Shooting down each other's drones because nobody is competent enough for coordination is, technically, "working together in an unprecedented fashion". So there is that.

Yes. But there is a second aspect: Make sure you are not spending much more overall on creating good quality. So far, even really good results seem to only get you 5-10% efficiency increase and there are strong indicators that for many things, AI use makes you slower.

Hence use AI, but do not ever expect it to do your job for you or "transform" things. It cannot do that.

There is actually more: Better mock-ups and experiments. None of which should ever make it in production.

Indeed. The very fact of the matter is that writing code is not "pointless drudgery". Sure, if you are bad at it, you are going to hate it, but if you are bad at writing code, why are you doing it in the first place?

That, or admit that its C-levels are idiots.

Indeed. And, incidentally, part of that idea being good is knowing what is possible and what is not. AI cannot help with that. All it can do is making known stuff crappier and cheaper.

Microsoft knows that "AI" cannot do that, even for the bad quality software that MS makes these days. But people believing these lies will make them tons of money.

I am an educator. I want to support AI literacy only in the sense to tell people to be very careful with it and to stay away from it when they try to learn something and use it only with extreme caution for real work.

They have nothing valuable to contribute anymore.

These people may explain to people what a fact is and even give them some! That would endanger our nice scam that is entirely based on people being really clueless!

The Gulf War had a lot of friendly fire deaths from the US ignoring any beacon signal and just killing anything they saw.

Do you seriously think their automated systems (built by people of precisely this mentality) will be any better?

That is incorrect. I like doing engineering and science in my spare time. The difference is this is self-directed. Yes, my employer benefits as well, but they do not control it.

So, the "great university scam" is exemplified by your personal, atypical history? You are not really smart, are you?

Funny thing: When you are cheating yourself (which is what these people do), it does not matter what others do. You still get cheated.

Indeed. Also, I am beginning to suspect that there are Warton graduates that could not fail to get the degree, no matter how badly they did.