Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Amazon Charging Different Prices for Same Items?

Posted by CmdrTaco on Wed Sep 06, 2000 10:09 AM
from the ok-thats-pretty-wild dept.
Rambo writes "Amazon is apparently researching consumer's buying habits by arbitrarily changing the prices on DVDs and other products. Computerworld has a story here about it. Amazon refused to say when they would halt the practice, or what criterion they used to set the different prices." Of course I haven't spent a nickel at Amazon since that whole one-click shopping thing, but I can imagine ways that this could be good or bad. Imagine I buy a lot of Anime DVDs. They could note this, and raise the prices by a buck or something. I tend not to do real-time price shopping on items like this: I looked at a dozen online stores when I started purchasing, and I settled on the one that had the features & prices I want. But 2 months later they could jack the prices and it would be months before I noticed. Alternatively they could lower the prices, or lower prices on similiar items as an incentive to buy other things. Very odd possibilities and I'm not at all sure about how I feel about it.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
  • Re:It's the other way around... by Narcischizm (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:17AM
  • Re:This is nothing new by JCMay (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:19AM
  • International DVD Pricings at Amazon.co.uk by MightyTribble (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:14AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by dublin (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:20AM
  • by StoryMan (130421) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:15AM (#801067)
    I can go into Border's and receive 10% off any book because I'm a teacher. I have a card that identifies me as such.

    A woman in line in front of me bought Elmore Leonard's "Pagan Babies" for the sale price. I bought "Pagan Babies" for sale price less 10 %. We got different prices on the same day for the same book purely based on some arbritrary criteria.

    Another example: I go into Seattle's Best Coffee. A man in front of me gets a latte for list price. I go in, plunk down my frequent buyer's card, get the latte for free because I've bought ten lattes.

    Same day, same item, same clerk, different prices.

    Since we don't know Amazon's criteria, I'm not sure we can accuse them of discriminating against certian *people*, right? I mean, I've bought a lot of stuff at Amazon, and over the past few days as I've been following this story, I've noticed that I'm received the lowest prices for all the DVDs that they're listing.

    They're not lowering the prices because my hair is brown, my eyes are blue, and I write left-handed, right?

    They're not lowering it because I'm a democrat and I think the Shrub (Bush) is a dumb, loud-mouthed boor.

    They're lowering the price based on whatever information I've given them, my ordered habits over the years, and the books (and DVDs) that I've ordered in the past.

    Obviously, they've got some sort of criteria that they've established -- repeat customers, money spent over the past year, orders over the last month, whatever -- and they're applying it to me.

    Or maybe they're setting random prices and seeing if it's enough to "catch" me based on my demographic.

    Whatever.

    But I know that I take one look at the list price, one look at the sale price, and make my decision there. If the sale price is too close to the list price, I won't buy it, period.

    If the sale price is 30, 40% of the list price, I'll probably buy it.

    I think the issue here isn't that they're doing it -- charging less for some customers, more for others -- but that we don't *know* the criteria.

    And of course because we're all good little paranoid Pynchonians (see 'The Crying of Lot 49' or 'Gravity's Rainbow' to see what I mean) we suspect the worst -- that not only are they screwing us and fucking with our privacy -- they're also fucking with our heads.

    Bad Amazon! Bad! Bad! Bad!
  • Re:so? by SEWilco (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:21AM
  • want to get Amazon in trouble? by jimmypop (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:21AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by interiot (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:15AM
  • Always assuming the worst by dmccarty (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:16AM
  • Bzzzzzttt! Wrong... by TopShelf (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:22AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by regahj (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:23AM
  • simple math by websensei (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:17AM
  • on a related note... by micco (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:17AM
  • Re:so? by kb9vcr (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:26AM
  • And that magic price is.... by argoff (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:27AM
  • Simple Economics by Beeman (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:18AM
  • Great! by UncaAndoo (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:18AM
  • Re:Are we tired of "free market" yet? by Kaa (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:19AM
  • Go forth and read the relevant Nielson.... by jalbro (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:20AM
  • Re:Bots might see different prices by interiot (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:29AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by Wah (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:29AM
  • Insurance and Credit Cards by JammmGrrl (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:30AM
  • Re:Comparison sites already dead. by Pinball Wizard (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:22AM
  • Wrong about priceline by tswinzig (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:30AM
  • Why? They are MY cookies, after all. by tswinzig (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:33AM
  • Re:Nothing wrong--or unusual--about it by irksome (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:26AM
  • And this is why it massively sucks. by sulli (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:34AM
  • I've seen this before by -brazil- (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:11AM
  • truly this isn't new to retailing... by rootrot (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:35AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by testcase (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:27AM
  • Any benefits for the consumer at all? by bay (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:12AM
  • Amazon.com Price Guarantee by 4/3PI*R^3 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:27AM
  • Re:Nothing wrong--or unusual--about it by irksome (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:27AM
  • News.com link (Score:4)

    by davidu (18) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:13AM (#801096) Homepage Journal
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by Howie (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:28AM
  • Fleecing by phee (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:13AM
  • Re:so? by dboyles (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:29AM
  • Supply and Demand by mholve (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:13AM
  • Re:Recommendation Engines... by daBum (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:17AM
  • Re:And this is why it massively sucks. by sulli (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:19AM
  • Re:Nothing wrong--or unusual--about it by 0xdeadbeef (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:37AM
  • Re:Higher prices for MS users by Stavr0 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:38AM
  • Re:And this is why it massively sucks. by Rombuu (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:26AM
  • Re:Go forth and read the relevant Nielson.... by the coose (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:30AM
  • Your .sig (OT) by tswinzig (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:38AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by Jeff DeMaagd (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:26AM
  • Re:Instructions: How To Close Your Account by micco (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:44AM
  • oh yeah the govt! by ArchieBunker (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:27AM
  • Re:It's the other way around... by DrTomorrow (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:31AM
  • Is browser relevant? by Taurine (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:32AM
  • Re:Nothing wrong--or unusual--about it by mOdQuArK! (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:46AM
  • And the answer is... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:31AM
  • Re:Nothing wrong--or unusual--about it by zlite (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:34AM
  • Re:Instructions: How To Close Your Account by waldoj (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:49AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by Tet (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:35AM
  • Counter-strategy? (Score:3)

    by mOdQuArK! (87332) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:50AM (#801118)
    Would it be possible for an auto-shopper agent looking for a particular item to log onto a company like Amazon.com's as many different individuals, pick the best price offered & buy that?
  • Re:Compare Prices. by dboyles (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:35AM
  • Re:A Threat to Comparison Shopping? by Pinball Wizard (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:36AM
  • Re:They are on a roll by Zico (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:38AM
  • This could make those engines unreliable by MemeRot (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:32AM
  • Re:Jakob Nielsen says -- "Bad Idea" by Jeff DeMaagd (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:32AM
  • Okay, so what are the browser strings? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:33AM
  • Re:Robinson-Pattman Act by Animats (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:50AM
  • Agents by Threed (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:51AM
  • Don't be a sucker. (Score:5)

    by Malcontent (40834) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:34AM (#801127)
    You missed the most important point. If Amazon tags you as a sucker (person willing to pay more then they have to) then they will most likely sell sucker lists to other e-tailers. You will then start paying more for everything on the internet and not even know it! Mail order companies already do this. They compile lists of people who buy stupid useless stuff (nose hair clippers for one) and sell it to each other. In fact they have "indicator items" (the aformentioned clippers) that they use to flag people as suckers.

    It's kind of a stupidity tax really. Browse with cookies on, pledge loyalty to a corporation or a brand and pay more.

    A Dick and a Bush .. You know somebody's gonna get screwed.

  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by Wah (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:52AM
  • Re:Switch off cookies by rbeken (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:39AM
  • Nothing new - really by MrM (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:54AM
  • Re:Jakob Nielsen says -- "Bad Idea" by watanabe (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:43AM
  • Re:And the next logical step is.... by Galahad (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:39AM
  • Re:And the next logical step is.... by Auckerman (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:55AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by 0xdeadbeef (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:39AM
  • Re:Bots might see different prices by Cuthalion (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:44AM
  • Re:Jakob Nielsen says -- "Bad Idea" by DrTomorrow (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:39AM
  • Re:Price testing is to get you to buy more by Wansu (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:55AM
  • Ever Bought A Car? by Carnage4Life (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:40AM
  • Re:sell your cookies! by dzurn (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:56AM
  • Re:I've seen this before by mozkill (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:42AM
  • Re:What's so odd? by Zico (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:42AM
  • by TheNightOwl (206911) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:44AM (#801142)
    The airlines and hotels alter their pricing because they have a "perishable" product. An unsold airline seat becomes worthless as soon as the plane takes off. They call it yield management. They alter the price as it gets closer to the expiration date, in order to maximize their revenue.

    The technique being used by Amazon is actually quite different, since books and CDs are not perishable. Amazon is altering the price based on who is doing the buying. If they know you are a loyal Amazon customer, they may charge you more because they think they can get away with it. If they know you are a price shopper, they may charge you less, because they think it is the only way they will get your business.

    Auto dealers take a similar approach. If you are a loyal customer of XYZ dealership, you will pay more for a car, because that dealer knows you prefer to buy from them.. There is also research that shows women and minorities pay more for cars, apparently because the dealerships (on average) feel that women and minorities (on average) have less bargaining power. Essentially they are taking a profile of what they know about you (previous customer) or what they assume about you (male/female; white/black/brown/tan) and using that profile to adjust their pricing.

    What is happening with online shopping is even more insidious. Because online retailers have the ability to create detailed profiles and automatically adjust the prices accordingly, they can really take advantage of the situation. The unfortunate thing is that loyal customers will often get the worst deal.

    This is not that uncommon. For example, I think priceline.com does the same thing. The first time a new customer makes a "bid" on a plane ticket, they will usually "win" it. This creates goodwill (loyalty?) on the part of the customer. After that, Priceline will alter their acceptance/rejection of that customer's bids, to determine how price sensitive the customer is. Their subsequent pricing will take advantage of that information. This is not traditional yield management (Priceline does not own the commodity, so from their perspective the commodity is not perishable), rather it is profile-based price management.

    So how can consumers protect themselves? The most important thing is to minimize the amount of information a retailer has about you. The less a seller knows about you the better. This is because companies that use profile-based pricing will almost always offer a "new" customer the best deal in the hopes of gaining your trust (so you will hopefully become a "loyal" customer and they increase their pricing and profit later).

    Other things consumers can do:
    (1) Do not patronize companies that practice this approach.
    (2) Publicly condemn companies that take this approach
    (3) Utilize price comparison services
    (4) Be ruthless about price shopping
    (5) Do not become loyal to a single retailer
    (6) Shop as anonymously as possible
    (6) Just say no

  • Re: Not necessarily by rkent (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:46AM
  • Airlines have "best price first" guarantees by RebornData (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:46AM
  • Big Brother and Amazon, the rest of the story. by rbeken (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:52AM
  • Re:Fundamentally different by TheReverand (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:54AM
  • Re:Simple Economics by mftuchman (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:57AM
  • Re:This is illegal according to the FTC by mudder (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:55AM
  • Re:Nothing new - really by MrM (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:57AM
  • You're missing the point.... by Jester99 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:01AM
  • Sorry if we stiffed you... by macdaddy (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:59AM
  • I've seen this with Dell, too by swb (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:02AM
  • Re: uh-oh by Inoshiro (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:47AM
  • It gets worse! by LordNimon (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:01AM
  • I looked high and low on their site, trying to determine how to erase my (long unused) account. Finally, I had to e-mail them, and they got back to me yesterday. To remove your account, simply e-mail:

    account-close@amazon.com [mailto]

    There were no further instructions, so I assume that the removal is done manually by an Amazonling. I used this:

    To Whom It May Concern,

    Please remove my account from your system. I haven't purchased anything
    from you since your 1-click & referral patents, but now that you've modified
    your privacy statement to permit the sale of my private information, it's
    time to remove my account. Please remove any data that you have under
    waldo@waldo.net and waldo@munkandphyber.com, and notify me when you have
    done so. Thank you.

    Sincerely,
    Waldo L. Jaquith


    I guess that's sufficient. I encourage all of you to close your accounts, though you'd do well to cite today's news in addition to the modification of their privacy statement.

    -Waldo

    -------------------
  • Different Amazons charge different prices by grahamm (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:48AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by Dr_Bones (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:02AM
  • Re:Nothing new here by DarkMan (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:06AM
  • Bots might see different prices by RebornData (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:49AM
  • Nothing new by BrK (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:50AM
  • Re:I've seen this before by mangino (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:07AM
  • by DarkMan (32280) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:52AM (#801162) Journal
    Not in the UK

    In the UK the major home shopping catalouge firms are all part of the Littlewoods group (Though not all).

    A summer job as a delivery driver for that group demonstrates quite clearly that the catalouges are all the same.
  • Re:Counter-strategy? by interiot (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:10AM
  • Hey, Commander, you forgot the obligatory... by locutus074 (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:53AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by streetlawyer (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:57AM
  • Re:Not necessarily. by Robert S Gormley (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:42PM
  • Re:Airlines and Amazon by Robert S Gormley (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:52PM
  • Re:Just don't log in. by mesusha (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:21PM
  • Re:Jakob Nielsen says -- "Bad Idea" by Ralph Wiggam (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:10AM
  • How stupid can they be? by Books (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:57PM
  • humor lesson by twitter (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:15AM
  • It's the other way around... by Enoch Root (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:14AM
  • Try BestBookBuys.com by JMan1 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:15AM
  • Re:Blatant plug for comparison shopping. by Anonymous Coed (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:21AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by Fishstick (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:11AM
  • Just don't log in. by The_Messenger (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:28AM
  • Re:Disclaimer: Amazon.com != Jesus by dublin (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:13AM
  • Re:I've seen this before by mancuskc (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:15AM
  • Different prices and other oddities by Cable (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:34AM
  • Re:Comparison sites already dead. by Fesh (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:15AM
  • so? by dboyles (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:15AM
  • Price Fixing by inKubus (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:48PM
  • Re:What ... you pay RETAIL? You FOOL! by testcase (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:15AM
  • hmmm by evilphish (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:16AM
  • Blatant plug for comparison shopping. by Anonymous Coed (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:57AM
  • Re:Disclaimer: Amazon.com != Jesus by interiot (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:16AM
  • Re:Ever Bought A Car? by testcase (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:58AM
  • Quantity! by mholve (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:16AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by csbruce (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:46AM
  • Buyer Beware by mlheur (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:51AM
  • Re:Not necessarily. by Lally Singh (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:18AM
  • Switch off cookies by Bazman (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:16AM
  • I checked. by daviddennis (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:18AM
  • Its WORSE than that! by Rdickinson (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:17AM
  • Re:Fundamentally different by SuiteSisterMary (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:00AM
  • Nothing abnormal here by arivanov (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:17AM
  • Re:Fundamentally different by orabidoo (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:02AM
  • Disagree? by 2nd Post! (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:20AM
  • Re:An omen of things to come? by BrentN (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:02AM
  • by evan1l38 (73680) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:17AM (#801200)
    This sounds like what airlines and hotels do constantly to maximize revenue. You don't even expect to pay what anyone else on your flight or in your hotel paid anymore. It's the same idea applied to a new area. I would expect to see a lot more of this kind of thing in the future, actually. Setting your prices to your target audience is really a good idea for the companies doing the selling - and as a buyer, if you don't like it, remember how easy it is to comparison shop on the web!

    Evan Reynolds evanthx@hotmail.com

  • Behavioural Marketing by Bernal KC (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:25AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by MissKitty (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:06AM
  • What ... you pay RETAIL? You FOOL! by Snocone (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:06AM
  • examples of other companies w/diff. pricing by JimBobJoe (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:09AM
  • Re:And by the way.... by PhilHibbs (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:59PM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by dayL8 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:20PM
  • Re:Higher prices for MS users by csbruce (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:52AM
  • Re:I checked. by JackAssPenguin (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:43PM
  • Price-finding service, anyone? by dolanh (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @10:53AM
  • Re:Higher prices for MS users by warsawza (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @12:42AM
  • Re:Higher prices for MS users by warsawza (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @12:45AM
  • Nothing wrong--or unusual--about it by zlite (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:17AM
  • A better browser. (Off topic) by onion2k (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @01:39AM
  • Re:Its a bit different by SpacePunk (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:27AM
  • Not necessarily by Booker (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:17AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by duffbeer703 (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:00AM
  • Amazon's not the only company to fiddle with price by cerberus1949 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:03AM
  • Re:Just don't log in. by The_Messenger (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @02:32AM
  • by Stan Chesnutt (2253) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:17AM (#801219) Homepage
    With services such as Priceline and EBay, we've seen the ability for buyers and sellers to come to a private agreement about pricing.

    Perhaps fixed prices are a thing of the past, a relic of the old ways of doing business. Fixed prices are certainly needed at old-style bricks-and-mortar retail establishments (so the customer can quickly view the price while examining an item) but really aren't required online, where the webserver software can issue a different pricetag for each viewer.

    In the future Retail Online Hell, massive server databases will track our every choice, become aware of our every weakness, and know what "must-have" preferences each of us has.

    The result: I'll be charged top dollar for things like DVDs, and offered astonishingly cheap prices for, say, scented candles.

  • Re:It's the other way around... by Rombuu (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:29AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by RalphSlate (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:11AM
  • Re:Demographics, economics by Richy_T (Score:2) Thursday September 07 2000, @04:20AM
  • What's so odd? by RocketJeff (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:18AM
  • Re:An omen of things to come? by Richy_T (Score:2) Thursday September 07 2000, @04:25AM
  • Re:Switch off cookies by AndyChrist (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:11AM
  • Re:It's the other way around... by ComaCreator (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:31AM
  • And the next logical step is.... by Auckerman (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:18AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by Andrew Dvorak (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:14AM
  • Nothing new here by ebh (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:19AM
  • Re:Any benefits for the consumer at all? by SpacePunk (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:34AM
  • Sleazy, yet typical by swordgeek (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:19AM
  • Re:so? by Rombuu (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:35AM
  • What Is this? by Grelli (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:20AM
  • Airlines and Amazon by sulli (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:15AM
  • Re:It's the other way around... by Moog (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:20AM
  • Re:And this is why it massively sucks. by Rombuu (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:38AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by Hard_Code (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:39AM
  • Karma for Sale! by PirateKing (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:39AM
  • Re:This is nothing new by greysoul (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @04:30AM
  • Re:sell your cookies! by Richy_T (Score:2) Thursday September 07 2000, @04:58AM
  • Relevant Article in Wired by mholve (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @05:33AM
  • Re:What's so odd? by irksome (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:16AM
  • Amazon Changing Prices by squeaky07 (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @08:24AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by Whiskey Jack (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:37AM
  • My purchase plan for DVD's by Ded Bob (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:20AM
  • Re:Fundamentally different by SuiteSisterMary (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @09:11AM
  • No biggie by Geo++ (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @09:31AM
  • Fighting comparison shopping. by zoftie (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:40AM
  • Just Like Buying a Car by akey (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:21AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by Tackhead (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:45AM
  • Re:Nothing new - really by mindstrm (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:41AM
  • Re:Jakob Nielsen says -- "Bad Idea" by DrTomorrow (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @11:51AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by wierdo (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @10:30AM
  • If it walks like a duck... by quintessent (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:01PM
  • Re:"Chew them down"? by Snocone (Score:2) Thursday September 07 2000, @12:19PM
  • Re:Nothing abnormal here by TheReverand (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:21AM
  • Re:Fleecing by Eccles (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:42AM
  • Re:I've seen this with Dell, too by swb (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:02PM
  • A Threat to Comparison Shopping? by Electric Angst (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:21AM
  • Re:And this is why it massively sucks. by benwb (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:42AM
  • Re:Demographics, economics by jovlinger (Score:1) Thursday September 07 2000, @06:02PM
  • Coca Cola by rigau (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:03PM
  • Are we tired of "free market" yet? by rellort (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:21AM
  • Re:Blatant plug for comparison shopping. by frankie (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:44AM
  • Re:Behavioural Marketing by zoftie (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:44AM
  • by pq (42856) <rfc2324NO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:21AM (#801266) Homepage
    Its always an information race, if you will, between buyers and sellers.

    The internet makes it a lot easier for the buyer to browse different prices, without having to pull out of the parking lot, drive to the next store, and find another parking spot. OTOH, it also makes it easier for the store to know what items you looked at and what you lingered over and what you put in your shopping cart before changing your mind - and they'd be fools not to use the information!

    Brings to mind the proverb, "Be careful what you wish for -- it might just be granted..."

  • dabs.com by devapoj (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:03PM
  • This is very cool by Roast Beef (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:21AM
  • Demographics, economics by jovlinger (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:48AM
  • This is nothing new by greysoul (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:21AM
  • Confusopoly by jetson123 (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:49AM
  • Re:Nothing new - really by zoftie (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:49AM
  • Re:Switch off cookies by ivan_13013 (Score:1) Friday September 08 2000, @11:53AM
  • Re:Higher prices for MS users by Felinoid (Score:1) Friday September 08 2000, @04:50PM
  • Re:It's the other way around... by Felinoid (Score:1) Friday September 08 2000, @05:15PM
  • Re:I've seen this with Dell, too by swb (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:05PM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by joshv (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:16PM
  • Dont log in! by The Cisco Kid (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:16PM
  • how dare they?! by dboyles (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:22AM
  • It's nice to see a little sanity here, in your post. Most people act as if Amazon.com was forcing them to make purchases for insane amounts of money more than what others were paying. Folks, that's what capitalism is, an exchange of a good or service for money. The amount of the exchange is based upon two factors:

    • What the seller is willing to sell it for
    • What the buyer is willing to pay

    You have a very conscious effort in deciding if you will pay what Amazon.com asks! If you are not willing to buy it, don't, it's that simple. (See #6 above, Just Say No.)

  • Price testing is to get you to buy more by DrZaius (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:22AM
  • Give Amazon a break... by Skim123 (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:31PM
  • Re:It's the other way around... by jafac (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:51AM
  • Re:An omen of things to come? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:23AM
  • They are not the first... by kenh (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:39PM
  • Re:It's the other way around... by jetson123 (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:51AM
  • This is just like buying a car by tyrann98 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:23AM
  • Online comparison shopping, the way it should be! by fugue (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:42PM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by nachoman (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:57AM
  • it's always like that by nomadic (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:24AM
  • Re:Not necessarily by funkycrib (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @12:43PM
  • This is illegal according to the FTC by GlitchZ (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:25AM
  • Re:so? by Score Whore (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:25AM
  • by jafac (1449) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:58AM (#801294) Homepage
    How about:

    Why do women get paid less for doing the same job as a man?

    Why do a pair of women's jeans (typically less raw material) cost 1.5-3 times as much as men's jeans?

    Why does an Acura Integra cost 1.5 times as much as the Honda Accord, a fairly identical car, the only meaningful difference being the sheet metal and name badge? (never mind the Cadillac Catera and the Chevy Cavalier!)

    Why does an audio cassette of an album cost $10, while the CD costs $18, even though the cassette costs about $2 to reproduce, and the CD about 5 cents?

    Why does a VW fan belt for an old beetle cost about 1/10 of what the SAME EXACT PART for a Porsche 356 cost?

    Things cost what stupid sheeple will pay for them.

    if it ain't broke, then fix it 'till it is!
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by ChadN (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @01:00PM
  • This is common practice by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @01:00PM
  • Re:And by the way.... by jafac (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:01AM
  • Robinson-Pattman Act by sphealey (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:25AM
  • Re:so? - Who can answer this? by memfree (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:03AM
  • Re:Switch off cookies by Phibian (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:25AM
  • Paper catalogs do this all the time... by Threemoons (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @09:10AM
  • Re:so? - Who can answer this? by kb9vcr (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @01:15PM
  • Comparative shopping. by len(*jameson); (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:27AM
  • consumers may benefit by weidai (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @01:34PM
  • Simple solution: shopping agents! by Drashcan (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:27AM
  • by watanabe (27967) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:27AM (#801306)
    Jakob Nielsen has an essay [useit.com] on why differential pricing is a bad idea. Although this particular essay of his is fairly low on content, it's a good introduction to some user-centric ways to think about the web.

    example quote:

    It is also very easy to plot a product's price elasticity curve on the Web: randomly serve up pages with different prices to the first thousand users or so who visit a given product page and measure how many buy at each of the price points. With this information, profits can be maximized by multiplying the profit margins and their corresponding conversion rates and picking the price that comes out best.
  • Re:Jakob Nielsen says -- "Bad Idea" by alprazolam (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @01:40PM
  • Re:Jakob Nielsen says -- "Bad Idea" by shocking (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @01:46PM
  • Show of Hands Please by Greyfox (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:28AM
  • Re:Nothing abnormal here by schporto (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:29AM
  • old Rothschild joke by Mark Gordon (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @02:41PM
  • only bad by gemseele (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:29AM
  • Re:It's the other way around... by SEE (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @02:46PM
  • by supernaut (35513) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:29AM (#801314) Homepage
    You really think they're gonna raise the price if you buy a lot? Think again... Think 'bulk purchase'.

    The logical and commercially viable solution here is to lower the price when you buy a lot, because they want to maintain that customer loyalty if it means you're a good buyer. Same way it works with everything else... Buy 1, it's a given price; buy 100, it's a lot cheaper per unit.

    I suspect you guys will whine a lot less if this kind of data collection means you'll save on your little anime DVDs, huh?


    Sorry pal, your simplistic argument falls flat.

    Problem: Amazon has made no mention of this to their users. I doubt they would have mentioned it had it not been discovered.

    Problem: Amazon has been very ambigious in their answers to queries. This alone warrants suspicion.

    Problem: First time users are getting charged varibly. Both high and low. We know this based on the clean cookie tests which have been performed.

    Problem: It seems long time users may be getting charged more than even first time users.

    Problem: Logic dosent always apply to those who hold the purse strings. And, what may seem logical to you, may not be the case. Indeed, there are many cases where, it would be logical for a retailer to do something, yet does the exact opposite.

    You need to pull your head out of the sand here, and realize, that, *any* company, that performs "testing" of this nature, without being forthcoming, either upfront, or when confronted, needs to be taken to task. Period.

    I also fail to see how "We've learned that certain aspects of our site resonate with customers in different ways, and we are continually fine-tuning our site presentation to see how these variables affect customers' purchasing decisions," necissitates fluctuating prices. Unless they are testing a theory of "different looks may get someone to pay more", in which case, such a test should be contracted out, and done in a lab type of setting, and not with the general public.

    So, please, get a clue here. After their one-click BS, its fairly obvious that they seem to think they can control anything they want.
  • Wrong-o, bud... by TopShelf (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:29AM
  • Re:sell your cookies! by imadork (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @02:54PM
  • Compare Prices. (Score:3)

    by NetJunkie (56134) <jason.nash@gWELTYmail.com minus author> on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:29AM (#801317)
    This is a non-issue. If you agree to a price when you buy something, the only person you can blame later is yourself. So what if they are doing price testing? Shop around. Show them you won't pay the higher price.
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by SEE (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @02:55PM
  • Re:What's so odd? by Mark F. Komarinski (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:29AM
  • Re:I've seen this before by RedX (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:30AM
  • Re:Don't be a sucker. by apk (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @04:49PM
  • by PhilHibbs (4537) <sd@snark.freeserve.co.uk> on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:31AM (#801322) Homepage Journal
    The basic difference is that in a regular shop, the same price is advertised to all. You know that they aren't preying on your buying habits. If you send your brother to get something, he'll be charged the same as you would have been. At a .com, it's like the shopkeeper takes a look at what kind of credit card you have and charges you more if it's a platinum. Which Amazon can do, 'cos they've seen your credit card.
  • Beat 'em by finally (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:31AM
  • Re:Higher prices for MS users by mduell (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:31PM
  • sell your cookies! (Score:3)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:31AM (#801325)
    That could open up a new market on the net: cookie sales

    Be a 'good customer' at amazon, get them to lower their prices for you, and then sell your cookies. What is fun is that you can sell the same cookie many times. The only problem is that cookies will probably spoil with use. You can also have special DVD flavored cookies, computer-book-flavoured cookies, etc.

    Lets see amazon try to claim that their cookies are not yours to sell.

    Get them now! Get them while they last! Fresh cookies from Amazon.com!

  • Discriminatory Pricing Increases Efficiency by kevin805 (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:39PM
  • This has been happening for YEARS! by jonfromspace (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:33AM
  • Re:This is illegal according to the FTC by SpacePunk (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:33AM
  • "Chew them down"? by porges (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:49PM
  • Re:Fundamentally different by djrogers (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:02PM
  • Offtopic? Moderator, did you READ this? by websensei (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:33AM
  • by costas (38724) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:14PM (#801332) Homepage
    Fixed prices are a thing of the past already in the 'brick' world; you, us, can't tell as easily as with the 'click' world though, because comparison shopping isn't as easy. But, consider these tricks regular --offline-- retailers pull:

    By far the most similar to Amazon's flexible pricing: checkout coupons. You know the little coupons you get printed on a tape similar to your bill at a super market? that is a checkout coupon and the contents of those are directly linked to what you just bought (I forget the name of the company who backs these things up with databases).

    Membership cards and private credit cards: e.g. a Target card, or say a Macy's card can be used to track your purchases and then target spam (old fashioned direct mail) at you. That has been around for ages and most people are aware of those. Well, what happens when Macy's sends you a catalog with some coupons inside? that is variable pricing, directly aimed at getting you to the store.

    Daily discounts. Thin-margin retailers (i.e. grocery stores) will routinely heavily discount --and heavily advertise-- a popular item to get people in the store. Those prices may vary from store to store, and day to day. Again, that is used for promotion, and is an entire science.

    The list goes on really... and yes, retailers already use massive databases and cutting-edge data-mining (I should know; you can figure out why). You can't really blame them though; they are plagued by ever decreasing margins, competition by nimbler online stores, and more and more demanding customers (as evidenced by this very thread).

    To make you feel better though, let me tell you that I've never seen a retailer that will consciously raise a price to a loyal customer, something that I doubt even Amazon will dare pull. The reasoning is simple: a loyal (i.e. a repeat) customer is far too valuable to loose for a coupla percentage points of profit. Word of mouth and future sales volume is far, far more important.

  • More /. Amazon-bashing by dublin (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:33AM
  • Its about "differnt prices" not raising them... by GlitchZ (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:33AM
  • Re:Blatant plug for comparison shopping. by frankie (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:37PM
  • Re:Fundamentally different by duffbeer703 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:41PM
  • Re:how dare they?! by sphealey (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:34AM
  • Re:Its WORSE than that! by RedX (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:35AM
  • Its the secrecy, stupid. by gad_zuki! (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:00PM
  • Old News (Score:3)

    by Kagato (116051) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:36AM (#801340) Homepage
    This is old news. They've been testing random price drops for over a year now. They simply test to see at what price sells the best. From there they can maximize volume to profit levels.

    They've done it with books, VHS movies, and now DVD's. It's not a big deal.
  • Re:Fundamentally different by TheReverand (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:36AM
  • Intelligent vending machines by jesterzog (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:41PM
  • Re:What's so odd? by svish (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:36AM
  • Re:old Rothschild joke by BoogieChillum (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:42PM
  • by codemonkey_uk (105775) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:37AM (#801345) Homepage
    websensei [slashdot.org] wrote:
    Also drug dealers usually offer great deals for first-time buyers, then once they have a steady customer who's come to depend on them they start the gouging.
    Are you talking from experience? Or are you wheeling out old propoganda?

    I would imagine, that your average scag head is especially unhappy when prices go up. S/he'd be used to getting her 5$ bag, I'd say a dealers much more likly to stiff on quantity or quality than price, and then who's going to be the biggest sucker, the new kid who's "trying it out", or the old mess-head thats done more dope than Cypress Hill? - No your analogy is poor.

    Amazon (et al) on the other hand are in a much better possition to shuffle prices as the see fit. If someone shops there regular it would not be hard to write a learning algorythm (GA, NN, whatever) that fiddles the prices on the "recomended reading" list to maxamises its profit.

    I could do it in a weekend ... and, Amazon, if your listening, for, say - ten grand, UKP, I will. :)

    Thad

  • Re:This is illegal according to the FTC by SuperBigGulp (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:51AM
  • Historical pricing practices by David Jao (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:43PM
  • Credit Cards Take This Concept Further by tomblackwell (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:37AM
  • This is capitalism by Zerothis (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:14PM
  • Caught again: by AbbyNormal (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:38AM
  • Re:Historical pricing practices by SEE (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @08:37PM
  • Nielsen predicted this... by C A S S I E L (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:38AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by TheTomcat (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:53AM
  • We are consumers. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:38AM
  • by testcase (95188) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:54AM (#801355)

    This is completely normal practice in the brick and mortar retail business, whay bash Amazon for it?

    This is absolutely not normal business practice in retail stores. The issue here is not that Amazon is analyzing the buying patterns of consumers in the aggregate and changing prices based on this information. The problem is that they are using some secret criteria to charge people different prices as individuals.

    Imagining going into Borders and being charged a different price for the same book as the person in front of you in the check out line. That is analogous to what is happening here.

    Frankly, if this happened in a 'bricks and mortar' retail store and the store would not release the criteria it was using to make their individual pricing decision how long to you think it would take before someone filed a discrimination suit?
  • Comparison sites already dead. by Fesh (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:54AM
  • by FattMattP (86246) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:55AM (#801357) Homepage
    a search for the Planet of the Apes DVD on the Amazon site that Computerworld conducted using a
    Netscape Web browser turned up a quoted price of $64.99 -- 35% off the original price of $99.98, according to the online retailer. But several seconds later, a similar search performed with Microsoft Corp.'s Internet Explorer browser resulted in a price of $74.99 for the same product.
    See what happens when you use Microsoft software? You pay and pay and pay... :-)
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by interiot (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:55AM
  • Re:Offtopic? Moderator, did you READ this? by cyberdonny (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:56AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by Wellspring (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:56AM
  • Its a bit different by GlitchZ (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:40AM
  • Airlines by mholve (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:40AM
  • Re:Nothing wrong--or unusual--about it by RedX (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:40AM
  • And by the way.... by TheReverand (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:41AM
  • Re:They are on a roll by Score Whore (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:41AM
  • Re:Fundamentally different by arivanov (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:57AM
  • False advertising? by gdr (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:57AM
  • Re:It's the other way around... by inw (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:43AM
  • Re:News.com link by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:44AM
  • Its Illegal in the EU by til (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:57AM
  • Re:Sleazy, yet typical by jacensolo (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:44AM
  • Disclaimer: Amazon.com != Jesus by GeekLife.com (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:58AM
  • Imagine this scenario if you will by Undocumented (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:58AM
  • The bottom line is... by Syberghost (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:00AM
  • There is a REASON... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:00AM
  • Re:This is illegal according to the FTC by Smallest (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:00AM
  • This is really braindead by drenehtsral (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:00AM
  • Re:Switch off cookies by Erasmus Darwin (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:46AM
  • Re:What's so odd? by akiy (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:46AM
  • Someone needs to talk to their marketing folk by PinglePongle (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:47AM
  • uh oh by British (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:47AM
  • Re:Nothing wrong--or unusual--about it by zlite (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:48AM
  • This is old news... by tswinzig (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:00AM
  • by Shotgun (30919) on Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:01AM (#801384)
    I would compare it more to car sales.

    If I walk on a lot and the prices aren't posted on the cars, I immediately leave. Their goal is to size you up and determine how much they can take you for. For instance, they'll take a woman and try to convince her that the rattling from under the hood is insignificant while ranting over the cool in-dash make-up kit, and try to convince her that this makes the car worth $3000 more than the bluebook value. Totally disgusting behavior, which tics my wife off so bad that I HAVE to go car shopping with her just to discourage the jerks. (Guess what I spent my labor day weekend doing.)

    This type of profiling is the same in my eyes. Amazon wants to figure out what you as an individual, rather than the market in general, are willing to pay for an item. It's just that in this case, there is a sticker price in the window so you can fill all secure inside that you are being treated fairly, but the sticker you get isn't the same one everyone else gets.

    As for comparison shopping, what happens when this profiling database gets distributed? Everyone knows that you like Anime, and you have to pay twice as much as I, no matter where you shop. Are we back to the situation where only the people who don't need credit can get it?

  • Re:It's the other way around... by ConceptJunkie (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @05:50AM
  • Re:Are we tired of "free market" yet? by Hooptie (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:01AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by sharkey (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:02AM
  • Re:Simple solution: shopping agents! by funkman (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:02AM
  • Privacy issue? by kbs (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:02AM
  • Price Discrimination by The Mutant (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:02AM
  • Unreal... by SupahVee (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:02AM
  • Re:Switch off cookies by rpack (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:02AM
  • Scary - exploiting price-insensitive customers by Frac (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:10AM
  • long wind by twitter (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:12AM
  • Seen it in their electronics store by CMU_Nort (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:12AM
  • Re:sell your cookies! by mitheral (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:12AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by 0xdeadbeef (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:12AM
  • Net Price Jacking by mp3car (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:13AM
  • Re:Its WORSE than that! by marcop (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:04AM
  • Re:Jakob Nielsen says -- "Bad Idea" by Ralph Wiggam (Score:2) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:14AM
  • Re:Fundamentally different by ScuzzMonkey (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:14AM
  • Re:it's revenue management - think airlines by haystor (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:06AM
  • Recommendation Engines... by 2quam4 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:09AM
  • Re:More /. Amazon-bashing by happyhamster (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @07:17AM
  • New Feature: Comparison Shopping at Amazon by Quack1701 (Score:1) Wednesday September 06 2000, @06:11AM
(1) | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5