Comment Re:what is React2Shell? (Score 1) 29
that would have been good; too bad Google didn't bring it up at the time.
that would have been good; too bad Google didn't bring it up at the time.
irrelevant to what I said; Canada is under the crown
even then, over 10 years ago, FB was selling your personal information and got in trouble for doing so. They've done it again and again. that's why I ditched it and all other usual social media.
It never was good.
Try getting a subreddit plus a Discord channel.
EV are polluting too though; it takes 3.5 years for one to work off the carbon debt and NO company is profitably recycling the batteries.
We'd be better off using biotech to have algae ooze octane and similar length hydrocarbons. ICE works well.
memeboy.
Current U.S. military actions in the Middle East have nothing to do with oil; zero. Or you think we're getting oil from Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, Iran?
I'm claiming a place should rightfully give UK English the finger. Canada should do the same to the King, who currently is their head and commander-in-chief of Canada's armed forces. In fact, the world would be better with some French style slicing and dicing of Royal neck.
In practice what you do is you use the car's navigation system, and it tells you if you need to charge to get to your destination.
"and picks your charging stops", I should have added. On long trips it optimizes to minimize charging time, which typically translates to 2-3 hours of driving, then a 20-minute stop, then 2-3 hours of driving, repeat. The charging stops tend to align pretty well with bio-break needs.
Before leaving the charger, you can see your next charging stop and the expected arrival SoC (state of charge). Only an idiot would leave a charger without having enough battery. You can also choose to charge more and skip the next charger - for example, if youÃ(TM)re stopping for lunch.
Sounds like a pain in the ass to me.
It's really not.
In practice what you do is you use the car's navigation system, and it tells you if you need to charge to get to your destination. About the only manual planning I do on road trips is to think about where we'll be for meals and override the automatic charger selection to pick chargers in those places, and check the icons on the charge station to make sure there's food nearby. This is a minor annoyance, far more than offset by the fact that when I'm not on a road trip I never have to go to gas stations at all, and pay no attention at all to my "fuel" level.
With TCO it is cheaper to put there bigger battery and remove the ICE. But most of the new car buyers cannot calculate TCO and they care only about purchase price.
Well, you also have to consider the large number of people that do not have the capability to charge at home.
The best numbers I've been able to find put that number at about 25% of car owners. That is a large number of people, but it's not a good reason to hold up the EV transition. Such people will transition last, and only after public charging options are sufficient that they don't need charging at home (and after apartment complexes deploy charging infrastructure so more apartment-dwellers can charge at home).
Also, we need to help people understand all you really need for home charging is a standard 120V outlet from which you can safely run an extension cord to your car. L1 charging will add ~40 miles of range every night, so unless you drive more than ~280 miles per week (14,600 miles per year), L1 is enough. Access to some public charging is also required, to deal with exceptional circumstances, but it can be rare and used only for getting a 15-minute quick charge when the battery is low. L2 is nicer, of course, but it's not the minimum requirement most people think it is. L2 at home enables you to pretty much just forget about charging/fueling ever in your daily life. It's a significant improvement over having to deal with gas stations, so people want it... but it's not a necessity.
We need to avoid all-or-nothing thinking. It will likely be the case for quite some time that people with unusual requirements have to stick with fossil-fuel vehicles. If there are legal electrification requirements they need to have an exception process.
I actually don't think we need legal electrification requirements, myself. If we put a reasonable carbon tax on fossil fuels (calibrated based on our best assessment of the future cost of mitigating the warming that will be caused by burning the fuel) to internalize that externality and if we drop trade barriers that block the purchase of cheap EVs manufactured in China, the transition will happen on its own for purely economic reasons. It'll probably happen even without those steps, but they would make it happen a lot faster.
For that matter, I think we don't even need to impose the carbon taxes and tariffs, just pass them. Phase them in over a decade, so people know they're coming, and people will begin making the change even before they take effect.
You want to sign an NDA to stop your business secrets from getting out? Fine.
But that should not let you refuse to talk to the law.
Imagine a crook that says, "I am sorry, but my NDA with the Cartel prevents me from revealing how we get the Cocaine here."
That is NOT any different from a car repair business saying "I am sorry, but my NDA with TESLA prevents me from talking about the safety issues with their breaks.
Or a cop saying his NDA prevents him from revealing how he suspected the criminal.
No I am saying that no single database should exist for all of their customers.
Amazon does not need to store passwords in the same database they store the sales information in. One database could contain just their encrypted passwords and the emails.
Another could store customers names and addresses.
And each database could be under the control of a different director who gets to maintain their security in a different manner.
Also, Amazon has different businesses. No need for the kindle unlimited accounts to be in the same database as the music accounts. No need for the Whole Foods to be in the same database as the Amazon Fresh. No need for Amazon Medical to be in the same etc. etc. etc.
What is going on is that the businesses are doing things for their own convenience that endanger their customers. NO!
You want to run a business with a million customers? Fine - more power for you. But you do NOT get to run this massive industry in a way that saves you a ton of money but also puts all your customer's privacy in danger.
Just as a small business is required to take minimal steps to ensure the safety of their customer data, you - being a huge business - is required to take HUGE steps to ensure the safety of customer data.
You do not get to use your economies of scale to endanger your customers data.
Due to lack of disk space, this fortune database has been discontinued.