Fuck your LG stock.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

I have no experience with their cans, only their buds, which I've been very happy with. Maybe they have been ruined since they started taking advice from Bose, as I haven't bought any in a while, but the last ones I did buy had a more-easily-untangleable flat rubbery cord and sounded really nice. They were clear for both music and calls, and were less than twenty bucks... maybe $14?

I'm not a "pay extra" kind of guy, though I do try not to buy the absolute most crap thing. I'm a "refurb" type.

That's true but irrelevant to this or any other point, since you'll never sum all small groups until extinction.

https://docs.nlr.gov/docs/lego...

Some of the worst mass murderers in history have also been dictators, but the two are not necessarily found together. Most dictators have been strict authoritarians, but without massive civilian casualties. And there are many examples in history of (non-authoritarian) democracies at war that have inflicted high caualties on their enemies.

TL/DR: someone can be a dictator without being a mass murderer.

This. What would make the IT guys all-smiles is to find that nobody clicked on their phishing-test links.

It's kind of like dentists, who would rather their patients not get cavities they have to fill, even though they get paid for it.

No problem, the hub is filled with Russian porn

There is another way to describe it. Russia is losing a larger percentage of their available forces per day.

What do you think the "Rus" is for?

Exactly. I always wondered why my LG TV was so pathetically slow and laggy until... Well, you know.

And all the WebOS ones

Suck my balls, cuck.

Sorry, you're right, I cited the wrong case. in Cramer vs. USA (1945) there was never a question about whether Germany was an enemy. The focus was on whether Cramer provided aid or comfort, and the conclusion was that he didn't.

The definition of an "enemy" as a foreign power engaged in war with the USA comes from cases connected to the US Civil War, and English common-law sources used by the US Constitution framers.

Prosecutors face an enormous hurdle to charge someone with treason. Part of that hurdle is the fact that an enemy must be formally declared to be in a war with the USA before any charges of treason can be contemplated. This is as it should be: treason is a serious crime that demands serious conditions be met.

There are crimes other than treason that prosecutors can charge someone with for hostile acts against the USA. For example, the Rosenbergs were not charged with treason, but conspiracy to commit espionage, because at the time the USA was not at war with the Soviet Union, even though they were considered to be hostile adversaries.

Obligatory XKCD.

Maybe I need that one. ;-P