Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Just A Hunch (Score 1) 105

I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest her statement was fair and accurate.

Irrelevant. I call my manager a cunt to his face at least once every in every 10 minutes of interaction I have with him. If I didn't, he'd probably get worried something was wrong. Whether or not this woman is telling the truth about her working conditions, any boss who fires someone for something as trivial as telling them they are a dickhead deserves a quick sharp boot in the hole.

Comment Re:You're quite right of course, but... (Score 1) 155

Yup., some times you get what you pay for...

Growing up, the one alcohol I could NOT stand was Scotch.

It was the one thing I would not raid in my parents' liquor cabinet as a teen.

MUCH later in life I had a girlfriend turn me onto good single malt scotch....it's like a whole new world opened up to my eyes and taste buds!!

That old blended stuff...ugh, still can't stomach it...but a good Balvenie....heaven.

That's more down to style than price I think. Not familiar with Balvenie, did a quick Google and see it's an unpeated single malt, so I'd probably like it too; I mostly drink pot still whiskies, like Redbreast. I know people who love their Laphroaig, but to me it tastes like a mix of bog water and listerine. For someone who doesn't know whiskey, they'd probably be better off with something cheap like Jameson than either Redbreast or Laphroaig; they're probably going to pour coke into it anyway.

Comment Re:What this means... (Score 3, Insightful) 138

The air CO2 fraction is 0.0004. To any climate denier, that is zero. You can double it and it is still zero. The only way these catastrophic climate models can depend so heavily on a zero, is if there are very big fudge factors hidden in it.

Climate denier science illiteracy is irrelevant.

Comment Re:Rose 150% In Three Years (Score 1) 40

Not entirely sure what to make of that response. Obviously sarcastic while referring to carbon credits, could be a climate science denier. More obvious sarcasm saying you feel better when I point out it isn't as bad as the title suggests, suggesting you are saying it is still bad. I shouldn't be replying to this, but you are fucking annoying. Completely useless and ambiguous sarcasm. Allow me to be clear about my position; climate change is real, it is caused by humans, we should try to stop it, and big tech are contributors. That doesn't mean you're allowed to just make shit up. Facts matter, accuracy is important. The title of this article, copied from Reuters, is incorrect. If you allow sloppy journalism to slide, you are encouraging the denialist rhetoric claiming deliberate falsehoods by people who actually give a fuck about reality.

Comment Re: Make America (Score 1) 296

As example, some very poor countries are rich in materials that get exported to the US, but have little purchasing power to import goods from the US. Them having a trade deficit is physiological and nothing at all "the US being ripped off" as it was presented.

Nonsense, if they are exporting materials they should have money to spend on other finished goods or materials from us.

The target should be as close to balanced trade as possible.

Yeah sure, as long as they aren't also exporting the profits. There are these things called international corporations involved in mining.

Slashdot Top Deals

A good supervisor can step on your toes without messing up your shine.

Working...