Comment Re: capitalism is for sellouts (Score 1) 41
Rent free.
Rent free.
Yeah but in practice virtually zero of them are actually closed loop. Even when it is claimed they are there is often a cooling tower which is used sometimes, which means they only sometimes operate in a closed loop mode.
Godwin's law obviously has no modern relevance given that it was invented for USENET and that was effectively destroyed.
Now seriously though it never spoke to whether or not the comparisons to Hitler were apt, as that is situational, only that they would occur.
And sidebar, Mike Godwin explicitly stated that such a comparison is apt when it comes to der pedofuhrer. Just like to toss that in there.
This is why there's no ethical consumption under capitalism. The worst people have the most money because they have no compunctions about harming others.
It doesn't actually provide that because of the things you can't do in unit files without scripts.
When systemd proponents can construct a non-fallacious argument maybe I'll consider taking it seriously
There is no value to running SteamOS on your PC over some other distribution except simplicity. If you actually want to do non-game things with it you'll wind up installing enough additional packages to erase the benefit. If you want simplicity, you'll also buy a steam machine, so you don't have to figure out the PC.
The controller is separate and is $80????
Yes, controllers generally cost $80 now. They used to cost $50, but there's this thing called inflation.
I saw a fake advert in Germany in May 2021, posted in the name of satire.
Alle 17 Minuten ruft ein Polizist Daten von Helene Fischer ab"
Polizeiship
The advert looked like one for "Parship" which is an online dating service.
The text translates to "A policeman/woman looks up Helene Fischer's data every 17 minutes" (she is a singer) and the small print went into more detail of abusive searches by the police (of just one state) in their online database. A lawyer was getting threatening letters from self-proclaimed neo-nazis at her private address, which is not publicly available. Death threats to her and her daughter. It turned out that the data was from that police database and that the policewoman who retrieved the data held political views which tended in that direction.
To the best of my knowledge, the man who sent the threats is in jail. I don't know what happened to the policewoman, but some of her group were suspended from duty and one of them reacted by driving his car into a tree at high speed.
Flook delivers current data (if they identify people correctly) but the problem is wider than that.
Some professional printers do have their spools in cartridges, and refuse to work without them...
5 axis printers using non-planar slicing are becoming more common in pro use, they allow you to print things without supports which would have required supports.
managing hundreds of machines with basic tools is a chore. I also believe that that argument for systemd was, vm users don't need to control their own environments
systemd might make sense for ephemeral VMs. That doesn't justify it for long-running servers or desktops.
Every silly error you see in automatic captions that is obvious nonsense can be caught by an LLM.
Every silly error I see in automatic captions today is on Youtube and was created by an LLM. Why didn't it catch them?
I didn't find them to be so. The primary advantage claimed was that it eliminated init scripts. But init scripts are really easy on modern Linux because of the boilerplate, and there are still cases where you need scripts with systemd, so it didn't actually eliminate them — It only reduced their number. The other advantage claimed was that it implemented cgroups. Well, I'm using Devuan and that uses cgroups too, they are created and managed and destroyed with simple commands and you do not need any special tools for that at all.
systemd solves a non-problem, since scripts are a core OS feature.
If you have a better, safer alternative for us to develop this much needed tech, please share.
Closed environments and simulations. Simulations are better in particular because you can create test situations trivially, so you can test on e.g. a thousand variations of the same onramp. You can't really build the vision models in simulation, but that's OK, because you can build them by logging data from cars where the computer isn't controlling anything and therefore isn't endangering anyone.
This isn't new, though, this is obvious. You just want to move fast and break things.
There are some things where I think it's fair to never trust that person fully again. Ever. But we need a way to trust them enough to let them live and participate in society if we believe they are rehabilitated while still protecting everyone around them.
I'm sure that's not easy, but it has to be easier than lifetime incarceration.
Somebody's terminal is dropping bits. I found a pile of them over in the corner.