We didn't fire a bunch of competent generals or run them out of office for various political reasons. I'm also extremely at ease because we didn't put a secretary of defense in, excuse me Secretary of war, solely because he was the only candidate who would not rule out ordering the US army to fire on American citizens.

We literally elected the king of debt. 1/4 of all US debt is Trump. That's 10 trillion dollars in debt.

And we did it twice. But I need did you hear how she laughs? And let's not forget, Trump low prices, Kamala high prices.

Like I said, you're a moron.

The statement was at best tone deaf, and likely intentionally offensive. The US Military leadership is trolling the American public.

MAGA lives on outrage. They want liberal tears. Even if it hurts Americans.

It is called "winning".

Yes, it's a fuzzy line, but I'm sure Putin realizes that the consequences of something like that and what would happen in response to an overt military attack are very different.

The pilots of these machines need to log actual flight time in order to be good at it. We set minimum training hours to maintain their flight qualifications, and then struggle to find something for them to do while they are flying around. Airshows and flyovers are done as ways to occupy some of those hours of flight time.

It is not a waste of money. It is money that would be spent anyway.

You'd think they'd be concerned about security even if just to protect themselves from corporate espionage, yet they can't even secure their own systems.

Presumably (but who knows - they seem incompetent) they've tried using their own models to hack/secure themselves, and the fact that they've failed rather taints their whole "look what a powerful hacking tool we've built" story.

Russia attacking NATO in some limited way (beyond just hacking & sabotage) is possible, but I don't see Putin opting for "suicide by cop" - he seems to very much want to stay alive.

What have I failed to show? Your premise that someone promised nukes to someone in 2030 is absurd.

Nobody promised nukes to anybody, and the JCPOA worked to prevent Iran from developing them.

Only you magat morons in your fantasy world spin stories about it.

Stories that never ever had a basis in reality.

MAGA == stupid as fuck and just about as gullible.

So what? If Apple cannot obey the law in a country, it needs to stop operating there. At best it should create a mostly independent division that's under local laws.

The only reason this affects Apple is because Apple chooses to make it affect Apple.

You keep repeating the "nu nuckes" mantra as if it is true.

But there is no equivalence between a concrete, working solution that physically prevented a crisis (JCPOA) and a hypothetical nightmare scenario used to justify blowing up that very solution, which is what you MAGAt morons did, pushed a bit by the lies of an indicted war criminal who desperately needs wars to avoid going to prison.

You're pathetic, really.

Probably "Mind your own business".

I don't agree with UK policy here, but the US telling other countries what they're allowed to legislate when it affects foreign entities is a little rich given its laws have literally impacted, for example, EU officials investigating Israeli government war crimes.

I wouldn't call it "Thinking" Archie...

Do tell, how is $5K per head giving workers ownership or control of the means of production?

Or are you another propagandized dick who's so used to misusing the term that you're another person who'll vote against things like socialized healthcare because sOcIaLiSm without knowing what the consequences of either are?

Word to the wise: either you're lying, or you've been lied to. A movement that embraces trade unions and the cooperative movement is not defined as "the government doing stuff".

You are why we can't have nice things.