data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3eef/f3eef28bb90433f5057bea87637e86e22c78c692" alt="Intel Intel"
Intel Delays $28 Billion Ohio Chip Factory To 2030 (dispatch.com) 20
According to The Columbia Dispatch, Intel's promised $28 billion semiconductor project in central Ohio has been delayed again until 2030, with operations beginning sometime shortly thereafter in either 2030 or 2031. From the report: By the time it opens, Intel's first factory will have faced at least five or six years of delays, as it was originally scheduled to begin operating in 2025. Intel's second Ohio factory won't be completed until at least 2031 and will begin running in 2032, according to the company. The new timeline comes as Intel continues to struggle financially, which was a key factor in the latest delay for the company's Ohio factories. The company was alerting its employees of the delays in a message Friday.
The changes were made so Intel can align its factory operation with market demand and better "manage our capital responsibly," Naga Chandrasekaran, executive vice president, chief global operations officer and general manager of Intel Foundry Manufacturing wrote in a message to workers. The changes will ensure Intel's Ohio fabs will be finished in a "financially responsible manner that sets up Ohio One for success," Chandrasekaran wrote. "I wanted to be upfront and transparent with you all about our current plan. In no way does this diminish our long-term commitment to Ohio," Chandrasekaran wrote. "(W)e will continue to scale our hiring as we approach our operational dates. Intel is proud to call Ohio home, and we remain excited about our future here."
The changes were made so Intel can align its factory operation with market demand and better "manage our capital responsibly," Naga Chandrasekaran, executive vice president, chief global operations officer and general manager of Intel Foundry Manufacturing wrote in a message to workers. The changes will ensure Intel's Ohio fabs will be finished in a "financially responsible manner that sets up Ohio One for success," Chandrasekaran wrote. "I wanted to be upfront and transparent with you all about our current plan. In no way does this diminish our long-term commitment to Ohio," Chandrasekaran wrote. "(W)e will continue to scale our hiring as we approach our operational dates. Intel is proud to call Ohio home, and we remain excited about our future here."
Such a surprise (Score:3)
Well, 2030, or never.
Re: (Score:1)
All work paused from 2025-2028. Work expected to restart in 2029 (unless Trump gets a third term). The plant should be operational in 2030.
Thats the same year as fusion (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
>> And Tesla FSD. Noice.
are you implying tesla's cars are going to need a software & hardware upgrade to get FSD?
Re: (Score:2)
I'd say fusion has a much better outlook.
Re: Thats the same year as fusion (Score:2)
Current Teslas will be classic cars by the time FSD exists.
Also... (Score:2)
Also, I suspect there's a little bit of "maybe we should wait for the shit-show in the United States to calm down" given that the political chaos is really causing companies to become risk-averse.
Re: (Score:2)
Only a "little bit"?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not move them offshore so much as wait until there's less economic uncertainty from the clown convoy currently in charge of the USA.
Re: (Score:2)
How do tariffs even remotely begin to address trade disruptions from COVID-19, the Suez Canal, etc? They only make things worse.
This company is circling the drain. (Score:3, Interesting)
"The changes were made so Intel can align its factory operation with market demand"
Nobody wants to buy our chips anymore.
"The changes will ensure Intel's Ohio fabs will be finished in a "financially responsible manner that sets up Ohio One for success,""
We can’t actually afford to expand because nobody wants to buy our chips.
It’s sad to see what’s happened to Intel. I know they were shitty monopolistic bastards in the past, but they still made great chips.
Re: (Score:1)
Typo? (Score:2)
Wouldn't that be the Columbus Dispatch?
$94 billion in stock buy-backs (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Quite so.
Weren't they given $4B in the CHIPS Act to build this factory?
That's on the taxpayers' timeline.
Engineers Build The Ship. Leech E Hoes Sink it. (Score:1)
You cannot let this kind of leeching fuckery continue to do this shit.
Never trust an engineer in a suit.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I approve the correction.