Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
The Almighty Buck AI

Goldman Sachs Launches AI-Free Index 19

Goldman Sachs has launched an "S&P ex-AI" index (SPXXAI) that tracks the S&P 500 stocks not related to AI, offering investors a way to "hedge their exposure to the AI trade," reports Axios. From the report: "Excluding 'AI enablers' from the passive benchmark would eliminate the noise introduced by the AI hype," Louis Miller, head of the firm's equity custom basket desk, wrote in a note to clients about the new index.

The ex-AI index is a compilation of all the stocks in the S&P 500 that are not related to AI, also referred to as old-economy stocks. It's available exclusively to Goldman customers, created in collaboration with S&P Dow Jones Indices.

Taking all the AI out of the S&P doesn't leave much behind, as AI companies make up ~45% of the index, according to the note. Over the last three years, the S&P 500 is up 76%. The ex-AI index is only up 32% in that same time period.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Goldman Sachs Launches AI-Free Index

Comments Filter:
  • Old Economy (Score:5, Insightful)

    by OzJimbob ( 129746 ) on Friday February 20, 2026 @07:25PM (#66002016) Homepage

    Non-AI stocks are now just the "old economy"? Maybe we should, maybe, wait until any AI company at all has actually made a cent of profit before we call them the "new economy" and relegate the companies who make real money and things the "old economy".

    • Re:Old Economy (Score:5, Interesting)

      by sg_oneill ( 159032 ) on Friday February 20, 2026 @07:42PM (#66002042)

      Let em cook. We're months off from a massive AI induced stock market crash at most. OAI will die, because its one of the most ludicrously overvalued company with literally no path to profitibility. When that happens, everyone else in the circle-jerk financing scheme will flee and shed a tonne of value.

      Then we can put this AI nonsense on hold for a couple of decades till the wonks figure out its problems.

    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      Actually many AI companies are doing very well, just not the ones that get the news. AI has enabled robotics to do things like sort recycled trash and package croissants without making a crumb, plan Amazon delivery routes more efficiently, and translate dozens of languages on the fly. They're not valued in the billions, but they're viable profitable companies with rational business plans for the future. Can Boston Robotics AI program carry on a conversation with you? Hell no, but then ChatGPT couldn't t

      • Lawsuits are flying from unauthorized use of copyrighted works to train the LLMs, communities are uniting to block data center construction, audiences are fiercely rejecting AI-generated content in various forms of media, prestigious law firms are getting slapped-down by judges for using AI-generated hallucinations in their court filings, students are using it to cheat on homework, creative workers of all varieties hate it for the threat it poses to their job security, and the world is drowning in slop.

        It i

  • by newslash.formatblows ( 2011678 ) on Friday February 20, 2026 @07:49PM (#66002050)
    ...out of three stocks?
    • by ffkom ( 3519199 )
      I certainly want to see the constituent list. The "not AI related" criterion may be a very vague one.
      • by EvilSS ( 557649 )
        It's technically "US 500 Excluding Artificial Intelligence Enablers Price Return Index" so I'm guessing it's sans most chip makers, hyperscalers, nvidia, and a bunch of other big tech stocks. Looks like they launched it out today but I can't find a prospectus. Probably not a bad hedge considering how heavy so many funds are in big tech stocks right now.
        • War against the US will come soon enough. It makes sense to have an index with a higher defense industry weighting.
          • War by the US will come before that. The only real motive to start wars these days is for dictators and wannabies to find "external enemies" to justify their clinging to or trying to capture power in their territories, and the US is now firmly in the second case - a losing wannabe desperate to cling to power. You think the Dubya "don't change dumb horses when crossing a river" example is lost on him?

        • A better bet is probably "S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index" or similar rather than just ignoring chip makers, etc.
  • by dskoll ( 99328 )

    Much as I completely detest the modern AI hype, experience has shown over and over again that buying the whole market always outperforms buying only parts of it, over the long term.

  • I was wondering if they would actually be able to find results.

    Well, it will be just as hard to find companies that aren't doing AI. I'm picturing a warehouse office with a few desks and stacks of paper everywhere, with one shared computer running Windows 95 to access vendor websites.

  • AI or not, chip makers and IT service giants aren't going anywhere. While the Big 7 companies are overvalued due to AI, they don't just do AI, so picking stocks based on binary AI criteria is problematic. Things are clearer with the smaller AI-only companies, but they don't count as much in the big picture of index funds.

Asynchronous inputs are at the root of our race problems. -- D. Winker and F. Prosser

Working...