Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Assume all proprietary router software compromised (Score 2, Insightful) 57

by anwyn (#49074083) Attached to: Flaw In Netgear Wi-Fi Routers Exposes Admin Password, WLAN Details
Once and for all: all proprietary router software must be assumed to be compromised. The NSA has been totally committed to ruthless information warfare against the population of the planet. There is no way a corporation can resist them. They consider themselves totally above the law.

Do not buy a router unless OPENWRT supports it.

Always overwrite what ever firmware came with the router with a new install of free software.

The days when Joe Sixpack can just buy a router an plug it in are over! You must do this.

Security experts need to take a close at uboot software commonly used to install alternate firmware. And check if NSA has hacked that up as well.

Comment: systemd runs on my rincky dink Pi just fine. (Score 1) 716

by anwyn (#49031497) Attached to: Is Modern Linux Becoming Too Complex?
I run a service on my Raspberry Pi that distributes hardware random numbers to my lan. For computers that don't have a hardware RNG. Just to see what the fuss was about I converted this Pi to systemd. It worked fine. The unit files were easier to read and write.

On my desktop I run debian testing. and I converted to systemd, with out knowing it, just by doing periodic updates.

Systemd is still free software. All the source is published, and it can be forked at any time. We need this functionality. It is a good thing that it has been redesigned to work smoothly together.

If the complainers really wanted to help, they could do a security audit instead of bellyaching!

If pottering becomes unbearable, the project can be forked. A lot of powerful forces need this project to work, so I suspect it will.

Its just a lot of whining and bellyaching from people who don't want to do anything.

Comment: It is still a freeking rocket! (Score 1) 282

by anwyn (#48951651) Attached to: NASA Looking At Nuclear Thermal Rockets To Explore the Solar System
The UFOs have space drives. Hundreds of witness, some with scientific credentials, have seen UFOs make extremely high G turns. With nothing being shoved out the ass end of the craft. Total silence.

Our physics if fucking wrong, and space drives are possible!

Instead of fucking with rockets, NASA needs to figure out what is wrong with our physics, and build the fucking space drive!

Comment: cross space by cooperation! (Score 4, Interesting) 272

by anwyn (#48721635) Attached to: How Civilizations Can Spread Across a Galaxy
Have a good reputation by practicing ahinsa, and always helping and not hurting the civilizations one visits. Send a copy of your self to other civilizations and get them to build it, giving them detailed instructions. (Use error correcting codes for the instructions.) In return perform same service for others with good reputations! Using this method one can cross space at the speed of light or better. You can cross space at the speed a message can travel.

If you hurt anyone your reputation will be damaged and with it the ability to travel.

+ - Congress passes bill allowing warrantless forfeiture of private communications->

Submitted by Prune
Prune (557140) writes "Congress has quietly passed an Intelligence Authorization Bill that includes warrantless forfeiture of private communications to local law enforcement.
http://thehill.com/policy/tech...
Representative Justin Amash unsuccessfully attempted a late bid to oppose the bill, which passed 325-100. According to Amash, the bill "grants the executive branch virtually unlimited access to the communications of every American""

Link to Original Source

Comment: No Space Drive=no flying car. (Score 0) 107

by anwyn (#47667141) Attached to: Where are the Flying Cars? (Video; Part One of Two)
Flying cars are expensive because just keeping them statically up requires pushing a huge amount of stuff downward to overcome gravity. Action reaction.

UFO have been observed to statically hover without pushing a lot of stuff downward. They have also been observed to accelerate at huge rates, without pushing a lot of stuff in the opposite direction. The UFOs in short, have a space drive.

Our current science has no idea how to produce a space drive. That is, accelerate without moving a lot of stuff in the opposite direction. Or overcome gravity without moving a lot of stuff in the downward direction.

The USA and other major governments is obstructing research into UFO's space drives by promoting the fiction that UFOs don't exist.

You can not have your flying car until you make major governments tell the truth.

Comment: What are the selection effects Scientific Method (Score 1) 725

by anwyn (#47393883) Attached to: When Beliefs and Facts Collide
What are the selection effects of the Scientific Method?

If science were to admit that the scientific method itself had significant selection effects, when applied to certain questions, then science would have to admit that science can not resolve certain questions.

One of those questions might be "Is the Universe a machine?" Or if one wants to take quantum into account "Is the Universe a machine with a gazillion true hardware random number generators attached?"

If the Universe is a machine, then the scientific method preference for repeatable results is justified. If the Universe is a quantum machine, or statistically unbiased machine (i.e. a machine with a gazillion TRNGs attached), then the scientific method's preference for repeatable statistical results is justified.

But what if the Universe is not any kind of machine? What if the Universe is a living being as Eastern religion and philosophy assert? What if the Universe is adjusting itself to the questions and presuppositions of science? What if the Universe is like a child being questioned by a biased investigator alleging sexual abuse? What if the Universe is giving the answers that it thinks the investigator wants to hear?

It seems to me that the scientific method can not resolve such claims. In order to prove an answer, one would have to prove that the scientific method had no selection effects, which one could not prove with knowing the answer to the question a priori . In other words the question is hopelessly circular.

This means that one of the key assumptions of scientism , can not to be proved by the scientific method.

"All my life I wanted to be someone; I guess I should have been more specific." -- Jane Wagner

Working...