Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Windows Live Goes to College

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Tue Apr 25, 2006 02:26 AM
from the captive-audiences-101 dept.
Tobias writes "BetaNews is reporting that Microsoft has struck a deal with 72 different colleges to use Windows Live for their email services. The problem with this is that Windows Live does not support any browsers besides IE 6, does not support POP or IMAP, and does not support email forwarding." From the article: "The Redmond company believes that catching the students early on will turn them into life-long users of Windows Live. They would likely create a Windows Live Messenger account, start a blog and organize their favorites under this e-mail account -- especially if they plan to continue using it, Microsoft says."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Windows Live Goes to College 50 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • by crazyjeremy (857410) * on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:27AM (#15195017) Homepage Journal
    Wait, wait... You man Microsoft is trying to MAKE people do things a new way... their way... a proprietary way which demands a complete change of hardware & software and includes an entirely new interface?

    Can they do that?

    From the article:

    "But although there has been a rapid uptake of the service, the company says it still meets resistance and skepticism. In return, Microsoft has been assuring education institutions that its only motivation is to get students using Windows Live, promising there are no ulterior plans."

  • how long... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Dance_Dance_Karnov (793804) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:31AM (#15195025) Homepage
    until they slip some cash to some people who then make it a mandatory part of the "college experience". Reminds me of the tobacco companies, "hook 'em while they're young".
    • Re:how long... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by NemosomeN (670035) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:36AM (#15195041) Journal
      It already will be. I'm attending Uni in Mississippi, and we are required to check our email daily. I imagine this policy is common elsewhere.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:how long... (Score:3, Funny)

        1.) Write a shell script that polls the site, downloads all new mails and sends them to a real email account/puts them into your mbox
        2.) Tell cron to execute the script daily
        3.) Rejoice as you don't have to deal with the thing anymore, except for the occ
          • Re:how long... (Score:3, Informative)

            As far as everyone who has used it has already posted, Windows Live has a fallback mechanism in case the user doesn't use IE6. In that case it reverts to a basic interface called "Hotmail Classic". Just dont' let your script pretend it's the IE and you sho
      • I work in a large (many say prestigious) hospital where they use Windows 2K terminals to access patient records, labs, X-rays, page doctors, order tests, etc. These are not only mission critical functions, but potentially life critical. Every time a decent
  • It does work on Firefox (Score:4, Informative)

    by figleaf (672550) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:32AM (#15195027) Homepage
    I am not sure were that IE6 only blurb came from.
    • Re:It does work on Firefox (Score:4, Informative)

      by Edward Scissorhands (665444) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:22AM (#15195151)
      No, IT DOES NOT WORK ON FIREFOX. Perhaps you haven't noticed, but the functionality on Firefox is limited. When you access Windows Live Mail Beta on Firefox you are getting absolutely NO ajax-style features. There is no preview pane. There is no interactivity whatsoever. There is even a bolded error message telling you that you are in "Hotmail Classic" mode which is even less featured than the old Hotmail interface. The bolded message suggests that you navigate to the "options" menu and turn on the full interactive Live Beta experience. You can do that in Firefox, but NOTHING HAPPENS and you will be greeted with the same bolded message whenever you look at your inbox. It tells you that you need to be using IE to fully use Live. It's completely unusable without ANY javascript functionality, you know.

      It doesn't work. Microsoft is dragging their feet on Firefox support because, once again, their programmers do not know how to write to standards. Either that, or their managers are telling the programmers to wait on implementing a "workaround" for non-IE browers.

      My guess though is that it's the former-- Microsoft simply doesn't hire employees that know or care about web standards. These guys are probably just learning about Firefox and the DOM as they go. They've only ever written to Microsoft's own JavaScript extensions.

      In other words, they are incompetent.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:It does work on Firefox (Score:5, Insightful)

        by KiloByte (825081) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @04:01AM (#15195232)
        In other words, they are incompetent.

        Wrong. Never attribute to stupidity what can be adequately explained by malice.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:It does work on Firefox (Score:5, Insightful)

        by balloot (943499) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @04:20AM (#15195265)
        You are certainly underestimating MS here - I'm sure it took a lot of effort and collaboration between the IE and MS Live teams to ensure that they create a product which works well on IE6 but is feature limited on Firefox.
        [ Parent ]
      • When you access Windows Live Mail Beta on Firefox you are getting absolutely NO ajax-style features.

        No Ajax? What do they think this is, Web 1.0 circa 2005?

        Fucking cavemen.

      • by everphilski (877346) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @07:56AM (#15195856) Journal
        Sorry bud, works great here. Firefox 1.5.0.2.

        There is no preview pane.

        Sure is! Pretty pictures and all. Looks like Bush is probing gas prices.

        There is no interactivity whatsoever.

        I can drag/drop windows around, pop config menus, hit the +,- buttons, sure works great for me!

        Suggest upgrading your Firefox. Or turning Javascript back on. One of the two.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:It does work on Firefox (Score:3, Insightful)

        I can recall when the www.live.com portal was launched. At the time, it did not support Firefox. IIRC, at the time, MS received many jeers for not supporting Firefox, and many indicated that it never would. I don't know when this changed, but I am now able
      • Re:It does work on Firefox (Score:4, Insightful)

        by figleaf (672550) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:13AM (#15195126) Homepage
        The article makes no mention about IE6.
        The slashdot poster must have added his just added the extra spice to get posted on slashdot.

        As far as your 'in other words' interpretation please go check out the channel9 presentations on windows live wherein they talk about their support for firefox.
        [ Parent ]
  • Ok (Score:3, Interesting)

    by NitsujTPU (19263) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:33AM (#15195032)
    Windows Live does not support any browsers besides IE 6, does not support POP or IMAP

    So, why did they do this? This mail service sounds like garbage (no offense MS). I can't use any standard email client with it.
    • Re:Ok (Score:4, Funny)

      by Jesus_666 (702802) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @04:17AM (#15195255)
      I can't use any standard email client with it.

      I think that was one of the design goals.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Ok (Score:5, Insightful)

      by FirienFirien (857374) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @05:14AM (#15195373) Homepage
      They did it to lock people in. The entire model locks people in, as mentioned in the summary - the email does not allow you to access them with third-party clients, and does not allow you to get the mails anywhere where you can access them with third-party clients, unless you do it manually for every single mail you get.

      The entire thing will be a serious pain in the ass for anyone with even mediocre IT savvy; the people who are used to using a web client will have no problems and are the easy audience for MS here (with MS hoping to use the structure of Windows Live to keep them as clients when they leave, since then they keep all their contacts etc); and the setup also forces the rest of the students - those who would prefer to do things in any of a variety of other ways - to stoop to using their system. MS are effectively pulling in a pile of easy targets, and then putting a big wall around the hard targets so they are stuck whether they like it or not. As seen in a good thread above, the common language means it does function in FF, but breaks its major featureset. Anyone in firefox will be stuck with a closed interface, and you won't find bets against that improving in a hurry, because it would be a door in that big wall MS are setting up.

      Whether or not they're losing lockin elsewhere, they've jumped on the opportunity to get a new generation before that generation gets savvy enough to get up in arms about what's being done to them. Sure, there'll be a few, but not enough until someone writes an interface that shapes packets to enable automation of the features that MS are intentionally leaving out.

      IMAP has been around for 20 years; POP3 for 12. The longevity and widespread use of these protocols is vast in terms of the internet and email; 20 years is a vast timespan for this arena. Yet MS have designed something that prevents both. I have no idea how long automatic email forwarding has been around for, but again it's something that MS have left out.

      When I saw the summary on the front page, I saw it was tagged 'monopoly'. I initially dismissed that, because I thought that with email you can't get a monopoly so the tag was irrelevant in this case. But when you force, force, force people to use your system with no way of connecting it up to their other systems, and use the weight of an educational institution to enable that lockin, then it is indeed a monopoly. They're not getting any money from it yet (I very much hope an institution wouldn't pay for this system) so the traditional connotations of 'monopoly' aren't there yet - but they're forcing people in while and where they can't do anything about it. Keep the number of people, they'll get their profits, whether it's in systems required to be able to use their services or something further down the line for Windows Live.
      [ Parent ]
  • And the one that Microsoft just can never seem to grasp, and probably the reason why so many people just don't want anything to do with them, is that there always has to be a hook.

    Some might argue that Google have a hidden agenda (and no-one has quite worked out what that is yet) but with their offerings such as their GMail for Businesses, regular GMail, Calendar, etc there isn't a 'hook' - its just there. You use it, you don't - You like it, you don't - so what.

    With Microsoft its always something like "We want to get people to be lifelong users" or "We reserve the right to turn on adverts when people graduate" - there is always a caveat or other reason rather than "This is a damn good product - we think it will sell itself".

    I can't wait to be rid of Windows at home and just be done with Microsoft.
    • by shawb (16347) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:06AM (#15195108) Journal
      By so many people, you mean the part that aren't in the approximately ninety percent that almost exclusively use Microsoft products? People really don't care. Look how the DMCA and P Patriot Act passed in The States without a bloody revolution or two.
      [ Parent ]
      • Statistics in your face. (Score:4, Insightful)

        by twitter (104583) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @08:50AM (#15196146) Homepage Journal
        By so many people, you mean the part that aren't in the approximately ninety percent that almost exclusively use Microsoft products?

        The Microsoft platform monopoly is very weak right now. Any web application designed for a single version of M$ will fail for about half of your users. While they still have sizable majority of OS use, you can't count on a specific version being present. When you permutate that with browser used, your numbers fall even more.

        Less than 60% of people use IE 6 [w3schools.com]. That means about two in five people will not be able to use this stupid service.

        Even M$ OS share is slipping. XP, the "dominant" platform only has 79% of the market. If you take out what people use at work, the Linux + Mac percentage is probably better than 10% now.

        So, while IE 6 is "available" to a majority of users, 25% prefer something else. In short, they care.

        If your school cares, they won't be using this service.

        [ Parent ]
  • by kitkatsavvy (921998) <kitkatsavvy@gmail.com> on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:38AM (#15195046) Homepage
    I signed up to use the hotmail live beta, and it takes FOREVER to reload the screen.. gmail refreshes just about instantly..

    Also, I can't even see my folders - after using hotmail live for about a minute, the folders section is reduced to about 1mm in size.... also, when you are reading EVERY email, there is an AD right next to the email reading window - and so you are forced to read that stupid ad with every email that you read...

    msn/hotmail live SUX! they are just trying badly to copy gmail! maybe their servers are clogged up or something to explain the bad refresh speed...
  • The thing is... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by nugneant (553683) <c45kyew02NO@SPAMsneakemail.com> on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:39AM (#15195049) Homepage Journal
    ...any college that would sign this sort of exclusivity deal probably doesn't have much in the way of, oh, how shall we say, a progressive-minded fast-paced cutting-edge technological studies / computer science department - by which I mean that this list of 72 colleges (which I don't believe was published - I skimmed TFA) is more likely to be "Ben Doke's Midtown College of Applied Farm Machineary" and "Oral Roberts God Fearing U" and 70 other semi-community colleges than it is "M.I.T." and "UC-Berkeley" and other notable names from the Ivy League and Division I-A - and students who'd attend the sort of college that would sign a deal as stupid and moronic as this are probably the sorts who'll be happily locked into Windows anyway, for the rest of the foreseeable future. Or the mildly sociopathic types who'll get a perverse thrill out of signing up for distance learning Web CT classes, then informing the instructor that they won't be able to check their validated campus email because they run Linux ;)

    So, uh, all hype, and it's sorta nerdy - but does it matter?
    • Re:The thing is... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:58AM (#15195092)
      The problem is, even if the school does have "progressive-minded fast-paced cutting-edge technological studies / computer science department", they won't be part of the negotations and decision making process. That will be up to managers in the central IT department and other non-technically minded business administrators. I work at a University and Microsoft have already offered this "solution", to management of course! It also turns out that students will get ads, unless the University pays for an ad free service.
      [ Parent ]
        • Re:The thing is... (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Al Dimond (792444) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:38AM (#15195189) Journal
          CS department? Since when is it the job of the CS department to administer the mail servers? Or any servers for that matter? The CS department studies computer science, not IT.

          You might say that if the CS department had any clout in terms of IT decisions that they would use that clout to block the adoption of this service. That said, I'm not sure the faculty in technical fields have much say in anything. I'm an undergrad at a university with a well-respected Computer Engineering department and the department's IT staff mandates crappy and broken "web boards" instead of newsgroups, won't set up servers for things like CVS/SVN (supposedly they'd rather try to roll their own web-based stuff, so classes tend to use whatever places they have available to set up repositories) and refuses to set up a Linux lab when that's what a class desires (instead we had a lab of Windows machines running Linux under Virtual PC, which is mostly adequate but sometimes a bit of a pain). The web-based portal that all their services go through has a bunch of ads on it, which is probably the reason they want as many services as possible to rely on it. The students and the faculty don't have a lot of choice in the matter. Either way, we can still learn the same ideas even if we don't always do it in the most elegant way possible.
          [ Parent ]
        • CS department != IT (Score:5, Informative)

          by a16 (783096) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @04:27AM (#15195278)
          A uni's CS department has absolutely no relation to the general mail services, or student network, of the university. Whether the CS department is badly managed or wonderfully managed, they will likely hate the people who run the main network if it's anything like my experience.

          My uni has a decent CS department, who run everything for their department themselves. We have access to their solaris machines and we have all of the normal mail (POP3/IMAP/SMTP) services, and can SSH to the machines etc. etc.

          The university however (and anyone on any other course) has to make use of crappy Novell Netware webmail. I could easily see them moving to this new MS system if the managers high up in the IT department were sent enough free copies of Office by MS, or whatever they are bribing them all with.

          When this list is published, expect to see a lot of top uni's with deccent CS departments in there. And whether or not they have a decent CS department or not, we can't say "oh it's ok, they don't have MIT so it doesn't mean anything" - MS are still going to be forcing literally hundreds of thousands of upcoming young adults into only knowing their own proprietary system.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:CS department != IT (Score:3, Informative)


            It's a little more complicated than that, but, yeah.

            I work for the Technical Staff of the CS department at Virginia Tech. Our department is not responsible for the university infrastructure (that's these guys [vt.edu]). However, we are closely tied in with them.
  • by tidokoro (967675) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:40AM (#15195053) Homepage Journal
    drops out freshman year, forms harmless little start-up to develop webOS, and goes on to take over the world.
  • Ok .. time for a bad analogy (Score:4, Funny)

    by shri (17709) <shriramc@gmSTRAWail.com minus berry> on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:51AM (#15195081) Homepage
    >> The Redmond company believes that catching the students early on will turn them into life-long users of Windows Live

    Who was it that said .. if you love someone, set them free? :)
  • Government control (Score:3, Insightful)

    by kestasjk (933987) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:53AM (#15195083) Homepage
    It's things like this which governments should be keeping a close eye on, not bundled media players. Bundling a media player doesn't lock you in; keeping protocols changing and closed (in this case ActiveX) does.
  • webmail (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mikesd81 (518581) <mikesd@pt[ ]et ['d.n' in gap]> on Tuesday April 25 2006, @02:57AM (#15195090) Homepage
    Web mail is great if you want an email where you can filter spam or from those porn site you don't tell your wife about.

    It's not nearly as good as an e-mail client where you can organize, flag, set rules, mark certain domains with colors bla bla. Also, who wants to refresh the page every x minutes to check for email, or have it reloading and wasting a IE page or tab in firefox/opera whatever when you can just have a small client open and every x minute goes and checks for messages. And the lack of forwarding sucks. What if you want to forward yesterday's notes to your lab partner(s) because he was out sick? Not supporting POP? I'm not sure that's such a big deal, unless it means it doesn't have a pop server that you can't log into. If that's true then see my above comments.
  • What schools? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by b0wl0fud0n (887462) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:00AM (#15195095)
    Does anyone have a link to the list of schools who are planning on implementing this?
  • About Time (Score:5, Funny)

    by dartarrow (930250) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:05AM (#15195103)
    Windows Live Goes to College

    About time somebody went to college... I hear the founder was a dropout
  • by jthill (303417) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:08AM (#15195113)
    So: MS want to foist Windows Live on .... College students?

    Do they really think they're going to compete with gmail that late in the kids' lives?

  • Just like McDonalds... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by nickgrieve (87668) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:12AM (#15195125) Journal
    And cigarettes... Hook em while they are young, and you have them for life.

    MS, used to be "good" used to be the underdog taking on IBM and Big Iron. Bringing affordable computing to the little guy, breaking the Vender Lock In (tm)...

    "Whoever battles monsters should take care not to become a monster too, for if you stare long enough into the Abyss, the Abyss stares also into you."
    --Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, chapter 4, no. 146

    Its a shame, really it is... :(
  • Students might not accept it (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Froggy (92010) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:54AM (#15195219) Homepage
    No POP? No IMAP? IE only?

    Oh, man. I can just imagine the reaction if my University tried to bring in something like this. It wouldn't just be the Software Libre lunatic fringe objecting -- we have a lot of fairly technically-capable students who like to read and store their mail on their laptops, and they'd howl the place down. Even the relatively technically unclued around here do their browsing with Firefox.

    Mac users would particularly hate it, especially considering Microsoft's recent statements regarding IE on OSX.

  • outsided again (Score:3, Interesting)

    by KlaymenDK (713149) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @04:00AM (#15195228) Journal
    .....does not support POP or IMAP, and does not support email forwarding.....

    I s'pose that if I were at one of these schools, I would take one glance at it, decide that it's a valiant effort but incompatible with the world at large in a typically-for-MS sort of way, and not use it.

    Meaning I'd probably be locked out of communicating with 90%+ of my peers (who are invariably less picky and don't mind (or notice?) being locked into being life-long users of one specific application).

    Which is why I have about 3 friends. So all of the above is more or less immaterial (but nonetheless now captured for posterity).
  • great choice for teaching marketing (Score:3, Insightful)

    by sl4shd0rk (755837) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @05:51AM (#15195455)
    bad choice for innovation.
  • It's a matter of control (Score:3, Insightful)

    by mtec (572168) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @07:15AM (#15195705)
    " Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past. "
    G. Orwell

    Lessee - a filtered search engine, control of all incoming and outgoing communications, a Media Center telescreen on the wall at the commons and in most of the rooms...

    Winston Smith: Does Big Brother exist?
    O'Brien: Of course he exists.
  • They Might Be Right (Score:3, Interesting)

    by eno2001 (527078) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @08:05AM (#15195902) Homepage Journal
    From TFA: "The Redmond company believes that catching the students early on will turn them into life-long users of Windows Live. They would likely create a Windows Live Messenger account, start a blog and organize their favorites under this e-mail account -- especially if they plan to continue using it, Microsoft says."


    Just think of how many people (Joe Average types, not geeks) started off with DOS/Windows 3.1 machines and built up a whole lot of data on their boxes between the original release and even up to a year or two after Windows 95 was released. Then when the time came to move to a new PC, remember how all of those users migrated their data from the Windows 3.1 box to Windows 95. They were very painstaking in their attention to detail with their precious data, lovingly learning about the file formats and required conversions and then running test migrations before committing to the moved data. And when some of them moved to Macintoshes when the iMacs came out, they were even very good about carrying their data and converting properly there too. Yes, I believe the Microsoft is right in thinking that they will have lifelong customers by 0wnz0ring their user's data and keeping them from using third rate products from competitors. The day and age of people wanting to try alternatives to the mainstream products, have come and gone. Everyone is perfectly happy with the products and services that MS gives them these days and really has no interest in alternatives like Firefox, Google, Mac OS X or Linux. So MS can say this with confidence since there will never be a day when their users might want to migrate their Windows Live data to another service.

    • by Mjlner (609829) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:37AM (#15195187) Journal
      "Most students will welcome this."

      Wrong! Most students will not have an opinion until they experience it. Many will still not have an opinion after that.

      "Most dont know or want to know what pop/smtp/imap are"

      True, but they will find out the hard way that their e-mail service is lacking something that they can't name. At the latest, they will do so when they try to read their e-mail in some webcafé or similar place that only has a non-IE browser. They will also notice that a lot of their friends have a choice of mail clients, whereas they do not.

      When I built an e-mail system for a business school, I was positively surprised by the amount of people who were actually knowledgable far beyond my expectations and they were really opinionated. Freedom of choice matters even among non-CS students. The CS students will of course be outraged and disgusted.

      I think a remarkable amount of students will rely on gmail for their e-email.

      [ Parent ]
    • "Most dont know or want to know what pop/smtp/imap are"

      And here I thought the purpose of school was to teach people not whore out their students to corporations.

      Lets call spade a spade here. Schools just sold their students to MS. There is no other way to
    • Re:Windows Live Supports Firefox (Score:5, Informative)

      by rm69990 (885744) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @03:46AM (#15195206)
      Yeah, most of Windows Live does. Try using Windows Live Mail with Firefox...it isn't pretty to say the least. All of the features that make Windows Live Mail better than Hotmail are gone, and some of the features that make Hotmail usable are gone as well. You can't even mark a message as unread in Live Mail while using Firefox. No drag and drop, no preview pane. I have a Hotmail account that was using Windows Live Mail, but it is useless on my Mac, so I have now switched back to the Hotmail interface. My main email is gmail though, thank god.

      I invited my non-tech friend to Gmail, and she used it as a second email account for a while. After trying out Windows Live Mail, she switched to Gmail on her main account, not liking the direction Hotmail was going.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Benefits? (Score:3, Insightful)

      Since Windows Live is an online service, why not discontinue e-mail service in universities for students completely? After all, its a lot of work, money (hardware, support, licenses) and infrastructure for a very transient population.

      The school for itself
      • Re:Give us the blacklist! (Score:4, Insightful)

        by Rick.C (626083) on Tuesday April 25 2006, @08:17AM (#15195966)
        Would you consider a college that had a policy of "no cars or bicycles on or around campus - you have to use the campus bus service"? How about "no personally-owned computers on campus - only the one we rent to you"?

        It's not only the personal inconvenience that's involved. Wouldn't you question the administration's ability to make sound decisions in other areas, based on their bad decisions in areas that are visible. Would you want to attend a college run by a bunch of yahoos?

        [ Parent ]