I misunderstood you too.

That attitude is exactly what's wrong with most of you people in America. You think that society exists for corporations to make money off people. In the rest of the world, we believe that society's sole justification for existence is to serve its people. We call it the social contract.

Our differences cannot be reconciled.

Social media per se isn't an ideally useful concept. We humans are adapted to living in small communities of between 20-50 people at the most. Large community communication systems such as social media are unnatural environments that cause dysfunctional outcomes and behaviours in humans when used. That's what we're seeing today.

So no, I don't believe that social media can be done "right".

"It" doesn't exist as a legal entity. The legal entity that organized the hack was OpenAI.

You would if you were stranded in the steaming desert for days!

That's what caffeine pills are for. They taste like nothing, so it's easy to taper down once you quit coffee.

It's stupid to prepare on day 1 for extended serving capacity without measuring the demand beforehand. If there's demand, the system can be scaled appropriately as and when it arises. The alternative of planning immediately for worldwide demand which may never show up is less efficient.

I'm just a little Amino Acid
doing my own thing,
dum de dum dum dum.

Tell me more! Can I subscribe to your old AI model instead?

You'd think that a university agricultural reference for the public would be in the top rankings when searching for a specific variety of vegetable, but apparently today, that's no longer the case.

Sadly, everyone likes an eggplant!

What causes the Chinese population to save more isn't lack of work. It's lack of people. The current demographics are such that families have elders who are cared for by too few numbers of children and grandchildren. This forces the latter to save more aggressively so as to afford their extended families living and medical expenses.

The universal rule of business is simple: if you want to sell your product in some nation/state, then you should follow the laws of the nation/state. It doesn't matter if every nation/state has different or even contradictory laws, you should follow each of them where required.

Marking a product according to some proprietary standard is not following the law, even if the intention is in the same ballpark.

You're making unsupported claims about Shakespeare which don't respond to the question. The question is: how much faster does a general purpose LLM algorithm converge to the works of Shakespeare relative to an infinite monkeys algorithm. I asked for rates of convergence.

"Infrastructure" is not always good. Sometimes, it it just bad. In those cases, giving away the infrastructure for free is just a way to dominate and prevent the world from getting something better instead.

Current AI infrastructure is a scientific dead end.

Stealing all that info is just for training purposes!

Granted, you'd expect a good tool to respect private data, but Grok is a GREAT tool, and great tools steal data!

Also: it's no different from when a human reads something and puts it in their brain forever! If you want SpaceX to erase the information, well maybe you should lobotomize your employees too?

Also: your information isn't that valuable anyhow, don't be so arrogant, it's no big deal.

Also: Let's get rid of copyrights, problem solved!