Comment Re: Hello naysayers (Score 1) 37
Google xkcd extrapolate
Google xkcd extrapolate
s/best/only/
No, I remember owning a calculator watch with phone directory because I could never remember phone numbers, outside of a few I used all the time. Then I got a cellphone and now I don't need to wear a watch.
Simp harder
Check out Clive Sinclair - he was an engineer and did pretty damn well selling his computers in the UK.
Kinda, I mean he did well, but it went under. Acorn did somewhat better and parts of Acorn are alive and well to this day.
Furber and Wilson lacked that marketing muscle. Were they a unique talent? I mean... no one else did that. Their CPU worked first time, outperformed their contemporaries, ran at a fraction of the power cost a fraction of the amount and went on to become massively popular.
Maybe Woz couldn't have done that, but it doesn't mean Jobs was the one required to help him, any competenant marketing type could have done the same. Vew few people could have designed the hardware and software that Woz did at the time.
I'd argue that Jobs was unusually good at marketing. Maybe as rare as Woz. I mean, look at the cult of personality that's developed around him where people think Apple (or really Jobs himself) invented all sorts of things which were actually popularized by Apple, but invented by someone else.
His schtick works.
I have no idea what graduates you look at, but this is not the case here (Europe).
The point being...AI doesn't tangibly save time. It might save a bit under some circumstances, but not enough to justify layoffs. The CEOs are full of shit.
Pretty much this. LLMs can be convenient, but they are not magic and that they make competent coders slower is pretty well established by now.
The problem with that is that external pressure to get better is raising, both from reliability requirements and from security requirements. In this case, stagnation means getting worse and worse.
Well, that is certainly what they are planning. Just one problem: The evidence is mounting that LLMs cannot replace competent engineers.
No surprise this idiocy is happening in other areas too. There is a special kind of mental disability you need to have (or acquire) to be an economics graduate: A total inability to see more than a few months into the future and a total inability to do any kind of risk management. It worked? Everything must be more than fine and surely we can do it cheaper, right?
That is why people with critical institutional and technological skills are not treated even remotely at their value, let alone critical for organizational survival. Tech history is full of big names that are not around anymore or only in massively reduced forms. And in most cases, it is because some "managers" did not manage to think.
Maybe someday Aptera will manage to get off the ground.
With three wheels? No doubt they will, insert clip of Reliant Robins here
The same applies here. Adopt Systemd with all it's age verification goodness and then demonstrate to the world how you give it the middle finger ignoring the field.
Yeah, you're a rebel for adopting software pushed into the freest OS by a Microsoft agent.
Railing against age verification while an orange man is sending the military into your cities, destroying your way of life and antagonizing the whole world against you is priceless.
Age verification is not what is being discussed, and only an incredibly simple person who is completely unable to imagine ramifications of what is obviously ubiquitous identity verification would make such a drastic mistake. This kind of technology is an obvious component of "sending the military into [our] cities" and "destroying [our] way of life" and is in fact exactly what the followers of the orange piggy are promoting. Did you not notice what's going on with e.g. flock? Fucking wake up and learn to pay attention, fascism enabler.
But very few people use open source, in any serious way.
Thank you, from the bottom of my heart, for proving that you know absolutely nothing about the subject we are discussing. It is so convenient when know-nothings out themselves I cannot properly express my appreciation.
The same people who steal music, software, and videos now want others to pay for their work.
If it was stealing, they wouldn't have had to come up with an entirely new body of law about it.
"Now this is a totally brain damaged algorithm. Gag me with a smurfette." -- P. Buhr, Computer Science 354