Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:It is disturbing... (Score 1) 187

RAM used for cache and RAM actually used by applications are completely different things.

The first is acceptable because it's usually disk cache that's immediately freed for use by other applications, while the second - when in excess - is usually a symptom of poorly programmed applications. Pay attention to the Windows memory manager, which shows how much memory is being used in actual cache and how much memory is being used by applications.

Comment It is disturbing... (Score 1) 187

... to see how many here FAILED to understand the point of the TFA.

Let's turn RAM into dollars to see if it makes it easier to understand the fucking point of the article: You have, say, $320 available. And you only need $3 of that to do the job you need to do. Why, for all the creatures of darkness, do you think you have to use all the $320 to do the same job just because you have $320? Is it because the $320 “is free” so you should use all of it? When out of the $320 available, you only need $3 to do the job?

Just because you have 32GB of RAM available doesn't mean you should waste it! And every mentally challenged individual who says, “Oh, memory is free now” should first be burned alive and then dismissed from any and all tasks vaguely related to programming.

Comment Re:Is the workplace itself toxic? (Score 3, Interesting) 187

Not really.

What I have noticed happening in recent years is a tendency to replace the company's leadership and management. Removing the people who actually know the business and replacing them with generic idiots or sociopaths, who don't know shit about the company's business but are really good at making the company owners believe that they are “essential to the company”.

And then it becomes difficult to work at these companies because, since these generic “CEOs” don't know jack shit about the company's business, they start giving absurd orders on top of absurd orders to the point where the company ends up going bankrupt or becoming so bad that it would be preferable to go bankrupt. Then your work environment ends up becoming toxic. Because your colleagues (and you) start to get stressed out by meaningless orders and restrictions imposed “because that's what the market wants” (Only the CEO thinks that), imposing increasingly difficult goals because the generic “CEO” completely believes that they are perfectly acceptable (remember that he doesn't know shit about the company's business) and starts cutting the budget where he shouldn't “because that's what the market preaches.” Of course, when the company ends up going under, it's all the fault of “the employees who didn't try hard enough to do their part,” while the “CEO” gets a golden parachute to go after his next victim.

Comment Re:Uh oh (Score 1) 128

What are you going to do next, give him surgery to widen his hips? Complete facial surgery so the "woman" doesn't have a grotesquely ugly face (because he's actually a man)?

Unless you can come up with a complete body swap, all you'll end up doing is horribly mutilating someone whose identity crisis would probably be easier to treat with a psychologist or a psychiatrist, and all this in the name of a panacea you can shout about all you want is still insane.

Comment Re:Uh oh (Score 1) 128

What is the safe and effective treatment for gender dysphoria?

If I knew, I would tell you.

Given the right wing's crackdown on abortion on a fetal personhood theory, why shouldn't adoption be promoted?

You missed my point: Real women can bear children, men who think they are women cannot. I have no problem with people adopting children but that is not the point of this situation.

Comment Re:Uh oh (Score 4, Insightful) 128

There's no such thing as a "transgender woman". What you have is a man with serious identity issues who needs psychological help, and the worst thing you can do is reinforce his crisis by agreeing with him about "being a woman" (a falsehood). It's like the guy claiming to be Napoleon and you agreeing with him (a bad, bad idea). You can even try to force the situation with hormone treatment, but this guy will never be able to have a biological child (adoption doesn't count).

Comment Re:Uh oh (Score 0) 128

Your comment is so lunatic I don't even know what to say about it. You know, this is exactly the same thing as those people who claimed to be Napoleon and were confined to psychiatric hospitals for their own safety. That you can believe with all your might that you are Napoleon and still that doesn't make you Napoleon.

Let's stop this insanity, okay?

Comment Re:NPM needs to be burned to the ground (Score 2) 33

That's the problem.

First of all, NPN itself is a piece of junk, the "cool guys" (teenagers who think they know how to program because they managed to glue together a few bits of JavaScript) have the terrible habit of pasting everything and the kitchen sink as dependencies, even when you could (or should) write the code snippet you need yourself and thus avoid adding another 1MB of JavaScript “libs”. It's how they arrived at this absurdity of any simple application literally needing thousands of dependencies and good luck checking each one for possible vulnerabilities.

The other big mistake the “cool guys” make is ignoring backward compatibility. They are always redoing everything without any concern for what might depend on the libraries they create, and if you “old dinosaur” question this, they arrogantly respond that you're the one who has to find a way to keep up (never mind that the reason for so much compatibility breakdown is because the "cool guys" don't actually know what they're doing, so they have to redo everything over and over again until they maybe get it right by accident). That's why applications that make the mistake of using these libraries end up having to “freeze” versions, because otherwise they quickly stop working.

And the biggest mistake, in my humble opinion, is linking these applications to libraries on external servers, even directly to repositories such as GitHub. This basically opens the floodgates to attacks such as those described in the TFA.

Comment Re:Significant UI refinements? (Score 1) 43

Where is the other 3.5 GB going on Windows?

Windows 11 has several features that it keeps loaded and running whether you use them or not, like the search system (even if you have checked the options to disable it). And since many of these applications use memory in an Electron / "web application" style where one of them alone can use 600MB or more, just a few of them loaded is enough for your memory usage to easily exceed 6GB even if you don't have any of your own applications running.

Comment Re:Significant UI refinements? (Score 3, Insightful) 43

The issue with memory in Windows 11 is that the idiots who took over its development continue with the retarded “Windows Phone” mentality, where even if you are NOT using a feature it is loaded anyway and on top of that, this feature is programmed in the most idiotic way possible in terms of resource usage (think electron "apps”).

Slashdot Top Deals

Machines have less problems. I'd like to be a machine. -- Andy Warhol

Working...