Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

MIT OpenCourseWare Now Online

Posted by timothy on Mon Sep 30, 2002 02:29 PM
from the home-schooling dept.
peter303 writes "A sampling of MIT's OpenCourseWare selections appered online today. The courses cover a full range of departments, but only a couple apiece. The material ranges ranges from just syllabi and calendars to extensive on-line course notes and interative demos. To succeed, OpenCourseWare must also be an advantage to MIT faculty and students, as well as the outside world. I think this may be possible, because it gives a uniform appearance and access point for online material, plus tools to build these."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • A little dissapointed (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 30 2002, @02:35PM (#4362007)
    I was eagerly awaiting the launch of this program, and unfortunately am now a little bit dissapointed. I think it is a fantastic idea in principal, but most of the classes don't seem to offer much. A handful (especially in the mathematics department) are excellent and even have videotaped lectures that can be seen online.

    Others have only thin offerings, such as lecture notes alone. In some cases the lecture notes are extensive, but in others they are just minimal outlines of the lecture and are not useful if you did not attend this lecture. (These could be made useful if video lectures were subsequently provided)

    I'm interested to see if other course directors follow the lead of the better prepared OCW sites. I think there is great potential, but it remains to be seen exactly how OCW will fare.

  • Not all of it is online (Score:3, Interesting)

    From 14.33-Economics Research and Communication

    The required text is Writing Economics by Neugeboren and Jacobson. You do not need to buy it. A copy will be provided for you. You are expected to read this text and follow its instructions in the work you hand in for this class, even though we will not cover the text in detail in the lectures. Other texts you might want to consult are A Guide for the Young Economist by Thomson, The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary by Berndt, Elements of Style by Strunk and White, Stata® manuals, and The MIT Undergraduate Journal of Economics.

    Humpf. So where do I sign up for that?

    • Clarity (Score:4, Insightful)

      by tomblackwell (6196) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:43PM (#4362062) Homepage
      I think the point that they are trying to make is that you won't do well in that course if you can't write well. Which is true for many courses in University.

      At least they are offering some resources which might help those who have trouble communicating well in their written work.

      I guess one might argue that writing well is something that you learn by writing often. You can buy books that will help you, but this is one of those courses that you won't master through acquiring new facts from your text.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Not all of it is online by Quirk (Score:1) Monday September 30 2002, @03:45PM
    • Re:Not all of it is online by macrom (Score:2) Monday September 30 2002, @05:12PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 30 2002, @02:37PM (#4362024)
    Excellent news. However, I feel it's necessary to point out that because the courseware is heavily based on the work of others, it's only proper to credit them with the naming of the courseware. I propose "Einstein/Edison/Socrates/Plato/Fermi/MIT/OpenCour seWare"
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Education is changing. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by wackybrit (321117) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:38PM (#4362028) Homepage Journal
    MIT's enthusiasm for this project is refreshing, and certainly quite encouraging. But online education is not particularly new, and all that MIT are adding to the mix is a qualifications system, which could certainly be quite handy.

    The role of education in modern society, however, is under question, since the ability to look up facts instantly (rather than knowing them) can make people appear to be a lot smarter than they really are.

    I have no problem with this. I'd rather people had common sense and an ability to use information, rather than just being a know-all.

    If you need to hire a programmer to write a proprietary TCP/IP driver for your new device, you can hire someone who a) is expensive and a TCP/IP driver expert, or b) someone who is cheaper, very smart, can turn their hands to anything, and uses the Internet to research how TCP/IP drivers work. Most companies these days would choose person B.

    And the main point?

    Education is overrated, since anyone with a decent IQ and a large reference library (say.. the Internet) can work out how to do things that you once needed a degree to do.
    • Re:Education is changing. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by LinuxInDallas (73952) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:50PM (#4362122)
      The role of a college education isn't force you to memorize facts, but to learn how to solve problems. That's why a good number of engineering classes these days are open-book or open-notes. The only time I have found this to not be the case is when the professor has had a hard time finding meaningful questions that wouldn't require a couple hours to complete. In those cases closed-book was necessary to allow some "show me what you remember" type questions to creep in. Simply memorizing facts gets you nowhere, although you MAY be able to dazzle an easily intimidated interviewer by spewing out some facts.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Education is changing. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Monday September 30 2002, @02:52PM
    • Re:Education is changing. by unicron (Score:2) Monday September 30 2002, @02:57PM
    • Re:Education is changing. by Steveftoth (Score:2) Monday September 30 2002, @02:59PM
    • Re:Education is changing. by henben (Score:1) Monday September 30 2002, @03:00PM
    • Re:Education is changing. by RazzleFrog (Score:1) Monday September 30 2002, @03:09PM
    • Re:Education is changing. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by LoRider (16327) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:13PM (#4362285) Homepage Journal
      You are right. But remember that taking all those math classes really had little to do with math. What you really learned to do is solve problems and organize your thoughts. That is the goal of most classes, it's not always obvious what they are teaching you until it's too late and you learned something else - a more important lesson. Those sneaking teachers.

      Memorizing the Constitution is fine, but it aint going to get you a job. Knowing how to think logically and knowing when you don't know something is the key to being successful in most careers.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Education is changing. by Daniel Dvorkin (Score:2) Monday September 30 2002, @03:31PM
    • Re:Education is changing. by apio (Score:1) Monday September 30 2002, @06:54PM
    • Re:Education is changing. by stephanruby (Score:1) Monday September 30 2002, @08:00PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by Colonel Panic (15235) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:41PM (#4362046)
    Rather disappointing...

    One of them is a lab and the other seems to haved little to do with Computer Science - something about transportation planning.

    I would have expected the Comp Sci department to be at the forefront in this experiment in online course materials.
  • An opportunity.. (Score:2)

    by -tji (139690) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:41PM (#4362048) Journal
    This looks like a good opportunity to realize your limitations. Taking courses at MIT, with the prof's, TA's, & classmates to confer with would be difficult enough.

    Taking the same things remotely / autonomously sounds impossible.

    When they put the courseware for St. Clair County Community College online, it might me a bit more accessible to us commoners.
    • Quite the opposite (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Space Coyote (413320) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:47PM (#4362097) Homepage
      It's actually quite the eye opener to be able to go through their mathematics courses and see how the material differs from the stuff they teach at my school. Most of it is pretty similar, and this certainly takes away the mystique that MIT had before I took a look at it all. I guess if your admissions standards and tuition fees are astronomically high that's enough too keep a stellar reputation.
      [ Parent ]
    • Not really... by ebbomega (Score:2) Monday September 30 2002, @03:22PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Another reason this is cool (Score:5, Insightful)

    by fm6 (162816) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:41PM (#4362049) Homepage Journal
    Damnit, this is not just a good idea. This level of self-description should be mandatory for all universities. It's the first serious proof I've ever seen that the institution is actually doing something with all that tuition and grant money. Plus it provides a more solid basis for choosing a school than campus tours and the quality of the football team.
    • Re:Another reason this is cool by MrDog (Score:1) Monday September 30 2002, @03:24PM
    • Re:Another reason this is cool by evilviper (Score:2) Monday September 30 2002, @04:16PM
    • Re:Another reason this is cool by stephanruby (Score:2) Tuesday October 01 2002, @12:54AM
    • Not new, but special (Score:4, Informative)

      by fm6 (162816) on Monday September 30 2002, @05:53PM (#4363327) Homepage Journal
      Quite correct. When I search the web for technical content, about 70% of the time I find what I'm looking for in somebody's lecture notes.

      But MIT is doing two things that are real steps forward. First, they're settings standards: instructors are expected to post certain kinds of information in a standard format. Existing course web sites are just online alternatives to photocopied class handouts, and it's up the individual instructors exactly what they bother to put online and how they present it.

      But what's really staggering is MIT's attitude towards public use of this material. Most course web sites are created specifically for the students taking the course -- public access is an accidental side effect, and probably wouldn't happen at all if University web sites secured their networks properly. They'd probably be taken down or hidden behind a firewall if public access started taxing the servers. Which is completely different from what MIT is doing: investing in servers and bandwidth for no other purpose than to enable public access to their content.

      [ Parent ]
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by systemapex (118750) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:43PM (#4362066)
    ...is that the lecture notes were far more comprehensive, and intuitive than those corresponding to the same course I took at a different university. One of the things I was looking forward to about this OpenCourseWare was comparing the teaching styles of professors from different universities. I've only checked out this one course (Laboratory in Software Engineering), but so far the score is 1-0 in favour of MIT. I wish I had these online lecture notes available to me when deciding on my university. Perhaps I would have made a better decision - I've yet to finish my degree (taking at least a year off) in CS in most parts because I just didn't feel I was at the right institution. This would have played an integral role in my decision making process if all universities made this material online and publicized it.
  • by cecil36 (104730) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:47PM (#4362092) Homepage
    ....hacking at MIT. Wonder if MIT hackers can create a fake page and alter the DNS entries so anyone going to the OCW page ends up at the hacked page.
  • MIT Degree Not Promised... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by BookRead (610258) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:49PM (#4362110)
    I was there when this got started. If you expect all of the materials from every class online you're going to be disappointed. They decided that they couldn't do distance learning well enough to have the MIT brand on it (and make money) so this was the next best move.

    The Copyright Law (partly) gets in the way of putting all the course materials online. The other problem is sheer volume. It's going to take awhile before they figure out how to get all the stuff up there. Some subjects will work better than others. Math will probably do well, history will probably be not so good because of percentage of copyrighted stuff used in history courses versus math courses.

    It will get better and richer as they figure it out. It'll definitely be a good resource but it'll never be an MIT (TM) education.

  • The software behind the site? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by dustym (566056) <dustym@g[ ]l.com ['mai' in gap]> on Monday September 30 2002, @02:50PM (#4362121)
    Forgive me if this is available on the site, I might not have seen it, but is the software for creating this site available? Are there web based tools for creating the individual course pages and maintaining them? Are the eventually going to be open sourced? Does it make it easy for the professor to create the page (i.e. .doc to pdf conversion and so on)?

    At my school [utdallas.edu] we have a system that I assume we purhased called WebCT, and, frankly, it sucks. In fact for a supposedly technology driven school, we have some crappy resources. A bunch of sun workstations and 6 dollar copies of Windows XP, whoopteedo. I digress.

    However, in my rhetoric class we handle all document management (turning in papers, journal entries, teachers notes, etc) via an online service [utexas.edu] provided by the University of Texas Austin. Aside from some really hokey things (strands of learning? that sounds rather new age) it is an interesting way to turn in papers and recieve feedback. It is pretty raw, but it has potential.

    It is supposedly going to be open sourced (it is a php/mysql thing, I know because I saw the standard mysql overload page on it one day). Any other schools have systems like this? UTDallas does not, but then again, UTDallas sucks.
  • by ksquire (247844) on Monday September 30 2002, @02:51PM (#4362132) Homepage
    But, rather, more humble. They are...
    • to promote communication at MIT. They hope that everyone will be able to quickly find out what other people are teaching, what textbooks they're using, what's being covered, and what's not being covered.
    • "open source" the resources that go into course production. Obviously, then, to make this same information available to scholars elsewhere, so that teachers at other places can see what MIT is doing and borrow resources, compare notes, make suggested changes.
    • Challenge typical lecture classes. I think that they're hoping to challenge MIT faculty to think of what the 'value added' is to classes, so that people realize that learning is about more than 'dumping content' into students' heads, and consider the pedagogical use of classes more carefully.
    • Provide resources for self-study. Sure-- there is a hope that someone out there in Alaska or something will take up some resources and teach themselves something.
    • Challenging notions of what is university IP or not. As many know, who owns what syllabi that is produced by faculty is hairy; if MIT puts it on the web, they hope that this will deflate the whole debate, and make everyone realize that a syllabus is not synonymous with learning.
    • Provide a model for the universities in online spaces. I think they're hoping that this will at least challenge people to think beyond 'how can we make a buck off putting courses online' and realize the role that universities could play in a networked age for contributing to the intellectual commons.
    As I understand it, those are the purposes of open coursewear, roughly. They're really not thinking that people will train themselves so much, as they're thinking that it will help change the nature of discourse around universities in online education.

  • They will not get it right until they start invovling the staff in collaboration with the audience through weblogs(blogs), p2p chats and etc.
  • I wonder whether this is good (Score:5, Insightful)

    by g4dget (579145) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:00PM (#4362205)
    I really applaud the spirit in which MIT is releasing this. But I also wonder whether it's good for education and science in the long run.

    I think there may be too much of a tendency by professors to reuse educational materials. This may lead to a degree of standardization and uniformity of the educational experience that could harm progress. A diversity of approaches to problems results from a diversity of different experiences. That oddball approach some professor is teaching at a small university may just be the basis for the next important breakthrough, or at least make the school's graduates fill some important niche in science and engineering not as well filled by others.

    It's like languages, cultures, genetics, and ecology: we really do lose something important when global communications carry a few dominant paradigms (or organisms) everywhere. Monocultures of the mind may be more risky and costly than monocultures of plants.

  • Good iniciative, but... (Score:2, Funny)

    by ivanandre (265129) <ivan.tamayo@gmai ... GERcom minus cat> on Monday September 30 2002, @03:01PM (#4362210) Journal
    I teach some CompSci courses in a small colombian college (its name better unknow).
    <br>
    Ive found that many universities put online material for students, obviously THEIR student, but anyway is on the net, and many persons, included me, use this material in order to get ideas for classes, exercises, exams, etc. <br>

    Ive read some MIT courses material (from opencourseware), and it seems great, but not to much... coming from MIT...
    • Re:Funny? by fault0 (Score:2) Monday September 30 2002, @04:33PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • To be pedantic... (Score:1)

    by NecrosisLabs (125672) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:01PM (#4362215)
    ... The plural of syllabus is syllabus (with a long U.)
  • Great... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by rovingeyes (575063) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:02PM (#4362218)
    This means that from now on less and less people will use those online (commercial) coursewares like www.knowledgenet.com [knowledgenet.com], as MIT online courseware clones will start springing up.

    It's delightful to know that people still want to make sure that knowledge will remain free.

  • OPEN and FREE information is. The vast majority of my college classes had comprehensive lecture notes and other reference materials (including old exams) online - getting it up there isn't hard.

    The difference was that access was password protected. The University viewed the material as property and expected people to pay for the classes to have access to it. If you wern't in the class, you didn't get to look at the material. After all, if you can get the material for free, why would you pay for a distance education class?

    "Back in the day" all sorts of university course and research information was available online - but then universities started taking most of it down. The information being online is unremarkable - that it's available for free is the unique part.
  • by jvmatthe (116058) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:10PM (#4362270) Homepage
    I'm teaching a scientific computing (numerical analysis and programming) course at Duke right now, and I just sent links to a couple of these courses out to my students. Specifically Numerical Methods in Chemical Engineering [mit.edu] and Linear Algebra [mit.edu]. The former contains some good stuff, including a Matlab tutorial. The latter has Java demos including one showing an idea that I've already has a homework on (SVD). My class is already "paperless", in that the homeworks are all posted online and submitted electronically over email and grades are sent in the form of detailed reports for each student's submitted work. This fits right in with this online-only system.
  • by Embedded Geek (532893) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:19PM (#4362319) Homepage
    The courses cover a full range of departments, but only a couple apiece.

    Apparently not from the English department, though...

  • Interesting, but (Score:2)

    by Registered Coward v2 (447531) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:20PM (#4362326)
    one potential problem is the varying amounts of readings for class. A math class, with one etxt book, would be far more accessable, than say, a management or econ class with readings from a variety of journals.

    Some journals are available on-line, and public libraries often have access to databases for fee-based articles, but pulling the articles togetehr will often be difficult. Compounding this is the use of case studies, which are cash cows for schools such as Harvard. What would be real helpful is the availability of inexpensive ecucational access (with limited d/ls per month to keep non-ed users out) to anyone so they could get the 50 or articles/cases they need.

    Th etrade off is the potential loss of sales to traditional users (which can be as much as $20/student/qtr per class at BSchool) who get cases and articles online for less vs the addin sales potential as on-line use increases.

    At least MIT is pushing in the right direction.

  • I like it (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Captain Penguin (469184) <will.herrick2@verizon. n e t> on Monday September 30 2002, @03:20PM (#4362327)
    I'm taking Linear Algebra (Bates College) right now and we are using Gilbert Strang's textbook, "Introduction to Linear Algebra 2nd edition". The first section of OCW I went to was Mathematics and then Linear Algebra.. lo' and behold, 34 ~40minute long videos of Strang himself lecturing. I might not even go to my class anymore!
  • by uberstool (470348) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:29PM (#4362401)
    Makes me wish I was eight years old
    instead of 30
  • by dbuck (69079) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:37PM (#4362462)
    Especially the math/compsci stuff. See here [aduni.org]. You can even buy an entire drive filled with all course content [aduni.org].
  • by guttentag (313541) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:47PM (#4362535) Journal
    How long before we begin receiving emails like this?
    Get an MIT Education for only $24.99! Our one-of-a-kind CD has lecture notes, diagrams, exams with answers and other materials provided by real MIT professors for HUNDREDS of courses.
    Of course, this will have to wait until MIT posts a few more courses...
  • by aquarian (134728) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:48PM (#4362538)
    This is a great experiment, and the material is very useful. I'm sure I'll be using it myself in the coming years.

    However, classroom learning *does not* really translate well online. Online coursework, if it's serious at all, requires a whole different approach- including several different kinds of interactivity. For MIT to offer *real* online coursework, it would require designing it specifically for that purpose, and probably producing it entirely separately. The reality is two separate universities- cyberspace and meatspace.

    That said, this is still pretty neat.
  • by SashaM (520334) <msasha&gmail,com> on Monday September 30 2002, @03:55PM (#4362582) Homepage

    It seems that the lecture videos format (at least for Linear Algebra, which I checked) is Realplayer's [mit.edu]. Anyone knows whether it'll be provided in a friendlier format as well?

  • Higher Education Online (Score:1, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday September 30 2002, @03:56PM (#4362593)
    Most universities have been offering online resources for students and professors. But few offer substancial material for non-enrolled students. This makes somewhat sense, because after all if you want Ivy League education you should meet all the prerequisites and pay for it.
    Regardless, among the few institutions really puting what they have out there for anyone to benefit, Columbia University [columbia.edu] so far has the most to offer. Few schools come close to Columbia's Interactive department as far as content beyond an online syllabus. MIT seems to be in the right track, until they start making access to the general public impossible. I don't think it should be free (as it isn't at CI or Harvard), but at least reachable. Some other schools simply block access and give no options to outsiders/non-students.
    From a purely business perspective, as some one else already pointed out, making content available to outsiders gives University recruiters a great "businesscard".
  • by gupg (58086) on Monday September 30 2002, @04:02PM (#4362636) Homepage
    Most courses at most univerisities have online web pages on which faculty frequently post their lecture notes (ppt or pdf slides), their assignments, the syllabus etc.

    MIT has done the simple (administratively complex) task of putting all this together and putting it online at one central place.

    UC Irvine [uci.edu] has a similar effort [uci.edu]; all UCI courses *have* to have a website with most of the course material online. I hope they see this MIT effort and take it to the next level of making it completely open and useful for the whole world.

  • by guttentag (313541) on Monday September 30 2002, @04:21PM (#4362753) Journal
    Have a look at Daniel Jackson's Software Engineering lecture notes [mit.edu]. He begins talking about the importance of good design and then cites Netscape as an example. He claims that the reason Netscape lost the browser war was because of poor design. He makes some valid points, but its interesting that he declines to factor in Microsoft's illegal use of its monopoly and even claims that Netscape's determination to remain platform independent was also partly responsible.

    This sounds like Microsoft's commonly-touted line: "We didn't drive them out of business. Their incompetence drove them out of business." Is he teaching software engineering or business? He should stick to the former, because he's either inept or well-paid when it comes to the latter.

    1.4.1 The Netscape Story

    For PC software, there's a myth that design is unimportant because time-to-market is all that matters. Netscape's demise is a story worth understanding in this respect.

    The original NCSA Mosaic team at the University of Illinois built the first widely used browser, but they did a quick and dirty job. They founded Netscape, and between April and December 1994 built Navigator 1.0. It ran on 3 platforms, and quickly became the browser of choice on Windows, Unix and Mac. Microsoft began developing Internet Explorer 1.0 in October 1994, and shipped it with Windows 95 in August 1995.

    In Netscape's rapid growth period, from 1995 to 1997, the developers worked hard to ship new products with new features, and gave little time to design. Most companies in the shrink-wrap software business (still) believe that design can be postponed: that once you have market share and a compelling feature set, you can "refactor" the code and obtain the benefits of clean design. Netscape was no exception, and its engineers were probably more talented than many.

    Meanwhile, Microsoft had realized the need to build on solid designs. It built NT from scratch, and restructured the Office suite to use shared components. It did hurry to market with IE to catch up with Netscape, but then it took time to restructure IE 3.0. This restructuring of IE is now seen within Microsoft as the key decision that helped them close the gap with Netscape.

    Netscape's development just grew and grew. By Communicator 4.0, there were 120 developers (from 10 initially) and 3 million lines of code (up a factor of 30). Michael Toy, release manager, said:

    "We're in a really bad situation ... We should have stopped shipping this code a year ago. It's dead ... This is like the rude awakening ... We're paying the price for going fast."

    Interestingly, the argument for modular design within Netscape in 1997 was driven by the desire to go back to small team development. Without clean and simple interfaces, it becomes impossible to divide up the work into independent groups.

    Netscape set aside 2 months to re-architect the browser, but it wasnt long enough. So they planned to start again from scratch, with Communicator 6.0. But 6.0 was never completed, and its developers were reassigned to 4.0. The 5.0 version, Mozilla, was made available as open source, but that didnt help: nobody wanted to work on spaghetti code. So Microsoft won the browser war, and AOL acquired Netscape.

    This is not the entire story, by the way. Platform independence was a big issue right from the start. Navigator ran on Windows, Mac and Unix from version 1.0, and Netscape worked hard to maintain as much platform independence in their code as possible. They even planned to go to a pure Java version ("Javagator"), and built a lot of their own Java tools (because Sun's tools weren't ready). But in 1998 they gave up. Still, Communicator 4.0 contains about 1.2 million lines of Java.

    You can read the whole story in: Michael A. Cusumano and David B. Yoffie. Competing on Internet Time: Lessons from Netscape and its Battle with Microsoft, Free Press, 1998. See especially Chapter 4, Design Strategy.

    Note, by the way, that it took Netscape more than 2 years to discover the importance of design. Don't be surprised if you're not entirely convinced after one term; some things come only with experience.

  • --pedantic (Score:1)

    by ++good-duckspeak (584950) on Monday September 30 2002, @04:30PM (#4362829)
    http://ocw.mit.edu /6/6.170/f01/related-resources/java-qa.html [mit.edu]

    Every 'java' is replaced by:

    "Java(TM) Syllabus Calendar Lecture Notes Assignments Exams Required Readings Related Resources Labs Sections/Recitations Tools Projects"

    http://ocw.mit.edu/6/6.170/f01/tools/index.html [mit.edu]

    adds a little TM symbol to every 'java'.

    Results in pages that read like Scientology Fan Fiction [somethingawful.com]

  • by FuzzyFurB (148573) on Monday September 30 2002, @05:14PM (#4363088) Homepage
    We have a similar thing at Cornell University called Blackboard. It's a standard interface of class websites that is maintained through the browser so any professor can do it. It isn't publically available ot the rest of the world (all pages are password protected) but most of all it's slow as hell. I don't know many people here that like it.

    If MIT's page set turns out nice, is fast, and provides me another source of information in even greater detail than just HowStuffWorks.com then I think this is a great thing for all us non-MIT world members.

    In terms of MIT students and faculty, these pages provide employeers a glimpse of what the course offerings really cover, hopefully conveying the idea to potential employeers of students that they truely did get a good background in the material they may claim to on their resumes'.
  • 5.61 (Score:1)

    by beachy (44887) on Monday September 30 2002, @05:23PM (#4363127)
    Whoa. 5.61 (quantum chemistry) looks identical to the 1990 version. Not that anything has changed in the last 12 years in undergraduate quantum chemistry, of course.
  • by Gerald_Hlasgow (558673) on Monday September 30 2002, @05:28PM (#4363148)
    As a student in Glasgow, Scotland who received this [utexas.edu] University of Texas Austin document, badly pirated (diagrams still referred to but not included, no acknowlegement of author) as the main reference work for my relational databases class, I applaud MIT for this and look forward to enjoying their (uncredited) work in the near future. Gerald
  • by bpprice (612705) on Monday September 30 2002, @06:39PM (#4363669)
    When I graduated from MIT back in the late '80s, none of this was as yet thought up, of course. The coursework was straight ahead, you could goof off if you didn't care and get a B, or you could put in a few hours and ace your degree - pretty much like any other school. But for my money (and it was a LOT of my money...) there is still no substitute for the personalities involved on both sides on the podium. I worked the hardest for and learned the most from teachers I really liked, regardless of subject. Hence I cannot help but to see the move to online coursework as either a second rate substitute for or an addition to an existing real class - with real people, real competition, real ideas being discussed in real time. Technical subjects benefit tremendously from peer review and interaction, two qualities difficult to find in the personalities drawn to MIT, CalTech, etc. Even in these rarified environments, one must work to seek out these beacons, for that is where the real action and learning occurs. The faculty at MIT knows this and tries to encourage interaction (however uncomfortably) among the undergraduate body. I'd give it a C until I see another reason to cheer, thought it is a good move from a philosophical POV.
  • by mccabem (44513) on Monday September 30 2002, @07:10PM (#4363898)
    About a year ago or more, I saw a show I believe was on PBS about alternative education. It covered from charter schools, to the Edison company to on-line universities and everything in between.

    Included in the discussion was a Prof. from MIT talking about the "Open Sourcing" of their curriculum.

    The way they layed it out at the time was fairly clear: This is not to be an online university, it is an open set of classes that a professor might use to improve or replace his existing class with.

    From that view it seems they're coming along fairly well.
  • by nomadicGeek (453231) on Monday September 30 2002, @07:35PM (#4364067)
    I think that this is a great idea. All public universities should start doing it. Professors and students at any university now have more information available to them. Students can learn better and professors can teach better.

    Now the next steps.
    1. Start publishing textbooks online. The only people who make money off of textbooks anyway are the publishers and bookstores. Why not make the material freely available? Textbooks published by professors at public universities should be made available with an open copyright. Textbooks have become very expensive and limit a student's access to material. I used to try to read at least one other textbook in addition to the one that was assigned in class.

    2. Start publishing papers online. This is the same situation. A professor writes a paper that is published in the IEEE Transactions on XXXXXX. The information is now copyrighted and I have to pay to read it. This limits a student's access to the material.

    Freeing up this material and making it available electronically would have a strong effect on education and research.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Nice! (Score:1)

    by efagerho (579859) <efagerho@cc.hut.OPENBSDfi minus bsd> on Monday September 30 2002, @11:58PM (#4365264)
    This seems very promising. The videos from Strang's lectures on linear algebra seemed nice as I've been reading Strang's books my self.

    As some people noted, this is in no way revolutionary as practically every university has webpages for each of their courses. Atleast at the university where I'm studying (Helsinki University of Technology) we usually get good lecture notes from the lecturer as a complement to whatever book we're using, but they never get published on the course's webpage. This is unfortunate, as many other people could benefit from these lecture notes if they were put online. There's lots of good quality material in different universities and I'm grateful to the lecturers who put their notes online. When trying to learn material covered on different courses I usually make a little search on the web trying to find lecture notes of the subject.

    I hope many more universities make it a policy to publish their material. I think this would also reduce the amounts of rushed or otherwise bad lecture notes, as I don't think anyone will put handwritten scanned lecture notes online, so everyone would have to typeset them on a computer. This is something you have to struggle with in the introductory math courses here at HUT...
  • by serutan (259622) <doug@nOspam.geekazon.com> on Tuesday October 01 2002, @01:37AM (#4365532) Homepage
    is that the MIT site is really responsive, even with inevitable slashdotting. I'm impressed by how fast the pages are loading, which says something for the people who did the actual implementation. Way to go folks!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Last Post! (Score:1)

    by alpg (613466) on Monday October 14 2002, @11:18AM (#4446126) Homepage
    There was an old Indian belief that by making love on the hide of
    their favorite animal, one could guarantee the health and prosperity
    of the offspring conceived thereupon. And so it goes that one Indian
    couple made love on a buffalo hide. Nine months later, they were
    blessed with a healthy baby son. Yet another couple huddled together
    on the hide of a deer and they too were blessed with a very healthy
    baby son. But a third couple, whose favorite animal was a hippopotamus,
    were blessed with not one, but TWO very healthy baby sons at the conclusion
    of the nine month interval. All of which proves the old theorem that:
    The sons of the squaw of the hippopotamus are equal to the sons of
    the squaws of the other two hides.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...
  • Uh... yeah... right... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by ebbomega (410207) on Monday September 30 2002, @03:16PM (#4362299) Journal
    Almost every computing science course I've taken, with a few exceptions, has been open-book. So reading off a book isn't cheating at all.

    The idea behind applied sciences is that it's real-world preparation, and in the real world, you're allowed to look at books if you don't know how to do something.
    [ Parent ]
  • by Marc2k (221814) on Monday September 30 2002, @04:07PM (#4362668) Homepage Journal
    There are twice as many courses in Ocean Engineering(?) as there are in both EE and CS (which is combined, but they are separate topics that I'm interested in, as are most people here). One of them is surely misplaced in both, this course [mit.edu].
    [ Parent ]
  • by wass (72082) on Monday September 30 2002, @04:23PM (#4362771)
    I think this is more-or-less just what they're doing. ONly thing is that alot of course homepages are eventually taken down, or sometimes even password-protected. In any case, the course homepages are usually presented only for students in the class. The OCW courseware is MEANT to be publically viewable. It doesn't necessarily mean the professor is willing to put more time into making it better, but now the school will actively support the endeavour to make them publically accessible.
    [ Parent ]
  • by fault0 (514452) on Monday September 30 2002, @04:25PM (#4362793) Homepage Journal
    The key words are "so far". Folks, this is just the beginning of OCWare. At least it's not vapour-ware anymore :-)
    [ Parent ]
  • Aside from it taking forever to load a PDF file into a browser, when the hell is someone (Adobe and/or the browser-developers, you know who you are) going to make a browser and/or plug-in and/or PDF file that will load correctly without hanging my box? When are They going to make it so I can open multiple PDF browser windows without hanging my box? Why do browser-developers assume I only browse in one window? I have 20 instances of my browser open and loading a PDF will mung the other 19!!?!
    [ Parent ]
  • 24 replies beneath your current threshold.