permission was required).

Yes. Or maybe an option to "Install with No Permissions" or something. It would be interesting to see which parts of the app required which permissions, then you could make an informed choice whether you wanted X feature enough to expose yourself in that specific way.

I'm a leet misanthrope, you insensitive clod!

Also: first time on /. for a good while - what's with all the spam?

If I found a locked phone I would keep it nearby and wait for it to ring.

(Sorry, I posted this in the wrong thread first time. Now I have to make a pointless change in order to re-submit...)

If I found a locked phone I would keep it nearby and wait for it to ring.

I assumed the GP was referring to a leaky browser sandbox rather than your common-or-garden XSS issues.

I know this was a joke at the expense of Java, but surely if it's possible to write a security-hole-ridden port of anything in HTML5 then HTML5 must have such holes all by itself?

At least it wasn't a lingering rape.

If this could ever actually work - which it can't - I wouldn't want my digital photos to expire anyway. BUT if anybody actually does want this, why doesn't facebook just delete them after the expiry date?

Stop being sensible.