Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Always on police bodycams are the more useful tool (Score 1) 34

Actually always on police body cams are the more useful instrument. Civilian cell phones too often do not provide a full and accurate portrayal of events, missing earlier parts of the interaction. This has happened with body cams that can be turned off too, hence the "always on" caveat to ensure a complete portrayal of events.

Comment Re: Directionally Right, Specifically Wrong. (Score 1) 135

Yes.
This is one of those questions that seems philosophically interesting but is not interesting pragmatically.

When you jail someone, you have reason to believe they are proximate to what you believe is a crime. You remove their freedom to move/act temporarily while you ascertain the existence/severity of a crime, and if they are a party to that crime.

When you figure out that you made a mistake, you release them.

"...and then you give them a sizable bank deposit for all of their legal costs, not justice served the towing of their car, the income they were unable to earn while jailed, the job they quite likely got fired from due to missing work, the ruination of their reputation, the destruction of their family, the diseases/injuries that occur while they are in jail, the mental damages, the spoiled food in their fridge, the bills that go unpaid, the overdrawn checking account fees, the credit card APR that jumps to 29% due to a missed payment, and the plea deal they finally agree to - despite being innocent - because the DA uses the full force of government power to leverage all of the above, making it rational to take a plea rather than spend 2+ years fighting it with income you no longer have, right?

...RIGHT???"

AnakinAmidalaMeme.gif

Your simplification of this scenario - which is playing out millions of times every week in the USA across thousands of criminal courts - as a simple mistake that can just be un-done, is one of those perspectives that "seems philosophically interesting but is not interesting pragmatically" because the system does not operate in that philosophically ideal way for anyone.

Comment Re:The use of the service is radicalizing people (Score 1) 57

Are AI services inciting desperate acts?

Are cigarette manufacturing services inciting lung cancer?

One of my gripes with the AI industry is these chatbot models are designed around engagement. They prey on human behavior and the elderly, young, and those with mental health issues are especially vulnerable. I don't believe that the AI agent itself has any intent (it cannot) nor does the company that owns and trains the AI likely have any specific harmful intent to "incite" something beyond engagement and purchases.

One of my gripes with the cigarette industry is these smokable-paper-cylinder models are designed around engagement. They prey on human behavior and the elderly who grew up with smoking, the young who have weak critical thinking skills, and those with mental health issues (like compulsivity and anxiety) are especially vulnerable. I don't believe a Nicotine molecule itself has any intent (it cannot) nor does the company that owns and manufactures the smokable-paper-cylinder model likely have any specific harmful intent to "incite" major disease/death beyond engagement and purchases of cigarettes.

Comment Re:Of course, their AI is working from CCP doctrin (Score 1) 179

Yawn, yet another commissarism, even when not able to present evidence or ...

The evidence is in the older posts, which you misquote and misrepresent.

.make any comment on substance,

Comments were made on the actual topic, remote frontier-level models. Not on the strawm you tried to change the conversation to, local models which you described as "modest". Something very different than the actual topic.

the moron doesn't give up. They truly believe they will win by persistence and escalation, the morons.

Again, you are projecting your own behavior.

Comment Re: Not Flock (Score 1) 116

If Miranda rights were written a little like the Second Amendment, police would indeed have a PD in house for this. But even the 2nd Amendment, despite 'shall not...', is regularly sidestepped. Bear in mind, though, that in many big cities the schools are teaching that police are the enemy. They fail, however, to follow that up with 0) know your rights, and 1) STAY OUT OF TROUBLE. But to make big city school systems are cheating students out of a future. It's criminal.

Comment Re:You plebs (Score 3, Insightful) 135

Translation for us plebs: You should eat shit so I can keep fine dining.

With that attitude, Sam shouldn’t be surprised to walk into his favorite restaurant and find The Altman being the dish du jour.

It’s quite telling how blind Greed can be when it utterly fails to see the concept of Eat the Rich behavior practically authoring the next menu revision.

Comment Re:You need this for an emergency (Score 1) 192

"Who the hell cares if I can get a radio station from thousands of miles away "

Most AM radio listening is to local stations. MW propagation can range a few thousand miles, but it's somewhat unusual.

And not the point of the defense of AM radio in automobiles. Timely information, emergency information, AM is still a popular option, and listenership is not decreasing.

"just buy a radio'. Huh, so that handheld radio would not suffer from interference (Hams call it WRM, but it is really RFI) just like the build in unit? The real problem here is that automobile manufacturers do not want to solve the RFI issues. It is expensive. And complex. And not unreasonable. The AM radio in my Prius does not suffer form RFI, and there is an inverter and HV drive system in there. Tesla etc. will have to employ serious engineers to show then where they went wrong. A Herculean effort? I bet not.

ps - Duke sucks.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Free markets select for winning solutions." -- Eric S. Raymond

Working...