What in the actual fuck are those tabs doing eating gigabytes of RAM? And why in the fuck are most Chromium based browser installs now almost a gig of storage?
Never going to say that we can't optimize something better.
But let's get real - the engines have got insanely more capable. We can do things with just CSS now that it took reams of JS to do before, if you could even do them.
But -- we can do that because the browser engine is now capable of it.
But if one ever decides to be a ShaoLin monk
He'd just leave the same day though, being able to lift that burning cauldron with no pain
So they pump water out of the water table below the city, and it flows thru pipes under the city, which are broken, so the water returns to (ultimately) the water table...right?
Eventually. How long is the question. It could take a few years to hundred of years to reach the water table depending on the soil conditions.
Yes, you can shoot yourself in the foot with a gun.
You can also use a gun as an excellent tool for security.
I'd recommend the latter, lol
"First documented in 1925, the city's sinking is a result of centuries of exploitation of the groundwater," the report says.
Or we could use the less emotionally charged word, the one that normal people use, which is "use".
I suspect is from sheer ignorance rather than any design to get more workers underneath them.
Wrong. Managers are always scheming to get as many people below them as possible. Claiming savings is an effective short-term strategy that only works in specific circumstances, and it only works as a strategy when it results in more people below you on the org tree.
However, this technique worked only for coiled cables..straight cables -- even exposed ones right next to the speaker -- did not record speech well.
If your fiber service loop is coiled more than Eddie Van Halen’s guitar pickups, you should be working for Fender, not Verizon.
In the end- good engineers with sufficient experience and support will get stuff working with any methodology. Bad ones or ones insufficiently supported will fail with any methodology.
So true. Same with programming languages, too. Good engineers solve problems in the constraints they are given.
They say that is the intent, but they have zero evidence that the reorganization will in fact lead to "moving faster."
Why do you think their intent is to move faster?
If managers can slow you down, then they need to hire more people below them. That is a promotion for the manager.
Managers are actively trying to slow you down.
Business consulting firms - Gartner, Forrester, and such need a new "silver bullet" program, strategy, plan,.... to sell to upper management.
They don't sell to upper level management, they sell to second tier management.
If you're second level, you need to make "positive changes" in the company to climb the ladder, but you aren't smart enough to think of those changes yourself. Gartner sells the plan to second level managers, who sell it to top level in hopes of getting promoted.
Gartner, Forrester, etc are in the "help second tier managers get promoted" business.
The problem with that is the skills needed to manage and the skills needed to do real work (let's take programming as an example) are pretty distinct.
Normally people become managers with zero training in management. It's not a high skill position.
If you want to manage, then this book will quickly get you into the 98th percentile of managers. Only 224 pages.
If you want to climb the corporate ladder, that is the difficult side of management. I don't know any good books about that.
Just more abject nonsense from you. You make claims, but can't back them up in the slightest.
My rebuttals are above, they don't need restating.
So, gun camera had malfunction in CCD and... ALIENS!!!
Not necessarily a malfunction, but I'm sure that happens too. Sometimes its just an inherent limitation of the technology that is solving a very specialized need.
We basically need a different sort of camera to spot the Jeffrey Epstein clone looking out the porthole of a flying saucer.
Aviators have been very, very wrong about what they've observed on multiple occasions
Undoubtably, but probably better than "guy on internet". Especially if the "guy on internet" is trying to monetize a feed or something.
I just need enough to tide me over until I need more. -- Bill Hoest
