Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Wikipedia Covers April Fool's Hoaxes

Posted by Zonk on Sat Apr 01, 2006 07:25 PM
from the check-out-what-you-missed dept.
vladd_rom writes "Wikipedia maintains an up to date list with April Fools hoaxes from this year. The list already includes hundreds of entries. Among the most popular, one could find Google Romance, a new Google.com project, Google Browser, as well as Yahoo!'s desire to buy all Web 2.0 companies on the web. However, it seems that this year hoaxes will be more interconnected: the wiki page already includes some websites that announced that they have been bought by Yahoo!, and linked to Yahoo!'s blog post from their pages."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Back to Green (Score:1)

    by TechTracker (920095) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:26PM (#15043703)
    Finally, back to the old green color... more comfortable.
  • It's obvious (Score:5, Funny)

    by eclectro (227083) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:27PM (#15043704)

    Chuck Norris rides horses, not ponies. He kicked slashdot so hard that it turned green.
    • Re:It's obvious by tehlinux (Score:1) Saturday April 01 2006, @07:28PM
    • Re:It's obvious by earnest murderer (Score:3) Saturday April 01 2006, @08:40PM
    • No... by jd (Score:2) Saturday April 01 2006, @09:07PM
  • Darnit (Score:1)

    by Draegonis (953885) * on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:27PM (#15043706)
    (http://brutix.com/)
    You mean Yahoo didn't take over the world? I feel somewhat cheated.
  • Noooo! (Score:4, Funny)

    by tgtanman (728257) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:28PM (#15043708)
    Where'd my pink ponies go ?!?
    • Re:Noooo! by RipTides9x (Score:1) Saturday April 01 2006, @07:39PM
    • Re:Noooo! by bar-agent (Score:2) Saturday April 01 2006, @09:07PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • All is well again.... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by 1053r (903458) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:32PM (#15043712)
    I think that "pink ponies" is perhaps the most annoying april fool's joke I have seen on the net so far...

    And by the way, I posted this already [slashdot.org]
  • by Phosphor3k (542747) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:32PM (#15043715)
    Do not follow the links! It's a Hoax and my anti-virus went crazy when I clicked the links!
  • /. April Fools Jokes (Score:3, Interesting)

    by HillBilly (120575) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:33PM (#15043716)
    Get worse every year and get taken to far to the point where the site is unuable for a day. Have one good joke and thats it, don't screw up the user experience.
  • Still pink? (Score:5, Funny)

    by brian0918 (638904) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:34PM (#15043718)
    Is the color scheme still pink, or did we switch back to the green? I shouldn't have clawed my eyes out...

    At least my typing skills are still omysvl//////
    • Re:Still pink? by cgenman (Score:3) Saturday April 01 2006, @07:52PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Get Your Pink Ponies Here (Score:4, Informative)

    by dduardo (592868) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:35PM (#15043721)
    Pink Pony CSS [slashdot.org]
  • They used their normal Google logo, instead of one that highlighted the season or some current event (like basketballs, snowflakes, 4 leaf clovers on St. Patty's day, olympic rings).
  • The best April foold's DAy joke that Slashdot ever covered was the . [slashdot.org]
    Wikipedia even talks about the evil bit [wikipedia.org]. I hope Slashdot remembered to set the evil bit to on before posting their Pink style sheets. CSS now means Crippling Stye Sheets.
  • Thanks God it's over... (Score:5, Funny)

    by fm6 (162816) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:40PM (#15043736)
    (http://picknit.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday July 29 2006, @03:58PM)
    ... that pink was hurting my eyes. Then again, it was a convenient reminder that there was nothing worth bothering with on Slashdot for the last 24 hours.

    I used to love April Fools hoaxes, but it's become lame. Attention! A HOAX IS NOT FUNNY WHEN EVERYBODY KNOWS IN ADVANCE IT'S A HOAX!!!! If you want to do an April Fool hoax, make at least a token effort to suprise your audience. Like this email, which got delivered to every employee of a certain large hitech company this morning:

    TO: U.S. Employees
    FROM: Global Employee Name Management
    DATE: April 1, 2006
    CONTACT: Name Management x94678 (WHO-R-U)
    ACTION: Please read.

    This bulletin contains important information about your name.

    Overview

    XXXX has long had a requirement that every UNIX username inside XXXX be
    unique. The transition to these globally unique usernames was at times
    painful, but the result has been that XXXX has been able to support a
    level of global operation that is unprecedented.

    It is now time to take that process to its next logical step: Ensuring
    that employees' names are unique.

    Employees with duplicated names represent immeasurable opportunities
    for confusion, wasted time, and security breaches. In the interests of
    improving the efficiency of the company, we are embarking on an
    ambitious effort to improve this situation by making employees' names
    globally unique.

    Implementation

    In the first phase, to be implemented between today and April 1, 2007,
    approximately 800 employees with duplicated first and last names will
    be renamed to eliminate the duplication. At the completion of this
    phase, it will be possible to uniquely refer to any XXXX employee using
    the employee's first and last name.

    In the second phase, to be implemented between April 1, 2007 and April
    1, 2008, approximately 20,000 employees with duplicated first names and
    last initials will be renamed to eliminate the duplication. At the
    completion of this phase, it will be possible to uniquely refer to any
    XXXX employee using the employee's first name and last initial. In
    addition to the obvious convenience improvement involved, substantial
    savings are expected through eliminating printing the full last name on
    various internal documents. The ink required to print a typical name
    will be cut in half!

    In the third phase, to be implemented between April 1, 2008 and April
    1, 2009, all employees at the Vice President level and above will be
    renamed so that their first and last initials are unique. Employees at
    the E/Z-10 level will be renamed so that their first, middle, and last
    initials are unique. In addition, in each Director-level group and
    each building, all employees will be renamed so that their first,
    middle, and last initials are unique. At the conclusion of this phase,
    it will be possible to refer to any highly visible employee using only
    two or three letters, and to any employee in a particular organization
    or physical location using only three letters. In the vast majority of
    cases, use of initials should be sufficient to identify an employee.

    New Employees

    New employees will be required to conform to the naming requirements in
    effect on their start date. If required to pick a new name, they will
    be encouraged to take the future naming requirements into account in
    their choice.

    Conflict Resolution

    In general, the employee with the lower badge number will retain the
    original name, and those employees with higher badge numbers will be
    renamed. The employee will be allowed to choose a new name, but if the
    employee is not able to decide on a suitable name before the deadline,
    a new name will be assigned in consultation with the employee's
    manager.
    I immediately fired back a letter pointing out that it would be more efficient to simply fire employees with non-unique names. Of course, I didn't remin
  • Worst - April - Fools - ever.... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Andy Gardner (850877) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:44PM (#15043747)
    Seriously what the hell just happened. Since when has april fools day been about making a fool of yourself?

    Where was that single hoax among the serious articles that sucked you in, until you did the double-take and realise you'd been 'had'? I expected something intelligent from /., something subtle. Instead we got 3000 comments about PONIES.

    For shame /.

  • Next april fools (Score:3, Interesting)

    by BkBen7 (926853) <bkben3@gmail.com> on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:46PM (#15043751)
    (http://progress.selfip.net/)
    we should give everyone mod points for the whole day.
  • Worst ever April disaster (Score:3, Interesting)

    by daniel23 (605413) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:53PM (#15043766)

    with that evil color scheme and having to disable the foolish css after every reload or link I quit my fav pretense of being busy entirely.
    Which in fact raised my productivity but looking at the number of comments I feel I wasnt the only one to do so.
    What about taking /. offline next year? April fooling the DNS or something?
  • What happened? (Score:1)

    by DarkMorph (874731) on Saturday April 01 2006, @07:56PM (#15043774)
    It's still April 1st.. Slashdot isn't pink anymore, now a genuine post?! What is happening to slashdot? Noooooooo...
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • A Hoax!?! (Score:5, Funny)

    by ArikTheRed (865776) on Saturday April 01 2006, @08:06PM (#15043789)
    (http://coderoshi.com/)
    Wait... so I shouldn't have registered boycottyahoofortakingovertheweb.org? Damnit!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Regarding tagging... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 01 2006, @08:17PM (#15043806)
    Just noticed this as it occured for this story. When the tags are clearly wrong, it should be possible to vote them negatively. For example, -gay would score down the tag and, hopefully would eventually disappear.
  • was getting a little tired of all the pink crap on /. I mean, next time cant ya'll pick a color thats slightly more condusive.

    I liked 2 or 3 years ago on slashdot, when they still made slashdot look... normal, and act normal. Ya know, like posting news, to obvious fakes, but still posting news. Last year's dupe on dupe sucked, and the pink ponies was stupid. April Fools should be about hoaxes and practicle jokes, and turning the SITE PINK DOESNT COUNT!@!!!@!23113 OMG PONIE RUSH!
  • by MickDownUnder (627418) on Saturday April 01 2006, @09:28PM (#15043939)
    Google has registered the domain gbrowser.com [betterwhois.com].
  • No RFC this time? (Score:1)

    by calctech (414259) on Saturday April 01 2006, @09:35PM (#15043959)
    (Last Journal: Friday August 24 2001, @12:36AM)
    I continually reloaded /. hoping to see the latest April 1st RFC. I'm somewhat disappointed. ):

  • Tagging (Score:1)

    by sec0ndshooter (577896) on Saturday April 01 2006, @10:00PM (#15044011)
    What's up with the tagging? Why the need for people to tag all the April 1 stories as "gay".
    I appreciate the people who rebutted with "straight" tags, but honestly, how juevenille.
  • by Devistater (593822) * <devistater@hotmail. c o m> on Saturday April 01 2006, @11:23PM (#15044204)
    Since when was wikipedia "gay, ponies" (tags) ?
  • by iamghetto (450099) on Sunday April 02 2006, @12:26AM (#15044324)
    (http://www.retardedjesus.com/)
    More than any other site, Slashdot completely ruins itself on April Fools. They post so many garbage stories I usually avoid the site completely April 1st & 2nd. Not so this year, though I wish I would've and might stop slashdotting for few days in protest. While the pink might have been "funny", all the stores that look like they written by a 14 year old girl on MSN really are awful. Not funny, not -gotcha, April Fools!-, just awful.
  • Notice (Score:2)

    by DeadPrez (129998) on Sunday April 02 2006, @01:17AM (#15044433)
    (http://www.lordsofdeath.com/)
    Not too long ago, April 1, 2002 [wikipedia.org] Slashdot pulled the following prank:

    Slashdot announced that it would start posting advertiser-sponsored news stories, and disable anonymous posting.

    Guess only half of that was true.
  • When I first visited the Wikipedia page yesterday, it contained [wikipedia.org] the following:

    Slashdot incorporated a pink "OMG!!! Ponies!!!" theme at 00:00 UTC. This girlish theme is in stark contrast for a techie website believed to be mostly frequented by male nerds. A "Special Birthday Report" [4] about Jeff "Hemos" Bates emerged in the first minutes of the day. A link to Thinkgeek's wireless extension cords has also been posted. The presence of humor on Slashdot has yet to been confirmed.


    That sentence probably disappeared due to Wikipedia's NPOV policy, which makes me sad.
  • Timezones anyone (Score:2)

    by smeenz (652345) on Sunday April 02 2006, @05:37AM (#15044971)
    (http://smee.co.nz/)
    I wish one of these years people would actually take timezones into account. I live in New Zealand, so it's well into the 2nd of April before I start seeing April Fools jokes appearing on slashdot, and because slashcode takes my timezone into account, the stories appear with April 2nd dates on them, making it even harder (okay, not this year cause they were all in pink) to work out which is which.
  • by anwyn (266338) on Sunday April 02 2006, @10:32AM (#15045680)
    Is there an url that will let me see the original april 1 /. article in its original pink?
  • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.