With satellite based visual, and IR mode (if cloudy), stealth is obsolete. The US has enough low earth orbiting satellites ( called StarShield ) to provide multiple overlap coverage of the Earth's surface. Any large object (bigger than say a car) traveling at hundreds of miles per hour in the air will be easily identifiable.
Submarines that can carry drones and hypersonic missiles are the future.
And what happens when the enemy kills your satellites?
Now, I completely agree that stealth is overemphasized, but stealth is just part of a larger problem. The US military, particularly the Air Force, has a seriously bad tendency to rely on "magic bullet" solutions... a hyper-expensive technology that they think will win wars in a single blow.... instead of taking a layered approach that mixes new solutions with old. Which is important, because, war after war, we have to relearn the painful lesson that magic bullets tend to fail.
I know it is easy to rag on the F-35, but in the last 75 years, has any high performance aircraft been "on time and on budget and on mission"?
The F-4 Phantom not only met expectations, but far exceeded them, to the point that the USAF adopted it (even though it hurt their pride being a Navy program). McDonnell started the design in 1955, the prototype rolled out in 1958, and it entered USN and USMC service in 1960. After it was bloody obvious that the F-4 was far better than anything the USAF had in it's so-called Century Series of fighters, USAF adopted it in 1962 and their initial version... the F-4C... entered frontline service in 1963. It would dominate USAF's tactical fighter wings, with F-4's making up 16 of their 24 wings at one time. All on time, and on budget, with multiple versions being developed along the way (notably the RF-4 photo reconnaissance aircraft, and USAF's ant-surface to air missile "Wild Weasel" F-4G versions).
Are they new lenses bodacious bokeh monsters!?!?!
(The photographers here should catch that one...)
In addition to permitting delays, almost every new nuclear project in the US also gets delayed through lawsuits. I don't really see a way around that here.
It's easy, all you have to do is change the laws.
And as soon as he notices, they will be out of the pipeline.
Damn, don't say that. If la Presidenta gets wind of that he'll demand they go back to steam. During his first alleged administration, he attempted to force the Navy into steam. He said at the time (my paraphrase but close): You need to be Einstein to understand those things, they should use steam. And then issued some sort of directive. I can see how that was received:
la Presidenta: I decree that Navy catapults shall use steam. Picks up pencil from the floor.
Navy Head: Why thank you for your leadership, la Presidenta, in picking up that pencil. Re the steam catapults. I shall immediately turn this over to our engineers.
Engineering: Uh, what kind of a dumbass believes in steam. It is only good for softening old bagels. We'll turn this over to our Engineering Steering Committee.
Engineering Steering Committee: What a wonderful proposal. We shall commence a study immediately with our Engineering Review Panel.
Engineering Review Panel: Oooooo, a new study. We shall immediately commence a pilot study to study the feasibility of the study. Get Boomer in the Engine Dept. on it.
Boomer: Hmmm....another fricking waste of time. I'll need to think about this for awhile.
3 years later:
Sec. Navy: Okay, la Presidenta, I have your study on steam powered aereo-planes. la Presidenta? Yo? Where'd he go.
Flunkie: He's down at Mar-A-Loco. He left some prepubescent girls down there and wants to check in on them, says they miss their Daddy. Meet our new President, Mr. Biden.
They should just field some new porn sites: "Yooohoooo, Mr. Russian Spy Man, get a load of these!!!"
there are lots of those, often with their own "store." I find batteries like that a lot.
But this was explicitly a Walmart listing, by Walmart, rather than a 3d party listing.
You can't cheat the phone company.