Comment Destined to fail (Score 1) 30
LLMs cannot be secured by guardrails. The easy and usually immediate jailbreaks demonstrate that nicely. Hence this "movement" has no chance of success.
LLMs cannot be secured by guardrails. The easy and usually immediate jailbreaks demonstrate that nicely. Hence this "movement" has no chance of success.
What posting are you replying to? Because it is not mine...
Yes. One of the first things I change when installing Windows. Although I am not sure I will do that again, ever. Maybe in a VM.
Not true. New ones get added to the mix whenever MS makes Yet Another Really Stupid Decision.
These things are as old as the first computers with floppies or other removable media. Without the determined efforts by Microsoft they would have died out by now. So big kudos to them for keeping that part of ancient computing history alive!
In other news, IT Security people have no problems at all finding jobs, while coders really struggle.
That's how it used to work here in the USA. Then the subsidies were terminated in favor of forcing students to get loans. Then a US senator led a campaign to prevent those students from discharging that debt through bankruptcy. That senator's name was (and is) Joseph R. Biden.
That handout isnÃ(TM)t coming stop asking for it
The boomers got the handout. I don't want anything they didn't get.
I don't expect to get it. I do expect to immediately discount any bullshit from the hypocrites who got it and think I shouldn't get it.
You didn't get it, and you're insisting nobody deserves it because you didn't get it, which is sad. You're sad.
You should also know that Canonical is looking for feedback before the specs for Myna are finalized, especially from people who already rely on dictation or assistive tools on Linux.
OK, how do we provide this feedback? The article is chock-full of links, but not one for that. It gives strong "get fucked" energy.
Since it's not worth putting out the effort to figure out where to submit some comments they definitely won't give a fuck about anyway: In no way is it a "first class" anything when it's only for GNOME and only in a snap. Let us know when it's ready for prime time so we can test it out and decide if we care. There's a 0% chance I'm going to use GNOME or snap.
Is it extremely laughable?
Yes.
To test your hypothesis, I compiled a list of as many U.S. Muslim elected politicians as I could (see below).
So you moved the goalposts and declared victory? Good work, clown.
So it's not "extremely laughable" at all. And when I asked AI why your comment was modded up to 5...
HFDWHhwHAHQAHHAHAHAHAHHAHa HA HAHAHHAHAHAH ahHAHAHAHAH HA AHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAH
That would be the sane thing to do. I doubt Microsoft is aware how bad their problem has become though, because their profits are excellent. And hence I think they will continue the enshittification until things cannot be repaired anymore. That point may already lie in the past.
AI hallucinations are not a new observation, even if people with no understanding of computing history think so.
I ran headlong into what we now call hallucinations in 1996 working on my Ph.D. on process control using neural networks. I decided it wasn't going work for real-word real-time control (and the committee agreed).
Probably not much of a surprise, but always worthwhile to verify.
I've been very amused by this whole AI rush.
As the saying goes, "It's human to err, but it takes a computer to really screw things up."
Indeed. I mean I did a few ChatGPT queries back when it came out and found its use a waste of time. I see the same level of incapability today in the AI summaries for Internet search and I am mostly ignoring these now. Occasionally I check and just find "still incapable". And while the paid models will surely do better, they will still not do well.
Yes. But most people do not understand NLP. They do understand "magic intelligent box", or think they do.
Enterprises need to wise up, these tools aren't being developed to do a good job but to make billionaires richer.
Obviously. Look at Musk's porn generator, for example, that does not mind undressing anybody underage, even when that is clearly illegal. Or at Googles AI summaries that may hallucinate stuff to the detriment of enterprises or people. This is a short-term money-grab and they do not mind if it all comes crashing down in a few years or tomorrow.
It's almost as if we need some non-generative AI to actually get the job done.
There is no AI tech that can do what GenAI is missing. All we have is actual human intelligence, but that requires expert-level capabilities.
RAM wasn't built in a day.